I have been Hit with UNWANTED Links and I need to know how to remove them?
-
I have been looking at Google Webmasters Tools and saw that suddenly I have this huge amount of links form an unknown source “SiteLoki” never heard of it? Didn’t want it! Need to get rid of it!
My Website www.getyourphotosoncanvas.com experienced a sudden and dramatic loss of presence on Google about three weeks ago. I first thought it was something to do with the new Google Algorithm.I also contacted Google to be re-evaluated. They replied:
Reconsideration request for http://www.getyourphotosoncanvas.com/: No manual spam actions foundMay 10, 2012 Dear site owner or webmaster of http://www.getyourphotosoncanvas.com/,
We received a request from a site owner to reconsider http://www.getyourphotosoncanvas.com/ for compliance with Google's Webmaster Guidelines. - - - - - -
We reviewed your site and found no manual actions by the webspam team that might affect your site's ranking in Google. There's no need to file a reconsideration request for your site, because any ranking issues you may be experiencing are not related to a manual action taken by the webspam team.
Google Search Quality TeamI have ran all kinds of web crawl tests, Google webmaster, talked with SEO “Experts” and still can not figure out what is happening. I decided to use a couple of SEOmoz tools to try to help me explain what is happening. I figured that if I could take a very specific and unique KeyPhrase and run it on a specific page that I might be able to better explain what is happening. Basically, We appear to be no longer searchable by key words or phrases on google?
There was another post regarding canonical tag issues; resolved, I removed all canonical tags for now.Today I discovered the links and I suspect that having even
1 link for this website will penalize you in Google.Here are some Webmaster Tools pages for reference:
I also noted that the image for the link is from an old site hosted on www.Globat.com. I don't know what that significance might be. I left them in January.
Thanks in advance for any help and advice you can offer,
Ray
Webmaster-Tools-Query_Your-Photo-On-Canvas.jpg Webmaster-Tools-Query_Photo-On-Canvas.jpg Webmaster-Tools-Query_Photos-On-Canvas.jpg Webmaster-Tools-Links_siteloki.jpg Webmaster-Tools-Links_siteloki_links.jpg
-
Yeah, unfortunately somebody bought paid links, which was probably were you were getting most of your traffic from for awhile, until it stopped working.
To be honest, attracta doesn't seem like the type of company to do that, but you never know.
I'd like to say that by removing those links your rankings will automatically recover, but that may not be the case. At best, it may lead to partial recovery. In cases like these, some webmasters are even walking away from their URLs entirely and starting over with the same site at another address.
Regardless, the only way to really remove the links is to write each of the webmasters in question, and ask for removal. Sometimes this has to be repeated over and over again and even then you only see about a 20% success rate.
Over time, some of these links will disappear by themselves.
Really, the best thing you can do now is start building new links. In many ways you're starting from the beginning, since your previous success was built on something that wouldn't last.
(that said, if you do have major errors in your SEOmoz PRO campaign, I highly advise you to fix them)
-
Thank you for your reply. To my knowledge I have not paid
for any links. I did sign up with www.attracta.com
and even asked the question regarding paid
links and was assured that they only submitted our sitemap and provided our
business information including hours of operation to search engines and other
sites like yelp, yellow pages, attracta’s directory and that sort of thing. They said they do not use paid links. Now I’m
not sure?After several posts on several forums you have given the
most useful and logical reply. Now what I need is some help or guidance on a
recovery. How do I remove these unwanted links. I thought that the first step
was to set up an account with SEOmoz to analyze the problem and then hopefully
get help on resolving the issue. It is hard to see any light at the end of the
tunnel at this point. We are a small business that depends on the website for
30-40% of our sales. This is life or death to us!So any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks again for your reply,
-
Hi Ray,
First of all, I'm sorry to hear about your huge drop in traffic. it totally sucks. There's a lot of that going around these days, but it doesn't make you feel any better when it happens to you.
First things first, I wouldn't be too worried about the links from SiteLoki. It looks like an auto-generated site that probably links to millions of URLs, and Google is pretty good about discounting these types of links. It's not uncommon for most link profiles to contain something similar.
Here's the problem... paid link networks. A few weeks ago Google started deindexing link networks by the dozens, the most high profile being BMR. (http://searchengineland.com/google-eliminates-another-link-network-116513)
I pulled up your site's link profile on OSE and picked a number of URLs at random. Here's what I found:
- Link 1 - Not Paid, Indexed - http://www.examiner.com/article/retirement-means-time-to-think-futuristic-for-local-art-photographer
- Link 2 - Looks Paid - http://coolartdude.com/how-to-get-your-photo-on-canvas/
- Link 3 - Looks Paid - Also hidden text - http://goldcardreview.info/421712603coolche.php
- Link 4 - Looks Paid - http://waterproofcameraworld.com/blog/2011/03/31/photos-printed-on-canvas-a-unique-gift/
- Link 5 - Looks Paid - http://www.giftsandgadgetsnews.com/keep-fresh-and-live-pictures-with-canvas-prints-from-digital-photos/
So out of 5 random links, 4 of them look spammy and paid, and often have very similar or repeating anchor text. My best guess as to what happened to you is that several weeks ago, Google discounted much of your backlink profile that was based on these links.
