Why are these sites outranking me?
-
I've been hit by every update and have spent thousands of $ and hundreds of hours trying to survive. Survival looks doubtful if I can't get turned around in 4 weeks or less. I have found adwords and google errors and fixed them. Alexa says us-nano.com is the best ranked site. I used my moz bar and they are doing everything wrong, keyword stuffing, no H1's tags, poor design. How are they ranking & I'm not? My duplicate meta tags are from this week when I added alexa and bing ID's to my header to verify my site ownership.
-
Thanks Chris. I did report the bounce rate question and someone else indicated the spammy links. I will start there. I think it might be related to my javascript not working right which gives a poor customer experience? After thinking about it, i did use the meta descriptions extensively throughout the site. I have about 125 product pages and 14 product category pages which i spent a lot of time doing the seo on. for instance, if a customer searches for graphene-nanoplatelets my landing page is https://www.cheaptubes.com/product-category/graphene-nanoplatelets/ which I think is highly optimized and not too spammy and we are the 4th organic result. I have neglected some of the non product oriented pages and shouldn't have. I definitely will revisit SEO but right now code issues and spammy links are my #1 suspects. I finally fixed a lot of the script issues but now the site takes 4 seconds to load which is a deal breaker for mobile and that is 30% of my traffic. I'm trying to find someone I can hire to fix it but last time i did that it led to this situation.
-
No problem, happy to help
This is a common scenario we come across where you've got some rankings and don't really want to change anything through fear of losing them but the truth is, as you've already pointed out, there's no use ranking for terms if the vast majority of your users are going to bounce anyway.
You also run the risk of getting hit by the next Panda increment. It's true that you may see a temporary dip in rankings by making these changes but over the next 6 months, the net result should be well and truly worth it. Don't forget that a real SEO campaign is about conversions, not your rankings.
As for the questions about your bounce rate, I'd say this will be a combination of spam referrers "visiting" your site for 0s (100% bounce rate from these spammers, depending on how they go about it) and the awkward keyword stuffing putting people off the site immediately.
Users are steadily becoming more savvy with this stuff and while they may not understand SEO, they do understand that keyword stuffing = untrustworthy. Obviously I'm not a standard user but the second I see it on a site I leave and regular users are starting to head that way too.
Regarding your meta descriptions, it's true that Google doesn't look at them _however, _you can't ignore the users! It's your second opportunity to sell searchers on why they should click your link in the SERPs over the other ~9.
I've always used W3C without issue for HTML/CSS validation, though I'm not a dev so there could be better out there. It may be that there are deeper issues with the template you're currently using and fixing one symptom on the surface is altering something more detrimental. Unfortunately I'm of little help to you in this area.
-
ok, thanks Christy - now that it appears I might have a handle on the errors and my bounce rate is back above 80% i think i will ask it to the moz community
-
Hi there! I meant this followup question: "I seem to have a high bounce rate but am an online store. Any thoughts on how to reduce it?"
-
ps- there has been some wonky code causing redirects. bing says i still have to many redirects and i'm trying to figure out how to fix that
-
Thanks Chris - You've given me something to follow up on. I do rank well for many keywords, like graphene nanoplatelets, i am the 3rd organic hit and am on the 1st page of google for the keywords I'm trying to rank for which makes me reticent to reduce any overused keywords. I added a WYSIWYG editor to the woocommerce product category pages so they will be the ranking pages. Rankings is the whole reason I spent thousands of $ paying someone to redo my site, but they messed it up so much that I had to spend hundred hours fixing it. I had to take it over to recoup my rankings after the algo updates. If my rankings are good now it seems like it might not be an SEO issue but why the high bounce rate? In January I had 95% bounce rate one day, almost 100% of my visitors bounced? Since then I've been aggressively trying to fix it.
I think the work I've been doing has helped. Last week my bounce rate fell to 18% for 1 day with 700 people per day visiting the site but now its back up to 80% and down to 225 visitors but the site had issues all weekend which i think i've mostly resolved. I've spent the last 4 days trying to fix the theme, it seems to have issues. I might have to retheme it but thought it was better working with a known theme trying to fix it rather than trying to retheme over the weekend. I didn't bother with meta descriptions because the search engines don't check them. us-nano has keywords stuffed their metas, i would think they would be penalized for that. I think you are right about alexa. if you know of any good code validators please let me know. I've been using W3C but the code they provide from html tidy mostly worked but caused other errors.
if you have any other suggestions please let me know. i might be missing something? how do i reduce bounce rate?
