Google Panda and Penguin "Recovery"
-
We're working with a client who had been hit by Google Panda (duplicate content, copyright infringement) and Google Penguin (poor backlinks).
While this has taken a lot of time, effort and patience to eradicate these issues, it's still been more than 6 months without any improvement.
Have you experienced longer recovery periods?
I've seen sites perform every black hat technique under the sun and still nearly 2 years later..no recovery! In addition many companies I've spoken to advised their clients to begin right from the very beginning with a new domain, site etc.
-
Thank you to you all for your valued feedback. Marie, please do let me know when this article becomes available. I'd be vary interested to read.
We use Moz to analyse and correct the general health of a website to eradicate errors accordingly.
Panda - I'm aware Panda updates have happened more frequently. All duplicates and the quality of content has been implemented for our client.
Penguin - I have disavowed "all" poor quality backlinks, ensuring good quality links remain. We did this manually checking each link and the referring websites for quality assurance.
**But how do we know when the Panda penalty has been lifted, when it's obvious we have a Penguin penalty in place? **
**Does a business who are desperate to advertise online simply begin creating new "valuable" **content, reach out to industry influencers etc, to achieve backlinks with authority - meaning waiting maybe months before the penalty is removed, if removed?
Or, create a new site, "completely" separate from the old, and implement our marketing strategy knowing that the spammy practices conducted in the past will not affect my clients new site?
-
If you disavowed six months ago then you still haven't seen a Penguin refresh as the last one was October 4, 2013. So, if you have done the work required to escape Penguin, you may see an improvement once Google finally refreshes Penguin. No one knows when the refresh will happen but hopefully it will be soon!
I actually have an article coming out on Search Engine Watch this week that lists 5 reasons why people don't see recovery on Penguin hit sites. To summarize:
1. Not a thorough enough disavow
2. Errors in your disavow file
3. Still waiting for a refresh (probably the case for you).
4. Not enough good links there to support the site naturally.
5. Other issues such as Panda or technical issues.
-
"My client is reluctant to spend money on developing links with relevance and authority until we see some evidence that the penalty has been removed."
Part of bringing a site any traffic after being penalized is developing a white hat strategy to get visitors via authoritative relative links pointing at your site.
It is like a fighter who has been knocked out. They are down and all the sudden everything changed they no longer are able to stay in contention.
Would you tell some guy who just got knocked out by Mike Tyson get back in there and fight them once he was pushed to his feet?
No you got to train and get yourself feeling better in order to get back to the same level you are at before if you can do that.
If the knockout was too hard you may have to swap out your current expectations with new ones.
How valuable is this domain to the client?
If it is not brought up to snuff there is no need to worry about whether or not will work because no one's will even try it.
Even with a new domain your client is starting at a disadvantage just because of who they are whois and numerous other methods will tell Google to a very small or very large extent exactly who they are.
Maybe they 301 redirect and it is the same deal for new domain
Maybe they start fresh realizing that without putting amazing content out there for end-users that they are just in it sit and complain it is not even worth thinking about unless they are going to do it.
You need to explain to your client that your site is equivalent to worse then a new domain right now most likely or depending on your circumstances possibly better I do not know.
But put yourself in either place you start a site with a new domain would you do?
You get penalized by Google for what occurred you have to really step it up top quality all the way.
You have to show Google that not only are you very trustworthy now and you are essentially sorry that you did what you did but that you are actually a site that is worth something to them and to end users. With the fact that you have had this penalty on your domain means your going to have to work even harder to make up for everything you lost.
If you did a link disavowal I think you took the right measures obviously you had no choice right?
The client has to start looking at search from a different perspective not one that states you can do a couple cool things that might get you a higher ranking but one that looks at their end users and how they can actually serve the visitors to that site the best they possibly can.
That is a pretty tall order and the web is huge so there is outstanding content, including video, text photograph, infotographs I could go on your client not only needs to have a top tier website.
They need very fast load times
An easy to navigate beautiful site.
Links that are being generated by users that like what they see.
Just those three things are not inexpensive in any way.
You want to start get into technical seo it only gets more time-consuming and a lot more expensive.
I do not know the circumstances of their penalty however a new domain might be something that will get your client to actually work on the things that they need to do to make the site a quality website.
I hope that helps,
Thomas
-
The disavow tool has of course been used. Some links still appear in webmaster tools. We've also asked the webmaster of each site to kindly remove the links, which some have been kind enough and removed.
I know once a link has been "disavowed" Google adds an invisible nofollow tag to the link. Similar to your no-followed links in WMT.
My client is reluctant to spend money on developing links with relevance and authority until we see some evidence that the penalty has been removed.
It seems we've exhausted all avenues by cleaning up the website. Plus disavowing links should also be used with caution!
Having seen no recovery for such a long time - my question is, will the site every recover if it has seriously abused Google's guidelines in the past?
-
If your trying to promote a brand it's hard to start from the beginning. Im wmt I'm sure you know about "links to your site" tab, go in there and see who is linking to you, if it looks spammy, disavow or email them to take the link off.
-
you can create quality links not quantity and create new fresh content , use Google disavow tool.
-
Have you just gotten rid of all the duplicate content, poor backlinks, etc? Or have you done that and also added quality content and obtained quality links?
- Ruben
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is there proof that disavowing backlinks in GSC help to boost rankings in Google?
Hi Guys Let's say you have a website and you got some questionable back links or lower quality ones. Does anyone have proof that after disavowing back links helped in the rankings or had some positive effects? I am concerned that Google will place our website on their radar and instead possibly demote it or smth. Lastly, if disavowing is the way to go what criteria do you use to disavow backlinks? So if you get questionable back links over time, should you disavow ongoing as well? If so how often? Cheers John
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | whiteboardwiz0 -
Does Duplicate Content Actually "Penalize" a Domain?
