Schema.org for real estate portal
-
I am looking for advise on how to best start adopting schema.org for a real estate portal.
Would like to get feedback and suggestions on my initial thoughts.
Here are the obvious ones:
1. http://www.schema.org/RealEstateAgent(Thing > Organization > LocalBusiness > RealEstateAgent) Plan to use this to wrap realtors' information.We ll start with their profile page but possibly also on other pages with their information (e.g. listing page) 2. http://www.schema.org/SearchResultsPage(Thing > CreativeWork > WebPage > SearchResultsPage) This will mark search results pages where e.g. multiple listings of certain type in certain area are presented. 3. http://schema.org/WebPage(Thing > CreativeWork > WebPage) Pretty generic so we are thinking of using it on every page. e.g. significantLinks and breadcrumb objects seem like they could help in marking important links that will help search engines understand the site's information architecture better.
I am not sure how to treat property listings Offer seems a good fit (http://www.schema.org/Offer) but not perfect. maybe it should be combined with place (http://www.schema.org/Place) http://www.schema.org/GeoCoordinates could also be used to mark each listing's location on the map.
any thoughts or experiences you would like to share?
-
Hi John Doherty,
I know this page is very since 2011, but I was wondering if you or any other person could help me out with the right schema for meQasa's real estate developers page. Will be greatly appreciated.
-
I've experimented with - and pushed the limits - with rich snippets. When they do work, they were the single biggest factor in increasing CTR , I've ever used.
As you noted, the first thing and easiest would be to itemscope itemptype your business with the real estate agent classification and then add your address etc. all the basics. ( you can use your logo as a business image ). Maybe this helps in Local search, but it is difficult to tell. But it can't hurt and it is easy to do by simply wrapping the itemscope itemptype pointing to real estate sales agent in the HTML tag.
Now the following are just tactics
My next focus would be setting up the authorship verification so that I could get my picture in the SERPS.
Second, I would code my breadcrumbs - in the past I've found that the schema.org metadata doesn't work as well as the other formats. Download Yoasts Wordpress SEO plugin and look how he formats his breadcrumbs. His way works - you can mix types on a site without problems.
Since your homepage doesn't typically have breadcrumbs, make some, these will show up as a mini menu, remember that in the SERPs the breadrcrumbs will show from right to left - truncating the left side items first, put your your most important link at the left to always show up in the SERPs
Every site that I've wanted or didn't want shows breadcrumbs on almost every page.
Images and video objects seem right now at least to work just as well with sitemaps and descriptive alt and title content and I would not waste my time adding the schema info.
There are some others that work well still but perhaps not right for a real estate site.
Last but not least, I would not waste my time coding up the addresses etc for the MLS real estate listings as they are IMO just a mass of duplicate content across the web. Think about it, why would you trust a geo coordinates more than just a simple address?
I'd focus on the neighborhood landing pages - perhaps making them quasi blog posts so that I could get use of the authorship pic.
Then make the property pages templates more appealing, ones that t will convert by moving away from the standard MLS format.
The frustrating thing about schema.org and the other formats is that when they work one day and then they are gone the next. Your CTRs increase when they are working , but testing and coding takes time as they testing tool has bugs and information on the web and examples can be outdated or just plain wrong.
As for whether it helps with rankings, I'm not sure and my gut feeling is that right now they are not a highly rated signal in the algo if at all, but as I said before, the rich snippet portion if and when it shows up in the SERPs dramatically increases CRT
Lastly and most important, it is my opinion, that, based upon your post, you are granulating the process too much. Basically making it too complicated - as I believe John from Distilled pointed it out. This tendency to overcomplicated the scehma.org info is perhaps the reason this data is not a stronger signal yet nor been adopted widely.
As you stated, just keep the top level real estate sales agent as your top level, forget about the offerings, WebPage, SearchResultsPage, etc, next if you have a blog as part of your site add the authorship.
You can then focus on the itemproperties ie NAP and breadcrumbs, etc. Best to keep it simple for now.
If you need some up-to-date info about this check out John Mueller on Google + http://goo.gl/Ow7jI He always answers questions directly and has been a big help to me and others
-
Hi -
The first three seem to make sense to me. If I were you, I would treat Property Listings like a Place. Place also has GeoCoordinates as an Itemprop, so you can mark up the location from within that Schema as well.
Depending on what kind of property it is, you could also use the Thing > Place > Residence Schema for certain parts. It's a bit more specific than Place.
