Free Media Site / High Traffic / Low Engagement / Strategies and Questions
-
Hi,
Imagine a site "mediapalooza dot com" where the only thing you do there is view free media.
Yet Google Analytics is showing the average view of a media page is about a minute; where the average length of media is 20 - 90 minutes.
And imagine that most of this media is "classic" and that it is generally not available elsewhere.
Note also that the site ranks terribly in Google, despite having decent Domain Authority (in the high 30's), Page Authority in the mid 40's and a great site and otherwise quite active international user base with page views in the tens of thousands per month.
Is it possible that GA is not tracking engagement (time on site) correctly?
Even accounting for the imperfect method of GA that measures "next key pressed" as a way to terminate the page as a way to measure time on page, our stats are truly abysmal, in the tenths of a percentage point of time measured when compared with actual time we think the pages are being used.
If so, will getting engagement tracking to more accurately measure time on specif pages and site signal Google that this site is actually more important than current ranking indicates?
There's lots of discussion about "dwell time" as this relates to ranking, and I'm postulating that if we can show Google that we have extremely good engagement instead of the super low stats that we are reporting now, then we might get a boost in ranking.
Am I crazy? Has anyone got any data that proves or disproves this theory?
as I write this out, I detect many issues - let's have a discussion on what else might be happening here.
We already know that low engagement = low ranking.
Will fixing GA to show true engagement have any noticeable impact on ranking?
Can't wait to see what the MOZZERS think of this!
-
Question, as it was entirely clear in the original question (or I missed it) and I think addressed later ... but if people are coming in and viewing the video without clicking anything (think youtube) then leave, then the time on site and page are not going to register. Is that happening here?
Now to the questions of if engagements rate get better in GA, if that can impact ranking. I have seen no studies on that and I highly doubt Google ties things in your GA account to ranking. Too many people mess up implementations for that. But I have not seen proof either way.
Now, Dwell, or whatever you want to call it, the instance where a user clicks on a result and within a relatively short period of time (as I think it depends on the query) goes back to the same SERP, I think that is taken into account, or is being investigated. That's Google's own data and totally possible to use. Do they? I am not sure and have seen no proof.
-
Thanks for your thoughts.
Been through it all, been doing a thorough site audit for the last couple of months. (that's what I do!)
Ghost and referral spam is somethign that I am very familiar with but it is well less than 1% of all hits.
Fortunately, on this site, it is well in the minority. I see it on other sites and it is nasty there but not an issue here.
I've been solving canonicals, dead ends, low engagement pages, improving pages (many) etc. And with this site there are indeed thousands of issues to deal with, for sure - but this is not the largest site I've worked on, not by a long shot.
This one has been fun. Been doing it for over 10 years on dozens of sites of all sizes.
Time on site is up strongly (generally), as is conversion and general engagement figures.
But those long form media items are still showing extremely poor engagement despite low bounce rates. and I know the system is not tracking them as I am one of my own "customers". I've been actually viewing this content for several months myself, and where I know I'm viewing 30 + 60 minute media for sure, GA is still only recording 2 or 3 minutes each time - and I can clearly see this in the GA data.
Let me give you another clue - many of these items have a zero bounce rate and a zero time on page and 100% exits - (keep in mind the media is many minutes long) what do these telling numbers suggest to you?
...yet despite all this I'm doing, ranking is simply staying near norms - although it is starting to fluctuate more widely than prior norms it is still where it is - and I'm tracking ranking for thousands of terms using 3 different systems.
Normally, I'd be seeing a fairly solid increase after all I've done.
Love to see if we can actually answer the original question if at all possible.
Can poorly configured GA cause low engagement in such a way that if it is fixed, might higher engagement figures drive increasing ranking??
Didn't DWELL get discussed here quite thoroughly?
for backgrounders, this cites Dr Pete.
http://www.searchenginejournal.com/understanding-impact-dwell-time-seo/108905/
-
Hello, my friend.
Have you heard about referral spam and ghost hits? This might be your answer to unreal numbers. Here is a post about it: https://moz.com/blog/stop-ghost-spam-in-google-analytics-with-one-filter
Also, as it was mentioned above, good DA/PA doesn't mean or guarantee rankings. What about 10000 other things SEO is about?
