My site was hit by the Penguin Update, Now What?
-
My site is very young, having only been up for about a month and a half. Despite being nascent we were seeing a ton of organic traffic.
Enter Google Penguin update....
Traffic is down 40% or so over the past week. So, assuming the damage has been done, the question is, what do we do next to start moving back towards where we were? If we're doing everything everything right do we just chalk it up to the fact that our site is very new and stay the course on original content and link building?
I know you can submit your site for reconsideration which is something that we are going to do this week, but I wonder what else we can do to start edging back to where we were pre-penguin update.
Maybe this would be a good Whiteboard Friday topic.
-
Until the public gets educated on the "Alternatives" we're stuck. Sorry
-
I'll be checking out your site! thanks!
I too was hit very hard by Penguin. I'm still not sure why, and actually, that's the main reason I am now here. I have noticed, at least in my niche, that the big names moved closer to the top of page 1 in Google, which pushed me down!
The big company I compete with has domain authority much higher than mine, they have millions of incoming links, and that's because they're a huge company! I do think the little guy got hurt most, no doubt in my mind.
But I can't change this, so it's best to focus on those things we have control over, and Georg, I think you have mentioned the most important issues. I have been reviewing all my backlinks, and I just discovered that one Site links to m 690 times, yet to only 28 pages.
I'm thinking that 'looks' like spam. So I investigated further, and the topics of the pages linking to me did not add one bit of value and were not relevant in the least. I hate to get rid of 690 backlinks, but I think they are hurting me more than helping me.
-
Frankly, I think it is over for the SEO business.
I agree that a lot of the low value methods and the SEOs who have built a business upon them are in trouble. Imagine how many clients are calling them!
-
Hi Grant,
you are not alone...
My site lost 50% traffic. I've already created a question: http://www.seomoz.org/q/lost-50-google-traffic-in-one-day-panic
The reasons are - probably:
a) over optimization of your site
b) bad links from outer web space...
c) bad anchor texts
I am still investigating why our site was hit that hard.
I've created a new website: http://www.seo-stories.com for all pengiun victims.
Ich hope that helped a bit.
Best wishes,
Georg.
-
Me too... I am down 40%. I used to get traffic on over 7,000 keywords monthly. A have a 500 page website so the usually jargon about "build quality content and you are safe" is a failed strategy.
I think you have to look deeper at Google's big picture strategy (its ugly).
Every time there is a major change in the search algorithm they make all prior SEO work nearly worthless.
Why would Google do that?
Three reasons:
1. They think they own the internet. They have been muscling in on organic search results for years. They now give Google products more and more space on landing pages and using Google maps is a take over of the internet. Do you have any doubt that they will eventually charge for Google maps and thus eliminate the need for a great portion of organic content. Isn't it amazing that they prohibit "link building schemes" yet that is where they get all of their profits i.e., Adwords. The internet was created to be a public resource utility. It's a Google owned corporate asset now and to a great extent they control the value of everyone's website.
2. Google has hijacked the internet. When they reshuffle the search results they create a lot of new losers who need to buy Adwods to recoup traffic. But note, there are not an equal amount of new winners. Many of the top rank positions in my niche are from (sterile) government sites and Wikipedia. (they don't buy Adwords) Neither do they pick up the phone and give people personal advice 24/7 (like I used to).
3. Big brand companies have been pressuring Google for years. Big companies want the little guy out of the internet and with every algorithm they get closer to their goal. Smaller companies don't have the resources to "start over" every 12 months, big companies do.
Frankly, I think it is over for the SEO business. (that's the way Google wants it) How can someone charge people a reasonable fee when Google can shuffle the deck anytime they want and make that work worthless?
It's become an anti-trust issue they need new competitors and consumers need choices. I liked the old search results better... but I don't have the choice and neither does anyone else. I also want to opt out of Adwords and local maps too. Their billion dollar link building schemes is a violation of my SEO policy.
Looking for a new line of work... another attack on the little guy. (it's Pottersville on a global scale)
Good luck..
Bri
-
Google is not looking at reconsideration submissions for the penguin update. I feel your pain. My site is about six month old and we were ranked in the top ten for 33 of our target keywords. Now we only have one in the top ten and the rest are all over 35... We don't have any of the spam stuff google listed... Not sure how to cope.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Cleaning up after Penguin | Next steps?
Background:
Industry News | | godreamvacations
We've come to the realization that Google's Penguin update back in 2013 has penalized us and are just now attending to the issue. We had subscribed to a link-building service for years and just recently cancelled their services. Unfortunately those links are still out there. We've submitted a disavow list to Google on January 14, 2014; but there is no way to tell when/if they processed it. Our homepage used to rank in the top three listings for our main keyword, but now we're somewhere around #31 on page 4. It's not even our homepage that ranks any longer either; its a page specifically created recently that is tailored to our main keyword. What I've Done So Far Using MOZ, I determined our homepage was using our keyword 53 times in various ways; so I dwindled that down to 27. I built a new page tailored to our main keyword that apparently is ranking in Google as #31 now; not gaining any placement at all though. I've implemented canonical tags in the <header>of most pages (usually just linked to itself to minimize duplicate pages being detected from URL variables and such). I've worked on Title and meta description length issues. Duplicate Content?
