Link building
-
Hello all !
I would love some opinions about one Link Building technical aspect from SEOs, link builders ...
How important is the number of outgoing links on the page you have the opportunity to place a link ? (from a scale of 1-10 / what about where dose this factor fits overall with your check list , as important to consider as far as link building)
Would you place a link on a page with 200+ outgoing external links if the page is ok (not involved in selling links, all links are related with the subject, target page, anchor text etc) or you would go with a link on a 10-15 links per page but not that 'powerful' and not that related (not spammy but more general on the subject that can contain links to some other non related resources).
Eg:
Option 1:
www.whatever-name.com/links.html
- the entire domain is about x.
- It has 250 links in that page (in the links.html)
- all links on the links.html pages are somehow related / resources with x.
- Your link can be placed with an anchor text related with x that will target a page on your site related with x.
- Domain page rank : 6 (as a general indicator), Page PR, the links.html one, PR: 2
Option 2:
www.some-other-name.com/x-is-so-great
- the entire domain is NOT about x, just the page.
- It has 5..10 links in that page (external links more or less related with x - but not spammy)
- Your link can be placed with an anchor text related with x that will target a page on your site related with x.
- Domain page rank : 3 (as a general indicator), Page PR, the links.html one, PR: 1
What's your best option ?
Thanks !
-
I don't think you didn't mentioned that you were paying for the link!
RISK / REWARD / EFFORT(COST)
Personally I wouldn't pay $200-300 for one such link on the kind of page you're talking about.
Think about how much difference the one link is likely to make. Are you going to see a change in your rankings, or any direct traffic how much additional traffic will it take to make it worthwhile (what's your goal conversion rate, and what's the value of these goals)
You can get higher quality links for much less!
-
Yes, I see what you mean but the fact is that those are the specs for a one year very expensive campaign and by expensive I mean really expensive.
Dose it worth to pay $200-300 for one link if it's placed on a page with 100,200 pr even more other links ? (even if it's exactly related and with good authority) or those money can be spent elsewhere ...
-
I think that maybe you're worrying too much about it. If there's nothing that triggers any warning bells, then get the link and move on.
Useful link/resource lists wouldn't be at the top of my priority list though.
-
I'm generally wary about "links" pages. It's probably just me.
I like to take a look at the relevance of the list (both to the hosting site, and to my site/keyword). How naturally will my link sit in the list.
Are the links followed or no-followed? Such link pages tend to be used to provide links back to low quality directories that as you to link back to them. Once the directory has validated the link, links get removed or no-followed.
How will the list be perceived - both by search engines and also by human visitors. Does the list provide any value to humans?
If you take a higher level view and look at the overall link landscape how does the site you're getting a link from fit - is it an authority hub? (Normally this is reflected in the domain authority, but not in all niches).
If you had to explain to your customer why the link is there - can you provide an answer they would be satisfied with?
At the end of the day, you have to make a quick decision based on:
RISK / REWARD / EFFORT
If you can get a link, and it's not going to reflect badly on your site and it's easy to get then there's no reason why you wouldn't just do it and more on to getting the next link.
Obviously you'd want to try and target higher value links (where you're going to get more link juice and/or maybe even some direct traffic!) You don't want to only have low quality links...
-
Let's say that both pages are just a "resources" type of page: links and a short description of each link - no content on the page that is actually hosting the link.
I do have exact samples but I don't think that will help with the issue - as it's a general question.
Thanks.
-
Hi eye
I guess I would place a link on a page with 200+ outgoing external links, provided the page has some solid authority and some useful content. I would consider the text - links ratio as well. It's not an easy question and I guess it really depends on the page.
-
I agree with you on that.
In Rand's post there is no coverage on this.
I've got some strong feedback from a well known figure in the SEO word - extreme approach as far as the number of links per page and I am a little puzzled about this.
I am doing link building for several years now and I keep up to date with all movement but this is the first time I've received extreme sided feedback links this one (no, we don't care about the number of links per page at all and similar)...
So, where do you place this aspect on your checklist ? How important is this in your view when building links / evaluating links ?
many thanks.
-
The more links you have on a page, the more the value of any link-juice needs to be shared. You may be better off getting a larger slice of a small pie, than a minuscule amount of a large one.
