Google plus authorship is driving me truly mad!
-
Ok permision to vent first
Aaaaahhhhhh!!!!! Fu@king Google authorship, for fuc@s sake why so fuc@ing useless....Ok vent over....
Mission: I wanted to add Google+ authorship images to appear in the serps so I followed this guide to the letter:
https://plus.google.com/authorshipI then tested it my authorship link on page http://www.netconstruct.co.uk/services/digital-marketing/ work via the testing tool http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets
And i get a thumbs down(arggg!!) no authorship data recognised but here's the mark up:
Author: [xxxxxxx](https://plus.google.com/u/0/114149997094688010790/?<br /> rel=author) onpafe http://www.netconstruct.co.uk/services/digital-marketing/So please can someone give me any insight into why this is not working
Grazie,
David!!IGNORE!! Spotted a gap in the authorship code afre the the question mark! Now it recognisies authorship mark up!
-
Hey Chris, thnk you for that bit of advice that is something I'll foolow here on in
-
The only caveat to your approach, Gregory, is that people who do this usually put that code in the head of their template - which means it will appear on all pages of the site. Google is very clear that authorship should only be applied to individual "article"-type pages. E.g pages clearly and identifiably written by a particular author. So NOT things like category pages, product listings, services pages etc.
Something to be very careful of when using the authorship code in headers. I strongly suspect that incorrect use like this is one of the many reasons why sites that have implemented it this way may not be seeing it take effect in the SERPS.
Paul
P.S. Obviously not a problems for Publisher implementation as that does apply sitewide.
-
If I publish and page and then later add authorship, it can take a long time before Google adds the author image to the SERP. However, if I publish a page with the author markup and then Google indexes the page, the author image is included in the SERP when the page appears in the SERP. So, the lesson I have learned going forward is to make sure the author markup is correct for all newly published pages, because if you get it wrong or add it later after publishing the page, it can take many weeks for Google to use it.
Best,
Christopher -
Hi David. Or it can be done more simply (If you have G+ pages for both your self and you business) by just putting these two lines in the head of your page
where publisher is your G+ biz page.
-
Glad you fixed it, also agree it's a bit poo. Set up publisher and author on some sites and Google has yet to think its worthy for SERPs.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Star rating in Google snippet
I have implemented a star rating from jetpack on my website. But google stubbornly refuses to display stars in the snippet. 2 months have already passed. Maybe I did something wrong? I must say that I did not cheat artificially. https://exoticfonts.com/discord-fonts-generator/
On-Page Optimization | | WayneM.0 -
Do Google's mobile friendly updates effect visibility on desktop results pages?
Google say that their quest to make websites more mobile friendly impacts mobile search results - https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2016/03/continuing-to-make-web-more-mobile.html But I am wondering if having a website that is less mobile friendly effects desktop SERPs as well? We require Adobe Flash as a tool for people to upload their images to us but not on the landing pages we're trying to rank. So our landing pages are not as mobile friendly as they could be (which we're looking to improve) but am worried this is effecting desktop search results even though Google do not claim they do.
On-Page Optimization | | KerryK1 -
Google search: 'define:____'
See: http://screencast.com/t/oFSzIt5rRm Thrilled that Google is pulling our content over wikipedia (in this instance). Wondering how we can assure more success like this. Mike Corso
On-Page Optimization | | Mike_c
Gartner.com1 -
On Brand Queries Google does not shows my home page first instead of it shows internal pages.
Also on my brand query it doesn't shows sitelinks. What may be the reason?
On-Page Optimization | | vivekrathore0 -
Blocking Subdomain from Google Crawl and Index
Hey everybody, how is it going? I have a simple question, that i need answered. I have a main domain, lets call it domain.com. Recently our company will launch a series of promotions for which we will use cname subdomains, i.e try.domain.com, or buy.domain.com. They will serve a commercial objective, nothing more. What is the best way to block such domains from being indexed in Google, also from counting as a subdomain from the domain.com. Robots.txt, No-follow, etc? Hope to hear from you, Best Regards,
On-Page Optimization | | JesusD3 -
Google rel hell
So apologies in advance for this question, but: Can someone explain whether as a site we should be using the "rel author" tag or the "rel publisher" tag? 1. We don't really need to distinguish between the people who write our content. 2. We definitely do need to establish ownership of our content, as unfortunately it has been widely copied. We are spending quite a bit of time filing DMCA notices. 3. Do we need to apply either tag to every page? Or does "del publisher" just need to be applied to the homepage to cover the rest of the site? 4. What looks better in the search results? - a person's face or a company logo? If prefer a face, but understand we need to promote our brand. Thanks P
On-Page Optimization | | dexm100 -
Does 'XXX' in Domain get filtered by Google
I have a friend that has xxx in there domain and they are a religious based sex/porn addiction company but they don't show up for the queries that they are optimized against. They have a 12+ year old domain, all good health signs in quality links and press from trusted companies. Google sends them adult traffic, mostly 'trolls' and not the users they are looking for. Has anyone experienced domain word filtering and have a work around or solution? I posted in the Google Webmaster help forums and that community seems a little 'high on their horses' and are trying to hard to be cool. I am not too religious and don't necessarily support the views of the website but just trying to help a friend of a friend with a topic that I have never encountered. here is the url: xxxchurch.com Thanks, Brian
On-Page Optimization | | Add3.com0 -
SEOmoz Says 530 - Google Webmaster Tools Says 16
A SEOmoz crawl report on 1/20/2013 says we have 530 duplicate page titles most of which are pages like this these two: http://www.audiobooksonline.com/reviews/review.php/details/38 http://www.audiobooksonline.com/reviews/review.php/details/104 These pages are the result of allowing visitors to post their opinions and ratings about specific audio books. Google Webmaster Tools reports we have 16 duplicate page titles none of which are a review page. Why is SEOmoz reporting duplicate page titles? Should SEOmoz be reporting these pages as having duplicate page titles? Why isn't Google Webmaster Tools reporting the review pages as having duplicate titles?
On-Page Optimization | | lbohen0