Hope this helps a bit!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Parsing jQuery Links as Real Links
While trying to diagnose a recent Google penalty I found out that links were being parsed by Google even though they were made using jQuery. I had the linkify plugin on my site and configured it to convert URLs to links on all of my pages. Today I found links to other sites of mine from sites that should not have been linking to them and found that the links came from pages whose links were generated via jQuery. This makes me wonder, how do I know if Google is counting javascript generated links? Is it possible that my native ad widgets are creating links that Google might count? Since I don't own any of the sites that advertise via the widgets I don't know how to tell if they are getting link juice or not. It used to be that Google didn't parse javascript, so you could add as many links to your site via javascript as you wanted without being seen by Google as linking to those sites. Does anyone know of a jQuery plugin that does turn URLs into clickable links that Google won't parse as real links?
On-Page Optimization | | STDCarriers0 -
Schema LocalBusiness for multiple store locations
Hello, I want to add LocalBusiness mark up to our store pages. I recently read this article https://moz.com/blog/structured-data-for-seo-2 One piece of advice I wanted to confirm is this section: It might seem counter-intuitive, but organization and LocalBusiness markup should only be used on the pages which are actually about your business (e.g. homepage, about page, and/or contact page). I am working on an e-commerce site that has multiple stores and a store page for each. Currently there is Organization Mark Up (with the head office contact information) on every single page. Am I right in saying that we should remove the Organization Mark Up from every page except the homepage, then add LocalBusiness mark up to each store page with the relevant contact information for each store? Many thanks in advance.
On-Page Optimization | | kbm30 -
Implementing Schema.org on a web page
Hi all, As we know, implementing Schema doesn't change the look & feel of a web page for the users. So here is my Question.. Could we implement Schema markup on the web pages only for Bots (but not visible to users in a Source code) so that page load time doesn't increase?
On-Page Optimization | | vivekrathore0 -
Question about url structure for large real estate website
I've been running a large real estate rental website for the past few years and on May 8, 2013 my Google traffic dropped by about 50%. I'm concerned that my current url structure might be causing thin content pages for certain rental type + location searches. My current directory structure is:
On-Page Optimization | | Amped
domain.com/home-rentals/california/
domain.com/home-rentals/california/beverly-hills/
domain.com/home-rentals/california/beverly-hills/90210/
domain.com/apartment-rentals/california/
domain.com/apartment-rentals/california/beverly-hills/
domain.com/apartment-rentals/california/beverly-hills/90210/
etc.. I was thinking of changing it to the following:
domain.com/rentals/california/
domain.com/rentals/california/beverly-hills/
domain.com/rentals/california/beverly-hills/90210/ ** Note: I'd provide users the ability to filter their results by rental type - by default all types would be displayed. Another question - my listing pages are currently displayed as:
domain.com/123456 And I've been thinking of changing it to:
domain.com/123456-123-Street-City-State-Zip Should I proceed with both changes - one or the one - neither - or something else I'm not thinking of? Thank you in advance!!0 -
Does schema.org assist with duplicate content concerns
The issue of duplicate content has been well documented and there are lots of articles suggesting to noindex archive pages in WordPress powered sites. Schema.org allows us to mark-up our content, including marking a components URL. So my question simply, is no-indexing archive (category/tag) pages still relevant when considering duplicate content? These pages are in essence a list of articles, which can be marked as an article or blog posting, with the url of the main article and all the other cool stuff the scheme gives us. Surely Google et al are smart enough to recognise these article listings as gateways to the main content, therefore removing duplicate content concerns. Of course, whether or not doing this is a good idea will be subjective and based on individual circumstances - I'm just interested in whether or not the search engines can handle this appropriately.
On-Page Optimization | | MarkCA0 -
E-Commerce SEO: What are the Schema.org properties you use?
Quick question about Schema.org for products. What are the properties you like to list on product-pages for an E-Commerce? Thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | AdrienOLeary0 -
Schema.org
Has anyone successfully added the schema.org code to an ecommerce site? Was it of any benefit to seo?
On-Page Optimization | | pretige120 -
Only showing googlebot schema.org tagged content - cloaking??
Would it be considered cloaking if I only show schema.or tagged content to searchengine bots and not to regular visitors. Mind you, no other change on the page, design or content. So instead of Googlebot would be served: 41 Main Street Regular visitors: 41 Main Street
On-Page Optimization | | Sebes0