Does google places mind listing cities on the home page
-
Hello,
A site in our industry is listing a bunch of cities on their home page and ranking for them. Like
"Our dog training facility provides services to dogs in city1,city2,city3,city4,city5,city6 state"
where the cities and states are relatively in their area.
It's working organically, will this confuse google places?
Thanks!
-
My pleasure, Bob!
-
Awesome Miriam, thank you!
-
Hi Bob,
This is an interesting question, in light of a recent update to the Google Webmaster Guidelines. Here is a link: http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66358.
And here is the text of the update: ------------------------------------
Keyword stuffing
"Keyword stuffing" refers to the practice of loading a webpage with keywords or numbers in an attempt to manipulate a site's ranking in Google search results. Often these keywords appear in a list or group, or out of context (not as natural prose). Filling pages with keywords or numbers results in a negative user experience, and can harm your site's ranking. Focus on creating useful, information-rich content that uses keywords appropriately and in context. Examples of keyword stuffing include:
Lists of phone numbers without substantial added value
Blocks of text listing cities and states a webpage is trying to rank for
Repeating the same words or phrases so often that it sounds unnatural, for example: We sell custom cigar humidors. Our custom cigar humidors are handmade. If you’re thinking of buying a custom cigar humidor, please contact our custom cigar humidor specialists at custom.cigar.humidors@example.com.
Note the second point on that list. Now, in my opinion, what Google is going after with that guideline is a practice I encounter on many local sites wherein someone posts a lists of cities (often in the footer) like this:
Auburn, Audubon, Arrington, Burnside, Camden, Cordell, Craton, Douglas, Douglas Pines, Farmington, Golden, Graham, Hyden, Isleton, Jonesy, Killey, Landow, Mongtomery, Noel Hill, etc.
You see this all the time. Sometimes the city names link to thin content, duplicate pages, and sometimes they don't link anywhere at all. It appears, from the guidelines, that Google does not like this practice.
However, my gut feeling is that Google will view this example differently:
Our dog trainers will come to your home in San Francisco, Berkeley, San Jose, Oakland and San Rafael for gentle canine behavioral training. We schedule appointments that are convenient for you, as you need to be present during each training session.
The difference here is that a short list of a few target cities has been incorporated into a paragraph of text in a natural manner. If, however, the business serves a huge list of cities, like the sample cited above, I would not list that in a block anywhere on the site. Rather, I would encourage the client to begin developing unique, strong pages of content, one by one, for each city, perhaps documenting a training session of a cute dog in a given city on each page. I would then work these into a menu tab called, "Where We Serve," or something along those lines. It's very important to avoid letting this approach turn into a weak effort resulting in duplicate content pages that mimic one another, only swapping out city names. This is a task that should be seen as an opportunity to produce some of the best copy on the website.
Now, all this being said, there are still tons of sites out there with blocks of city names linking to thin, duplicate content that are managing to pull consistent high organic rankings. For clients, this can be a temptation to imitate what a competitor like this is doing. This is where you can help by letting the client know that making a better effort than their competitor has may provide protection from future penalties, should a Google update target certain practices, or should Google turn an eye of heightened scrutiny on the client's industry. With Google, an ounce of prevention is always worth a pound of cure!
Hope this helps, Bob!
-
if it is a legitimate reason that you have to list more than one city. For instance they're not cities but actually just towns? That is fine you can get away with that just fine in fact you can tell them you walk dogs and every city that you legitimately do make sure that you sign up with Google places and link it to that account it will help legitimize any doubts Google may have.
Respectfully,
Thomas
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Negative SEO with Google Images
We have a client in the heavy equipment industry that is trying to "push down" images in a Google image search that are associated with an accident over ten years ago. This client has launched a new website, and we have applied the best practices of on-page SEO (page titles, unique meta-descriptions, alt-image tags, focused keyword targeting, etc.). The challenge we have is with Google Image results. It seems the image results shown in the Google Image search rankings are often not inline with how images have been labeled in the alt-tag section. I have checked these images with the Moz Chrome extension, and I have often found the way the image is labeled in the alt-tag is not related to the search query made within the Google image search bar. I certainly may not be factoring in other weighted items when it comes to how images are ranked. Are there other ranking factors associated with Google Image results outside of the Alt-Image Tag? If so, what are those factors? Our ultimate goal is to provide a strategy that would allow us to tag images within this specific sector that are relevant to this specific heavy equipment product, and at the same time, "push down" the rankings of the images that have a negative association to them. We certainly want to take the right approach here, and want to earn these rankings. However, the way Google ranks images seems to be a mystery of sorts. Is there a specific strategy relevant to Google Image rankings that would fall inline with the challenge listed above? I appreciate any advice on this topic. Thank you.
Image & Video Optimization | | JaredBroussard0 -
Off Page SEO help
What are the thing we ca do to increase our organic traffic for website: http://www.gobol.in/ Please suggest best possible activities to promote our website organically apart from On-page SEO.
Image & Video Optimization | | Obbserv0 -
Updating address in Google Places
My client has moved address to a location in the same city. Will updating his Google Places page lead to a drop in rankings? If so, what is the best way to resolve it?
Image & Video Optimization | | neooptic0 -
Google Places rankings
Is there a way to see what keywords I rank for in Google Places?
Image & Video Optimization | | echo11 -
Google Video Results
Hello Team, I've video website as: www.medikalekran.com . Website has 3550 index. But no result as video. I've 750 video in my website. And also I created a videositemap as: http://www.medikalekran.com/vdstmp.xml I added it to my Google Webmaster Tools account. What can I do for video indexing? Regards,
Image & Video Optimization | | medikalekran0 -
How come none of my images are being indexed by google.
None of my images are being indexed by google. Here is a link to one of my site gallery pages : http://www.mconcrete.com/gallery/stamped-concrete
Image & Video Optimization | | munoz04510 -
Getting reviews to stick on Yelp & Google
Do you have any tricks to getting reviews to stick on yelp? Whenever we ask out customers to review us on there their reviews end up getting "detected" as fakes. I have tried it out myself, and the only way i've gotten them to stick is making several reviews of various different local businesses with average ratings and then dropping one in for the client with a better rating. Perhaps this is a little on the blackhat/greyhat side of things. But if our customers are legitimatly trying to review us and it doesn't stick, i don't feel all that bad taking this route, the only real problem is time consumed. What about google? has anyone had any luck gaining more reviews for their client on google?
Image & Video Optimization | | adriandg0 -
Citations have dissapeared from places listing
This site citations have dissapeared from the 'more about this place' and looks to have effected the maps ranking by dropping the listing a few places: http://maps.google.com.au/maps/place?hl=en&ie=UTF8&q=stella+settlements&fb=1&gl=au&hq=stella+settlements&hnear=Perth+WA&cid=9895804169495459418&z=14 The citations that have been removed are: http://www.truelocal.com.au/business/stella-settlements/burswood http://www.hotfrog.com.au/Companies/Stella-Settlements http://www.yellowpages.com.au/wa/burswood/stella-settlements-13951907-listing.html (all of these are listed on other competitors citations currently) (also the places page is using the reviews on Truelocal.com.au listing above which is strange) Do you know why these citations listings have been removed, however these have not been removed on competitors places pages by Google? thanks
Image & Video Optimization | | nickydunin0