You can view the MozLocal dots and if you put the mouse over then it will show the expected date. It will be seen by the public. About 2-3 months.
Hope that helps,
Tom
Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
You can view the MozLocal dots and if you put the mouse over then it will show the expected date. It will be seen by the public. About 2-3 months.
Hope that helps,
Tom
Stephanie,
I am currently writing a blog on this so I cannot give you every bit of information that I normally would. But I can share this with you visitors the facts about these hosting companies.
if you are managing only WordPress sites and nothing else. Or just the majority of WordPress sites like 80 to 90%. I would strongly suggest going with a manage WordPress host. The reason I'm saying this is they take care of everything backups security and your site will never be slow with any of these companies. I personally host my site on WP engine but I can also tell you that I have accounts with absolutely every single one of the companies I am about to list. Not of them are anything short of excellent
WP engine, is extremely fast and extremely customer oriented.
Many of the largest problems the WordPress site owners face are that typical shared servers, or even VPSs and dedicated on generic hosting platforms, are not optimized for WordPress’ unique performance and security requirements. WPEngine.com , ZippyKid.com , Page.ly WebSynthesis.com & Presslabs.com (presslabs is moving into the US market quickly they are excellent for Europe right now along with WPengine, Page.ly & Zippykid who already offer European hosting as well.) are all managed WordPress hosting companies listed where developed by an expert technical team that also had the experience of being in the trenches like you and me, running high-traffic sites on WordPress. This is why their unique and finely tuned configurations work so well for WordPress. It is also why they have advanced and evolving security checks in constant motion, plus a guarantee to clean up your site in the event of an invasion. And the support is top notch. From migrations to troubleshooting to plugin recommendations, these guys have seen it all through their real-world WordPress experience, which makes your life that much easier. Too often, hosting is associated with problems that make our lives harder. Wouldn’t it be nice to have a host that gives you benefits instead of headaches? That’s why I would recommend each and ever one of the hosts listed so go check out their plans and tell us what we can do to get you sign up for truly worry free hosting.
** WPengine.com **
I have posted with WP engine for 2 years they are fantastic and very fast to respond. Along with being a lightning fast host I recommend them to anyone. You get 4 free months to try them out via http://www.seomoz.org/pro-perks
**Zippykid.com **
ZippyKid is an outstanding company with phone support like WP engine based on a private cloud and with one of the best backup systems in the industry I don't believe that you can go wrong choosing them.
Maybe the most cost efficient depending on multiple factors. they offer 30% off for life to any
SEOmoz pro member you can get that discount here http://www.seomoz.org/pro-perks
if you continue to add sites they will continue to take 30% off each additional website
is a fantastic host however if you have a lot of Websites is is a great deal more money to host more than 3 websites in comparison to the others.
is another outstanding WordPress host however they are just moving into the United States now. Their prices start at $199 per month for one site.
I have accounts with every single one of them, and they're all excellent I know that that does not make it easier on you. To pick but if you have a lot of sites and want to resell them and have the billing handled by the company Page.ly may be your right choice.
for all non-WordPress websites personally I use firehost.com I find them to be fantastic. I would strongly recommend datapipe.com, bluebox.net, Pair.com, singlehop.com
I agree with Webby www.servint.net is a great company that does not offer shared hosting only VPS.
I don't recommend shared hosting unless you are using a managed WordPress host which in that case it is far different than using a company like blue host.
if you do not want at 100% WordPress web host I would recommend bluebox.net they, are, in the same office building as SEOmoz, but the real advantage is there built off of bare metal have a content delivery network built-in and really do know what they're doing when it comes to Hosting.
I would then choose pair.com their proven uptime is unbelievable and rivals that, of posts like data pipe which start at $1000 a, month. However, Pair starts at $10 a month and goes up.
again I can't tell you how strongly I feel towards using a managed WordPress host for hosting WordPress it's simply night and day. However I can tell you with complete confidence that every host I have mentioned does a fantastic job.
I'm sorry I could not tell you everything I wanted to tell you all the little bits and pieces about every host but I am writing a blog on it and did not want to not be able to include information in my article that I have worked so hard on because I gave it to somebody in Q&A. However I would strongly recommend looking at the data I know there are a lot of choices. But if you do a lot of WordPress managed WordPress is always the right choice.
might own website has a hosting part where you can read about hosting
http://www.blueprintmarketing.com/hosting/
I hope I have been of help to you.
Sincerely,
Thomas Von Zickell
It is there to authenticate you with the social media networks as well as create open graph tags
it is a form of structured data called open graph
See
<script < span="">type="application/ld+json"></script <>
{"@context": "http://ogp.me","@type":"article","og:locale": "en_GB","og:title": "Log File Analysis for SEO","og:description": "Mastered technical SEO and feel like you’d like to stretch your knowledge further? Read this unapologetically technical guide to Log File Analysis...","og:url": "http://builtvisible.com/log-file-analysis/","og:site_name": "Builtvisible : Digital Marketing & SEO Agency","og:image": "http://builtvisible.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/log-file-analysis-social.jpg","og:published_time":"2014-09-15","og:author":
"Daniel Butler"}
I hope this helps, Tom
please look and see that I updated my response I did I copied from a dictation software's writing pad and only copied a part of it when I meant to copy all of it
please read and let me know if I can be of help
sincerely,
Thomas
I think the idea is to manage them in Moz Analytics for more accurate things like tags they'll be a lot more options soon.
"Currently, we only support a single column upload (keywords). We will be updating this to support uploading the same file you can export from the keyword list pages which will include the keyword, volume, difficulty, opportunity, custom score and potential. We’ll let everyone know when that update is released!"