-
I think the first mistake here is judging the success of a site by Alex rank. IMO, this stat means absolutely nothing since "traffic" can come from anywhere.
We have great rankings including #1 for our toughest term in this state yet if we look at Alexa, we're heavily outranked by Indian SEO firms and dodgy directories.
If you've been hurt by multiple updates over the years, this suggests there are a lot of problems with your site that need to be fixed. Trying to turn this around in 4 weeks is highly improbable, particularly if you have been penalised in the past.
Assuming it's cheaptubes.com, there are quite a few issues I can see immediately:
- Page titles - e.g. the page title on the home page is currently Welcome | Cheap tubes | Cheap Tubes
- Meta descriptions - e.g. Home page meta description is Cheap Tubes Inc Home page
- Fairly thin content - Most pages seem to have ~400ish words and quite a few pages seem to over-use keywords or "Cheap Tubes" - e.g. the Products page starts with Cheap Tubes Inc Online Shop -> Welcome to Cheap Tubes Inc Online Shop!
- I've only had a quick glance at your backlink profile but this seems rather questionable as well. There are a lot of .ru, .tk and .jp links in there. These may be relevant but unlikely
I'd expect that fixing up these elements would see some decent improvements for you reasonably quickly, though seeing real traffic improvements in 4 weeks is still highly unlikely.
Helpful Resources Page Titles
-
Thanks Chris - i've been in WP hell since posting that. I fixed an error but crashed part of the site, no mobil nav and other theme issues. I've been working all weekend trying to get back to where i was thursday. the folks who made my theme weren't on their game i guess. They resent me an updated version of my theme but when i try to validate it at W3C it validates at 2%. The theme as I've edited validates 10-11% so it didn't make sense for me to go backwards and lose several months SEO work and validate worse when I'm trying to clear the errors. I've been validating code and uploading it, checking the site, then the next. I broke the site several times but have it back. I will check the plugin. Right now I'm trying to figure out why I have 151 404 errors according to screaming frog, they look like this. https://www.cheaptubes.com/
I'm also trying to figure out how to fix the theme files i couldn't get to validate or the ones that did validate and still crashed my site....ugh
-
Assuming your site is cheaptubes.com, run it through Googe's Page Speed Insights and look at the scores.
Looks like you could help those low scores quite a bit just by optimizing the images. PSI even provides those optimized resources for you. Google says site speed is a ranking signal although it may not be a significant one. Still it seems pretty easy to fix the "low hanging fruit" and just clean this up. If you want to do more as to JS and CSS files, have a look at the Wordpress plugin "Autoptimize". I have had good luck with it and it is well supported by the author.
Best!
-
Thanks Christy - i did ask one question - how are they out ranking me?
-
the java errors may be resolved. I found out the folks who made my theme don;t know how to call for java
That is something someone hardcoded into your theme.
./cheaptubes/footer-home.php:
./cheaptubes/header.php:
./cheaptubes/layout.php: <script<br>src="js/vendor/modernizr.js">
./cheaptubes/layout.php:Those three files all show you something that is basically the wrong way
to include javascript.A QUICK fix is this:
Edit the files footer-home.php and layout.php
In all cases where you have this:</script<br>
-
Hi there, and welcome to the Moz Forum!
This is a great question, and deserves its own thread, actually. Would you mind starting a new thread with this question? (Asking one question per thread makes it easier for folks with questions similar to yours to find it when searching the forum. It also keeps the forum nice and tidy, and gives your question the best chance of being thoroughly answered.)
Thanks so much for your cooperation.
Christy
-
Bounce rate is normally a signal that the user is quite unhappy for some reason.
You could always look to do a little heat-mapping to see how people are using your pages, where they are clicking or try some live user testing to see what people don't like about the site.
-Andy
-
Send me a PM with your site details and I will run a few checks for you and see if I can see anything glaring.
It will also help if I know when you noticed the drops as this will help rule out / target any penalties.
-Andy
-
i seem to have a high bounce rate but am an online store. Any thoughts on how to reduce it?
