Multiple Locations Same City
-
I have a local seo campaign im trying to reconfigure.
Lets say i am a dwi lawyer and i have multiple locations. These are merely examples for cities and keywords.
- Home page is Criminal defense lawyer - this is the term we should be targeting. Maybe i can target the state name, but i am losing so much SEO weight by not leveraging this home page as the main page for this term.
- Then we have a location page in south Boston that is "S Boston DWI lawyer" as the title tag.
- Then we have another location page north Boston that is "N Boston DWI Lawyer" as the title tag.
I can leave the city name off the home page title tag, but then what do i do with these pages that are pretty much competing with one another? I know the home page will not rank since none of the locations point to it, and only to a location page.
I was thinking about creating one page with both locations and having both G map listings go directly there, but that doesn't make sense because other locations do not have the same setup. Or choosing the most central location and pointing that to the home page and let the rest have a locations page.
Finally the home page will not rank well for any major terms. The location page does rank for the fictional south Boston DWI lawyer, but the other listing does not show up. The home page does not show up in the first ten pages either. One other aspect is that the home page ranks for terms that I am not even targeting.
These pages are all targeted on specific keywords so that they do not overlap or compete, but some pages are the services main outline, but the location pages have their own version.
I have removed all mentions of the same keyword from the home page. I made a few wchanges about 2 weeks ago and already noticed movement in rankings days later.
-
Hi Waquid!
Thank you so much for adding a bit more context to your question. I perfectly see your scenario now.
So, if a business does something like landscape design and has only two offices in San Francisco, it's likely that the homepage and both location landing pages will include references to "San Francisco" and "Landscape Design". The landing pages could also be optimized for hyperlocal terms like "North Beach" or "Glen Park" if they are in different neighborhoods.
However, if the business has, lets say, 20 offices in California, then they wouldn't be likely to use any city or neighborhood terms on the homepage because there are simply too many cities to cover. Rather, the homepage might reference regional names, like SF Bay Area, or Central Valley or Orange County, etc, or even just Northern California/Southern California.
If the service is identical at all locations, then there's really no avoiding using those service keywords on all pages. You can vary them in any way that keyword research shows you variants. For example, you could dice up findings like "sustainable landscape design, native landscape design, commercial landscape design" etc, between the pages, but if you have just one overarching service, then it will be reflected on all pages. It's the geo-terms that need to be parsed up to fit the scenario of your various offices.
-
Question is how does one target two locations in the same city with the same keyword/service, and then the home page as well.
I have GMB links to my location pages for a south and central location in one large metro city. The home page is having the same keyword.
What would you do in this instance?
For now i removed all instances of keywords located on the location pages. The home page has a totally different topic now.
I did see my rankings jump up a page and we got into the top 5 on gmaps for tons of terms. I am just trying to see if there are any options im missing on best way to setup multiple locations targeting the same city without wasting the home page SEO juice. Because right now my home page is not ranking for any major terms at all.
-
Hi Waqid,
Thank you so much for bringing your topic to to the forum. I've read through your scenario now, but I'm not seeing the question you're asking. Can you please detail what your exact question is? Thanks!
-
Thanks for the responses but the keywords are fictional and jsut an example of my predicament. The business has been around for 27+ years and in google for about ten. our backlink profile , citations and etc are all very competitive. Clean and concise citations and links.
I will re read what you said. But it sounds like we are on the same page and I do not expect rank well jsut because on page is perfect. What I’m trying to figure out is the best plan for long term success targetfing these highly Competitive terms.
Content is also exceptional and very informational and helpful.
I’m going To review competition again and make spreadsheet of their layout.
I will kepe this updated so that maybe I can help others in the future
-
"Lets say i am a dwi lawyer and i have multiple locations. These are merely examples for cities and keywords.
- _Home page is Criminal defense lawyer - this is the term we should be targeting. Maybe i can target the state name, but i am losing so much SEO weight by not leveraging this home page as the main page for this term. _
- _Then we have a location page in south Boston that is "S Boston DWI lawyer" as the title tag. _
- _Then we have another location page north Boston that is "N Boston DWI Lawyer" as the title tag. _
I can leave the city name off the home page title tag, but then what do i do with these pages that are pretty much competing with one another? I know the home page will not rank since none of the locations point to it, and only to a location page.
