The mystery of a SERP - Your Opinion is appreciated :)
-
I'm looking into the result set for "vehicle graphics" with local setting set as Irvine, CA. The first result is occupied by Airmark Co and its page "http://www.airmarkco.com/vehicle-graphics.html". Doing a quick scan of this site and its page it seems that a few things are way off.
- Low DA: 12
- Low PA: 19
- Company is located out side of the local area (Irvine, ca)
- Offsite links coming into the site are few with only one external domain (from the company that built the site)
I'm comparing it to a site we launched a few months back, one that has a similar profile and yet is nowhere to be found -- http://www.calibersi.com/page/vehicle-graphics.
Would love to hear your thoughts as to why this site is outranking much stronger and relevant local sites (based on the SERP's that are coming back) ?
-
I had been thinking about this. I would make one correction to the order that Jarno proposes and that would be to put the link to the JS not in the head but as the last thing before the tag. That is for speed optimization - per Google rx:
-
Thanks for that example Jarno - great way to demonstrate that concept. Thumbs up!
-
I Agree with Clever,
You use a lot of different Javascripts in the page source code even within the body copy. When your body starts you should also start with the code for the site. Move all of the Javascript to external files and include them just like CSS. This also speeds up the page a lot. And most importantly it cleans up the code real good.
Another issue. Look at the structure of your code.
You also use javascripts in the head code. Move them to an external file. A nice clean code would have to following options in this order:
- <title></li> <li><meta description></li> <li><meta canonical (if you want this one)</li> <li><meta robots (if you want this one)</li> <li><link stylesheets</li> <li><link javascripts</li> <li></head></li> </ol> <p>This way your title is the first code the search engines encounter. When I changed this for one of my own websites it increased my rankings by almost 12 positions. Off course this is not a guarantee but I would definitely change this.</p> <p>Hope this helps</p> <p>Regards</p> <p>Jarno</p></title>
-
I looked in to both websites and it looks like that you have both DA and PA higher than yours but there are few areas where they are beating you!
- URL structure
They have a better URL structure that discusses the page right after the domain where as your domain structure contains a directory between the page and the domain.
- Content
Their content is more strong and stable as compare to yours plus the use of keyword is to the point. Try to redevelop your content and make it more stable and user friendly.
- Overall on-page
Try to audit your complete website and see what other stuff are need to get done in order to make a website more user friendly to users.
- Links
I do understand that your competitor does not contain good links but if you try and get some relevant links that talks about you, you probably will easily out rank your competitor.
Hope this helps!
-
The competitiveness of the keyword is moderate and when you run it through the Moz keyword tool, I do not see the Airmarko site in the top ten. This was the same when I added "Irvine" or 'Irvine, CA" to that keyword combo in the tool. The pages that did rank had PAs in the range above. This was the same when I searched with personalization turned off. If you are logged in, maybe Google is showing you that page since you were visiting it a lot with your research.
One thing I did notice. On the calibersi.com site, you had over 6,000 characters in a hidden form element and various Javascript,etc, etc all in the top portion of the code. Googlebot has to get to around line 350 before it sees the "content" on the page. Airmarko gets you to the content by line 35. Not saying this is a silver bullet, but there seems to be a lot of overhead going on that could reflect negatively on your site.
-
I can see a few reasons: their Domain Authority and Page Authority are both higher than yours. It looks like both pages are properly targeting the keyword on-page, but perhaps you can remove the /page/ from the URL and see what that does? Make sure you redirect the old page to the new URL. Once you do that, try to get a few more quality inbound links to raise your DA and PA and you should be ranking higher than his page soon enough.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to break into a serp dominated by large companies? (but low keyword difficulty)
I'm currently doing some keyword research, and on favourable keywords such as: "weekend breaks in lake district" (320 searches per month with 39% keyword difficulty), I see that all of the first page SERPS are from larger companies (last minute, centerparcs etc) How likely will it be that I can get on that first page, assuming I am focusing my page on that particular keyword. Sparse info I know, but I didn't want to spend hours going down a dead end street. Is it simply that these larger companies are in the top 10 because there are no specific pages targeting that keyword, or do I have little chance?
Competitive Research | | Gordon_Hall1 -
Why is our website ranked lower but beats most competitors in full SERP report?
