Keyword confusion
-
Thanks for taking the time to read through this.
I'm currently optimizing a website and have a few structural questions:
-
How should one view targeting keywords with respect to the home page of any given site? EG -> If the home page has the preferred keywords at the beginning of title and the page follows most if not all the recommendations from SEOMOZ tools, why are sub pages outranking my root domain for the set of keywords I'm after?
-
When sub pages use my homepage keyword as the 2nd keyword in its respective title, does that give the overall homepage more power for the keyword it's after?
EG. Homepage Title "ABC DEF - DEF ABC - XYZ | Company name
I'm targeting "ABC DEF" for the home page
Subpage title -> "DEF ABC - ABC DEF - XYZ | Company Name.
The sub page keyword is "DEF ABC"
-
-
I don't understand why you insist on cramming SEO and Kingston in the title of every single page you make. It isn't necessary. I would suggest stepping back from SEO mode and going into functional mode. Ask yourself what would really make your site the best site for information on SEO and SEO services in Kingston. Build that site. Forget about Google and keywords. Build a variety of pages related to SEO, but not necessarily about SEO. You can break it up with information useful to readers like how to optimize a landing page, what UX converts buyers, etc. And for Pete's sake, don't put SEO and Kingston in EVERY title or on every page. Get as much information as you can and make each page informative and useful. Don't focus on SEO at all - just build the site for people. When you're done with this and you have a functional and informational site that people like to use, you can then go back and edit it for SEO. It looks like you're obsessed with rankings and keywords. This is going to get in the way of your overall goal - ranking for your keywords.
That's the best advice I have for you. Good luck!
-
Very insightful feedback. Thank you for the recommendations.
My thoughts were simply this (square brackets denote keyword target):
Kingston SEO and SEO Kingston don't appear to be the same simply because the Google SERP display very different results. That was the impetus for creating multiple pages with specific keyword targets.
-home [kingston seo]
-services
--kingston seo services [kingston seo services]
--service2 [etc]
-seo kingston packages [seo kingston]
The overlapping characteristics of the keywords however has made this more challenging in the end. I believe you're correct with the restructure. But with so many key terms overlapping each other with keywords, wouldn't I end up in the same place again - having multiple pages effectively jockeying and competing against each other?
-
I can lead you to water, Thomas, but I can't make you drink. You should not be targeting the exact same keywords on your internal page as your home page. With each sub page your keyword set should be more and more precise. 3 links deep should be pages that are very precise and they should be sniping long-tailed keywords from Google SERPs. You don't have to worry about how link juice travels all around the internet to make your site rank well. Don't get yourself confused with all the jargon and details of SEO. Make your site for people first - then Google. If you build a home page about Kingston SEO and then I go to a subpage and its about SEO in Kingston... ?? i'm confused. Plus, Kingston SEO and SEO Kingston are really the same aren't they? I think you should reevaluate your site structure and exactly what you're trying to accomplish.
Obviously, your goal is to rank for Kingston SEO and SEO Kingston. That should be the focus of your home page. A good idea for a sub page is "Why we're the best SEO Company in Kingston". Then build a landing page around that topic and try to get that page to rank for "best seo company kingston", etc.
-
Thanks for taking the time to respond.
The challenge I'm facing is that my key terms are for these two pages are simply reverses of one another. "Kingston SEO" vs "SEO Kingston". My sub page is optimized for SEO Kingston whereas my front page is optimized for Kingston SEO.
In addition to this, I'm still confused about the concept of inner pages feeding keyword juice back to the front page.
Thoughts?
-
You're discovering one of the Google algo changes the hard way, Thomas. The explanation is more than I'm willing to bang out on a keyboard. In short, Google has shifted the value to sub pages for some keywords. It also has to do with the keywords and if Google thinks they're broad match or specific. Broad match USUALLY works best for the home page. But what you consider to be broad match keywords might not be what Google considers to be broad match keywords. Google is telling you that it likes your internal page better. Focus on your internal page to rank. You'll be surprised at the results.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
URL keyword separator best practice
Hello. Wanted to reach out see what the consensus is re-keyword separators So just taken on a new client and all their urls are structured like /buybbqpacks rather than buy-bbq-packs - my understanding is that it comes down to readability, which influences click through, rather than search impact on the keyword. So we usually advise on a hyphen, but the guy's going to have to change ALLOT of pages & setup redirects to change it all wasn't sure if it was worth it? Thanks! Stu
On-Page Optimization | | bloomletsgrow0 -
Keyword stuffing as per the on-page grader
Hi Moz Community, I've recently become a Moz Pro user and I very impressed with the insights that it has to offer. However, I have been using the on-page grader to evaluate this page and it suggests that I am using the keyword "kiln dried logs" too many times and not to use more than 15 times. I have a slight dilemma because my product titles all contain this keyword and I wanted to get somebody's take on where the "15 repetitions" comes from and if it is better for me to strip this keyword out of my product titles to fall within the guidelines? Should I optimize just my main category page for this keyword at the expense of potentially losing traffic for my product pages? Any input would be much appreciated.