Hi all, Some co-workers and myself were in a conversation this afternoon regarding if duplicate content actually causes a penalty on your domain. Reference: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66359?hl=en http://searchengineland.com/googles-matt-cutts-duplicate-content-wont-hurt-you-unless-it-is-spammy-167459 Both sources from Google do not say "duplicate content causes a penalty." However, they do allude to spammy content negatively affecting a website. Why it came up: We originally were talking about syndicated content (same content across multiple domains; ex: "5 explanations of bad breath") for the purpose of social media sharing. Imagine if dentists across the nation had access to this piece of content (5 explanations of bad breath) simply for engagement with their audience. They would use this to post on social media & to talk about in the office. But they would not want to rank for that piece of duplicated content. This type of duplicated content would be valuable to dentists in different cities that need engagement with their audience or simply need the content. This is all hypothetical but serious at the same time. I would love some feedback & sourced information / case studies. Is duplicated content actually penalized or will that piece of content just not rank? (feel free to reference that example article as a real world example). **When I say penalized, I mean "the domain is given a negative penalty for showing up in SERPS" - therefore, the website would not rank for "dentists in san francisco, ca". That is my definition of penalty (feel free to correct if you disagree). Thanks all & look forward to a fun, resourceful conversation on duplicate content for the other purposes outside of SEO. Cole
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | ColeLusby0 -
Is this Penguin or Manual Penalty?
I have a client that's traffic dropped off on April 10th. They did get a message in GWT on March 21st. The April 10th date leads me to believe that it is a manual penalty and couldn't be penguin since penguin was released on April 24th. I guess either way backlinks need to be cleaned up though.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | RonMedlin0 -
How The HELL Is This Site Ranking So Well In Google Places?
When I do a search for this site it ranks number 2 on Google just below the official federation of master builders website for the keyword phase "builders in london" this is the site http://bit.ly/Lypo8E which is a nasty looking blog which has nothing to do with builders and they don't even have an address anywhere on the site. The only thing I can see is that they are sharing there address with a lot of other businesses and all of the citations from those other businesses are causing them to rank higher on Google places, but surely Google can't be that stupid right?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | penn730 -
Redirecting doesn't rank on google
We are redirecting our artist's official website to copenhagenbeta.dk. We have two artists (Nik & Jay and Burhan G) that top ranks on Google (first on page 1), but one of them (Lukas Graham) doesn't rank at all. We use the same procedure with all artists. http://copenhagenbeta.dk/index.php?option=com_artistdetail&task=biography&type=overview&id=49 Doesn't rank but the old artist page still does. Is it the old page that tricks Google to think that this is the active page for the artist?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Morten_Hjort0 -
Why doesn't Google find different domains - same content?
I have been slowly working to remove near duplicate content from my own website for different locals. Google seems to be doing noting to combat the duplicate content of one of my competitors showing up all over southern California. For Example: Your Local #1 Rancho Bernardo Pest Control Experts | 858-352 ...
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | GerryWeitz<cite>www.pestcontrolranchobernardo.com/</cite>CachedYou +1'd this publicly. UndoPest Control Rancho Bernardo Pros specializes in the eradication of all household pests including ants, roaches, etc. Call Today @ 858-352-7728. Your Local #1 Oceanside Pest Control Experts | 760-486-2807 ...
<cite>www.pestcontrol-oceanside.info/</cite>CachedYou +1'd this publicly. UndoPest Control Oceanside Pros specializes in the eradication of all household pests including ants, roaches, etc. Call Today @ 760-486-2807. The competitor is getting high page 1 listing for massively duplicated content across web domains. Will Google find this black hat workmanship? Meanwhile, he's sucking up my business. Do the results of the competitor's success also speak to the possibility that Google does in fact rank based on the name of the url - something that gets debated all the time? Thanks for your insights. Gerry
0 -
Why is this ranking first in Google Places for this term....?
"Best Bar In Chicago" - http://www.google.com/search?gcx=w&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=best+bar+in+chicago They have only 5 Google reviews, and their local directory reviews are suspect. One of them goes to rateclubs.com and it's not even a page for their business, while one of them doesn't have user reviews, it's just an editorial review. The other one at superpages.com doesn't even link back to their site, it links to their restaurants.com profile. What is going on here? I've been trying to figure this out for a while as their first place ranking has been solidified for quite some time now. I can also tell you that a few of the bars listed below them have a MUCH higher profile and are better known. You can see that just by the reviews.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | MichaelWeisbaum0 -
Why did Google reject us from Google News?
I submitted our site, http://www.styleblueprint.com to Google to pontentially be a local news source in Nashville. I received the following note back: We reviewed your site and are unable to include it in Google News at this
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | styleblueprint
time. We have certain guidelines in place regarding the quality of sites
which are included in the Google News index. Please feel free to review
these guidelines at the following link: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=35769#3 Clicking the link, it anchors to the section that says: These quality guidelines cover the most common forms of deceptive or manipulative behavior, but Google may respond negatively to other misleading practices not listed here (e.g. tricking users by registering misspellings of well-known websites). It's not safe to assume that just because a specific deceptive technique isn't included on this page, Google approves of it. Webmasters who spend their energies upholding the spirit of the basic principles will provide a much better user experience and subsequently enjoy better ranking than those who spend their time looking for loopholes they can exploit. etc... Now we have never intentionally tried to do anything deceptive for our rankings. I am new to SEOmoz and new to SEO optimization in general. I am working through the errors report on our campaign site but I cannot tell what they are dinging us for. Whatever it is we will be happy to fix it. All thoughts greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Jay0