_I was thinking about creating one page with both locations and having both G map listings go directly there, but that doesn't make sense because other locations do not have the same setup. Or choosing the most central location and pointing that to the home page and let the rest have a locations page. _"
Obviously have your main keyword on your homepage, but unless your site has a unique value proposition (watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AmRg3p79pM - only watch until Miley outlines common mistake #1, the rest is pretty much irrelevant here) that trumps that of all your competitors (who may have been operating in the area before you) - don't expect to suddenly jump to number 1. Your popularity massively affects your rankings and having a unique value proposition for end users massively affects your quality and volume of organically created backlinks
As to whether you should have separate pages for S Boston (South Boston) and N Boston (North Boston?) - that depends on your implementation and the keyword volumes.
- "n boston dwi lawyer" - 0 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
- "north boston dwi lawyer" - 0 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
- "s boston dwi lawyer" - 0 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
- "south boston dwi lawyer" - 0 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
Pointless! Let's try slightly broader terms:
- "n boston lawyer" - 0 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
- "north boston lawyer" - 0 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
- "s boston lawyer" - 0 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
- "south boston lawyer" - 10 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
Still pretty bad. If I could 'quickly and easily' find evidence that Google though people were searching for these terms regularly, or broader variants - and that Google didn't 'group' their search volumes (and thus thought they were distinct search entities as per Hummingbird) I might say yeah, have two separate pages and on each page create one of those Google maps that draws a border around an area (usually created with zipcode / post-code data) which would illustrate your area of service and the cut-off boundaries
Since there isn't much volume here for these kinds of terms, is local SEO really the answer for you? Is it even going to benefit you that much? Is it even going to make a difference, whatever you do? I'm not really sure about that, looking at the data behind Google's searches
Experimenting with more terms it does very much seem that South Boston could be worth targeting independently, but North Boston is really not even worth bothering with:
- "n boston legal" - 0 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
- "north boston legal" - 0 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
- "s boston legal" - 10 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
- "south boston legal" - 10 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
Actually, people seem to care more about the distinction of 'greater' Boston and what that means. People care about South Boston and Greater Boston, rather than North / South divide of Boston:
- "n boston " - 10 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
- "north boston" - 480 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
- "s boston" - 40 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
- "south boston" - 12,100 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
- "greater boston" - 2,900 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
So go for South and Greater Boston related terms if possible and divide it up that way:
- "greater boston legal " - 20 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
- "south boston legal" - 10 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
- "greater boston legal services" - 1,900 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
- "south boston lawyer" - 10 estimated monthly searches in the USA from Google's Keyword Planner
If you have no base of operations in Greater Boston, maybe you want to fundamentally reconsider that as somewhere in Greater Boston might be considered more lucrative from a search POV. Maybe North Boston is part of Greater Boston, I don't know - I'm from the UK! I'm trying to see it a bit like London and its various districts (North London, South London, Greater London, Camden, Covent Garden etc)
With all this info coming together, I'd say don't really bother with North Boston much at all. I might Create a South Boston page and reference Greater Boston on that a lot, drawing up a Google map showing your bordered service areas (highlighting South Boston, your office in South Boston, and then surrounding Greater Boston - all on ONE map)
I'd talk a lot about the legal scene in South Boston, why the product is more relevant there (when people in North Boston don't seem to even care much for legal aid at all). I'd illustrate that your core focus in is South Boston with aspirations and clients in and around surrounding Greater Boston - where it seems like the real money is
Without an office in Greater Boston somewhere, rankings in that area (those areas) will be slightly hampered, but competition for "greater boston legal services" is "low" (at least for PPC, but it's probably also low for SEO as well) - so you might make some ground and get a bit of traffic more quickly
If having a South Boston specific location page which does not really reference North Boston much (or pollute itself with that term) necessitates for UX purposes that you also need to create a North Boston page, fine do it. Just don't expect it to bring much traffic in (based on what I am seeing!)
