What's the best strategy for reducing the number of links on a blog post?
-
I'd like to optimize my blog better for search. The first reccomendation I got from my SEOMoz Pro Campaign Crawl was that I needed to reduce the number of links per page on my site. I have lots of links from navigational items in the sidebar that people do click on. I'd really like to keep some or all of the tags and categories I list. Comments are another issue. Most of our posts get about 10 comments. However, our best posts get 50-100 comments. Those comments create a lot of links.
I was planning on attempting to reduce the number of links using javascript but I guess Google understands javascript now. I may still do this b/c our pages are huge and some progressive rendering would likely help the user experience.
Can you use javascript (ajax or otherwise) to limit the number of links on your page in a way that helps your SEO efforts? Any specific suggestions for reducing links that come from comments and navigational items?
How much will reducing the number of links on a given page help with SEO? Any simple way to estimate or quantify this without diving in?
Thanks in advance!
-
Your domain strength is pretty high, so on your home page and top pages, those navigational links are going to be fine, but you could nofollow the bulk of them on the individual blog pages.
You already have the tweet and facebook like buttons that are getting use, but you might be able to add some easy to copy & paste code, similar to a badge, to try and boost inbound links (http://www.seomoz.org/dp/badges). Also, since you have so much content you could try getting a Polyvore-like feature added to your site that helps people make a collage from the different wedding details they like. (http://www.polyvore.com/).
I didn't dig too deeply so these are just off-the-cuff examples, but hopefully enough to spark some ideas for you.
-
Anyone have any thoughts about whether or not I should attempt to reduce the number of links in the sidebar via javascript? I've got 160 navigational links. Should I try to load these in via Javascript? How would Google react to that?
-
Hey Ryan, thanks for taking a look. nofollowing the comment links is a good idea!
I'm under the assumption the assumption that nofollow links are still hurting my SEO efforts do to how Google passes page rank through links.
Thanks for the tips on looking at other blogs and seeing how they use nofollow. Again, I guess the big guestion is should I be reducing the number of links on my site (including the number of nofollow links).
Can you give a more specific example of "hooks for people to link back to"?
-
Hi Tait. I went through one of the blog posts with 20+ comments and saw that most of the links via user names are pretty wedding relevant--wedding photographers, profiles back to your own site, some broken links--plus they're already nofollowed already. It'd be a good idea to apply nofollow to the individual comment links as well below the user name.
If you have the SEOmoz toolbar you can turn on "Show Nofollows" here and see all the different links the 'moz is disregarding. All the "Browse Category" links at left are nofollowed, the section tags, and the function links (Add Image or Video URLs...) I think you could take a similar tack with your blog and apply any incoming link juice to a few select links that are the focus of that blog post. That way you're leaving the option open for people to be social via your blog and provide links for people to click, but the technical focus is around your target keywords.
To get more insight on where you could apply nofollows, just leave the "Show Nofollows" highlighter on in the tool bar and surf the web for a bit: competitors, blogs that would likely be in a competitive niche, etc. You should be able to get a pretty good idea fairly quickly from that exercise.
Last, coming up with hooks for people to link back in to individual blog posts would be handy as any juice coming in would then be redistributed to your most targeted links.
-
That seems like a pretty practical solution. Some people won't stop by any more but those are the people who are just trying to promote themselves. I wonder if it might actually increase comments b/c now the form will be even shorter and simpler to fill out.
-
It sounds like you are getting good contributions and are doing a proper job of blocking the weasels.
What do you think of eliminating the "website" field of the comment form? I would eliminate it if it was on my site.
-
Thanks EGOL. To be clear, we remove most comments with links embedded in the text (unless they are relevant). However the "website" field of the comment form creates a nofollow link to a site if filled in.
I don't want to remove comments. People really do contribute in our comments section. Having comments show people stopping by our blog that we have a nice little community of readers. While there is some abuse we work to remove spammy comments and blacklist domains that continue to spam us.
-
Those comments create a lot of links"
There is what I would ATTACK. A lot of those links are placed there by people who probably don't give a rat's behind about your content - they are simply there to drop a link on you. Consider the content of these comments and ask if they are honest contributors.
I would disable links in comments or moderate them out.
"How much will reducing the number of links on a given page help with SEO?"
I believe that relevant links are helpful for SEO. However, I also believe that if you have a blog about knitting and it is getting links dropped on it to men's health products, hotels in Turkey and online casinos, then you better pray that Google doesn't drop your rankings.
