Finding the exact numbers on this will probably be unlikely without access to their analytics, but you can get a guesstimate by seeing which of their pages are used as site links when you search for their brand in Google. You can also derive some guesses via search rankings by dividing out a percentage of clicks based on ranking from total search volumes.

Still, you're going to be missing a lot of data by not knowing how well they're doing in terms of email marketing, social, referrers, etc.  Companies that try to accomplish this are ones like Compete and Quantcast.  A better way to go about finding popularity by topic though would be to use a tool like Google Trends, Twitter Trending, etc.

As for time on page, why?  You'll be better off focusing all your efforts there on your own site's usability, experience and customer satisfaction.

Hi Joost. The reasoning behind noindexing category and tag pages is because they have a high tendency to show up as duplicate content--as you've just experienced. People like to keep them as part of their site due to user friendliness but often these pages on their own are a reshuffling of content and can be highly repetitive from a search engine perspective. Ideally you keep your top level categories that are unique within the index and noindex the rest.  Feel free to keep links within your site as followed.  Cheers!

Yup. And the title of that page is that it's unusual activity from your network, and Moz isn't your network, so that one is easy to eliminate.  It's likely some other trigger as I and others mention.

Moz just recently pushed their latest update: http://moz.com/products/api/updates which tends to affect these numbers. The important thing is to check how you're comparing to your competition. Often they see fluctuations as well. With the previous update, Rand put out this post regarding fluctuations: http://moz.com/community/q/have-questions-about-the-jan-27th-mozscape-index-update-get-answers-here:

...we crawled a massively more diverse set of root domains than ever before. Whereas our previous index topped out at 192 million root domains, this latest one has 362 million (almost 1.9X as many unique, new domains we haven't crawled before). This means that DA and PA scores may fluctuate more than usual, as link diversity are big parts of those calculations and we've crawled a much larger swath of the deep, dark corners of the web (and non-US/non-.com domains, too). It also means that, for many of the big, more important sites on the web, we are crawling a little less deeply than we have in the past (the index grew by ~31% while the root domains grew by ~88%). Often, those deep pages on large sites do more internal than external linking, so this might not have a big impact, but it could depend on your field/niche and where your links come from.

Cheers!

Hi Ash. I've used Moz for years and this has never happened (due to Moz). The machines they use to check rankings are separate from the machine you're using, so here's what could be going on...

1. You're checking rankings so much in Google, repetitively running the same searches over and over, that Google is limiting your machine's access.
2. You're on a VPN that is shared by others and they're doing similar to #1.
3. You're on an office network that is doing similar to #1 and it's causing the captcha to appear.

As an experiment, launch a fresh browser instance--preferably one you never use, like Opera, or a fresh Firefox install--load up a VPN to change your location to some other country, and then run your search in that country's local version of Google. I doubt you'll see the captcha then.  Cheers!

Here's my take.  Some footer bests aren't necessarily links.

**What is the good, bad and ugly of backlinks in the footer: **

1. Good: Links are like a mini sitemap. Footer is a very useful addition to the page above it. Features heavily used features of the site that benefit the page by being available in the footer as well.  NAP. Anti-Spam. If links are external, they're to parent or partner companies within the same overall company.
2. Bad: Spammy. Tries to link to every page on the site with keyword heavy text. Broken links. Obvious paid links to external sites.
3. **Ugly: **Low utility. Never updated. Service provider links.

In most cases a server move with no other changes to page structure, names, etc. would not impact rankings. Perhaps in very rare cases the IP could be associated with a known spam server, but you can check something like that out at sites like: http://whatismyipaddress.com/blacklist-check.

If the server move enhances your site's speed and responsiveness then go for it. Cheers!

Correct. It's pretty much US focused, per their "how" page:
Q: Do you support listings in all countries?
A: Moz Local currently supports U.S. business listings only.

I don't know if they're planning on expanding though.

If I was only giving 8 hours I'd spend it all on project mapping.  The work a site requires to be effective is way more than 8 hours but you could construct a broad project road map that would lead you consistently in the right direction for a year or more.

With the above context I'd be working on increasing domain authority and auditing site architecture to get the most bang for the buck.  Steve's suggestions are spot on.

Hi Rosalia. Keywords are typically determined at will, meaning, if you want to rank for a the keyword "lizards" you make the best page you can about "lizards". Keywords also can be determined via the search engines, meaning some people arrive to your site in with terms that might surprise you. Ideally you're trying to find a sweet spot where you're getting a decent amount of targeted visits from people that are interested in what your site has to offer.  As a working example, visit Wikipedia. Basically each page of their site relates to a keyword that is the topic of their page.  Make sense?  Cheers!