Define: Good Content
-
I am curious to hear what you guys consider to be the characteristics of good content and in which order if you have a preference.
Here are a few I can think of:
- Informative (you can learn something new)
- Substantial (enough of it and thorough)
- Complete (doesn't give half-baked information or ideas)
- Unique (not regurgitated original content)
- Helpful (practical actionable information)
- Visual (content complemented by media)
- Referenced (claims made are substantiated through citations)
- Entertaining (or otherwise emotional, e.g. surprising, sad, shocking, controversial)
- Formatted (easy to read and follow)
- Timely (right content at the right time, applies for news)
- Professional (writing style, grammar, spelling and sentence structure)
Can you add to this list?
-
"quality content = ranks well."
Well that's what Goog keeps telling us. ... so are we talking real world or pixie land?
Honestly, I knew I was stepping into a pile of crap when I put the "Ranks Well" criteria in there. But, it sure makes for a good litmus test. So yes... quality content = ranks well. ...and the vicious circle continues.
-
I guess, as far as SEO goes, all content is written with an action in mind. So whatever increases the action is what I would measure
Bounce rate/time on page is not a good one for me, you could have a great reference piece that people return to over and over but dont stay long or they naturally bounce from it - like the BBC or CNN homepage, continuously checking for news - youd have to be super careful what you measured on that type of site, as you could unintentionally skew what you produce
-
1 part, should be that it grabs you visually straight away - like a glue value, keeps you glued to that page to actually engage with the content - that can be a good headline, or image or typography or any combo
- Actionable!
-
We're working on the duplicate posts. I was able to delete some of them, but not all.
Keri
-
Well, one would assume that quality content = ranks well. It's kind of a loop, isn't it
Demand is a very interesting point!
If there are 200 content pieces on a topic versus only 2 pieces of content and one is really good value would undoubtedly be much higher where there is less such content available.
-
I am surprised that as a bunch of SEOs that no one has said SEO friendly.
So can I add:
- Ranks Well.
- Demand Research (Keyword/demand/competition)
Demand researched content also makes for more engaging content, but any of the current list could be classified as engaging. The difficulty with defining "good content" is that it's an opinion. But you've got a great list going. I wonder how individuals would prioritize that list based on their verticals.
-
Good Content is specific to what ever would get the site book marked, and that is very specific to the topic and purpose of the site. Give the visitor the information they were seeking, and you have great content. It doesn't need to be deep or wide , it just has to tell them what they came to see.
I would be interested in how you all measure great content? Bounce rate? Conversions?
-
I read this post and it reminded me of when this actually clicked with me recently. I have read thousands of words on blogging, writing good content and the list above resonates across the top bloggers that you can read who all beat this drum constantly. I was recently in the process of putting a guest post together for a blogging forum when after a day I realised that I had put more effort into the guest post than any post that I had for my own blog. So I **abandoned **the planned submission and used it on my own blog. I had spent 2-3 hours tweaking, looking for good images, deleting wasted words, working on all the formating and so on.
A lot of us who are email slaves and quick content junkies should revert back to our English High School class where we spent time on our essays for exams and tests. I have even applied this logic to forum replies like this. In the past I would have been much pithier and not as informative (I am being informative I hope !!)
It is worth looking at some of the blogging resources out there Problogger to see that they constantly expound on this topic. Even guys like Matt cutts say it again and a again about making your content STAND OUT like just thereWe
You may say how do I do this for a product like a Blue Widget. At first glance this may seem impossible. But if I am looking to buy a blue widget and am doing research over the web I would like to see
- Product Information in depth
- Reviews
- Some usage of it
- How to use it in different situations.
- A user forum
- Some evidence of good product support
- Some social media juice about it and some fan love
Replace blue widget with website design (my area), cameras, puppy dog collars and so on.
You might say that this sounds like complete overkill but believe me it isn't as the effort will pay off as over time your site will become a rich resource of solid quality information that can't be gotten anywhere else and there will be good payoffs.
There is a well known saying you wont get better by doing the same things every day so work on your blue widget page today then move onto the red widgets and keep going. Then revisit them all and polish again.
-
I use two columns for articles.
Left column is for text with multiple subheadings. (scanable)
Right column is for images, captions, data tables, references, video embeds.
Really important promotions and links to related content on my own site are floated to the left side of the left column or roadblocking it.
This makes for easy scanning and a big stack of images/data/video in the right column gives a rich and substantive look.
-
Well, I guess a well-formatted content does not always mean scannable. Little eye catching elements, bolding of key terms and colour would aid in the process.
-
I wanted to emphasize the scannable aspect in terms of bullet points etc. But, yes, I guess it's the same
-
Give Google content it strives/loves to deliver to it's users - the thing that is the core of their whole ethos: RELEVANT content - without that Google users go elsewhere to find it and you miss the opportunity to promote your product or service.
-
Ah, good point which goes well with "Formatted (easy to read and follow)".
-
I agree on that. That's a very important step. Reassurance that they are in the right place before they hit 'back'.
-
When the visitor arrives on your content the first goal is to let him know that he is in the right place with a very clear title and then let him know that he is in an interesting place with an interesting graphic above the fold.
Even before he determines if your content is gold or crap the appearance must pull him in. Then as with a good book you need a "hook" and after that the real quality of the content and the presentation style will have to take over.
