How do the powerful links of an old domain help my new domain?
-
I recently purchased a domain with over twenty years age, a few .gov links and A LOT of .edu links. Of course, the domain is relevant to my site's content. I'm hosting the domain on my shared server and have setup 301 redirects for each page that had external links pointing to it via the htaccess file within the domain's root directory.
These 301 redirects, of course, point to my new domain, which is on a dedicated server. Specifically, they point to a directory on my new domain.
I've also verified the purchased domain and my new domain on Google Search Console/Webmaster Tools. Finally, I've completed a google site change request for the old site to point to my new site.
My questions:
-
Should I also list my old domain on the dedicated server over the shared server or does it matter?
-
Will the backlinks of the old site show up in my new site's links via Google's search console, Open Site Explorer, etc.?
-
Will the backlinks of the old site improve the authority of my domain? Also, keep in mind that I have the 301 redirects pointing to a directory on my new site, not the root page of the new domain.
-
Will the backlinks of the old site help my new domain's authority?
-
In the eyes of Moz I've read, NO. I understand it's just a MOZ metric but from what I understand it also correlates with Google's actual 'authority' metric/method of giving value to a particular domain over another based on the backlinks.
-
How exactly do the backlinks of the old domain benefit my new domain and is there a way to measure this/see the relationship?
Thank you for any help you're willing to give!
-
-
I've had similar questions, thanks for the great info everyone!
-
Sorry, Chris...not sure where i got that from
Nails
-
Hi Matt,
Thanks for the info. Just to clarify, I didn't say anything about a subdomain as I know that would be a bad decision.
Chris
-
Chris,
You already received great info from Chris. Let me address the one point that he wasn't sure about:
- Will the backlinks of the old site show up in my new site's links via Google's search console, Open Site Explorer, etc.?
The answer is no. All that will show is your 301 from the old domain and any new links you get.
Also, you mentioned using a subdomain and i wanted to remind you that subdomains are bad for SEO: https://moz.com/blog/subdomains-vs-subfolders-rel-canonical-vs-301-how-to-structure-links-optimally-for-seo-whiteboard-friday
Nails
-
Chris, first... GREAT NAME! Second, THANK YOU for such a detailed response! It really does help me out! In response to your question: I've pointed all the 301 redirects to a specific directory/page on my site because it's only that directory/page that is relevant to the specific traffic coming in from those links. If they showed up on the home page the bounce rate may shoot up too high. I, of course, want to make sure the homepage showcases the info/tools on this 'landing page' but it's not the only tool/info I offer on the site. Of course, the other info/tools on the site are at least related to the 'landing page' content... but more like cousins than brother/sister relation.
-
Hi Christopher,
Thankfully this sort of scenario is pretty straight forward these days. I've answered each question below but let me know if you have any other questions.
Should I also list my old domain on the dedicated server over the shared server or does it matter? It won't make a difference. Google does look at some sever-related info (IP/subnet, location etc) but whether you're on a shared or dedicated server won't alter your rankings.
Even if both sites share the same IP/subnet, it's really not an issue unless you've purchased a volume of domains to do this with.
Will the backlinks of the old site show up in my new site's links via Google's search console, Open Site Explorer, etc.?
You know what? I've actually never thought about this. I doubt they will but either way, it doesn't really matter. You don't lose any strength via 301 redirects these days so whether Google shows them in GSC or not, you're getting that strength.
Will the backlinks of the old site improve the authority of my domain? Also, keep in mind that I have the 301 redirects pointing to a directory on my new site, not the root page of the new domain.
Theoretically yes, though this is another situation I've never tried or seen tested. Is there a particular reason you haven't pointed them to a specific page on the site?
Will the backlinks of the old site help my new domain's authority?
Sure will. As I touched on above, a 301 redirect now passes 100% of that strength (PageRank). While PR is no longer visible to us, Google continues to use it internally and that metric is mostly what we're talking about here.
Cyrus covered the whole topic very nicely last year, it's worth having a read.
Whether or not Moz's metrics will demonstrate this I'm not too sure but ultimately, Google/Bing are the ones we're interested in when it comes to acheiving rankings/traffic.
How exactly do the backlinks of the old domain benefit my new domain and is there a way to measure this/see the relationship?
Also something I touched on above. The theory here is that Google is still using PageRank internally and 301s pass 100% of PR. Assuming this is all accurate (we can't possibly know for sure), then 100% of the PR from the old site will be getting pushed through to your new one.
An important point that Cyrus raised in the post above is that PR isn't everything when it comes to links. If the old site was still receiving traffic, keep an eye on how that redirected traffic is engaging. While the link strength is nice, you want to capitalise on the traffic as well.
-
Hi, sorry, I'm still unclear what specifically you mean based on my original questions. It seems that you're saying that google won't give much value from the old links. That doesn't seem right.
The new content is 100% relevant so no worries there.
-
Those things still work - in some extent. Google however will drop some/most of the links but some do stick. if you can diversify the target it will help even more.