"_Finally the home page will not rank well for any major terms. The location page does rank for the fictional south Boston DWI lawyer, but the other listing does not show up. The home page does not show up in the first ten pages either. One other aspect is that the home page ranks for terms that I am not even targeting. _
_These pages are all targeted on specific keywords so that they do not overlap or compete, but some pages are the services main outline, but the location pages have their own version. _
I have removed all mentions of the same keyword from the home page. I made a few changes about 2 weeks ago and already noticed movement in rankings days later. "
Strong technical SEO and keyword 'cannibalisation' avoidant deployment 'allow' you to rank well. They don't make your site the best page for Google to rank. All they do is clear your roadblocks, but if you don't have enough fuel (popularity, value-add propositions) to be competitive and win the race - don't expect to win
SEO is not a substitute for a business offering which may not be more competitive, than all others sites ranking above itself. SEO helps your website to rank appropriately, where an unbiased user would expect to see it in Google's rankings
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Local Strategy for Multiple Domain Integration
Hello, We are a locally driven business with two locations. Currently, each location has its own local site and are linked to from our central domain (3 domains total). We are discussing whether we should integrate the local sites into location pages on our core domain. However, we would also prefer to keep the ‘local’ domains live. Is this a viable strategy and what would we need to do to ensure the local sites won’t cannibalize our efforts with the main domain? Also, should we remove the contact information on those local sites to avoid NAP issues? The other option would be to build out the local domains but that could raise concerns over budget and potentially expanding into the future. And we would like the main domain to take presendence. A few additional notes on this: Each location has its own brand name and contact information. Traffic across all 3 sites is about the same. We are also considering using silos with sub-folders to build out local service pages. We understand how to set up location pages but are asking more in terms of overall strategy and ideal way to position all 3 sites. Any help or insight would be very appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Local Website Optimization | | Ben-R
Best,0 -
Differentiating Franchise Location Names to better optimize locations
Hello All, I am currently spear heading SEO for a national franchise. I am coming across locations in the same city and zip code. I'm definitely finding difficulties in naming the location in a way that will be specific to the franchise locations (locations are 1 mile away from each other). I am looking to apply geo specific location names for each center regardless of local city terms. (e.g. Apexnetwork of north madronna, Apexnetwork of south madronna) Also, building the website and location to read (apexnetwork.com/north-madronna….. apexnetwork.com/south-madronna) While encouraging the client to continue using the geo specific terms while writing blogs. Is this best practice? Any feedback would help.
Local Website Optimization | | Jeffvertus0 -
Difficulty Ranking Two Locations in the Same City
We are in the self-storage business and have locations through the Pacific Northwest. As we grow, there are cities where we've added multiple (2-3) locations. But we're discovering that we're having a great deal of difficulty ranking for all of these. For instance, we have two locations in Vancouver, WA. One is West Coast Self-Storage Vancouver, and the other is West Coast Self-Storage Padden Parkway. Both are in Vancouver, WA, but for the most part, only West Coast Self-Storage Vancouver is getting ranked. In fact, on those searches where Vancouver ranks, Padden Parkway doesn't show up anywhere. Not in the top 10 pages anyway. Each location has an outer landing page and an inner details page. On each page, we've placed unique, city-optimized keywords in the URL, Page Title, h1s, content. Of course each location has a separate NAP. Each location also has its own GMB page. Each location has a decent amount of reviews across multiple sites (Google, Yelp, GetFiveStars.) Both locations were previously on their own domain until a year ago when they were redirected to their current URLs. Both of those original domains were close to the same age. With the Padden Parkway location, we've tried to be even more hyper-local, by including the address in the URLs and in the h1 of the outer page. We've also created an h2 that references local neighborhoods around the business. We're also running into this situation in at least one other city, so I'm wondering if this has something to do with our url structure. Other businesses in our space use the URL structure of domain.com/state/city/location. We only go down to the state level. What are we missing?
Local Website Optimization | | misterfla0 -
One locations page, or multiple pages?
Hi, I represent a franchisor who does all marketing- including local seo- for our franchisees. I've read a lot about local SEO and understand the basics, but have some remaining questions. 1- If our typical territories are quite large and encompass more than one major city, should we create multiple location pages for the same franchise owner? I believe the answer should be yes from an SEO stand point, but the problem is that most of our franchisees naturally just have one business address (their home). Since PO boxes and virtual offices aren't the way to go, what's the best course of action? And when I say major cities, I'm really talking about major cities (and not just small towns/boroughs). Can they just use a friend's/relative's address? 2- There's a lot of info out there about "locations pages," but it's not really clear whether or not you should really just have ONE page for each location, or several pages with different content? For instance, it looks like a lot of businesses are creating just one, "home-page" looking landing page for their individual locations, with everything from services to testimonials on just that one page. Is this preferred over creating several different local pages for that one location? The latter is what we currently do. From the user stand-point, it looks like each franchise location has it's own "mini website" on our main website. For instance, a landing page optimized for the local business name, a local services page, a project/photo gallery page, local review page, etc. It seems like a lot less work just building one landing page for each location, but is the payoff the same? I'm torn between the two strategies- is it really worth the extra work (in terms of traffic + local ranking) to build out the individual pages for the one location? Thanks Moz Community!
