Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Again as per MoosaHemani and Lynnp, Google's algorthims will often choose a string of characters from within the sites content that is deemed suitable for the page, normally the first descriptive paragraph. This will remain in place until you set up your meta descriptions correctly.
Sometimes you may also find that the Yahoo/Bing network also do the same.
Have you got anyone performing any monitoring on your site?
I think it may be down to the headers which are being passed by the browser when the form is submitted. Could it be that the third party plugin from gravity forms, performs a funny post and redirect when the submission is made. This will then return the visitor as direct as opposed to organic.
I have found this .htaccess solution on Shortstack - it may solve the issue, but you will have to check as I have as yet not had the chance.
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^\xC2\xA0/?$ / [L,R=301]
Or if you have to use mod_alias:
RedirectMatch 301 ^/\xC2\xA0/?$ /
Let me know if it works.
Tim
It is normal for Google to optimise there own serps to deliver the most relevant pages, as such your "what is voltage optimisation" is clearly deemed the more relevant for users searching. From my experience the home page tends to be displayed mainly when surrounding branded search.
Your welcome, good luck with the project 
Hmmmm, I think it could slightly affect the internal linking structure and possible mean the loss of important pages being linked together.
However my main concern would be to regular users from a UX perspective. You are clearly going to be making people work a lot harder to find regular content that is possbly the bread and butter traffic for the site. Rather than changing the menu, would it not be better to implement a "New Item" in the menu structure rather than changing it all. Or have a feature banner.
Hope this helps a little.
As with the previous comments, I would of suggested sticking with Kawasaki.com as it is already a world reknowned brand. However I can see that kawasakirobotics.com is already a live entity.
If you are going to stick with the two domain names, make sure that you point a couple of links back from the brand name to pass a little authority. Then maybe work on getting the robotics brand out there with a bit of a link building campaign to other releveant robotic and manufacturing based websites.
Hope this helps a little.
I think Amelia's comment could hit the nail on the head... and I have to agree after taking a look at your twitter account. It is a tad repetitive. It might be worth hand picking the best and most valuable articles to tweet about rather than everything.
Have you considered performing a survey to see what people would like to hear about?
Personally, I think you are probably correct in the fact that you could be seen to be damaging your social reputation as so many tweets could be considered spammy.
The problem is you will be constantly flooding your followers twitter accounts with simply too many automated tweets, I would seriously recommend slowing it down and tweeting only a few key times a day with relevant content that people will want to retweet, favourite or comment on,
Also and this is only from my stand point, try and interact with people rather than being a blank faced corporate tweeting entity, this will most likely help you to become real and in that case hopefully attract more followers.
EDIT : As such it is not necessarily Hootsuite that is the issue.... Maybe just schedule in the odd tweet a couple of times a day.
I think this has been covered a few times, infact also only a day or so ago.... I would suggest you read Egol's comment in the following Q&A.
I would imagine that the best solution would be to point the sub cat canonically to the parent this making the parent category page the dominant authority page.
I suppose it could be a few factors...
1. Local country specific - are you checking UK or US based searches.
2. Have you got personal search on within google, as this will most definately skew your results.
3. I think the keyword ranking tool runs once a week, when it ran your positions will be stored, however the day after they could be different, but this won't be picked up for another week.
4. Sometimes there is simply a misread signal too so may show as 50 it would seem.
Hope that helps
Possibly not solely for Brand but there is one for organisation which could be interpretted as brand in some instances. Maybe have a look into utilising it. Organisation Schema
First of all nice new site, I love the look and feel....
As far as content goes, is it a fresh approach or have you used the exisiting body content and meta details from your previous site. As for what I can see via MOZ, the majority of the key indicators suggest your site is in an already strong and healthy shape. Personally I can only assume it is a particularly difficult market to be in. Especially in London. have you done some research into the top 10 to see just what they are doing different from yourselves? And have you considered trying to do more local search techniques to see if that helps.
Cheers
Tim
It could possibly be the second update that was apparently rolled out last week (12th I believe) for Payday loans, however there is talk that it may be a change to the Panda 4 update.... check out more on http://www.seroundtable.com/google-payday-loan-update-or-18709.html - but sounds like you have taken a hit.
