On page vs Off page vs Technical SEO: Priority, easy to handle, easy to measure.
-
Hi community,
I am just trying to figure out which can be priority in on page, off page and technical SEO. Which one you prefer to go first? Which one is easy to handle? Which one is easy to measure? Your opinions and suggestions please. Expecting more realistic answers rather than usual check list.
Thanks
-
difference between On page and off page SEO
On page SEO is done within a website like improving meta tags and Title , optimizing headline and content, keyword optimization in order to get increase ranking in SERP pageOff page SEO refers to measures outside of our website to gain authority and influence ranking .
In off page we do submission in order to create backlinking that influence our website ranking , submission like
Social bookmarking
Article submission
image and video submission
we do submission on website who has high DA, PA and low SS.number one prioirty is ON page SEO before you do anything you should have proper website and optimized
-
Page, off-page, and technical SEO are three essential components of search engine optimization (SEO), each with its own set of priorities, ease of handling, and methods of measurement. Let's break down each of these aspects:
PMP Exam Prep
Priority:On-Page SEO: This should be a top priority. On-page SEO involves optimizing individual web pages for search engines. This includes optimizing content, meta tags, headings, and ensuring a user-friendly experience. It's important because it directly affects the quality and relevance of your content to users and search engines.
Off-Page SEO: This comes next in priority. Off-page SEO focuses on building the authority and reputation of your website through link building, social signals, and online mentions. While it's crucial, it often depends on having solid on-page SEO first.
Technical SEO: This should also be a high priority. Technical SEO deals with the technical aspects of your website, such as site speed, mobile-friendliness, and crawlability. If your website isn't technically sound, it can hinder both on-page and off-page SEO efforts.
Ease of Handling:
project manager jobs
On-Page SEO: This is relatively easier to handle because it's within your control. You can update content, meta tags, and make your website user-friendly with manageable effort.
Off-Page SEO: It can be more challenging because it often involves building relationships and earning backlinks from authoritative sources, which can take time and effort.
Technical SEO: This can be complex and might require technical expertise. Handling technical issues like site speed optimization and ensuring proper indexing can be challenging, but it's crucial for overall SEO success.
Ease of Measurement:On-Page SEO: It's relatively easy to measure the impact of on-page SEO. You can track keyword rankings, organic traffic, and user engagement metrics (e.g., bounce rate, time on site) to gauge its effectiveness.
Off-Page SEO: Measuring off-page SEO can be a bit more indirect. You can monitor backlink growth, referral traffic, and online mentions to assess its impact on your website's authority and visibility.
Technical SEO: Measuring technical SEO requires tools like Google Search Console and website auditing tools. You can track metrics like crawl errors, site speed, and mobile-friendliness to evaluate its effectiveness.
In summary, the priority of SEO components should start with on-page SEO, followed by technical SEO, and then off-page SEO. On-page SEO is the easiest to handle and measure, while technical SEO can be more complex but is essential for the overall health of your website. Off-page SEO is crucial for building authority but can be more challenging to manage and measure due to its indirect nature. To have a successful SEO strategy, it's important to strike a balance and address all three components effectively. study abroad -
The order of priority between on-page, off-page, and technical SEO can depend on the current state of your website. However, it's commonly recommended to start with technical SEO before focusing on on-page and off-page SEO.
Technical SEO: This refers to the process of optimizing your website for the crawling and indexing phase and involves aspects that improve your site's readability and understanding by search engines. It includes measures like ensuring your website has an SSL certificate for security, improving site loading speed, creating a sitemap, and making your website mobile-friendly. Without proper technical SEO, search engines may have difficulty accessing, crawling, and indexing your site's content, which could make all other SEO efforts less effective.
On-Page SEO: Once technical SEO issues are addressed, you can focus on on-page SEO, which refers to content and HTML source code optimizations. It includes aspects like keyword optimization, meta descriptions, header tags, image alt text, and URL structure. On-page SEO is all about providing high-quality content and optimizing that content around specific keywords. It's crucial for ensuring that search engines understand your content and can therefore rank it appropriately.
Off-Page SEO: After your site is technically sound and your content is optimized, off-page SEO helps improve your site's reputation and authority. Off-page SEO includes actions taken outside of your own website to impact your rankings within search engine results pages (SERPs). The most commonly known off-page SEO tactic is backlink building, but it also includes techniques like social media marketing, guest blogging, and brand mentions.
In terms of ease of handling and measurement:
Technical SEO, while it can be complex depending on the issues, is relatively straightforward to measure because you're dealing with concrete factors such as site speed, mobile-friendliness, etc. Tools like Google's PageSpeed Insights, Mobile-Friendly Test, or a full-fledged site crawl can give you clear indications of what's working and what's not.
On-Page SEO is also fairly easy to manage and measure. You have direct control over your content, and you can use tools like Google Analytics and Google Search Console to see how your content performs in terms of traffic, click-through rate, impressions, and rankings.