I have a blog and used to allow comments. I turned them off because even with a plug-in to block spam comments a lot of undesired comments were getting in. Some comments came from people who are in my industry but were trying to use my blog as a signpost for their business. So, I cut the comments and now run a bully pulpit. Less work for me and less odor on the blog.
I was sad to lose comments from a few genuine contributors... but this is a better balance for me.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What to do to index all my links of my website?
Ok, i have a new website, with only 14.000 page indexed by google, but the potential is big, 1-2 million pages. What i have to do, to force somehow google to index my website faster? This is my website: https://vmag.ro/
On-Page Optimization | | TeodorMarin0 -
How to handle outdated, unoptimized blog posts receiving little or zero traffic?
I'm doing some overdue spring cleaning on our WP blog. Some big visual updates are in the works, but currently I'm working on pruning and updating some poopy and outdated content. Many of the older posts weren't written with SEO in mind and were posted to the blog merely as an extension of our monthly enewsletter. Here's an example: http://pq.systems/2FkQyVG This post needs a lot of work to meet our new standards. The content is thin, readability is weak, kw targetting is non-existant, the visuals suck, zero links, and the charting software mentioned has since been replaced with another solution that we are currently promoting. There are quite a few other posts with similar issues... Any thoughts on the best way to handle these posts? From poking around similar Q&A threads, it seems my options are: Create new updated post, remove old post, 301 redirect from old to new Create new updated post, add blurb & link pointing to new post at the top of old post Edit/update old post, add "This post was updated....etc" blurb to top of old post Any other options or opinions on which solution I should go with would be much appreciated!
On-Page Optimization | | SamKlep0 -
Same titles in Webmasters' tools
Hello, In webmasters' tools I get a message saying I have 505 pages html improvements that are possible because 505 of my titles are used on two pages. Actually, webmasters' tools is tripping since the doubles they find are: www.example.com and www.example.com/ Anyways, I have indexation problems and I was wondering if this could be the case and how to solve that. Thanks for your help;
On-Page Optimization | | EndeR-0 -
Too many on page links
Hello, I have a page that isn't ranking very well. http://nicontrols.com/uk/drives-motors/variable-speed-drives According to the MOZ research tools I have too many on page links. I believe most of these are a result of the advanced filtration options on the left hand side of the page. I don't want to remove the filters as they are extremely useful for customers but I am also worried about the number of links Anyone get any ideas about the number of links? Should I care?
On-Page Optimization | | DavidLenehan0 -
What's the best way to handle crawling of photo gallery?
When you have a photo gallery with many search filters and loads and loads of pages, is it best to block all the filters and use google's pagination code? Ex: http://photo.net/gallery/photocritique/filter This site has pages for many different queries. While the page titles are unique, the pages are showing duplicated content.
On-Page Optimization | | cakelady0 -
Limiting On Page Links
Right now, we have about 160 or so links on the home page. It's been recommended that we keep it to under 100, though that's not as big of a deal as it once was. Is it helpful to make a bunch of those links "nofollow" in order to preserve link juice? Is it going to make a difference, or be at all helpful? I assume it won't be harmful, especially as a bunch of them are to the same page but on different sections of the page. Would live your advice and thoughts! Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | DeliaAssociates0 -
Breadcrumb links
Hello. Are the breadcrumb links valued more over other links ? (google searches for them specificaly to display them in the results)
On-Page Optimization | | seo.academy0 -
Best SEO structure for blog
What is the best SEO page/link structure for a blog with, say 100 posts that grows at a rate of 4 per month? Each post is 500+ words with charts/graphics; they're not simple one paragraph postings. Rather than use a CMS I have a hand crafted HTML/CSS blog (for tighter integration with the parent site, some dynamic data effects, and in general to have total control). I have a sidebar with headlines from all prior posts, and my blog home page is a 1 line summary of each article. I feel that after 100 articles the sidebar and home page have too many links on them. What is the optimal way to split them up? They are all covering the same niche topic that my site is about. I thought of making the side bar and home page only have the most recent 25 postings, and then create an archive directory for older posts. But categorizing by time doesn't really help someone looking for a specific topic. I could tag each entry with 2-3 keywords and then make the sidebar a sorted list of tags. Clicking on a tag would then show an intermediate index of all articles that have that tag, and then you could click on an article title to read the whole article. Or is there some other strategy that is optimal for SEO and the indexing robots? Is it bad to have a blog that is too heirarchical (where articles are 3 levels down from the root domain) or too flat (if there are 100s of entries)? Thanks for any thoughts or pointers.
On-Page Optimization | | scanlin0