Video SEO: Should I add Video Transcriptions to You Tube Videos Even with Google CC?
-
So, You Tube allows plenty of room from descriptions. I think 5,000 characters. Google does a poor Closed Caption of our audio. Should I also be adding accurate transcriptions to the description field in YouTube to help my Video SEO.
What are the pro's cons and is it worth doing?
-
Quite.
However, they don't use the machine generated transcriptions to rank your videos yet. i don't think it was the intention of Jeff to suggest that, but It's a bit of a misnomer. They currently onyl regularly index the one's you upload (because they're deemed as more accurate).
-
One of my analysts found this form a WBF in Ausgust:
“The fourth YouTube ranking factor on the content side is transcription. This is something that most people don't know about. I'm going to tell you about it today. That is that YouTube has a feature where it's going to try to transcribe your video for you, and it is horrible at transcribing your video. If you've ever tried to read the transcription that it does by machine, it is awful. However, something else that they don't tell you is that they use those transcriptions to rank your video for keywords.
So, if you were to slip something, and there's actually been some tests done on this, where someone transcribes a video and throws in a word that isn't mentioned anywhere in the description, anywhere in the title, and then you type that in a search in YouTube and up comes that video. They are indexing the transcriptions. So take the time to go ahead and transcribe your video word for word. Upload the text file. It will match up the words. It will then make your video closed caption, which will increase your click through rate, and it will also allow you to rank better for that video. Just a quick tip on that. Definitely worth doing. If you're going to take all the time to make the video, take a few extra minutes and transcribe it and make it happen.”
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/youtube-ranking-factors-whiteboard-friday
-
I think they'll eventually get to the point where the auto-generated transcriptions are also indexed, but currently the transcription quality just isn't quite accurate enough across the board to make that possible.
-
Phil,
Thanks. You were the first to point out the defining reason for transcription: "YouTube's machine generated transcriptions don't get indexed, but transcripts you upload will."
That's really what was not clear to me. I guess if I were Google and owned YouTube, I would to index CC, but I am not.
At least for now it seems transcription is well worth the effort.
-
Yes. YouTube's machine generated transcriptions don't get indexed, but transcripts you upload will. This will then allow your YouTube videos to rank for long tail queries relevant to the text of your transcript (much like page copy). You can also "keyword stuff" your Transcriptions to optimise the video for certain keywords.
NOTE: You can and should keyword stuff in a Whitehat way, not just plough tons of versions of the keyword into the text at random points. What i mean by this is... for example, if you want to rank for the name of the actor performing in your video - then you could append "actor's name: " to any line that they speak. Additionally, you could add some descriptive text explaining what's going on - rather than just copying the recited text.
-
We had recently tested them. I think that will be our route.
-
SpeakerText is awesome. You will be in good hands. I wish we had the volume of videos to go enterprise with them because their Caption Box is wicked cool.
-
thanks for the +1 vote on Dana's comments. We did the first 80 videos transcribed via an elance contractor, but I think the service is probably the route to go.
-
Thanks for the reply Dana. I guess I was getting concerned over somehow the transcription being considered duplicate content. You actually answered the better question of how should we deal with transcriptions in general.
With 700+ videos to transcribe, nice to get it right the first time. The service we are considering is speakertext.com. I believe they can automate the CC need.
-
I agree with Dana - there really aren't any negatives and a huge amount of positives to adding closed captions to YouTube videos. If you have any kind of narrative in your videos I can't think of a single reason why you shouldn't.
Also, take advantage of good (but still cost effective) transcription services and upload closed captions in as many other languages as you want/need to.
Carla
-
Yes. It is definitely worth doing. IMHO, there are absolutely no "cons" to adding transcriptions, especially good ones. You are right, the Google machine transcriptions are just plain horrible.
I wouldn't load the transcription into the description area on YouTube, because that's not really what that space is intended for. I would create a transcript, upload it to YouTube and then disable the machine transcription. There is one very compelling reason to do this. YouTube displays a "CC" for all videos that have been closed-captioned. People wanting to watch videos with captions (and that's not just hearing-impaired people, it can be people on mobile devices without headphones, or people at work without speakers on their computers), can search and sort by this parameter. This means if they are looking for a video on a particular topic and they need it to be closed-captioned and they sort by that, your videos will come up on the list. If you transcription is just in the description area, then your video wouldn't come up as having captions available.
I use http://www.dotsub.com to create timed captions for all of my company's videos. They provide a wonderful, easy-to-use and free tool that does a splendid job. Exporting your transcript and uploading them to YouTube is a piece of cake.
There are of course services that you can pay to do it for you too, and they tend to be fairly inexpensive.
Once uploaded, your close-caption file content is 100% indexable content to search engines. It isn't hidden in a iframe or anything like that. The only downside is the same downside you face interms of SEO by hosting your videos on YouTube instead of a 3rd party like Wistia. YouTube will always outrank you for your own content. When your videos get ranked in Google, they will link back 99% of the time to YouTUbe and not to your Website, no matter what you do...transcription or no transcription.
Bottom line is those transcriptions can only help you. They cannot hurt you.
I hope that's helpful!
Dana
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Updating Youtube Videos: Does this Reset Your Views to 0?
Hello Moz Community, Our team is looking to update a few videos in our Youtube channel but are concerned that doing so will reset the current amount of views to 0 once the change has been made. Would anyone happen to know if this happens or if the views remain the same? Also, how do the updates to the videos affect rank and visibility? Thank you all for your help.
