Can fun, slightly unprofessional text be good for conversion rates?
-
I operate on a freemium model. The three plans are currently called "Free", "Gold" and "Platinum". Besides being incredibly square and boring, these titles are also meaningless.
I'm doing a slight redesign of my site, and the new (unreleased) site has a very fun, playful feel. I'm also trying to make everything more streamlined and obvious. I'm considering renaming the three plans "Boring Amateur", "Kick-Ass Amateur" and "Bona Fide Professional" on the registration page and simply "Boring", "Kick-Ass" and "Professional" elsewhere. There are lots of places on the site where I have to refer to "amateurs" vs "professionals" - these tags would make that easier to explain. Easier = more sales.
What do you think about using unprofessional text like this? Is it too risky, possibly offending too many people and losing sales? Or is it a good eye-catcher?
I know the best answer is "test it." But this is one of those changes that I don't want to have to put my users through too many times.
Thanks for any thoughts!
-
Here's my two cents. I run two web sites offering the same service, one in the UK and one in Italy. One of the qualities most people remember me by from what I heard (and what I've been told) is my sense of humour.
Last year I decided to incorporate this in my two sites and the results could NOT have been more contradictory. The UK market seemed to respond better to my naming the services and membership statuses in a humorous manner than their italian counterparts. I actually lost two Italian clients because they took offence to having their membership status as 'Principianti' which in essence means newbies.
I want to add that there was no rudeness in the humour employed by either site, I simply did away with any formality.
Result: Perhaps some A/B testing would have been clever in hindsight but ultimately what I lost with this experiment I more than made up for in clients with a sense of humour!
-
Good point on keeping it industry-related.
"High School", "College", and "Pro" would be the obvious, safe choice.
I'm going for something closer to "Little Leaguer", "College Superstar", "Professional". I just have to figure out how to say it in a compact, memorable way.
-
If it is a sports related site then there are tons of different terms you can bring to bear on the matter! Sounds fun.
-
Maybe name it "Toe in Water", "River " and "Niagra Falls"
or
Mild Sauce, Medium Sauce and Hot Sauce (with flames)
Boring seems a little too risky..for the little guys getting their foot in the water. I am not sure but SEOmoz has me hooked to sign up however they did it. lol I start my paid subscription tomorrow and even though I now I am not a "PRO" it makes me feel good that I am moving in the right direction. So you have to look at the pre-sale and the post-sale. After a person buys something you don't want them having buyers remorse and feel "Boring". Again just thoughts but maybe your campaign would attract a different audience with more cash.
-
I would make it fun but keep them related to your sports industry.
-
Yes, I usually take on every project with a different criteria. Depending how important this project is for you, it's probably better you play it safe. Let's take SEOMOZ for instance, which has different names for user levels and they sound professional and fun at the same time. I would tighten it up in this way by balancing between professional and fun.
-
Haha. While that might work, I'm also thinking of making the change for ease-of-use purposes. The new names, with "amateur" and "professional" already built into the names, saves me from having to include a lot of unnecessary text elsewhere on the site.
-
Free-user conversion is really important for us because the data provided by the free users is what powers the paid memberships. Without free users we have nothing to sell.
It's hard to explain in text how I want the word "boring" to be construed. And that's my fear.
-
Looking at your site, I think you could get away with a lot.
I would be tempted to do something like:
"Girly Man Plan", then "Real Man Plan", then "Manly Man Plan" or whatever.
You would of course alienate the women, but I am guessing there are not too many there in your line of business.
Good Luck.
-
I totally agree and that' why I clearly stated that it may decrease the conversions :). I was just suggesting what I would do. I guess I'm a little bit more of a risk taker
-
Smashing Magazine has a good article on price plans (granted its not about price plan names) but I thought it might be of benefit to you.
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/10/13/pricing-tables-showcase-examples-and-best-practices/
-
Good points. The audience is mainly 18-35 year old males. That being said, there are also a fair number of 45-55 year olds.
I suppose there is a lot of wiggle room between "Gold" and "Kick-Ass". Maybe I'll try to tone it down slightly while still being playful.
-
With things like this, you can't let you personal persona dictate what you do. What you want and what your target audience want could be two separate things entirely. This is why I said you need to take your target audience into account.
-
You need to know what to say and how to say it when using coloquioal (unprofessional) text on a website.
I agree with stubby MailChimp does it very well but I think their branding has helped them get away with it. They use a chimp, and as we all know chimps can be mischievous animals so maybe this visual cue gives them a bit more flexibility with the wording on their website.
They are still a professional company and they do supplement the humour and 'banter' (for use of a better word) with page upon page of useful and professional information. If used sparingly and used well you can get away with it and I think it can benefit conversion rates.
In terms of the plan names you might want to think of your target audience before using words like, "kick ass" but food for thought. If you website is targeting young adults then I'd say Kick Ass is acceptable, if you're targeting the middle-aged / elderly then I'd suggest avoiding it.
-
The whole point of a freemium model is to get lots of free users to eventually convert into buying members. Although, I totally like the new names for your plans, it may decrease the conversions due to the fact some people are big babies and may get offended if you call them boring. Personally, I would go for it because I like to be bold and take the risk.
-
I tend to like it. MailChimp does it very well (mostly after you sign up). SeoMoz does it a some, but not as well as Mailchimp.