Sorry, I do not know the answer, but like yourself I am experiencing a very similar situation were a main key term returns our home page and yet a couple of days back it was the specific deeper page being returned, it is switching around quite regularly. Would also like to see if anyone has a response!
Good Question SRWills.
If you have done all you can to request the links are removed - why not try out the disavow tool on those that simply won't budge... just make sure you detailt to google that you have tried every effort to have them removed.
NIcolas could also do some link digging himself... maybe look on www.opensiteexplorer.org and see what linked domains have been generated. Hopefully they willl be of a relevant nature to your site and not paid directory submissions etc.
For the site to bounce up and down the rankings it could be a mix of the recent Google Algorithm updates settling or like Karl mentioned some dodgy tactics for short term gain.
Personally, I would avoid Flash for mobile in particular iOS mobile platforms as they will not display...I don't think!? I would suggest moving to HTML5 Video or animated HTML and JS, you could always still run Animated GiFs. Others may suggest otherwise.
Hello All,
I have a page (http://www.caravanguard.co.uk/touring-caravan-insurance/) we have seen it drop a bit over recent months and now we have been appearing low on page two (Google UK) for the term "Caravan Insurance".
Now I do not expect to rank above some of the big players in our market and the aggregators, but we do feel we have good content and have tried to act as white as we can in terms of SEO, link building and alike, but we are still slipping.
My main issue is this - one minute we have the link appearing in the serps and then the next it drops from the serps altogether. At this point i often resubmit for indexing in webmaster tools and a few minutes later its back.... is this just likley something I am seeing local to me due search becoming more personal (I have toggle hide private results too) or is there a cause to its sudden disappearance and reappearance?
Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
Would it be possible to do a redirect from /section/index.php to just /section/ without causing a completely pointless infinite loop etc....
There has been a sudden leap from a couple of sites employing the same tactic. In fact one site I checked also had a very similar backlink profile (possible a sister brand to the one I mentioned in my first post above) and they too have climbed in recent weeks. I will look forward to any further insight you can provide on the matter
Good luck.
Very true, I had not considered they may have started to disavow some of the really poor links allowing the quality links to once again shine through...
Edit* : If it is not a case of utilising the Disavow tool, I do hope that any impending Google Algorithm update (which may have been in testing of late) comes along and bite them in the proverbial bottom.
Cheers Marie.
Cheers Tom,
Have to agree, I want to keep it on the straight and narrow, helping to maintain a site that should be seen as white to the core.
I do hope that the algorithm will be further cleaned up and that we will soon see our site moving back ahead of those employing dodgy tactics for short term gain.
Thanks Tim
Cheers Andy and Jonathan,
I didn't check to see if they are paid links as yet - but will go have another look for sure.
Andy, I totally agree, despite being as clean as we can be, we do know that many of our competitors can be a little shady when it comes to SEO and we also understand that we cannot really challenge the super huge aggregators for authority, however consider ourselves to one of the best of the rest.
We do try and create great linkable assets, but mainly for peripheral elements associated with us e.g. charity news, product reviews etc I am trying to get more genuine insurance articles on our blog etc - infographics, case studies etc... but finding people that think our content is valuable to both them and their readers is the hardest bit. I think people have certainly become a little numb to direct contact and so the content really has to shine and stand out from the crowd.
Cheers for your help so far.
Howdy fellow Mozzer's,
I have been doing some background seo checking on a competitor in my small "insurance niche" to try and see why they have recently shot up the listings and are now consistently out ranking us.
We have quality content on our site and have always taken an approach of trying to be whiter than white when it comes to developing out SEO plans.
The site in question has recently moved ahead of us (along with some aggregators e.g. confused.com) possibly due to shifting patterns from possible algorithm changes favouring brand or could it be a case that Google has dropped a ball when it comes to checking back links as the competitors site is 99% linked to link farms, link submission sites, directories and lots of other spammy/poor quality sites.
We do not feel they are doing anything from a content stand to justify their sudden propulsion up the ranks. I am reluctant to pursue dodgy tactics to help get out site back in position as I feel it could then contribute and hurt us down the line.
Does anyone know how I can combat against their poor QUANTITY over QUALITY banklink profile that is surely helping them at the minute?
At a bit of a loss so any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers Dave, would you potentially recommend reworking the sites link infrastructure to point to /section/ as opposed to /section/index.php? or would it not likely make much of a differance? Thanks for the prompt response.