-
Thanks Andy
We've been around longer than us-nano but not nanoamor. Us-nano links appear spammy. when I looked in alexa there was a lot of red for spam links. We all have about the same internal linking. I am far out ranking them in organic search now. None of this makes sense. I am fighting for survival now and so far nothing I've done has brought customer inquiries back up. My rankings dropped in Nov but I launched the new site in Sept. I did find problems in adwords where I didn't update links but those are fixed weeks ago. I fixed the 404 errors.
Looking at all 3 sites I think ours looks better than us-nano. maybe we're tied with nanoamor. All Us-nano did was combine keywords into page titles like carbon-nanotubes-graphene, We've put all like products in the same category where they belong. my company is 11 years old. I should be able to get my traffic back. I used to kick both of their butts rankings wise.
They both have a ton of text links on their home pages, we have images and text links. I think it looks much better for page design and for a better user experience. Isn't that what the updates that hit me were supposed to be targeting?
-
Hi,
There are so many possible reasons why they are ranking above you. Google doesn't look at the use of H1's and on-page basics like this, as a strong signal but will look at your content in depth.
I always ask everyone to look at their site first. Take a step back and ask yourself if it is answering the questions people are searching for. If you look at your site and your competitors side by side, apart from the basics, do you think they deserve to be there?
You might find they have a lot of strong links or are doing well with their internal linking or perhaps they have been around longer and have more trust in Google's eyes?
Without actually knowing your site it is a little awkward to give you any real critique that might help.
-Andy
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Need help Taking my Site to the Next Level
Any, and I mean ANY suggestions would be Great and Welcome, Good and Bad. Have a Good site, with what I believe good content, and just stuck at the same level for over 6 months. Please and Thank you for taking a few minute of time out of your day on this. Joe https://www.surecretedesign.com/
Reporting & Analytics | | surecreteproucts0 -
Why would on-site search queries show up as referral traffic?
The site analytics have been set up for over a year and suddenly last month there was a huge spike in referral traffic (1100+ sessions). Upon further investigation, the majority of it was coming directly from internally, either as mysite.com or search.mysite.com and the landing pages from the referrals are all /search.html?query=* This was never an issue before so I'm trying to understand what could have changed. I'm following up with the client to find out if their dev team may have changed anything related to their search engine but I'm wondering if there may be another explanation. A few notes: previously mysite.com / search.mysite.com were not in the Referral Exclusion list. I've added them now but this was never an issue before. Thanks in advance!
Reporting & Analytics | | SEMnMs0 -
Site account in Google Analytics
Hello I have a question about my site account. On 2014, during a week, my ID tracking of Google Analytics was removed of the site, in this period the volume of users and sessions is lower than the other weeks. But I don't understand why are the sessions and users still reporting during this period without ID Tracking
Reporting & Analytics | | Arkix0 -
How can I redirect incoming links from an old version of my site ending in .ctlg and .ivnu?
My original site was published in 2001 using "version 2" software from Ivenue, the hosting company that I signed up with at that time. The site's structure was built in such a way that the primary category pages ended in the extension .ivnu. Product or item pages on the shopping cart side ended in the extension .ctlg. My site's name was and is [Lamplight Feather, Inc.](<a class="webkit-html-attribute-value webkit-html-external-link" href="http://www.tonyhill.net/" target="_blank">http://www.tonyhill.net/</a>). We built our business between 2001 and 2011 and by the last three years (2009 - 2011) of using their version two were averaging a million dollars per year in gross sales. We decided to "upgrade" to Ivenue's "version 3" in 2011 to take advantage of some more modern options and because their newer software created web pages ending in .html which we thought more desirable. We made the switch in late 2011. But it was a disaster. Traffic and sales dropped precipitously. For the past two years (2012-2013) our annual gross sales average dropped to $400,000. (Two other factors were involved beside losing the many incoming links and link juice we had built up over the years: Panda came in that fall and my little niche market (decorative feathers) was flooded with competitors.) However as I try to rebuild our traffic and business little by little, I