I might cringe at "boring", but in general I would say it engages people just a hair so they know you are real.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Overlay / modal for product pages - bad or good for SEO?
Hi all, I am considering using full overlays/modals for an e-commerce site for all our product pages (category/listing pages will be "normal", the product page will come over the listing page as an overlay/modal when you click on the product). Those “product overlays” will also be accessible directly with own URL (if need to be linked to for ex.). All the literature I find out there treats overlays and modals as “marketing” ones (ads, sign-ups, etc.) and is generally critical to overlays when it comes to SEO, while also saying that an overlay that has to do with good UX should not hurt the SEO of our site. What do you think? Will all product pages as overlays be considered as good UX by the search engines and therefore not be negatively impacted, SEO speaking? Or should we stay clear of overlays and create “normal” product pages? Thanks in advance! Arnaud NB: The reason we want to create those overlays are for design and UX purposes, and try to increase our conversion rate.
Conversion Rate Optimization | | Arnaud_Fo0 -
Facebook Connect login preventing traffic source conversion data. Any solutions?
We're buying traffic to the website via Adwords, and when they hit the website and go to sign up for an application (enter into our conversion funnel), the session concludes as a bounced session, a new session starts and that session now has a referral from Facebook rather than the original referring source. This means we can't monitor adwords conversions properly (or any other traffic source conversions) this seems to be quite a common problem with Facebook/Google account logins, in the case of Google, people block account.google.com but we can't afford to block Facebook outright as we're wanting to see other Facebook referrals. Has anyone come across this problem? Any suggestions of how to fix this?
Conversion Rate Optimization | | Startupfactory0 -
How can I find the redirect that removes special parameter from Adwords?
My main problem is Google Analytics doesn't show data from Google Adwords because a redirect in my site removes the special parameter(gclid) supplied by Adwords. Here's an email from one of Google Adwords representative: "When I reviewed your website, I found that a redirect set up on your site is removing auto-tagging information from your URLs. Auto-tagging automatically adds a parameter to the end of each of your AdWords destination URLs in order to identify visitors as AdWords referrals. The tag captures keyword, campaign, ad content information, and your ad's position when a user clicked it. The parameter used in auto-tagging is called "gclid." However, due to your website's redirect, the "gclid" parameter is being removed from the URL. As a result, Google Analytics is unable to properly track visitors reaching your site through AdWords. We suggest contacting your webmaster to append the "gclid" parameter to the redirected URL. If this isn't possible, you may want to consider removing the use of the redirect." Thanks in advance!
Conversion Rate Optimization | | esiow20130 -
Google Product Ads - Improving our Cost Per Conversion?
Hi all, We have been running Google Product Ads (paid for) ever since it began in the UK. We are still struggling to get to grips with the best way to make it worthwhile for us. Our data for the last 14 days:
Conversion Rate Optimization | | complete_outdoors
Clicks: 1827
Impressions: 65789
CTR: 2.78%
Average CPC: £0.22
Cost Per Conversion: £15.13 We've added some auto targets for our most popular brands, with a higher CPC than "all products". We've also added negative keywords so we only come up with relevant searches. Basically, what we'd like to know is: how we can best set-up our product ads to reduce our Cost Per Conversion (I guess everyone would like to do that!), as it is barely worth us using it currently. If you require any further data to help answer my question, please ask. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks.0 -
What happens when i import analytics conversions into adwords if I already have conversions set up?
Hey everyone, I have a question. We already have conversion tracking set up for our landing pages, however Adwords has the option to import goals from anaytics, one of which is for the landing pages. What will happen if I do? Will it erase all the conversion data I already have? Will it mess things up? Or am I not understanding this correctly... Any help would be appreciated 🙂
Conversion Rate Optimization | | jhinchcliffe0 -
Can trackingcodes in your url be seen as duplicate content or break other rules?
I recently gave ReachLocal control to manage my Adwords campagne. I didnt want "Reverse Proxy" on so I decided to go with the Remote Conversion Tracking. So they track my website in every stap of the way. Therefor I had to place a Javascript on each page. But what worries me are these kind of URL's I see appearing in my Analytics account: /webpaginaname.html?scid+29903&cid=12343&tc+13012316371028544&rl_key=32850e0a2d4499e02a711d0b969044d2&kw+8307565&pub_cr_id=16701148613&dynamic_proxy=1&primary_serv=www.website.com&rl_track_landing_pages=1 Could this be seen as duplicate content by Google? Or could it break any other rule you know of? Should I be worried? Thanks a lot!
Conversion Rate Optimization | | wellnesswooz0 -
Improving Bounce rate, Time on Site & Pageviews per visit
Based on what seems like a general agreement that the Panda update has modified Google's algorithm and on page metrics such as Bounce rate, Time on Site & Page views per visit are now vital to a websites rankings. What methods are you using to improve these metrics? Have they worked?
Conversion Rate Optimization | | donthe0 -
Ideal product page conversion/retention rate for eCommerce sites
Hi SEOmoz-ers, I was wondering if anyone has data regarding product page abandonment rate (% of potential customers that leave the site after seeing product pages) for websites like Overstock, REI or Zappos? As you may know the above mentioned sites do an exceptional job with product pages. It would be helpful to know what some of the leaders in this space are achieving in terms of conversion rate. What is your personal opinion about this? Thanks,
Conversion Rate Optimization | | Kush_VMI
Kush0