Spammy Website Framed My Site & Stole Rankings
-
Hi
One of the pages of my website was starting to gather some real traction in Google rankings and hit 3500 visitors per day.
This is the page: http://www.naturallivingideas.com/drinking-apple-cider-vinegar-benefits/
On 11th January search traffic to this page fell to virtually 0. The rest of the site rankings were unaffected.
Yesterday I tried searching for some of the main keywords I was ranking for and instead of my search listing, this was appearing:
Image: http://www.naturallivingideas.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/weird-rankings.jpg
It is in the exact position I was ranking in, but instead this evn . moe site has stolen my ranking. Upon opening the website, it is simply my original article page in an iframe. If you look at the source code of the offending website, you will see what I mean.
Hopefully now you are getting a 403 forbidden error as my host blocked referrals from that site but they still hold my rankings.
Has anyone ever seen this before?
How was this done?
And how can I get my ranking back?
Thanks in advance,
James
-
There is no hard and fast answer to this. I've seen a DMCA request with Google take over a year to respond to, and I've seen it take a couple of months. Treat it as a marathon instead of a sprint. If you're lucky you'll be one of the ones whose case is examined and quickly rectified but expect this to take awhile.
-
Just to give an update on the situation.
I submitted a DMCA request here. As yet (5 days later) it has not been responded to but the offending domain has been offline for 3-4 days. Not sure who took it offline.
Still Google is ranking the offending domain instead of mine. In fact if you search for my exact URL (http://www.naturallivingideas.com/drinking-apple-cider-vinegar-benefits/) in Google, it still brings up the offending domain.
How long does it take for a site to be removed from the index once it goes offline?
James
-
@Kevin - Thanks. Is that this tool? https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/dmca-dashboard
@Greg - Thanks for the tip. As yet, no changes in ranking with only the 403 error.
@Paul - Thanks - my host have since implemented that line of code to prevent further problems.
@Brett - Thanks. I will do that and hopefully rankings will come back.
-
We're dealing with a similar issue here. Someone from Russia scraped our content and knocked us out of the SERP. Google sees a 200 status code but all others see 404.
We sent in a DMCA takedown request via https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/dmca-dashboard and it was responded to in less than a week (4 days). One caveat - make sure you have copyright ownership on that material. If you are an agency representing a client you may not have copyright and you may need to have them submit the request.
When you submit the request to Google and they verify it's legitimate they will remove the offending site from their search results. This is the only way to begin restoring your position.
You can contact their hosting provider and submit a takedown request with them as well. Provide evidence, and threaten legal action if they do not respond. Of course, Google has still indexed the other website, so you still need to submit a DMCA request with them to get your rankings back.
May the odds be ever in your favor.
-
The only sustainable way to protect a site from this kind of abuse is to implement the X_Origin security headers. These headers control whether any other sites are able to iframe content from your site. This protection should be applied to all sites, IMO.
Assuming your site is running on Apache and allows use of htaccess file, you add this line to your htaccess:
Header append X-FRAME-OPTIONS "SAMEORIGIN"
This determines that only other pages on your own domain can iframe your content. If you want extra protection, you can change "SAMEORIGIN" to "DENY" in which case no iframing at all will be possible. This directive can also be adjusted slightly to run in the httpd.conf file if you have root access and control of your server. This is vastly better than 403ing offenders after you have (hopefully) detected them, as it's proactive, Miscreants can't iframe you in the first place. Though they can of course still outright scrape the content. Hope that helps? (and that you get the rankings back after knocking the page content off the scammer's site.) Paul
-
caught my interest with this one, iframe alone shouldn't cause the issue. The 403 should help and after a couple days return to as was. you can also submit a DMCA request - http://www.dmca.com/FAQ/What-is-a-DMCA-Takedown to help. Rings a bell to some hijacking I've read about which ties in with the domain privacy settings for that domain.
Also like Kevin said you can use Google - https://support.google.com/legal/answer/3110420?hl=en-GB
Let me know in a few days if it returns to normal which it should.
-
Report this to Google thru the Feedback section of your webmaster tools. Google "should" discredit the thief and return your status. Be prepared to verify the content is your original work.
Good Luck,
KJr
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to find if a website has paid or spammy back-links? Latest ways to investigate.
Hi all, I would like to investigate about our website back-links if something is wrong. If there are any paid or spammy back-links. How to proceed on this exercise? We have been using ahrefs and seems like it's quite enough. Is there any way we can pull out the fishy back-links? Do we have any helpful data from webmasters about this? Thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | vtmoz0 -
How do you change the 6 links under your website in Google?
