SEO's Structuring Your Work Week
-
Hi
I wanted some feedback on how other SEO's structure their time. I feel as though I'm falling into the trap of fire fighting with tasks rather than working on substantial projects... I don't feel as though I'm being as effective as I could be.
Here's our set up - Ecommerce site selling thousands of products - more of a generalist with 5 focus areas.
2 x product/merchandising teams - bring in new products, write content/merchandise products
Web team - me (SEO), Webmaster, Ecommcerce manager
Studio - Print/Email marketing/creative/photography.
A lot of my time is split between working for the product teams doing KWD research, briefing them on keywords to use, checking meta.
SEO Tasks - Site audits/craws, reporting
Blogs - I try and do a bit as I need it so much for SEO, so I've put a content/social plan together but getting a lot of things actioned is hard... I'm trying to coordinate this across teams
Inbetween all that, I don't have much time to work on things I know are crucial like a backlink/outreach plan, blog/user guide/content building etc.
How do you plan your time as an SEO? Big projects?
Soon I'm going to pull back from the product optimisation & try focussing on category pages, but for an Ecommerce site they are extremely difficulty to promote.
Just asking for opinions and advice
-
I also want to know about the SEO structure in terms of content especially when you are working for an E-commerce site. I'm working for an Arabic gum product and I want to increase its organic search.
-
We have lots of content on our retail sites.
Some is content that helps visitors use/select/maintain/repair/enjoy the products that we sell. These pages link to where the product can be purchased, where to purchase parts, where to purchase accessories, etc. These pages bring in more traffic than our sales pages and people who arrive at the site through these pages account for a significant number of conversions.
Some is content that is related to the niche that we sell but unrelated to the products that we sell. These pages also bring in more traffic than our sales pages and account for a significant amount of conversions.
On all pages of our site, articles, sales, category, home, etc.... we run adsense, but block the ads of our direct competitors. These ads bring in nice money. Do we lose a few potential buyers through these ads? Yes, but we don't have to do any work for the income.
-
Hi
so the linkable refers to things people link back to? What if those linkable pieces of content aren't directly profitable?
So you produce a great piece of content, but it doesn't initially drive conversions right away?
-
Get a big white board on the wall of your office. Along the left side draw a vertical line and label it "PROFITABLE"... along the bottom draw a horizontal line and label it "LINKABLE". These are the Axes of Success.
Now plot your projects on this graph at positions along these axes. Then organize your work to do as many jobs in the upper right quadrant as possible.
-
HI Becky, so our priorities matrix involves both our business needs with our company values. As such we score each Project (not task) out of 5 for the following :-
- Profitability
- Positive culture
- Customer experience
- Distribution and growth
The total score then dictates the order of priority for our business. We are service lead to our scoring may differ from yours, but hopefully this gives you an idea of what we do. Our projects list is also used at board level to show what we are working.
-
Thanks for your feedback, I have used Asana and I keep lists but I probably need to get better at consolidating the lists & organising them into sections like you said.
Things here can often be disorganised and something will drop in which is completely unplanned for.
How did you put together the projects/priorities matrix? We've started organising our teams tasks into whether they directly impact our KPI's & if not the tasks drop to the bottom.
We're just being pulled on by 2 different teams, their priorities and then ours & your feel like your priorities just slip way down.
I'll see what courses they have online that sounds helpful
-
I know how you feel, in the beginning this was a real problem for me, especially being in the industry we are in, as this makes it so much more difficult. The pace of change is staggering and there is often very little lead time for a huge change that can impact your whole task list.
I find a flexible approach works best for me, I personally, use Asana to order my Task Dashboard into manageable and categorised sections, projects, recurring tasks and where possible tasks that are in progress or have been handed off/waiting on others.
I also have a second projects and priorities matrix which grades my projects (not smaller tasks) based on business needs and the largest potential wins, this helps me to focus my time on what really matters.
Sometimes external influences do cause your projects to creep or slip, just make sure all parties involved are kept up to date to manage delivery expectations. After all Google does like to throw an algorithm spanner in the works every now and then.
It also would not harm doing a course or two in time management. Hope that helps a touch. Feel free to reach out if you want to know more.