We sell hotels, so we have a ton of internal links 500+ hotels, linking to/from one another. One page might have 100 hotel links (all internal). Another category page might be duplicating half of those links. For example, we have 200 all-inclusive resorts, so they are listed as links with the hotel name and a short description. On an adults-only page, we have 100 resorts, but 75 of them are the same resorts as on the all-inclusive page; so it may appear like duplicate content. << Not sure how to combat this. ? Too Many internal Links on Homepage?
Our homepage: navigation bar has 68 links, rest of page has ~74 links. I've read that that's too many and other people say it's fine as long as your page has textual content that is long enough. Any thoughts? Domain Name Change?
An SEO company that we talked to said they would transform our site into a Wordpress-based site for SEO reasons and that we should change our domain name; thus starting fresh and ridding us of the bad/spammy links that are coming to us. They also said they have several high-quality ranking pages that they would write articles on and link to us. Considering we don't have many good links to our site to begin with, what are your thoughts on a domain name change? It's drastic and we're not that open to the idea (yet). Would the SEO's link-building technique be what MOZ is talking about in his video 7 days ago. If so, I think that's a scary route to take; especially when after we stop the SEO's services, they said our links would come off those pages. Won't google see that happen and flag us as using black-hat tactics? As for Wordpress; we have 500+ hotels.. so that's doable, but a chore in itself. If our CMS code and website can be cleaned up some I think our custom CMS is fine for SEO. Any WP fanatics out there think WP is good for 700+ page sites? *we already have our CMS programmed to pull data from vendors; so that code would need rewritten also to work with WP. Analytics Data
I reviewed Google Analytics closely looking at the google organic traffic closely from Jan 2012 till now and I don't see any sudden drops; just gradual decreases. Is this normally the case for Penguin-hit sites; or shouldn't there be a sudden drop in organic traffic? If you've read this far; THANK YOU. Any comments to the above questions are appreciated. </header>0 -
Now that Google is no longer publicly displaying Page Rank updates, how will this effect Moz's ability to calculate DA and PA?
Hi, How much more important do you guys think that Moz's Page Authority and Domain Authority metrics are going to become now that Google has stopped giving people public access to a site or pages Page Rank? And how accurate is PA and DA as a measurement in comparison to Page Rank..so for example if I was seeking a guestposting opportunity and saw a site as having a PR of 4....if I now looked to Moz's Page and Domain Authority metrics instead...would that still give me equivalent information on the strength of that domain and thus make a judgement on whether it will be a worthy site for a guestpost.. I guess what I am asking is, how close is now looking at Moz's metrics (ie. a third party company) to the info on PageRank that was being updated by Google themselves? Also will the lack of updated public PR info from Google effect the ability for Moz to calculate PA and DA?? Look forward to your replies on this,
Industry News | | sanj50500 -
Paid links from directory listing and business listing sites are good or bad according to Penguin 2.1 update?
Hi Friends, Recently on October 4<sup>th</sup>, 2013, a new spam filtering algorithm got live named Penguin 21. / Penguin 5. The update goes after sites that may have purchased paid links. I would like to know is it safe, if we submit website details with links in paid directories, eg: https://ecom.yahoo.com/dir/submit/intro/ (yahoo directory) and quality business listing sites provided the categories are related to our website. Our competitor sites having the backlinks from those kind of directories and they are performing (ranking) well in major search engines. May I know how Google treat these kinds of links according to this recent algorithm update?
Industry News | | zco_seo0 -
Google Pushed Out Panda Update 3.9 Last Night
Google said it was rolling out a Panda algorithm last night.
Industry News | | ChenzoNew data refresh of Panda starts rolling out tonight. ~1% of search results change enough to notice. More context: goo.gl/huekfHas anyone been affected yet ....I seem to see a jump in some newer sites less than 3 months old already for some rankings - I don't like seeing rankings that quick!Do you see anything?
1 -
Google's Current Wave of Updates (4/24 edition)
Edit: Someone beat me to the punch, here is the thread: http://www.seomoz.org/q/google-webspam-algo-update-24-4-12 Let's just discuss it there. So Google has said they are doing another wave of algorithm updates that could impact anywhere from 3-5% of SERPs. I saw it here: http://searchengineland.com/google-launches-update-targeting-webspam-in-search-results-119295 http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2012/04/another-step-to-reward-high-quality.html Has anyone seen any changes? I've heard from a few friends that their sites are bouncing all over the place, which seems to happy a lot during these updates. We might not actually know the fallout for a few days/weeks/months. I saw a few of my smaller sites take a hit, but most of mine have stayed the same. Anyway what do you guys think? Sometimes an update like this can be a wake-up call to people who think they are doing white hat stuff but may be pushing the envelope a bit too much. Thoughts?
Industry News | | vforvinnie0 -
Google to Target Overly SEOd Sites
I just watched the video from Barry Schwartz talking about the new Update to come with the Google Algo. Video of his Friday Post: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJqSPT2NXdA I have also started reading on Webmasterworld on this topic: http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4429947.htm What do you think Google has in the list of changes?
Industry News | | Ben-HPB0 -
Subdomains seen as one site
Earlier this month Google announced that sub-domains are now
Industry News | | AlanMosley
be treated as one site. At first I thought this was good news as I like to use
sub-domains for separation of categories and the like. But what about links
from one sub-domain to the other, they uised to be external links now they are
internal links. If you don’t have many external links, I would say that the
cross sub-domain links would have been important, if you have a lot of external
links then the flow of link juice would be of more benefit. I think overall its
is a good thing. Does anyone have any opinions about this or know of any writings
on the subject since this announcement? http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/08/reorganizing-internal-vs-external.html0