Off-Page SEO can be the most challenging to handle and measure because it often involves factors beyond your direct control, such as gaining backlinks from other websites. However, tools like Moz's Link Explorer, SEMRush, or Ahrefs can help you track your backlink profile and overall domain authority.
-
@Lynn12 Hi,
What points should we cover in On page and technical SEO? -
A- On page optimization- It includes optimizing different segments of a website. This directly affects the search engine rankings. Hence, it is also known as on-site SEO. It has to maintain the relevancy of websites to improve its ranking. They include keyword optimization, title tag optimization, meta tag, internal link optimization, image optimization, etc.
Off page optimization- Off page SEO depends on another pages to increase your site’s ranking. It involves third party help to increase online visibility. It helps in obtaining fresh links. Link building increases the traffic to your website and help in ranking high. The process includes social bookmarking, social media marketing, link-building, etc. -
on-page,
technical,
off-page
On-page is basics and should be done first. You can see its effect just in a few months or weeks sometimes. When it is done properly, websites start ranking (of course with low competition keywords, but still it is the you're doing it right).
What is great here is that you can improve on-page SEO occasionally and detect what brings the best ranking results.
Technical issues are important too as indexing, mobile friendliness affect SERP in a positive way and actually they are important ranking factors.
Off page SEO is being discussed much though backlinks still work. There are good services for backlinks purchase just choose the best one matching your needs.
Hope that helped a bit. Good luck!
-
On-site is priority number 1. Before you can conduct any off-site, you need to have a solidly built website to direct them to, or they'll simply bounce.
There are niche affiliate marketers such as Income School that rely solely upon on-site SEO for the success of their businesses. While I disagree with their theory of not conducting off-site strategies as a part of my link building efforts, I like the fact they solidify the necessity to focus on your website.
I'm not sure what you mean as far as Technical SEO, I think there are quite a few advanced aspects to both on-site, and off-site SEO, but I haven't seen it categorized separately from the two by itself quite yet, not saying some experts don't, just new outlook to it as of this moment.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best way to handle outdated & years old Blog-posts?
Hi all, We have almost 1000 pages or posts from our blog which are indexed in Google. Few of them are years old, but they have some relevant and credible content which appears in search results. I am just worried about other hundreds of non-relevant posts which are years old. Being hosting hundreds of them, our website is holding lots of these useless indexing pages which might be giving us little negative impact of keeping non-ranking pages. What's the best way to handle them? Are these pages Okay? Or must be non-indexed or deleted? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Do keyword target landing pages increase rankings?
Let's say we create landing pages for targeted keywords in our niche. So like we have landing pages optimised for 80% of the top keywords with decent search volume. If these pages started ranking at first page or around; will this scenario improves the ranking of website? Right now, only few of our top pages are ranking good. Planning to create more of such.
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Sudden drop in rankings and indexed pages!
Over the past few days I have noticed some apparent major changes. Before I explain, let me say this: Checking my analytics and WMT: There is an increase in traffic (even via google organic) There is no drop in impressions or clicks There is no drop in indexed pages in GWT Having said that; When I check my indexed pages using site:www.mywebsite.com, I see only 30 results as opposed to the 120K that I was seeing before (it was steadily climbing). The indexed pages have increase 3 fold in the past year, because of the increase in pages, updates, and products on the site. I see a sudden drop in rankings for major keywords that had been steadily rising. For example, I had some major keywords that were on page 7-8, not they are on page 20+ or not at all. Also, the page that used to show in the rankings has changed. I have only done white-hat guest blogging in the past year for link building, on a small scale (maybe 20-30 links in a year). They only other change recently, is that we are: Posting products on Houzz and Pinterest daily adding our site to all local directories (white pages, Yelp, citysearch, etc.) My site got hit by Penguin more than a year ago, but we have done everything right since, and our traffic via organic results has more than doubled since the Penguin release. What the hell is going on? Should I be concerned?
Algorithm Updates | | inhouseseo0 -
What was the biggest challenge you faced as an SEO in 2012?
As an SEO (in-house, freelance, consultant, agency, entrepreneur) what was the biggest challenge you faced in 2012? Please be as specific as you can, and let us all know what you are doing to overcome this challenge in 2013. For me personally I would have to say the biggest challenge I had to deal with was Google+ Local. Obviously Google is putting a lot into G+L, but it has been so messy and at times I have just thrown my arms up in the air. Especially when it comes to multi-state locations and losing reviews.