Local Website Optimization | | kimberleymeloserpa0 -
Local SEO case with two physical locations
I hope someone can help me make some decisions. I did read a lot about Local SEO lately but I’m not sure what way to go with this client. Client: Service provider with two physical locations (service is provided on the physical location). In the coming 12 month there will open 1-2 new physical locations in other cities. Has only one phone number. I will try to advise them to get a local phone number for both locations. But they prefer one (mobile) number to keep things simple. Clients are willing to travel for the service, since it’s a one day course they take. Current clients do come from a lot of different locations. The competition for around 5-6 big cities is pretty low since there aren’t a lot of service providers who deliver these courses. Questions: Should I put both addresses in the footer? It’s a best practice with only one location. I think it’s handy for users with two locations as well but I’m worried about how Google sees this. Also this will get confusing when the client passes 3-4 locations. If the client sticks with one mobile phone number, should I make a Google + local page for both physical locations? The Google guidelines clearly state they prefer a local number as much as possible. If I add “Our service areas “ to the top navigation and make a unique place page for every city (to rank organic aswell) is it wise to link those local Google + pages to the unique page about this service? Normaly I would go for yes, but I want to add places with and without a physical location under the same navigation. With just one location I would just focus on that city and add unique pages for the other pages. I’m getting a bit stuck between best practices since the client got opportunities with multiple strategies. I hope you guys (and girls 😉 ) can help!
Local Website Optimization | | Bob_van_Biezen1 -
How to handle clients who want to target far away from their location?
In general, How do you recommend handling clients that are persistent about targeting a location that is very far away from their physical location, i.e. the client is in Providence, RI, but wants to target Boston, MA. I typically give them a discussion about how they will not rank in the 7 packs, particularly post pigeon, but wanted to know if the Moz community had any other tips since this seems to come up so frequently. Thank you!
Local Website Optimization | | Red_Spot_Interactive1 -
How Best to do implement a Branch Locator for a Website with invididual location category pages
Hi All, We have an ecommerce Website with multiple locations for our stores and we currently display separate location specific pages for the different categories and sub categories. This has helped us previously to rank well for local search in each of the areas we have a store but over the last few months since humingbird, our local rankings on some things have dip a little . We want to implement a branch locator of some description to improve the user experience. From looking at other websites with branch locators, they tend to a separate button/page with which you can search for a branch etc. However, they don't have location specific pages. My query is should I do it so if a user comes in on a specific category location page and follows it through to product page , then to have a tab on the product page displaying the local branch from which he can come in. My thinking here is that , is that it would help confirm my local citations and help improve local rankings. Or Should the local branch be displayed on the local category pages instead or as well ?. If a user comes in from the homepage or not on a specific location page, then the branch locator will allow them to search for a specific branch. Should I also put in a branch locator as a separate page or can It be in more places. I don't want to damage anything which may have an effect on rankings due to citations and NAP on the location specific pages. Any advice or good examples to look at would be greatly appreciated thanks Sarah.
Local Website Optimization | | SarahCollins1 -
Location pages for Landing pages
So i have a client for carpet cleaning in Seattle, but he doesn't just want to rank up for "Carpet Cleaning Seattle" he wants to rank up for sub locations such as Lynnwood Carpet Cleaning
Local Website Optimization | | tonyr7
Kirkland Carpet Cleaning
Kenmore Carpet Cleaning
Issaquah Carpet Cleaning
Everett Carpet Cleaning
Edmonds Carpet Cleaning
Bothell Carpet Cleaning
Bellevue Carpet Cleaning
Auburn Carpet Cleaning
Orting Carpet Cleaning
Monroe Carpet Cleaning
Milton Carpet Cleaning
Marysville Carpet Cleaning
Lacey Carpet Cleaning Right now the designer he hired to develop the website has created a separate web page for each of these location pages. the reason being he services all these areas and wants to rank up for all of these areas with basically the same keyword... SEO is fairly simple to me when it comes to straight forward small sized projects or targeting specific services in one set location. But with all these algorithmic changes I worry that this is not something Google may want to see.. What is my best bet with this project, and what SEO methods would you recommend for a site that has 40 total landing pages all with similar keywords just different locations?0