I have noticed that Google has started to simply link to /section/ as opposed to /section/index.php and I haven't changed any canonical tags etc.
I have looked at my pages moz authority for the two /section/ = 28/100
/section/index.php = 42/100
How would I go about transferring the authority to /section/ from /section/index.php to hopefully help me in my organic serp positions etc.
Any insight would be great 
Hi Highland.
This was the article in question - http://moz.com/blog/save-your-website-with-redirects
And this was the statement that made me worry as we have numerous dealer redirects doing this kind of action. Unless I am interpreting it wrongly.
_Savvy SEOs have known for a long time that redirecting a huge number of pages to a home page isn’t the best policy, even when using a 301. Recent statements by Google representatives suggest that Google may go a step further and treat bulk redirects to the home page of a website as 404s, or soft 404s at best. _
This means that instead of passing link equity through the 301, Google may simply drop the old URLs from its index without passing any link equity at all.
Cheers - Tim
Hello fello Mozzers,
I have just read a post about 301 redirects on the Blog. A great read and has provided me with a bit more insight and highlights what could be a potential issue for a managed site I look after.
On this website I manage, I have inherited a .htaccess file with literally hundreds of non file based existant 301 links.
e.g. redirect 301 /dealerbrandname http://www.domain.com/
So we have lots of dealers and they place a link on there site to http://www.domain.com/dealerbrandname
We then redirect it to the homepage or a relevant topic page along with some tracking variables. Is this likely causing significant issues, based on the post I read I imagine it will be, but anymore thoughts on this would be hugely helpful.
CheersTim
Could the meta title be being pulled from an external source - causing an override?
I noticed this morning a drop in the SERPs for a couple of my main keywords.
And even though this is a little annoying the more pressing matter is that Google is not displaying the meta title I have specified for the majority of my sites pages, despite one being specified and knowing my site has them in place.
Could this sudden change to not using my specified title be the cause of the drop, and why would they be being displayed by Google in the first place, when they are there to be used.
The title currently being displayed inthe SERPs is not anything that has been specified in the past or from the previous latest crawl etc. Any insight would be appreciated.
Tim
I do agree that not spending too much time is critical, as it can become hugely time consuming and inefficient. But getting rid of a few is also a help.
Being so time consuming was the main reason in my initial post, to see if there were any quicker options available to web masters, e.g. sending google a list of links that you wish for it to disregard due to not being generated by yourself... unlikely I know... :o(
Thanks for the response.
We have been made aware of a series of irrelevant links on some rather dodgy sites.
Absolute rubbish im sure you will agree. These links must surely be causing our link profile some damage.
They are currently wordpress sites with no means of contacting the authors. What ways and means are there of removing these negative pages and links?
Cheers all, any help appreciated.
I have been looking at the organic keyword search position rankings on Google. I think
Thanks for the insight Sven,
I have a had a look over the stats for the main keywords in our analytics and there is certainly a downward trend for our main keywords. I have been keeping track of the Ranking for our main terms via the rankings tool on SEO moz - we dropped as low as 10 from around position 5 since the Penguin update. In the last ranking results we had climbed back up to 8.
According to Google Queries we have had no impressions or clicks for our main terms for the last three days - I am hoping this is due to it needing time to catch up.... otherwise something is very wrong.
Due to the seasonality of our market, as soon as the weather is nice people go out in their motorhomes and caravans, this will also affect traffic to a degree.
NOTE - just looked in webmaster tools - this does only go up to the 27th of May not to the 30th so a couple of days behind.
Hello All,
Just a quick question.
Since the penguin update our site www.caravanguard.co.uk has seen some pretty fluctuating movement in Google, many of our key terms dropped over night, but over the last few weeks they have slowly started to move back up the rankings.
The bizarre thing is despite the recover in rankings our unique traffic has taken a fairly large whack in numbers. Seasonality? Weather? ( it's been nice in the UK for a change)
I can only assume the longer tail terms are taking more time to recover. I have tried to look into our back link profile and have noticed a little too much in terms concise keyword targeting, How do you go about changing these terms and removing the really bad links (struggling to identify the worst cases) on totally irrelevant sites or poor directories.
Put in place before I started here
Any help truly appreciated.
Regards
Tim