Is Creating a Lot of Content A Bad SEO Strategy?
-
In Danny Dover's book, Search Engine Optimization Secrets, he talks about how every page on your site should be at least a little linkworthy, or it is just sucking link juice from the rest of the site and not contributing any.
Does this mean that creating a lot of content, (like a daily news article on your site that summarizes industry news or something similar) is not a good SEO strategy?
Should you limit the amount of content pages on your site unless it can attract links or hits on one of your target keywords?
Thanks!
-
Thanks for your thoughts, Alan. Much appreciated.
I agree that "quality" is the key.
-
I think it all comes down to the quality of the content, the ease of readability, and the ability to not diverge too far from the primary topic.
I personally find pages that are endless content, such as blog indexes that load entire articles on the page, to be quite annoying. In that scenario, helping SEO is outweighed by harming user experience. And if the sub-topics wander too far, it can dilute the primary topical focus of the page.
So with proper planning, and user experience considerations, sure, it can be done. Heck, there's a common belief that short blog articles are better than long ones. Yet some of my best, most read, most linked-to blog articles have gone on seemingly forever.
On the flip side, my "Anatomy of an SEO Audit" articles were each strong enough on their own that it was best to split it out into four pieces. Not only did it make readability a bit more reasonable, it gave me three additional "new content" opportunities, and I got to link across all of them by the 4th article, Yet two more valid SEO factors to consider.
-
Alan,
I am interested in your comment. I agree with the "supporting pages" idea and employ that on many parts of my websites. The main page attacks a primary keyword and the supporting pages attack secondary keywords. The anchor text links between the pages might help the rankings.
However, I am also finding success with another method...
Place all of the content on one page to create a very long and impressive document. The length (and word diversity) causes that page to pull a lot of long-tail traffic. Also, the size of these documents might make a favorable impression on other webmasters who are looking for an authoritative document to link to. Maybe Google also favorably considers the length and subtopic diversity of these documents?
Another variation would be to treat the article like the index page of a blog that has the full text of each blog post displayed. Each of the subtopics is a subheading on that page and the <h>tag used for the subheading is linktext to a secondary page with full text and images displayed.</h>
Any thoughts on those?
-
I'd offer a slightly different perspective.
If you create lots of content that supports a higher level page, many of those supporting pages might very well not ever garner any external links. Yet they very well could offer tremendous value in boosting the primary page's value from an internal linking perspective as well as an inbound link perspective.
For example - if you want to be known as THE AUTHORITY on all things related to widgets, you'd be wise to have many second and even third tier content pages within your site structure. The vast majority, if not all of the inbound links would point to the higher level pages exactly BECAUSE you've got all that depth.
-
- Creating a lot of bad content is a bad strategy.
- Creating a lot of good content is a good strategy.
(Assuming it's done in balance with your capacity.)
Content is the king but a kingdom needs other roles to run smoothly so I would not completely sacrifice other SEO activities just to satisfy monthly content needs.
One example of content being a problem is when too many pages discuss the same topic and fragment your inbound links, diluting the effect. This would only be good if that was only way to get as many diverse inbound links.
-
Should you limit the amount of content pages on your site unless it can attract links or hits on one of your target keywords?
In general, the answer to this is YES, don't put up pages that are not going to attract links or search traffic. The exception would be pages on topics such as "ordering information"... "privacy policy".... etc.
Why put up a page if it will be useless?
Does this mean that creating a lot of content, (like a daily news article on your site that summarizes industry news or something similar) is not a good SEO strategy?
If you run a content site the best way to bring in "new money" is to publish new content. However, you might be careful about creating pages about "news". Those pages might be "new content" but they become "old content" quickly.
If you are going to have a site that places an emphasis on news and does a good job of it then publishing news is a good idea. However, if you have any other goal then a focus on "evergreen" content might be a better strategy.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How important is content production in the online store of gas coolers?
HiI am the manager of a store site in the field of online air conditioning store at a novinmarket.com address Not much content can be produced for the air conditioner Is it important to produce content on store sites as well?
Content Development | | sarairan0 -
Simple Blog Content Question
Which is better? To write my own blog post or, (with permission) use other high DA content on my blog. I'll probably do both, but I'm very curious as to what the search engines prefer or which is better for seo. Thanks in advance!
Content Development | | MissThumann0 -
Duplicate Content for Non-SEO Purposes
Duplicate Content for Non-SEO Purposes There are a few layers to this question, but at the most basic level the question is... -Will having the same article (in the form of archived e-newsletter issues) on multiple different websites' newsletter archives HURT those sites? I'm fairly sure it won't HELP any of them in terms of SEO, but will having these back issues of their e-newsletters archived on their websites get them penalized? For the purpose of this question, these are not clients we are doing SEO for, just hosting and their e-newsletters. So it's fine if the archives provide no SEO benefit, we just don't want to leave them up if they will become LIABILITIES for the websites. -If having the same article in archived issues of e-newsletters on multiple different websites WOULD be harmful, would moving these archives to a sub-domain change anything or would it be best to simply take the archives down altogether? -Alternately, would spinning these articles make any difference in whether or not these sites get penalized? -Lastly, would spinning make the articles usable for archived e-newsletters for clients that ARE signed on for SEO services? I have a hunch about this, but I'd love to hear your expert opinions. Thanks!
Content Development | | BrianAlpert780 -
We want to move Content from one domain to another
We have a large amount of unique content on a domain we are no longer using/promoting. Its been sat there for a couple of years. Its literally wasted content on a non used or promoted domain. We want to move it to a busy site of ours. Are there any best practices or pitfalls we should be aware of?
Content Development | | Simonws0010 -
SEO for a News based site : Outdated content
How do we maintain the SEO of a 5 year old News content based site? How should we deal with 3-4 year old content, which are outdated or not searched? Some of them are still useful as archiving/history of a topic..but not searched.... ?? Should we no-index them? or should we keep it like that?
Content Development | | Wpfreesetup0 -
Content Marketing Strategy for a Solar Panel Shop
Hi everybody Everybody's talking about content marketing strategies these days and the videos from MozCon has definitely been a great inspiration for me. I have a customer who sells solar panels (wiki) here in Denmark and they are more or less hooked on the idea of investing long term. And this is where I wanna ask you guys for ideas to this strategy. I'm open to anything from overall guidelines to specific ideas on content. I hope you will chip in, thanks a lot 🙂
Content Development | | loevgaard0 -
How much weight does UGC really have in SEO
Hi Guys....One of my sites has a blog and the site does very well overall.....however managing the blogs comments (fighting spam...attacks...general monitoring and approval) is becoming to much trouble. The blog itself really gets fed from facebook and most of the blog comments are done here. I am thinking of removing the comment section on the blog and only responding to facebook comments.....I am concerned though how much weight the "user generated content" carries with regards to SEO...it has always been said that it does carry weight but what if i get traffic to these pages and links but remove the comments ability... just really wanted to hear some opinions on this and how much respect i should give UGC. thanks for your time
Content Development | | nomad-2023230 -
Duplicat Website Content? (UK, Ireland)
Hi, My website is based in Ireland on a .ie domain & now I would like to enter the UK market on a .co.uk Is it ok for me to duplicate my .ie website and provide all the information on a .co.uk OR is this considered duplicate content in terms of Google. (I'm led to believe that your own content on my domain's is not considered duplicate & this is only considered duplicate content when you go from .com to .ie, .co.uk etc). (all content, images, branding are my own).
Content Development | | GlenBOB0