The number of links aren't the only factor though. This article by Rand has a number of nice illustrations showing the value of different links:
All Links are Not Created Equal: 10 Illustrations on Search Engines' Valuation of Links
Hope this helps.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is there any link building value to design showcase websites?
I am interested to hear people's opinions on this. We are launching a microsite that is for branding purposes only, no real SEO strategy beyond optimizing for branded terms on it. However the design of the site is strong in my opinion. I think it could get picked up by "sites of the day" websites, showcases, galleries, etc. Would there be SEO benefit of in being featured on those sites since they tend to be curated lists of only the best sites and therefore editorial links? Or is there danger of those not being seen as quality links that could get you into trouble?
Link Building | | IrvCo_Interactive0 -
Winning Link Building Strategies for 2013
I was just looking at a forum post written on SEOmoz back in Jan 2012 about the best strategies for 2012 and the first recommendation I saw was blog networks - OUCH! What are your thoughts on which link building strategies you think will work well in 2013 in order of effectiveness?
Link Building | | Clicksjim0 -
Link building when your domain name is your head term.
Hello, I am working with a company that their domain name is the same as the head term. For example, if I was going for the head term coffee, and my site was coffee.com. This is specifically in the medical space, and i'm competing directly with Web MD and The Mayo Clinic, my advantage on the term is the EMD. We have a legitimate site with thousands of pages of relevant content, and I am starting a guest blogging campaign on relevant health sites. My real challenge is when I go for anchor text links should I ideally go for [head term] or [headterm.com] as the anchor text. Thanks in advance for your insights Zach
Link Building | | Zachary_Russell0 -
Are the following considered bad links for Link Building.
I've been doing a lot of research lately on link building & I've read a lot about having a diverse amount of links. Social links, Blog links, comment links, footer links, No follow links, Directory links as well as links with Anchor text URL match, brand match, partial brand match, non-descriptive, and with keywords. But there is a lot of talk of removing those links that look like a site that's built just for link building purposes.... but Directories are basically built for link building are they not? I'm wondering if anyone can tell me if they feel links from the following directories would be bad links. (Non-Paid) http://www.yoganza.com http://www.wkool.com http://www.wee-directory.com http://www.voicelet.com www.hotfrog.ca http://www.webdirectorieslist.com http://multiplelistingboard.com http://mozdirectory.net http://freedirectorypr.info Industry specific below: http://bestautolinks .com http://automotivedome.com http://automobilebuzz.com http://craigsautolinks.com Thanks so much for the help!
Link Building | | DCochrane0 -
Is this link building concept white or black
These guys have a service for bloggers and advertisers - advertisers submit their wares for review and bloggers review providing text links - they also let people know they are getting paid for the review is this another grey link building tactic https://www.reviewme.com/ and what about https://www.text-link-ads.com/r/advertisers
Link Building | | GardenBeet0 -
Link Building Features/Tutorials
I am previewing this software and am getting a little lost in its features. I am really looking for something that will help me identify link prospects, filter out the low-authority domains, and organize this information into an actionable list. Can anyone point me to resources (tutorials, etc.) on how to do that with this software? Which tools should I be using and how can I use them to reach these goals?
Link Building | | Falconberg0 -
Create content or more link building?
For those of you who have been doing white hat SEO for many years, I'm curious what % of your time (and/or how many hours/week) you spend on 2 activities: -- creating new, original content for your site -- work on getting links to your existing content I find that working at getting links via article marketing, guest blogging, forum posting, etc, is an open ended time suck that never ends. But maybe a necessary investment for sites that have fewer external links than their competitors (?). Adding unique original content to my site is also time consuming, and I'm not sure about the short-term vs long-term benefit of it. I'm curious if you guys who rank in top 3 positions of the SERPs split your time evenly between link building and content building, or if you spend more time on one than the other? And does the answer change for a site that's been around for a while and already has several hundred external links and several hundred pages of original content? Where should I spend my time on a site that is 8 months old, has about 90 pages of original content (all with good on-page SEO), and several hundred external links (with mostly relevant anchor texts)? My goal is to rank higher for the key terms people search on to find a service like mine. Currently I'm on page 1 in SERPs but not in top 3.
Link Building | | scanlin0