Hello everyone, I have no idea how to ask this question, so I'm going to give it a shot and hopefully someone can help me!! My company is called Eteach, so when you type in Eteach into Google, we come in the top position (phew!) but there are 6 links that appear underneath it (I've added a picture to show what I mean). How do you change these links?? I don't even know what to call them, so if there is a particular name for these then please let me know! They seem to be an organic rank rather than PPC...but if I'm wrong then do correct me! Thanks! zorIsxH.jpg
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Eteach_Marketing0 -
Lots of websites copied my original content from my own website, what should I do?
1. Should I ask them to remove and replace the content with their unique and original content? 2. Should I ask them to link to the URL where the original content is located? 3. Should I use a tool to easily track these "copycat" sites and automatically add links from their site to my site? Thanks in advance!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | esiow20130 -
Are back links from audio sites any good?
In light of G's view of links from directories and other sources I have heard that links for audio sites like soundcloud.com can be beneficial. Has anyone had any positive experiences building likes from sources like this?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Aikijeff0 -
What happens when content on your website (and blog) is an exact match to multiple sites?
In general, I understand that having duplicate content on your website is a bad thing. But I see a lot of small businesses (specifically dentists in this example) who hire the same company to provide content to their site. They end up with the EXACT same content as other dentists. Here is a good example: http://www.hodnettortho.com/blog/2013/02/valentine’s-day-and-your-teeth-2/ http://www.braces2000.com/blog/2013/02/valentine’s-day-and-your-teeth-2/ http://www.gentledentalak.com/blog/2013/02/valentine’s-day-and-your-teeth/ If you google the title of that blog article you find tons of the same article all over the place. So, overall, doesn't this make the content on these blogs irrelevant? Does this hurt the SEO on these sites at all? What is the value of having completely unique content on your site/blog vs having duplicate content like this?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | MorganPorter0 -
Problems with link spam from spam blogs to competitor sites
A competitor of ours is having a great deal of success with links from spam blogs (such as: publicexperience.com or sexylizard.org) it is proving to be a nightmare. Google does not detect these (the competitor has been doing well now for over a year) and my boss is starting to think if you can’t beat them, join them. Frankly, he is right – we have built some great links but it is nigh on impossible to beat 400+ highly targeted spam links in a niche market. My question is, has anyone had success in getting this sort of stuff brought to the attention of Google and banned (I actually listed them all in a message in webmaster tools and sent them over to Google over a year ago!). This is frustrating, I do not want to join in this kind of rubbish but it is hard to put a convincing argument against it when our competitor has used the technique successfully for over a year without any penalty. Ideas? Thoughts? All help appreciated
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | RodneyRiley0 -
Should this site be punished?
Every summer for the past 4 years one of our customer's competitors suddenly has a big jump in Google's (.co.uk) rankings for some of the main industry phrases, particularly "air conditioning". We were always under the impression that they bought links before the busy summer season, as they have these strange massive jumps in the rankings. (for the rest of the year they often drop down) I recently checked out some of the back-links going to their site and noticed something I'd not seen before. Of the (approx) 480 links that showed up, around 80% of the SourceURL's ended with "?Action=Webring" (see 1st attached image). To me it doesn't look natural at all and I'm surprised that Google hasn't picked up on. Their site is www.aircon247.com. It had been mentioned to me that this may be to do with link sharing sites (which I assume is black-hat) but I'm not 100% sure that they are doing this. They also have an identical long spammy-looking footer at the bottom of every page which is clearly only for search engines to see. We reported it to Google a year ago but no action was taken. Do you think that it is acceptable to have it on every page? (see 2nd attached image) I would be interested to know your thoughts on both of these, and whether this would be a dangerous tactic to try and emulate? Gc5MU.png iXGA9.png
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | trickshotric0 -
Using Canonical Tags to Boost Lead Form Ranking
I presently have a number of whitepapers that bring traffic to our site. If a visitor elects to download the whitepaper they are taken to a lead form with an abstract of the whitepaper. The abstract is present because the visitor may or may not have come to the lead form directly. I imagine this would be a "no no," but how do you feel about placing a canoncial tag on a whitepaper that points to the lead form w/ abstract? The obvious idea being to take the umph of a whitepaper to direction search visitors directly to the lead form.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | shoffy0