am stumped as to how to redirect the many incoming links that went to our first site's .ivnu and .ctlg pages. I have constructed redirects for some of our current but changed .html pages like this and put them in the file cabinet and they work: For (example): http://www.tonyhill.net/feathers_c384589.html then But trying the same thing for (example) http://www.tonyhill.net/craftfeathers.ivnu still returns a 404. Is there something I am missing. Ivenue is useless in this matter by the way. Their "technicians" are no help. I plan to be migrating my site once again to a new hosting company and hope to solve this problem before then. Thanks for the attention, Tony Hill This is an example from Google Webmaster of the type of links that show up as 404's that I would like to redirect: | URL: | http://www.tonyhill.net/productCat96521.ctlg | | | Error details | Linked from | | <colgroup><col></colgroup>
Reporting & Analytics | | featherman
| http://www.tonyhill.net/productCat43986.ctlg |
| http://forum.muppetcentral.com/showthread.php?t=21416&page=2 |
| http://www.cosplay.com/showthread.php?p=3832751 |
| http://forum.muppetcentral.com/showthread.php?t=21416&page=2&highlight=fur |
| http://www.muppetcentral.com/forum/threads/puppeteers-resources-links.19330/page-2 |
| http://www.muppetcentral.com/forum/threads/how-do-you-like-my-puppets.18549/page-2 | | | | |0 -
Does a Manual Penalty Affect Other Sites in Same GA Account
Hello Mozzers, I was a bit foolish a couple of years back when first getting into the game, and employed a dodgy agency to do some SEO for me on some sites. Fast forward to this year, and the two sites in my Google Analytics account have been hit with a manual penalty. I decided to ditch the websites and move on, so removed them from my GA account, webmaster tools etc and will simply let them die a death. My question is, do you think this would affect how easy it would be to rank other websites within my GA account? Does anybody have any views on this? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | Marc-FIMA0 -
Why did I loose all my product page rankings (e-commerce site)
This friday I noticed that I'd lost pretty much all my product pages in the SERP and also their rankings for the product names. These are products I both have introduced to the market (sweden) and also some that I've been the only one selling. I've analyzed a couple of different ranking-faults. Examples: **"super mario väggdekaler" should rank **http://www.roligaprylar.se/Super-Mario-Vaeggdekaler.html as #1 and has done for several years. Instead this search in my internal search engine ranks #10-#15 with no relevance. www.roligaprylar.se/?q=mario%20v%E4g "jedi morgonrock" should rank www.roligaprylar.se/Jedi-Morgonrock.html as #1 or #2 but instead this url ranks as #12 www.roligaprylar.se/product_detail.php?pid=Jedi-Morgonrock "Charlie sheen bobblehead" (in the swedish serp this should be the most simple term to rank on. previously #1) my internal search engine ranks for #8 with this url <cite>www.roligaprylar.se/?q=Charlie%20Sheen%20Bobblehead</cite>J So I've drawn these conclusions and actions Products that don't rank well longer but still ranks with their alternative non-rewritten url has gotten deep links from affilliates (i track affilliate ids and stuff via this link) and have replaced the original url which is rewritten. Action: Canonical urls for these non-rewritten products to the rewritten version. For example on this product page www.roligaprylar.se/product_detail.php?pid=Jedi-Morgonrock I've placed a canonical for this url www.roligaprylar.se/Jedi-morgonrock.html With the products not ranking at all or when searches in my search engine shows up I suspect some kind of dup content punishment where Google thinks the search result is more important than the product page. Action: All search-pages are now noindex,follow I also increased product name density in terms of keywords on the product page. But I'm still owned and losing tons of money during the holidays (buying adwords at obscene amounts instead hehe). So just wanted to hear with you guys. Are my conclusions and actions correct? What have I missed, what more could I do to reverse this? Thanks Dan
Reporting & Analytics | | nuttinalle0 -
.com version and .org version of site
So i just discovered that a site I now managae has a .com version - as well as the .org version that is the one everyone knows about! I'm guessing this is not a good thing... So the whole site eg www.abc.org/example has a mirror page www.abc.com/example.... What should I do about this? Is it really bad to have 2 versions out there? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | inhouseninja0 -
No Internal Followed Links on My Site?
I just ran the Site Explorer on my site (myeyedr.com) and it reported that there are no internal links on www.myeyedr.com or myeyedr.com. However, there were 20 internal followed links on www.myeyedr.com/index.aspx. I'm guessing this is hurting my SEO. Any suggestions?
Reporting & Analytics | | lance-1744490