-
I would recommend listing out everything you're doing on a daily/weekly/monthly basis (whichever encapsulates what you do)...you already have a great start to this. Then, for 2018, decide the things that you need to either stop doing to delegate to other people (don't worry about who that would be just yet). List out the things that you need to get to but aren't, as well.
So, that leaves you with three lists, essentially: the things you shouldn't be doing (and can pass off to someone else), the things that you should be doing but aren't, and the things that you have been doing (and will continue to do).
Present that to your boss with your recommendation for how to get the other items done (pass them off to a colleague, hire an intern, hire a part-time person). Also, include some ROI of what will most likely happen if you start focusing on those new, key areas.
And then message me and tell me how it goes.
From the sounds of it, you need to put some production management techniques in place. We all face that...
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Canonical URL's For Two Domains
We have two websites, one we use for Google PPC (website 1) and one (website 2) we use for everything else. The reason is we are in an industry that Google Adwords doesn't like, so we built a whole other website that removes the product descriptions as Google Adwords doesn't approve of many of them (nutrition). Right now we have that Google Adwords approved website (website 1) no-index/no-follow because we didn't want to run into potential duplicate content issues in free search, but the issue is we can't submit it to Google Shopping...as they require it to be indexable. Do you think removing the no-index/no-follow from that website 1 and adding canonical URL's pointing to website 2 would resolve this issue (being able to submit it to Google Shopping) and not cause any problems with duplicate content? I was thinking of adding the canonical tag to all pages of website 1 and point it to website 2. Does that make sense? Do you think that would work?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | vetofunk0 -
Why do people put xml sitemaps in subfolders? Why not just the root? What's the best solution?
Just read this: "The location of a Sitemap file determines the set of URLs that can be included in that Sitemap. A Sitemap file located at http://example.com/catalog/sitemap.xml can include any URLs starting with http://example.com/catalog/ but can not include URLs starting with http://example.com/images/." here: http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.html#location Yet surely it's better to put the sitemaps at the root so you have:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | McTaggart
(a) http://example.com/sitemap.xml
http://example.com/sitemap-chocolatecakes.xml
http://example.com/sitemap-spongecakes.xml
and so on... OR this kind of approach -
(b) http://example/com/sitemap.xml
http://example.com/sitemap/chocolatecakes.xml and
http://example.com/sitemap/spongecakes.xml I would tend towards (a) rather than (b) - which is the best option? Also, can I keep the structure the same for sitemaps that are subcategories of other sitemaps - for example - for a subcategory of http://example.com/sitemap-chocolatecakes.xml I might create http://example.com/sitemap-chocolatecakes-cherryicing.xml - or should I add a sub folder to turn it into http://example.com/sitemap-chocolatecakes/cherryicing.xml Look forward to reading your comments - Luke0 -
Help with Schema & what's considered "Spammy structured markup"
Hello all! I was wondering if someone with a good understanding of schema markup could please answer my question about the correct use so I can correct a penalty I just received. My website is using the following schema markup for our reviews and today I received this message in my search console. UGH... Manual Actions This site may not perform as well in Google results because it appears to be in violation of Google's Webmaster Guidelines. Site-wide matches Some manual actions apply to entire site <colgroup><col class="JX0GPIC-d-h"><col class="JX0GPIC-d-x"><col class="JX0GPIC-d-a"></colgroup>
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | reversedotmortgage
| | Reason | Affects |
| | Spammy structured markup Markup on some pages on this site appears to use techniques such as marking up content that is invisible to users, marking up irrelevant or misleading content, and/or other manipulative behavior that violates Google's Rich Snippet Quality guidelines. Learn more. | I have used the webmasters rich snippets tool but everything checks out. The only thing I could think of is my schema tag for "product." rather than using a company like tag? (https://schema.org/Corporation). We are a mortgage company so we sell a product it's called a mortgage so I assumed product would be appropriate. Could that even be the issue? I checked another site that uses a similar markup and they don't seem to have any problems in SERPS. http://www.fha.com/fha_reverse shows stars and they call their reviews "store" OR could it be that I added my reviews in my footer so that each of my pages would have a chance at displaying my stars? All our reviews are independently verified and we just would like to showcase them. I greatly appreciate the feedback and had no intentions of abusing the markup. From my site: All Reverse Mortgage 4.9 out of 5 301 Verified Customer Reviews from eKomi | |