Image & Video Optimization | | PowerhouseMarketing1 -
How do I increase my client's Google Local listings?
Hi Guys, I have a hypothetical question for you. Let's say I live in a town that has two pizza places and in the maps section of a Google SERP the other place outranks my client when I type in "Pizza Place Smalltown NY." What would be a list of things that I could do to make "Pizza Place Smalltown, NY" rank better in that portion? Thanks!
Image & Video Optimization | | oomdomarketing0 -
Doing SEO for multiple clients, who should make the content?
I realize that since content marketing is (or can be) a part of SEO, then it would logically follow that it's up to whoever is doing the SEO to create the content*. And when it's 1 person or a small group of people that work for 1 company, doing its SEO, that makes perfect sense. But I'm having a little trouble wrapping my mind around how that's supposed to scale up for an outside agency responsible for the SEO of 5 or 10 or 50 other companies. One of the biggest factors in my misunderstanding of the system is the reasoning for creating content in the first place. I absolutely understand how a professional in some field (let's say dentistry for example) could write up some insightful, accurate blog post about why flossing is great. After all, a dentist does (or should, hopefully) have a level of expertise on the subject that most people don't have. That blog post is a tangible addition of value to the website for anyone curious about the subject. But why would anyone want to read a blog post about wisdom teeth written by just some random person at a marketing company? If that person has the time to do a lot of research and BECOME something of an authority on the subject of dental care, then that's fine. But what if they also need to create content for clients that do plumbing, car repairs, and cooking? I don't really see how someone can become enough of an expert on enough subjects and still have any time to do the other parts of their job. Maybe I'm just expecting too much, but I sort of feel that the internet is already full enough of advice and information from people that have no idea what they're talking about, so content from someone that's not an expert (but is a marketing person that the expert hired) seems... frivolous to me. So to get back to the actual question, should/can an SEO ask their clients to create at least some of their own content, or is it the SEO's responsibility to generate all the content, even if it's not always stellar? Or is it just one of those "Could God make a rock so big that he couldn't lift it? Yes, he could, and then he would lift it" (or however that saying went) sorts of deals? Thanks for the feedback, this can all be kind of overwhelming for me at times. *"Creating content" in this specific case meaning writing blog posts, making videos, etc.
Image & Video Optimization | | BrianAlpert781 -
Local SEO: How to optimize for multiple cities on website
Hi, I couldn't find any reference to this, so if the answer is already here, I would appreciate a link to the answer. That said, my question is this: When a local business services a large geographic area, I wanted to know how to optimize for the multiple towns? I already have the main city in my title tags, but there are at least 40 areas that surround this town. Should I have a "Services Area" page, and place all the towns there, or should they all be in the footer? I saw this one guy - in the same niche who put all the towns in his meta keyword section - but I think that's incorrect, especially since Google doesn't look at that particular meta tag. Any help would be appreciated.
Image & Video Optimization | | jayestovall1 -
Finding Pages with Youtube Embedded Videos in Google SERP
I'm trying to figure out a process to find specific youtube embed videos using Google search. But a lot of sites are not being returned. For example, I know that the following video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MnylRaQC3w) is linked to and embedded on http://gizmodo.com/5898438/watch-how-fender-builds-its-iconic-stratocasters However, I can't figure out a set of search terms to find that in Google. Searching for (1MnylRaQC3w Gizmodo) doesn't return the right page in the results. I'd like to figure this out so I could see everywhere a certain youtube video has been embedded.
Image & Video Optimization | | nixforsix0 -
How to Fix Duplicate Item Error in Google Merchant Center?
I have set schedules upload of Test Data Feed in Google Merchant Center. Today, I have found duplicate item error in test feed status summary! There are 2697 error for duplicate item. But, my http://www.vistastores.com/feed/test_data_feed.txt does not contain any duplicate item. I have checked test feed twice before raise this question. How can I fix this issue?
Image & Video Optimization | | CommercePundit0 -
Local seo, business in multiple cities?
Hello Everyone, What is the best strategy when it comes to optimizing a website that services more than one city. So, say I'm in computer fixing business and I have offices in New York, San Francisco, Seattle, Denver, Miami & Dallas. (took me a while to come up with some US cities) - how should I structure my website so that I look relevant for every city? Is it possible to display specific information for users coming from specific cities, say someone browsing from San Francisco will see my main page optimized for San Francisco (containing a real address, phone number all the necessary stuff). I'd really appreciate your thoughts on this. Thank you in advance, Alex
Image & Video Optimization | | pwpaneuro0 -
Optimizing Google Places
Hey everyone, Trying to improve my Google Places page for the Pet Medical Center of Las Vegas but am having trouble knowing where to start. There doesn't seem to be a whole lot that can be customized. Maybe I am missing something. http://maps.google.com/maps/place?hl=en&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&biw=1370&bih=718&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=pet+medical+center+of+las+vegas&fb=1&gl=us&hq=pet+medical+center+of&hnear=0x80beb782a4f57dd1:0x3accd5e6d5b379a3,Las+Vegas,+NV&cid=13431404354265657899 Does the small description act like the SERP in Google searches? Trying to rank for Vet Las Vegas. Any ideas?
Image & Video Optimization | | PMC-3120870