Rel=author markup in head tag
-
Between Google's confusing instruction on implementing rel=author and the volumes of blog posts, I'm sufficiently confused.
We have a bunch of writers on our site that we'd like to expose in search and connect with their content. I'd like their bylines to link to their author page rather than to their Google+ profile. So, I'm thinking this is what I need to do:
1. Have writers create a Google+ profile linking to their bio page on our site in the "contributor" section of their Google+ profle
2. Add the link rel=author tag to the of their author bio page like this
3. Link their bylines on each story to their author page like this
Is this right? I'm working with an inflexible CMS so I have to go through IT, which means I have to get this right the first time.
Any feedback/ corrections/ improvements are much appreciated.
-
As far as my understanding goes, you have most of it right, except on #2, the link should have rel=me instead of rel=author
but you are right, it is all very confusing
-
I used to try and to the whole author tag thing in the head section and it never worked. The only thing I have gotten to work is the ?rel=author at the end of a G+ profile link. Here's an idea. Why not include the author's name at the top of the news article and link it to their profile page.
Then at the end of the article have a by line about the author and link their name there to the G+ profile? Or vice versa?
-
Thanks, Daniel.
We are a news site that work very quickly in publishing content. So, we have to automate as much as possible. As I mentioned we have a rather rigid CMS and strong feelings about linking our author's bylines to their bio on our domain.
So, I'm not sure if having two links from the actual article will be super streamlined. So, knowing that there's a desire to link the author byline to their bio on our domain, am I going about it the right way or do I need to tweak my process?
Or is there a way to add the link href in the head tag as well as have the visible byline go to their on domain bio.
I know I'm making it more confusing than it needs to be.
-
There is a much easier way to do this now. Simply link the authors name to https://plus.google.com/1000000000000000000?rel=author and Google picks it up. Then they add your domain to their Contributor section of their G+ profile.
If you want their name to link to their profile page on your domain that is fine. Just use their name twice, one with a link to profile page, one with a G+ link. Or you can link their name to G+ and add a link in the bio like "click here to read more articles by john doe" or something like that.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Domain authority vs indexed pages
Hello, There are many articles and from our personal experience we can say that you can rank a page without backlinks with high DA but we cant figure out if DA of domain help to rank as the link juice ( so the link juice going from home page thru all pages to specific page) or it will rank a page even if its not linked in any way from homepage or any other pages and even if it not linked in any way from other pages and still ranks just because of high DA, does that DA value will spread even above all indexed pages if you have lets say 100,000 pages, i mean if domain has 100 indexed pages and DA of 50 and another domain has 100,000 and DA of 100, if both pages are the same on those domains and have no backlinks to it from my understanding page on domain with 100 indexed pages and DA of 50 suppose to rank higher ? Please share what you think
Branding | | maxdelop0 -
Is there Schema Markup for "brand name"?
Hi Mozzers, I've been trying desperately for months to get my domain to rank #1 for its brand name in Google. This is made hard by the fact that the brand name is also a combination of two keywords, one of them being "Hire". I've actioned everything I can think of, setting up and maintaining social networks (including g+), adding the site to lots of high quality business directories, internal and external linking. I even asked right here. The site continuously rises in the ranks until it hits top of page 2 and then starts falling again. When searching [Brand name] +[Town of HQ] we get the open graph info displayed, and the g+ pin, but still only rank 3rd! My Question: Is there a schema.org markup for brand names? and would it make any difference adding this? I feel like I'm clutching at straws now... Oh were in the UK if that helps. I'd also be happy to share the domain via PM if anyone is willing to help!
Branding | | Silkstream0 -
Need the proper schematic markup for a business CEO, founder and founding date
I'm trying to apply schematic markup to our client's website to help influence the knowledge graph. Can anybody give me the exact schematic markup for business CEO, founder and founding date? I've visited schema.org and know the markup exists...but I want to make sure I'm applying them properly. Thanks!
Branding | | VanguardCommunications0 -
Using Schema.org Organization Markup for Logos
Google is currently showing an old version of our company logo (sourced from a different website) in the righthand-side knowledge graph box on SERPs. I would like to try and get our current version of the logo there instead, ideally linking back to our official site. I've been looking into Schema.org's organization markup as a way to specify our preferred logo to Google. However, our obstacle is that we don't have a version of our logo image sourced directly on our homepage; it's part of a global navigation CSS stylesheet. Two questions: Is it okay to upload a new, high-res version of our logo image file to the server and apply the markup code to that version of the logo instead? This might mean that it's a non-visible element, since the new image file wouldn't technically be part of the page layout. Alternatively, should we try applying the markup via meta tags, as outlined in this article:
Branding | | Critical_Mass
http://clarknikdelpowell.com/blog/google-schema-support-for-logos-and-what-that-means-for-css/ Any advice would be appreciated! Thanks!0 -
Press Releases benefit from having an author
We just started doing some Press Releases and want to maximize the benefits of them to our full potential. Would it be beneficial for our PR to have an author? We know Google likes real people and was wondering if attaching the author to the PR will provide more strength to that particular author?
Branding | | WebRiverGroup0 -
Can i link my rel=publisher to a number of relevant microsites ?
We have linked our Google plus company profile to our main website and setup a rel=publisher authorship which appears and works fine in the SERPS as we regularly create Google plus posts about our industry and products. We also gain some good traffic through some of our smaller product specific micro sites so i wanted to setup our publisher markup for these also as some of our posts are relevant to these products. I setup the rel=publisher on one of these , but the Google snippet testing tool says that the rel publisher is unverified. Is this Google's way of saying i cannot use the same Google plus company profile across multiple sites My question is: Does Google not allow you to display the same Google plus rel publisher profile for multiple websites ? or is the there a problem with how i am marking up my micro sites ? has anybody tried this ?
Branding | | Antony_Towle0 -
Building Site Authority vs. Link Building
Hi,
Branding | | rayvensoft
I just watched the recent Whiteboard Friday, and I have one question. He talks a lot about "Building Site Authority". Is that just Link Building, or is it something else? If it is Link Building, does that mean that exchanging (3 way, or non-reciprocal) links with other "relevant" and good sites still works, as long as you use your brand name and/or url in the anchor text? Or did I misunderstand. Is "Building Site Authority" something entirely different from Link Building? Sorry if it is a basic question, I just want to make sure I understand the difference if there is one. Thanks in advance!0 -
New Social Media Site + META Tags for User Profiles
I'm currently in the process of building a social media site and was deciding whether or not to add META descriptions/keywords for individual user profiles. After reviewing Facebook, I noticed that in the META Description field, user profile pages just inherited the values for Facebook (there were no META keywords); and, when I reviewed LinkedIn, there was no META description/keywords at all. After this investigation, I figured it might be a question best addressed to the SEO community. With that, what do you guys think? If you were building a social media site, would you have META description + META keywords for each user's profile? If so, what would be the best way to optimize the individual profiles so they rank highly within the search engines?
Branding | | NiallSmith0