We are analysing why our website ranks so low (currently position 8 in serp). We beat our competitors in most areas. Also we produce by far the most useful content. Do not buy links or do any other malpractice. We have been for a long time ranked in top 3 (well mostly 1-2) positions. In the last year we have seen a decline to position 8-10 and we are not sure why this is the case. Can anyone suggest what we should be focusing on? We are clueless. All the practices we used to "know" now seem obsolete. m8qIeyC,Kf1LLei#0
Competitive Research | | urkeman0 -
Localized SERP Rankings - Multiple Questions...
The Google SERPs for my keywords are pretty regional. We are in the "IT Support Company" space. I've checked with friends in other parts of the country, and we don't show up in the SERPs in other parts of the country for KWs that we are ranking for locally. Questions: 1. I see both national and local players showing up in the SERPs. Is there any kind of formula for how Google decides who gets on the first page? 2. Some of my keywords trigger Google+ listings. How long does it take to show up in Google+, assuming we're optimized appropriately, and we have earned a placement? 3. For Moz's keyword ranking tool, how does it handle regional searches? Moz's tool is going to show different KW rankings than what I will see. My immediate concerns are rankings in my area (NY Metro), but we want to go national. How do we track rankings in different areas? 4. Is it possible to be on the 1st page with Google+ and Organic listings? 5. Do the Google+ 7 packs have generally better, or worse CTRs than similarly placed organic listings?
Competitive Research | | CsmBill0 -
Reason behind SERP Behavior
Greetings Mozzers, What would be the cause of the Title of the SERP to read a company name only instead of the <title>content?</p> <p>For example, if everywhere on my website, it reads SuperFun (if SuperFun is my company name). And I have a <title> of "SuperFun | Great Fun that is Super | New York"</p> <p>Let's say I then Google -> Great Fun in New York and I'm ranked 3rd. Yet the SERP reads "Super Fun" as the title.</p> <p>Any reason for this? Or ways I can further optimize this so it reads:</p> <p>1- the correct company name</p> <p>2- the <title> I specified in source code.</p> <p>Thanks for any clarficiation/advice on this matter!</p></title>
Competitive Research | | MonsterWeb280 -
Google serps for split keyword searches
A client has come to me with an issue with the marketing of their website. it is mainly focused around the search of their name. the site is an Magento GO hosted e-commerce based site through Magento. it requires a good amount of optimisation and its in a very competitive market - which has high volume of searches. When entering the name of the business it doesn't show on the first page of Google but it does on Bing or Yahoo. The site name is lovehugz and is UK based The issue is when searched for by name lovehugz it appears on the second page, however if the search term is separated love hugz it appears first on the first page. The site is poorly optmised at present with the page title limited to the name lovehugz. Does anybody know of reasons why Google might be behaving in this manner and what steps should be taken to overcome. Optimising for the name is not the only aim here, however it something that should be in place for people searching by name, There is a lot of work to be done to optimise the site for its essential relevant keywords to stand a chance in its market. Any ideas of help would be greatly appreciated thanks
Competitive Research | | Bristolweb0 -
SEOMoz bar shows competitors ranking higher in SERPS with less Moztrust and Mozrank?
We are targeting the term "wholesale fireworks" we are currently on page two and just completed some on page optimization. I noticed using the Mozbar that the SERP results on the first page show a site with near zero page rank, Moztrust, domain trust, etc.. It is steadily number two in SERPS. Our site is just as strong or stronger on these ratings as anyone on the first page. How is it possible that we are still hanging out on page 2?
Competitive Research | | devonkrusich0 -
Unjustified ratings and reviews in google SERP?
I was checking Google US for some search term my company is interested for and found a thing I cannot explain well. The site Tradecarview is shown with a rating of 4.4 stars from 4209 reviews. (Please see attached image).The same rating is shown on their homepage, but I could not find much more details. (By the way: Tradecarview is a sort of directory for used car dealers to post their vehicles, something similar to Ebay or Yahoo motors.) The question is simple: is Google trusting the ratings given directly on the website? Maybe just summarizing the ratings shown here? http://www.tradecarview.com/pr/providerlist.aspx?pn=0&st=7 Or are there other sources I couldn't find that Google used to specify the rating? What do you think? Thank you in advance for your answers, Dario Pe1ft.jpg
Competitive Research | | Darioz0 -
Anyone have an opinion about BrightEdge?
I'm going to sit in on a BrightEdge demo tomorrow, to see if the SEO services they offer might be right for a client of mine. Just wondering -- Does anyone have experience using BrightEdge SEO services? If so, what is your opinion? Any particular question I should be sure to ask the sales rep during the demo? Thanks so much for any thoughts/suggestions. -- Jim
Competitive Research | | jimmartin_zoho.com0