| | [https://www.ekomi-us.com/review-reverse.mortgage.html](<a class=)" rel="nofollow" title="eKomi verified customer reviews" target="_BLANK" style="text-decoration:none; font-size:1.1em;"> |
| | ![](<a class=)imgs/rating-bar5.png" /> |
| | |
| | All Reverse Mortgage |
| | |
| | |
| | 4.9 out of 5 |
| | 301 Verified Customer Reviews from eKomi |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |1 -
Site was moved, but still exists on the old server and is being outranked for it's own name
Recently, a client went through a split with a business partner, they both had websites on the same domain, but within their own sub directories. There is a main landing page, which links to both sites, the landing page sits on the root. Ie. example.com is a landing page with links to example.com/partner1, and example.com/partner2 Parter 2 will be my client for this example. After the split, partner 2 downloaded his website, and put it up on his own server, but no longer has any kind of access to the old servers ftp, and partner 1 is refusing to cooperate in any way to have the site removed from the old server. They did add a 301 redirect for the home page on the old server for partner 2, so, example.com/partner2/index.html is 301'ing to the new site on the new server, HOWEVER, every other page is still live on that old server, and is outranking the new site in every instance. The home page is also being outranked, even with the 301 redirect in place. What are some steps I can take to rectify this? The clients main concern is that this old website, containing the old partners name, is outranking him for his own name, and the name of his practice. So far, here's what i've been thinking: Since the site has poor on-page optimization, i'll start be cleaning all of that up. I'll then optimize the home page to better depict the clients name and practice through proper usage of heading tags, titles, alt, etc, as well as the meta title and description. The only other thing I can think of would be to start building some backlinks? Any help/suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RCDesign740 -
Do I need to update my previous blog posts with my new SEO strategy'?
Hi Everyone, I have published 46 articles so far on my blog. Recently I changed my SEO strategy including changing main page titles, changing the targeting pages for each keyword, ... . Do you think it is a good thing to go back through all of my blog posts and change the internal link building and modify them accordingly. Thanks,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AlirezaHamidian0 -
Are clean mobile URL's necessary?
Adding code to redirect/clean up ugly URL's slows down mobile site performance, so it is necessary if we are already using rel=alternate tags on our desktop/www pages?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | recbrands0 -
Other domains hosted on same server showing up in SERP for 1st site's keywords
For the website in question, the first domain alphabetically on the shared hosting space, strange search results are appearing on the SERP for keywords associated with the site. Here is an example: A search for "unique company name" shows the results: www.uniquecompanyname.com as the top result. But on pages 2 and 3, we are getting results for the same content but for domains hosted on the same server. Here are some examples with the domain name replaced: UNIQUE DOMAIN NAME PAGE TITLE
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Motava
ftp.DOMAIN2.com/?action=news&id=63
META DESCRIPTION TEXT UNIQUE DOMAIN NAME PAGE TITLE 2
www.DOMAIN3.com/?action=news&id=120
META DESCRIPTION TEXT2 UNIQUE DOMAIN NAME PAGE TITLE 2
www.DOMAIN4.com/?action=news&id=120
META DESCRIPTION TEXT2 UNIQUE DOMAIN NAME PAGE TITLE 3
mail.DOMAIN5.com/?action=category&id=17
META DESCRIPTION TEXT3 ns5.DOMAIN6.com/?action=article&id=27 There are more but those are just some examples. These other domain names being listed are other customer domains on the same VPS shared server. When clicking the result the browser URL still shows the other customer domain name B but the content is usually the 404 page. The page title and meta description on that page is not displayed the same as on the SERP.As far as we can tell, this is the only domain this is occurring for.So far, no crawl errors detected in Webmaster Tools and moz crawl not completed yet.0 -
Do we have to do different work for SEO for an affiliate site than for a normal blog?
I am interested to do the SEO work for an affiliate site. Is it same as others or something particular has to be done for affiliate sites.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | raybiswa0