Article Marketing - manual vs automated or both
-
Hi Mozzers,
Are services such as Article Samurai or Content Crooner worth the time/effort/money?
On one hand, I cannot see them generating high quality links. But , they may be able to help on the quantity side of the link building equation.
Does anyone have any thoughts or experience with automated article submission?
Thanks,
Peter
-
The problem with all of this is that "automation" can lead to just about anything depending on the service you use. It IS possible to get an effective number of anchor text and contextual links with the right set up, especially if you generate your own link network that only you use, but then you have the problem of dupe content. The RIGHT way to do it is far too time consuming to make it worth your while unless you can find a legit link builder/article writer on odesk that will make the time/cost problem go away, but even then they usually don't speak English as a first language and you end up spending a lot of time rewriting the articles because the grammar and syntax is absurd..
Also what does
"Searching for your exact topic in Google, and finding incomplete resources. Ask them for links" mean? I didn't understand what you meant by incomplete resources. Thanks
-
There are blogs out there on how to use code on Google Docs to pretty much automate most of this process.
-
I think this answer is spot-on and voices one of my deeper concerns that has been lurking in my mind: relevancy. Automated submission does not take this factor into account and non-relevant links will hurt in the long term as it is not a natural link profile.
I think the answer to off-load some work is outsourcing which if performed in proper fashion might be the way to go. All of your answers have helped point me in this direction. If I build a list of potential candidates, write the intro email etc...but outsource the actual sending of requests, this can help give me some extra hours during the week.
Thanks everyone.
-
Much better answer to the actual question!
-
I have a client where 95%+ of their backlinks are from low-quality directories, articles, and automated link-exchanges. They built all of these before I came on board. This has caused long-term damage to their backlink profile and the rankings are not better because of the time/money spent. Their quantity of links is high. Quality LOW. Not only am I building high-quality, legit links to the site, but I've been actively trying to remove some of low-quality links they had previously obtained.
I work with another site that is newer, music related. We do NOT have a high "quantity" of links coming in, but they are all extremely natural and relevant with lots of branded anchor text. We have pages with 25 domains linking in and we're outranking other pages (for very competitive terms) that have 10 times that. We've never done any automated link-building of any kind.
So for me personally and the things I've witnessed, it is a complete waste of time and money to be going for low-quality links.
And when I say "low-quality", I don't mean a low Page Authority or a Google PageRank of zero or only a handful of backlinks pointing in. I'm referring to web pages that have...
SPAM!!
- links that are easy to obtain
- links out to sites having anything to do with sofware stuff, web design, computer whatever, directories, loans, ppc, anything with "ads" in it, employment sites, insurance sites, etc etc
- backlinks based on automated services
But I have to say, if you do go this route, make sure you get plenty of branded anchor text, it will help you in the long run.
This is just my opinion. There are lots of people using automated services. Maybe an SEOmoz member can chime in with a recent success story regarding automated article submission?
-
If you use automatic submission you're faced with a problem. Duplicate content. If you want to get around the duplicate content problem then you're faced with another problem, you have to use article spinning. Both of which are not good. Aside from that, the majority of the sites the auto software's submit to won't end up giving you any links and your article will still read with visibile, non-working html code in it, of the ones that do give you a link it will be either nofollow, or pass zero of anything to you because it's spammed to hell with millions of articles for being one of the few article sites that allow follow links.
Now, there might be a few sites that pass juice, but that will be because of quality levels in what they publish. So submitting to them would have to be manual only, as there's no way any auto software would get your article into a site like that.
-
Thanks Ressler! All good advice in terms of manual submission. Regarding the duplicate content issue, I know Article Samurai guarantees this won't be an issue as they do have a spinning component as part of their service.
I'm just considering this as a way of generating quantity links while I work on the quality links using the methods you listed above.
Nothing's easy in this effort but if I can either automate some of this workload or outsource the quantity aspect of link building, I can maximize my efforts with a little bit of scale.
Thanks again
-
Article submission used to be the bees-knees (is that how the phrase is spelled? Anyway...). However, what you will really generate is a whole bucket load of duplicate content on the web. To make matters worse, it's unlikely your articles will get picked up.
A better use of time is:
- writing fantastic copy, citing sources with followed links (welcome back to high school!).
- Emailing people in, or remotely in your industry (Real Estate Agent - property lawyer, house insurance, home inspector, etc.) and suggesting how useful this article might be to their clients.
- Placing article on Digg, Reddit, Twitter, Facebook hoping some news companies see it, and pick it up.
- Looking on Haro (http://www.helpareporter.com/) to see if anyone is writing about your topic, and needs a source.
- Searching for your exact topic in Google, and finding incomplete resources. Ask them for links
- Make friends in some news departments, try get them to link to you (give them a couple stories every once in a while, and they will help you out).