Algorithm Updates | | clarktbell0 -
Video SEO: Youtube, Vimeo PRO, Wistia, Longtail BOTR Experience and questions
Obviously Video SEO is changing, Google is figuring out how to do it themselves. We are left wondering… Below we have tried to explain what we have learned and how the different sites work and their characteristics (links to graphics provided) Our problem is: We are not getting congruent Google site:apalytics.tv Video filter results. We are wondering how duplicate content may be affecting our results… and if so, why will Youtube not be duplicate and prevent your own site SEO efforts from working. Is Youtube special? Does that include Vimeo too? We see our own duplicate videos on multiple sites in Google results, so it seems it is not duplicate related…? We’d appreciate your experience or add to our questions and work as a community to get this figured out more definitively. Thanks! We’ve tried four video hosting solutions at quite a cost monetarily and in time. 1.) Youtube, which gets all the SEO Juice and gets our clients on to other subjects or potentially competitive content. Iframes just don’t get the results we are looking for. 2.) See Vimeo Image: Vimeo PRO, a $200 year plus solution that allows us to do many video carousels on our own domains hosted on Vimeo, but are very limited in HTML as only CSS content changes are allowed. While we were using Vimeo we allowed the Vimeo.com community to SEO our content directly and they come up often in search results. Due to duplicate content concerns we have disallowed Vimeo.com from using our content and SEOing our content to their domain. However, we have many “portfolios” (micro limited carousal sites on our domains) that continue to carry the content. The Vimeo hosted micro site shows only three videos on Google: site:apalytics.tv During our testing we are concerned that duplicate content is causing issues too, so we are getting ready to shut off the many microsite domains hosted at Vimeo. (Vimeo has an old embed code that allows a NON-iframe embed – but has discontinued it recently) That makes it difficult if not impossible to retain SEO juice for anything other than their simple micro sites that are very limited! 3.) See Wistia Image: Wistia, a $2000 year plus solution that only provides private video site hosting embedding various types of video content on one’s site/s. Wistia has a free account now for three videos and limited plays – it’s a nice interface for SEO but is still different than BOTR. We opted for BOTR because of many other advertising related options, but are again trying Wistia with the free version to see if we can figure out why our BOTR videos are not showing up as hoped. We know that Google does not promise to index and feature every video on a sitemap, but why some are there and others are not and when remains a mystery that we are hoping to get some answers about. 4.) See Longtail Image: Longtail, Bits On The Run, (JW Player author) a $1,000 year plus like Wistia provides private hosting, but it allows a one button YouTube upload for the same SEO meta data and content – isn’t that duplicate content? BOTR creates and submits video sitemaps for your content, but it has not been working for us and it has been impossible to get a definitive answer as I think they too are learning or are not wanting the expose their proprietary methods (which are not yet working for us!) 2O9w0.png 0eiPv.png O9bXV.png
Algorithm Updates | | Mark_Jay_Apsey_Jr.0 -
Is changing your meta titles frequently good SEO Practice
Greetings, Im a new SEO and really knew nothing until signing up to SEOMoz. After reading the SEO101 and gathering as much information in a short period of time things started to become a little clearer. So I started my first campaign used my new SEO knowledge and input all of my meta information. Then I waited a few days to see what happened with my search result. We had never ranked for a single keyword before mind you. So a couple/few of days go by and I started punching in my keywords and looking through the pages. There I was page three. I was SO happy. I read the entire SEO101 again, realized a little more about what I had to do. So I started changing everything up, adding pictures, I found out what a IMG ALT Attributes were in the HTML editor, bolded text and all the other things I missed the first time around. Three days go by and I move up again. I start to notice my traffic is increasing and I am actually getting organic hits through search traffic. This has never happened before. I am over the moon. But I realize that I have my main focus keyword as the second key word in my title tag. So I switch the two words around, wait a few more days. Here's why I ask my question. The original title tag was still showing up and I was on the first page for both keywords, and I could see both title tags when searching for either keyword. So; Is changing your meta titles frequently good SEO Practice ? Warmest regards, Michael S&M Warning: adult site, NSFW
Algorithm Updates | | Sexandmetal0 -
Hyphens vs Underscores
I am optimizing a site which uses underscores rather than hyphens as word separators (such_as_this.php vs. such-as-this.php). Most of these pages have been around since 2007, and I am hesitant to just redirect to a new page because I am worried it will cause the rankings to slip. Would you recommend changing the file names to be in hyphenated format and place 301 redirects on the pages with underscores, or stick with the existing pages? Is there anything else that would work better? Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | BluespaceCreative1 -
Is a slash just as good as buying a country specific domain? .com/de vs .de
I guess this question comes in a few parts: 1. Would Google read a 2-letter country code that is after the domain name (after the slash) and recognize it as a location (targeting that country)? Or does is just read it as it would a word. eg. www.marketing.com/de for a microsite for the Germans www.marketing.com/fr for a microsite for the French Or would it read the de and fr as words (not locations) in the url. In which case, would it have worse SEO (as people would tend to search "marketing france" not "marketing fr")? 2. Which is better for SEO and rankings? Separate country specific domains: www.marketing.de and www.marketing.fr OR the use of subfolders in the url: www.marketing.com/de and www.marketing.com/fr
Algorithm Updates | | richardstrange0