You can export from the keyword tool which you can save a list of keywords under a tag or name. So if I have list-1 and list-2 I can pick relevancy and use filters to slim them down to exactly what I want but I do not believe you can add another tag in addition to the name of the list. You have to do that inside of Moz Analytics
Here is an excellent walk-through on how to do exactly what you just asked.
https://moz.com/help/guides/moz-pro-overview/keyword-rankings/add-and-manage-keywords
Here is a great link to a larger photo than the one below showing you how you can place the tag and first below and add the keywords in bulk. Once you hit upload, you will have your tags attached to any of the keywords that you've placed in the box labeled keywords.
http://i.imgur.com/wl9Pdg7.jpg
I don't think me describing it would do any better than that page can do but please let me know if it is something that you would like more help with or if you have any other issues.
Cite: https://moz.com/help/guides/keyword-explorer FAQ
In the future, we’ll have an automatic button that lets you directly add keywords to a Moz Analytics campaign. For now, the easiest way is to export a list to CSV and import or copy/paste to the “add keywords” page in Moz Analytics."
Photo: http://i.imgur.com/ZMLvbId.jpg
I hope I've been of help,
Thomas
Hi Bruce,
I agree with Dana
&
I would use the C name as you will force people to your site I like the way it looks as well I do a vid.blueprintmarketing.com
as a cname for Wistia
the SEO Embed makes a sitemap so google can see your video & rank you for it.
http://wistia.com/doc/video-seo#embed_video_using_the_seo_embed_type
Hope this helps,
Thomas
If the background of the site is white and you made the H1 White you are doing something black hat rather your intentions are good or not in the eyes of Google.
I'm not saying you're trying to do something wrong if the client does not want to use the H1 tag what are they using for a title? You can still combine the two if you must is much better than making it essentially clear text which is what Google will think the white text is if the background is white.
you have to tell your client the H1 tag is extremely important and they need to introduce the page with the H1 tag displayed to the end-user.
Respectfully,
Thomas
Hi Robert,
I think what you've brought up is extremely interesting. We have one in turn and currently we are not paying them at their own request. This is odd I know and I believe possibly illegal.
I think federal law states that you must pay an intern for any job you would pay an employee to do.
I've never met anyone who comes to a business and asks can I work for free without anything in return.
This particular intern needs this internship and so you know we are in fact paying her even though she keeps refusing our checks. Simply because we will have trouble on our hands possibly if we don't.
I agree with your statement about wanting to pay people so they will have the incentive to work hard for you.
I do pay my interns although I do only have one at this current time as school has just restarted.
I have always given a paycheck of $12 an hour to any intern we have had. The maximum amount of interns we have ever had is four for blueprint marketing however my main business is in plastics and the amount of interns we have had their is well over 40.
Every one of them is paid as well and we essentially have copied the word went to pay you rather you like it or not planned from MTI Polyexe for instance http://www.mtipolyexe.com is built on Hubspot (we are not abandoning hub spot just hosting on WordPress) and currently it is the interns job to rebuild the website in WordPress we are using a dead domain as a staging server please feel free to take a look at what they've accomplished so far.
&
http://mtipolyexe.wpengine.com
my other company that manufactures plastics.
My advice to you is make sure you pay them regardless just because you never know with federal law.
I do think they benefit quite a bit by learning from somebody who has been there and done that as long as they're interested and really care about coming to work I'm cool with taking them on. I have had some interns that have blatantly no interest at all and unfortunately we have to let them go.
I hope my story of how we use interns in my marketing company has been of help to you. If you would like to know more about how we use them in the plastics business I would be happy to share my stories with you.
Sincerely,
Thomas
The only thing I can think of is Google is showing you what it last indexed and that does sound strange. However there is a other way to put your address on schema properly and quickly so you'll get the local search results you want.
Use this tool http://www.feedthebot.com/tools/address/
it's 100% free and has a lot of extra tools connected that are great
You can also utilize
If you prefer to use micro data which is almost the same thing as schema you can use this tool.
http://www.microdatagenerator.com/
However I have been told not to mix the two causes some issues with search engines. So take schema or micro data is what I have recently been told I have been trying to get a solid confirmation so I think it's a possibility that it would make sense but don't want to tell you something that is not true.
My $.02 use the 1st tool and it will do the job just fine.
It is in the form of a Word press plug-in but also gives you the ability to create schema correctly right on the site and paste it into your code.
The nice thing about it is there's a little box to the right that gives you a exact match of what it's going to look like on your site.
If you don't want it to look like it formatted anything I would use the 1st tool. However both of them are excellent.
One last thing if you're using WordPress consider Yoast Local SEO it seems expensive but does a fantastic job
More great sources of information
http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-use-schema-markup-for-local-seo/
http://searchengineland.com/13-semantic-markup-tips-for-2013-a-local-seo-checklist-143708
Sincerely,
Thomas
Use this to make a critical render path
http://www.feedthebot.com/pagespeed/critical-render-path.html
with
http://www.feedthebot.com/tools/css/ (for CSS)
this for JS
http://javascript-minifier.com/
If you add this it will fix this as well
https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/module/filter-js-minify
Merry Christmas,
Ruben
Your friend is speaking about a 100% HTML site and the answer is your site should not end using
www.yoursite.com/index.htm or home.htm or default.htm
Using Word press your site should end in www.yoursite.com or www.yoursite.com/
Some people when they ring there site over from an HTML static site to WordPress they might find a parma links
http://codex.wordpress.org/Using_Permalinks
If you do this and 301 redirect any links that would be changed by using WordPress to the new Permalink structure shown below or if you feel like using one of the others which I recommend against you may. However most sites are best served using the settings below.
Sincerely,
Thomas