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Handling External links to articles in a blog
I have a blog that has it's own articles but then also want to feature third-party sites that have my op-ed content on them. Wondering what is the best practice for handling external links. The reason we want to do this: Make sure our followers and people who subscribe to our blog see all our content (especially when a third-party "high authority" publisher is featuring articles from our authors We also want to be able to get a ranking for the article title when someone searches for it on Search Engines. i.e I write an article for hubspot called "my article about something". When googling "my article about something" I want to see both the Hubspot listing (where my article originated on) as well as a link to my website where I show an abstract (original abstract) and then the link links to the hubspot article. For example: www.myblog.com/listing (renders a listing of articles with links to each individual article) If showing an "abstract" for the blog article and then linking out to the third-party source (where content is featured) www.myblog.com/category/post-title (renders actual article page) When showing an individual post-title page what are the minimum requirements (META TAGS, length or amount of characters ,etc) Thanks in advance!
Link Building | | dspete0 -
Indirect Link Earning via dofollow Links In News Articles
Hello, MOZ SEO Gurus. I've been trying to think some deep thoughts on safe, effective link earning for news publishing sites, and wanted to run this up the flagpole and see if you salute. Our site is a biotech news service -- we pump out copious amounts of news content each day, which works well for driving traffic. That being said, we also want to rank some optimized landing pages as well. Take, for example, this page, which we'd like to rank for "secondary progressive MS" and related keywords: http://bionews-tx.com/secondary-progressive-ms/ Now, as far as I'm concerned, shopping this page around to MS influencers isn't easy. I can go to Foundational websites, blogs, etc., and say, "hey, we have this info page on SPMS, and I thought that you might find it helpful/want to link to it." But chances are, the MS influencers already have their own proprietary content on SPMS, and there isn't much value to linking to it. Therefore, I think that we'll get few link earning conversions on the effort. However, what if I take our Secondary Progressive MS landing page, and I link to it in a corresponding article about SPMS research, as I did here: http://bionews-tx.com/news/2014/01/30/secondary-progressive-ms-natalizumab-clinical-trial/ Then, I go to the drug developer who is at the center of this story and say to them, "hey, we recently covered your drug in the news, and I thought you might want to link to it." Then, we get a link from an MS drug developer to the news article, which in turn has a prominent anchor text, dofollow internal link to the landing page for SPMS. If the link from the drug developer is dofollow, then we flow page rank juice from the drug developer page to our news page to our landing page. To me, it's much easier to earn safe links this way than to try and shop the landing page itself. That being said, if we get a dofollow link on the news piece, we only get a diminished portion of page rank going to the landing page. Is this strategy viable? Is the indirect flow of page rank from a linking site to a news article to a landing page even worth it? I'd love to hear your thoughts. Thanks!
Link Building | | bionewstx2 -
Content Marketing: What to say when calling prospects
Hello, We have a useful article on a topic that there isn't much information on in our niche. Some of these organizations which we're outreaching to have general phone contact numbers. Would it be a good idea to call them? If so, can you give me some pointers as what to say? Thanks
Link Building | | BobGW0 -
Generic Anchor Vs Branded Anchor?
Hi, I have always been very careful when building links, making sure that I use lots of variations relevant to my site in the anchor text, so keep the ratio diluted. However, in recent weeks I have stumbled on some SEO's focussing wholly around branded anchor terms for future link building, I feel that a branded focussed link profile looks more natural. I'm interested to know what the rest of Moz community think about this? Thanks
Link Building | | dt18070 -
Pros and Cons of Links in Articles
My question pertains to articles that I'll be submitting to certain article directory sites. What are the pros and cons (If any exists) of adding links to the body of an article for certain keywords vs. just adding a link to the website at the bottom (i.e. visit us at www.somewebsite.com) ?
Link Building | | qlkasdjfw0 -
I want to know that which is better option for link building through article submission.
which option is better for Link building through Article Submission and why? 1. submitting one article at 100 websites. OR 2. submitting 20 articles at 20 different websites.
Link Building | | pawankatak0 -
Natural vs UnNatural Links: How to Understand It?
Today, I was reading one help article on Google webmaster tools help regarding Google friendly sites. I found that, Natural links can give us more benefits compare to Unnatural links. So, I have search on Google regarding Natural vs Unnatural links and come to know about great video. But, I am still confuse with exact understanding. I am trying to create external links on different websites. So, is it natural or not? How can I justify value of external website before creating link over there.
Link Building | | CommercePundit0 -
Impact of Internal VS Inbound Links
Internal linking channels juice being accumulated through inbound links and the two work as a team. I am interested to hear from those who have either tested or have a fairly good gut feeling about the impact of internal links on rankings (as an additional signal). Also in your opinion how does internal linking compare to external links pointing to the same page (e.g. impact of benefit/ranking gained through internal linking + inbound links as opposed to scenario where there is no relevant internal links at all). Conditions: Relevant anchor text used (or close contextual variation) Measuring impact on a single phrase (or relevant phrase variation) Internal links can be from unlimited pages on the same site (even site-wide) External inbound links can be only to the target page (disregarding inbound links to other pages). Disregarding layout based navigation as internal links and focusing on content based links only (contextual, editorial links). For example: Internal link ranking impact: 10% External link ranking impact: 90% Since this is a simplified model feel free to provide necessary clarifications below your estimate. Looking forward to your answers!
Link Building | | Dan-Petrovic1