Take a look at the competition here. There are far more qualified domains, that should out rank feedthehungry.org. The reason they don't is because "Feed the Hungry" is the brand. If you look, there are other relevant sites that appear with this query, but no where in the title can you see the exact match to the query. If you want to compete on a branded key term like this one, it is going to take strategic back linking and great on page content so that the engines can equate your domain as relevant to the topic.

Yes, they show because that is the name of their organization. It is their brand, not their key term. Does that make sense? That is an extremely competitive term. It is a branded key term as well, making it even more competitive because you have to compete with the actual brand name. So if you wanted to compete with them on that phrase, which has only about 700 searches per month, you would need to work extremely hard to get your brand associated with that topic.

No worries. We were all beginners once.

I would say your domain name should be the name of your company, your brand. Your key terms will be included in the URL for your categories and products. Stuffing the URL with key terms will not help you rank. Take the baby powder example. If your domain is babypowder.com and your category page is Baby powder, and your product page is entitled baby powder for infants, your URL would be www.babypowder.com/babypowder/babypowderforinfants which is not best practice.

If you make your brand johnsonandjohnson.com, your URL becomes www.johnsonandjohnson.com/babypower/babypowerderforinfants.

So, to answer your question, no having the keyword in the URL several times does not help you rank. Having a naturally flowing URL that contains your brand and key term is what will help you rank. Having the space in the domain name is frowned upon, it generally isn't best practice.

You want to avoid using the EMD, your domain should be your brand name, or business name. An EMD is a domain that exactly matches your key term, like babypowder.com.

Take a look at this article about domains. It is very high level, and it breaks down the importance of brand vs. key term. Hopefully it can explain it a little better than I am doing right now, lol.

I disagree. I think that if there is any short term value it will be exactly that, short term. There is not enough value for the short term. It will eventually make it harder to rank and then you will have to start over. EMD (exact match domains) have lost significant ranking value. It is what comes after the .com that is important, what products are in your URL, what key terms you use, not what your domain is. It is too easy to manipulate, which is why it has lost its value.

The difference is web mentions vs Backlinks. If someone mentions your name, Blue Widgets Foundation, that is valuable in its own way, where as if you were using anchor text it would more likely be for a term you are trying to rank for, like a product or converting term. Not that you couldn't link to your name, because you can. Web Mentions are kind of how engines gauge the popularity of your brand name, and back linking is used to increase the rank of a particular key term and domain authority. Does that make sense?

So, it would be like saying "You can find household widgets (Backlink using key term) crafted by the Blue Widget Foundation (web mention - increases brand value and awareness)"

I agree with Ryan. I would just add that the value of an exact match domain is no where what it was 3-4 years ago. The way that Google is evolving its algorithm encourage sites to have a "brand" and not a domain that has a highly competitive key term instead of the name of the business. It would be the difference in www.babypowerder.com or www.johnsonandjohnson.org. Baby powder might get more searches, but Google with associate JohnsonandJohnson.org with that term because they are related. Does that make sense?

Darn it, you are right, we added a new site, not a change of address, sorry about that. Apparently my coffee is no longer effective!

Did you do a change of address in Google Webmaster Tools? Http and Https are considered different URLs, and you will have to do a change of address if you switched to a full https site.

You don't have to run a VLookup necessarily. You can align the data side by side and do a simple division formula to calculate the percentage of change. Just copy and paste the data into two columns, and use the IMSUB to find the difference, then divide for a percentage.

I agree with Valeria completely. To elaborate, your title should read like a newspaper heading, and your H1 tag can be more descriptive and detailed. To make them exactly the same means that one of them will not be used to their full optimization potential. The two things should work together. I have always used by H1 tag to expand on my title tag, for example:

Title - Generac 6244 | 20kW Generator | 200a ATS Package

H1 - Generac 6244 Guardian Series 20kW Home Standby Generator with **200a Automatic Transfer Switch **

I would add user generated reviews and comments. Even a product q&a option is helpful. If you can get enough unique content on those pages to outweigh the duplicate content then you shouldn't have any troubles. I would recommend the user generated reviews in this instance over canonical tags because it will prevent the pages from ranking. You are basically telling Google that one of those pages is the authoritative one, which will prevent he others from ranking. The duplicate content is the same way however, unless there is something uniquely valuable on those pages. In this case, customer reviews would solve both problems. There is nothing more valuable to a searcher than hearing what other people have to say about a product.