On-Page Optimization | | RicharCampbell0 -
Homepage ranking above category page, but no keywords in there! Why?
So...we have a 5 year diary product page at TOAD diaries. It's had a lot of on page treatment: keyword in title, alt text, decent copy, pictures of the product etc. Find it here - http://www.toaddiaries.co.uk/shop/5-year-diary So we rank 22nd for 5 year diary, but google sends the customer to the home page! There no mention of 5 year diaries on there. Seems ridiculous! I can't help but think we should rank better for this as it's a low difficulty term (according to keyword difficulty tool on MOZ). Any thoughts on why this might be? Oh, Google HAS indexed the 5 year diary page. Used a search operator to check that first (thanks to you guys on here:) ) Thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | isaac6630 -
How do you optimize for keyword phrases that don't follow natural speech patters?
For instance, We have a phase "solar panels for home" that sends decent traffic to our site, but I'm sure we could be capturing more if any of our content was optimized better for it. But how do you optimize for a phrase that makes you sound like a robot if you use it verbatim?
On-Page Optimization | | wreevesc0 -
H1 Tags for Articles in Blog Category - confused ;-(
Dear Seomoz community This is my first post here. Until now I was only browsing the Q&A and learned a lot just by reading the existing topics. Since we launched our website with a new design last week I started to heavily use Seomoz to track down missing tags, descriptions and other on page issues. Just out of curiosity I checked the page outline of the Seomoz blog. I was really surprised! Seomoz uses only H1 tags on their blog main page. Each article is wrapped in an H1 plus the blog title. I am a total SEO beginner but until today I was thinking that using several H1 tags on one page is not optimal. We use one H1 tag on our site for the magazine category description (for example http://www.siam2nite.com/magazine ) and then for the articles H2. So my question. Should I change my H2 to H1 for the magazine articles like Seomoz did? Would really appreciate your advise on this Regards, Menelik
On-Page Optimization | | menelik0 -
Keyword optimization of main keyword across site.
My site is optimized for keyword "payment gateway" but it seems for each keyword only one page should be optimized as per good SEO. So if I've a page about Paypal then how should I spread the keywords? Here the main will be Paypal and site keyword will be payment gateway. It means site should have more Paypal than payment gateway. But can payment gateway be in 3rd or 4th position in density? Similarly how should I create other pages? How search engines determine the site authority based on keyword? ( let us ignore the external backlinks, context of them and anchor texts).
On-Page Optimization | | rag_gupta0 -
How important is it to include the target keyword phrase in the page URL?
If I want to target a keyword phrase to a particular phrase, but do not want to change the URL of that page, will that negatively impact my rankings? I am also wondering if I can get around it by creating a new, short URL that 301 redirects to the original URL. Would that be as effective as including the keyword in the original URL?
On-Page Optimization | | susannajbost0 -
Tag clouds: good for internal linking and increase of keyword relevant pages?
As Matt Cutts explained, tag clouds are OK if you're not engaged in keyword stuffing (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYPX_ZmhLqg) - i.e. if you're not putting in 500 tags. I'm currently creating tags for an online-bookseller; just like Amazon this e-commerce-site has potentially a couple of million books. Tag clouds will be added to each book detail page in order to enrich each of these pages with relevant keywords both for search engines and users (get a quick overview over the main topics of the book; navigate the site and find other books associated with each tag). Each of these book-specific tag clouds will hold up to 50 tags max, typically rather in the range of up to 10-20. From an SEO perspective, my question is twofold: 1. Does the site benefit from these tag clouds by improving the internal linking structure? 2. Does the site benefit from creating lots of additional tag-specific-pages (up to 200k different tags) or can these pages become a problem, as they don't contain a lot of rich content as such but rather lists of books associated with each tag? Thanks in advance!
On-Page Optimization | | semantopic0