If there is no relevancy though (between the links, old domain and the new domain/pages) - you won't feel anything.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Impact on backlinking with https://www.domain or https://domain
Hi, this questions have bugging me for a long time now; we check our website how is indexed on Google and we see that we have most of the backlinks for URL https://www.speedhub.eu , but 15% are linked to https://speedhub.eu , in the past we had our website for http requests redirected via 301 htaccess to https://speedhub.eu without giving it importance, now we have it with www included. Bottom line questions: Is it important if your links are with www or without www, do you lose "link juice" by splitting your backlinks via links with www or without www ? Does Google make a difference for domain positioning via this criteria ? Best regards,
Link Building | | SPEEDHUB_eu0 -
Value of Links? What is each link worth?
Morning Everyone, I just had this thought and wondered what everyone's opinions were in terms of link value in monetary terms. We'll assume for the purposes of this that the links come from contextually relevant sites and that the sites in question have got the Moz DA from being high quality and have a good quality incoming link profile. Its a bit of a theoretical question, but i guess imagine if the only way you could get links was to pay for them, what would they be worth to you. This is link value for SEO purposes, they will have in addition value from traffic from good sites, that no doubt varies wildly depending on topic. I assume everyone also agrees on: The first link from a domain is the most valuable High DA sites are worth more than low ones. So could anyone who has an opinion on the link value suggest a monetary value for links. Its really just using a monetary amount to see how best to target my time. Here is my example of what might be expected, but I am hoping people with more knowledge will perhaps correct it. DA Rating First Link 2nd-5th Link 5th-10th Link 10Plus Links 5 $5 $2 $1 $0 15 $7 $3 $2 $1 25 $25 $10 $5 $2 35 $45 $20 $7 $3 45 $65 $30 $11 $4 55 $95 $45 $19 $5 65 $200 $100 $45 $6 75 $350 $120 $65 $9 85 $700 $240 $95 $15 95 $1100 $450 $200 $30
Link Building | | wellandpower1 -
Page links, header links, footer links
HI I have been hearing about links, you should keep to 100 Just look at this url http://www.powerwale.com/store/acdelco-sealed-vrla-iacdv5l--b-5ah-bike-battery/77031 and go for Recommend section, where you same product applies to different vehicles 1. im confused, should keep it or not?
Link Building | | Rahim119
2. Header links are less, Footer links are less, and in the future, we are planning to add more, will this affect SEO more than 100
i see many ecommerce sites, has menu showing many categories, more 100 categories links
3. Wht about link equity? If I have more links in header and footer page(all this will follow in the rest of pages).
4. More links in the header and footer shows that you are big ecommerce site.. Pls suggest, which is right way and go gain SEO value1 -
Starting a new site's link campaign... how to approach it?
Over the last few years I have been building content in my niche that I believe rivals some of the best content out there and deserves some attention. Although I have a plan to produce alot more content which I believe will take the quality and quantity of my content into a position among the top 5 or top 10 sites in my niche in the next 1-2 years, I decided that making that massive investment in content production irrespective of a consistent marketing plan is a recipe for failure because I need the positive feedback loop from site visitors to begin now, not in 2 years. Right now I'm in a position where I'm producing content that I think is better than alot of what's out there, and it's just not ranking the way I believe it should. I think I need to do a legitimate link building campaign to establish the website a little more firmly and put it on more level ground with some of its competitors. In Majestic SEO's "fresh index", most of my site's immediate competition have no more than 500 new domains in their links, though the biggest one has some 2,000. How can any link building effort I might take on possibly compare to links of this scale? Is there some "rule of thumb" for how many quality links I should aim for to get on square ground with some of the competitors on the lowest rungs? And if I try to build that many links at once, do I risk sending signals of untrustworthiness? (Assume I'm not going to be looking for any shoddy links, and in general will aim to follow Google guidelines.)
Link Building | | guitarsites0 -
Thoughts on creating a resource/recommend links page in order to attain links?
Hey guys, Just wondering, how does Google view reciprocal link building nowadays? I've heard in the past that it's something that Google isn't particularly keen on. However, more recently, I've also read that - as long as the links are decent (and in moderation) - link exchanging is by no means a bad thing. The reason I ask is that I'm thinking of creating a "resource/recommended links page" for a client of mine. Because of their industry, it's really apparent that attaining links is often only possible if there is the opportunity of a reciprocal link in return. Therefore, I'd need to have a resource/recommend links page of my own. Is this something I should go ahead with to make it much easier to attain links? Or should I try to avoid reciprocal links and attempt to pinpoint one-way linking opportunities - even if they're thin on the ground? Any help much as appreciated as always. Cheers.
Link Building | | Webrevolve0 -
Why aren't links to my site from YouTube showing up in my link reports?
Our company is paying for a service to create hundreds of videos/month for us with links back to our primary domain. If I go to YouTube I see the videos with the links, but YouTube does not show in my link reports. Why not?
Link Building | | jtroia0 -
Are old links worth more juice?
In the last week and a half at a couple of shows in London, and including today on SEOmoz Q&A, I've heard polarised opinions on this topic, so thought I'd throw it out there to see what other people think, and what evidence/experience people have with this. Basically - some people are saying older links are worth less than new links, and others are saying old link are worth don't devalue and are possibly worth more. I have to admit, I don't have a strong opinion on this, as it is really hard to judge on live projects, and I think it is a case by case thing. Any thoughts?
Link Building | | Tom-Anthony0