What can you do? First of all, if you are still paying for links, stop now. It might help to try and clean up/remove as many bad links as you can. Read Dr. Pete's post on Penguin.
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/penguins-pandas-and-panic-at-the-zoo
In the end, you probably need to take a different approach with your link building, and begin to build good, white hat links over time.
Regardless, I hope this helps. Best of luck with your SEO!
-
Also and I suspect related are the 406 Permanent 301 redirects that showed up on a crawl analysis on SEOmoz.
See Below:
-
Thanks for the reply ...
The first think that I did was to look at links using SEOmoz and I didn't and still don't see the links from "Siteloki" Then i read this blog from SEOmoz
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/10-minute-missing-page-audit
Then I look deeper in Webmasters Tools and found the 6,000 plus links from "siteloki"
All of these links refer to the website as it was prior to a rebuild that launched in mid January. This is also what is accounting (I think for all of the 404 errors).
I am beginning to think that this was a Hack Job!
-
Hi Ray,
This doesn't sound good..
I'm not that familiar with sitemap.xml protocols but have you checked in webmaster tools that understands your sitemap correctly? Also there might be some info in crawl dates and crawl errors in your webmaster tools.
I can't imagine you've been banned from google because of just one link.
Greets,
Sven Witteveen
Expand Online
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Rel Sponsored on Internal Links
Hi all. Should you use rel sponsored on internal links? Here is the scenario: a company accepts money from one of their partners to place a prominent link on their home page. That link goes to an internal page on the company's website that contains information about that partner's service. If this was an external link that the partner was paying for, then you would obviously use rel="sponsored" but since this is a link that goes from awebsite.com to awebsite.com/some-page/, it seems odd to qualify that link in this way. Does this change if the link contains a "sponsored" label in the text (not in the rel qualifier)? Does this change if this link looks more like an ad (i.e. a banner image) vs. regular text (i.e. a link in a paragraph)? Thanks for any and all guidance or examples you can share!
Technical SEO | | Matthew_Edgar0 -
Webmaster internal links issue
Hi All, In webmaster > Internal links https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/internal-links?hl=en&siteUrl= I get counts as in the image http://imgur.com/9bO5H0f is this logical and ok or should i work on finding why so many links and reduce them? Thanks Martin
Technical SEO | | mtthompsons0 -
If I get a natural link for a great site and I have my keyword with anchor text in this link, how should I proceed?
If I get a natural link for a great site and I have my keyword with anchor text in this link, how should I proceed? I need to contact the site and ask to remove the link or request the removal of the anchor text and leave only the site URL? Or yet do not I need to worry about this issue?
Technical SEO | | soulmktpro0 -
What i should do about bad links ?
Hi, my blog is http://www.dota2club.com/ and i have many bad links to my blog what i should do about that and how ? i started 10 days ago guest blogging but my bad links from before are hurting my blog. please help 🙂 thank you !!!
Technical SEO | | wolfinjo0 -
Forum Profile Links
Are they really important? Many preach they are, and there are tonnes of services out there who give you thousands of forum profile links in no time. I strictly believe in genuine links built the hard way, and definitely don't want to get into anything which is black hat. Please suggest if building several Forum Profile Links is an appropriate way of building links?
Technical SEO | | KS__2 -
Broken LInks Tool?
Hi I am trying to find broken links on my site, Is there a tool for this? Free or Paid tool is fine thanks.
Technical SEO | | daracreative0 -
Track outbound links
I would like to track outbound links at http://bit.ly/yYHmbf 1. Shall i add the following code before at the above page What does 100 means in above code ? 2. Then use this for each outgoing link ``` [onClick="recordOutboundLink(this, 'Outbound Links', 'example.com');return false;">](http://www.example.com) ``` [](http://www.example.com) ```[``` http://www.example.com is the outbound link Am i right on both counts ? where should i look for report in GA ? ```](http://www.example.com)
Technical SEO | | seoug_20050 -
Which version of pages should I build links to?
I'm working on the site www.qualityauditor.co.uk which is built in Moonfruit. Moonfruit renders pages in Flash. Not ideal, I know, but it also automatically produces an HTML version of every page for those without Flash, Javascript and search engines. This HTML version is fairly well optimised for search engines, but sits on different URLs. For example, the page you're likely to see if browsing the site is at http://www.qualityauditor.co.uk/#/iso-9001-lead-auditor-course/4528742734 However, if you turn Javascript off you can see the HTML version of the page here <cite>http://www.qualityauditor.co.uk/page/4528742734</cite> Mostly, it's the last version of the URL which appears in the Google search results for a relevant query. But not always. Plus, in Google Webmaster Tools fetching as Googlebot only shows page content for the first version of the URL. For the second version it returns HTTP status code and a 302 redirect to the first version. I have two questions, really: Will these two versions of the page cause my duplicate content issues? I suspect not as the first version renders only in Flash. But will Google think the 302 redirect for people is cloaking? Which version of the URL should I be pointing new links to (bearing in mind the 302 redirect which doesn't pass link juice). The URL's which I see in my browser and which Google likes the look at when I 'fetch as Googlebot'. Or those Google shows in the search results? Thanks folks, much appreciated! Eamon
Technical SEO | | driftnetmedia0