Then... if you want the link or the tweet or the like, the impact must be there. This can be quality of content, substantiveness, engagement, impressiveness.
Bottom line... I think that you must have both academic quality along with aesthetic presentation - without stinking it up with too many ads and side-promotions. Its a fine balance and hard to know when you have it.
-
- scannable (aid people in natural scanning proces)
-
I consider user driven metrics as a big part of what Google uses to judge quality (citations, links, social buzz). Other stuff would have to be with their understanding of the content itself. I wonder how much of it they are able to figure out?
And when it comes to user motivation to spread and engage I am curious what the elements are and attempt to dissect and analyse what makes up a good piece of content.
-
I think of this question in terms of the effect that it will have on the visitor.... Will it motivate the visitor to link, tweet, like, share, email, bookmark.
If it doesn't do that then it isn't very good.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is it a good idea to publish a list of players in my industry, including competitors?
I am working with an e-commerce site that does mostly B2B sales in a very commoditized industrial product segment in which very few manufacturers sell direct. It's all done through distributors and resellers, like our site. We don't often win on price, but we do win enough SERP battles to get the visitors and provide great customer service, so we have gained a following and we do compete well for some very large orders. We list several thousand products and in a given month, visitors regularly hit over 1,000 different landing pages. While we make most money from relatively few items, most items are sold only once a year, maybe twice. It's a very longtail business, and therefore tough to do a great job optimizing all pages down the tail. So, one thing I'm doing is building out a set of resource pages with common questions, terminology and other useful bits so the site gains more traffic and authority, in the hope of boosting product pages. e.g., an in-depth category definition in the glossary could link to all the items in a category. In addition to adding content that augments product pages, I'd like to create basically a map of the whole industry, including brand name manufacturers, white label manufacturers, distributors, etc. If it's going to be a truly comprehensive list, it should include my competitors. Given that I have never found such a list, it feels like this could be a good page and earn some links. Since it's unlikely much traffic will even find that page, compared to product pages, are there potential pitfalls I should be aware of? I get the feeling if I create a page that others bookmark and visit when hunting for products in our market, we win, even if most visitors to that page won't buy from us. I've been in this industry for four years now, and it's amazing how hard it is to find some companies. Only a handful even think about SEO, since they sell through other channels. Should I link to all my competitors (which is only about a dozen) among hundreds of other industry links?
Content Development | | Mike_Sobol0 -
Project content marketing SEO value and Traffic
I'm creating a content marketing plan and need to project the visitor impact it could have on an exact-keyword domain name. The plan will produce at least 10 quality, original articles per day. Are there any common metrics or ways to guess what the visitor impact could be?
Content Development | | msantore821 -
New website content before or after new webdesign launch?
Hi, We are planning a full website redesign and rewriting the content of the key pages. The new contents will be ready sooner than the new website, what is the better solution? 1. Replace the content of the old site with the new (better) contents
Content Development | | Jozsefodor
or
2. Waiting until the new website will be ready (over months) and launch it with it?0 -
Recommendations Content / Copywriter
We are based in the UK & have used alot of content / copywriters & so far have struggled to find someone we feel meets our needs? Can anyone recommend a content writing company or freelancer? Thanks
Content Development | | webguru20140 -
Duplicate Legal Content
Oftentimes lawyer websites will publish laws (codes, statutes, regulations, case law, etc). They add no value to the text, it's just copy pasted. Therefore, the same text/content may be on potentially hundreds of websites. Does google interpret this as duplicate content, or does it recognize government content as special? I want to have the laws on my website as well, however I am debating whether to add no follow tags or not. Or I'm thinking about adding value to the content by breaking down the specific law. However, even then at least 50% of the content on the page will still be the law, and I'm not sure if that is enough to be considered duplicate content.
Content Development | | irnikij0 -
Is there a way to repost content (with permission) to another site without being penalized by Google?
I write a monthly Social Media Marketing column for a local Business Journal and the column is printed in their paper as well as posted on their website. Is there any way I can repost these articles on my website's blog without being penalized by Google for "duplicate content"?
Content Development | | vyki0 -
Is there a software that gives keyword density for primary and seconday keywords as content is written ?
What software do you recommend to write web content for a new website and then manage the same as the site gets older. I am looking for a software that can take a list of primary and secondary keywords - give the keyword density and have the ability to create internal links between pages.
Content Development | | aromal70 -
Displaying archive content articles in a writers bio page
My site has writers, and each has their own profile page (accessible when you click their name inside an article). We set up the code in a way that the bios, in addition to the actual writer photo/bio, would dynamically generate links to each article he/she produces. Figured that someone reading something by Bob Smith, might want to read other stuff by him. Which was fine, initially. Fast forward, and some of these writers have 3,4, even 15 pages of archives, as the archive system paginates every 10 articles (so www.example.com/bob-smith/archive-page3, etc) My thinking is that this is a bad thing. The articles are likely already found elsewhere in the site (under the content landing page it was written for, for example) and I visualize spiders getting sucked into these archive black holes, never to return. I also assume that it is just more internal mass linking (yech) and probably doesnt help the overall TOS/bounce/exit, etc. Thoughts?
Content Development | | EricPacifico0