Also, is time on page the only problem child? everything else is fine? It sounds that you need good analysis of google analytics data.
-
I understand the inverse relationship and there is no question that in reality, there are few that would engage for tens of minutes, just due to the nature of behavior - and the averages bear that out.
But when looking very carefully at this only segment, I would expect more than fractions of a percent to spend more than a mere minute.
Your example shows a 10% view rate (like what we see) and 1800 minutes total use.
In our case, in this exact scenario, GA is only showing about 6 minutes total use.
I think that GA is undercounting dwell time by a reasonably large margin.
That said, stating the question more clearly:
Could it be possible that insufficient or incorrect information regarding actual dwell time on the site might be a factor in the abysmal ranking of this site?
-
There are a few different points here that I think are prudent to make:
-
Having a good/great domain authority has no bearing on the actual quality of the content regarding users. I would be hesitant about making decisions based on two non-correlative data points. Quality in this context refers to the value the average user perceives that content to have.
-
As such, here's an example: Say I have a page hosting a video that's 90 minutes. If 1,000 people visit the page, let's say that 100 came there with an actual interest specifically in that video. Of those 100, maybe 20 will watch the entire thing. So, 20 out of 1,000 people getting to 90 minutes isn't going to give you a high average. This is obviously an abstract example, but it makes the point that video length means nothing as a metric without any insight into these other key numbers.
-
That said, yes, Google is imperfect and won't measure anything perfectly. But a general rule for content of any type is to expect only a certain percentage (usually not very high) to be highly engaged. It's an inverse curve structure in terms of graphical representation.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is it possible to reverse a G algo update (Penguin/Panda)?
...if yes, how? Can you share resources / blogs / etc... I want to reverse my site's rankings. Here's the gist of it: I recently purchased a website that has 600+ pieces of aged content on it. Domain was ranking great about 10 years ago (1M uniques a year) It apparently got hit by a G algo update in 2012/2013 (Penguin and Panda?), because the rankings have tanked (10 hits a day) In the past two years, the previosu owner published about 100+ off-topic blog posts and it appears been using the site as a PBN. The UX sucks and there's a ton of 404s. (NOTE: I am in the process of removing that content and have cleaned up the 404s). Domain stats: 20+ years old (1998) and DA 32, linking domains 850+, inbound links of 16k+ What I've done: disavow (550 domains), fix all the 404s What I'm doing / about to do: remove spammy content write new/fresh on-topic content update the site UX start a backlink building campaign My questions: is it common to bounce back from a G algo update? is it hard / am I over my head / am I a sucker trying to get the site back alive? are there articles about bouncing back that you can share so I can learn more about this process? Or agencies / consultants, etc that you recommend? what other recommendations / suggestions do you have that would help reverse this 8-year-old penalty?
Reporting & Analytics | | seo.owl0 -
Slow growth in organic traffic
Hi, Recently our website after 5 months of launch started seeing more organic traffic, thanks to the seo effort being put. However, off late the growth is quite slow and we don't see much increase in organic traffic any more. Any idea on what could have happened to cause this or is it normal. Here is the link to the website to check and if you can recommend anything - https://www.keyhub.com Thanks, Search-Console-Search-Analytics-https-www-keyhub-com-1.png
Reporting & Analytics | | kh-priyam1 -
Why is Indeed.com traffic appearing as organic in Google Analytics?
A large number of sessions in my client's Google Analytics account appear to come from medium: organic and source:Indeed. Since I'm focused on SEO for this project, I'd prefer that Indeed be treated as referral traffic. Any ideas for fixing this issue? Also, and I'm sure the answer is no, is there a way to fix the past data in Google Analytics that has already reported Indeed as an organic medium?
Reporting & Analytics | | Kevin_P0 -
What does 'Safari (in-app)' mean in Google Analytics browser traffic?
Hi, can anyone explain what 'Safari (in-app)' refers to in my browser sources? Also, it has a very high bounce rate - any ideas why?
Reporting & Analytics | | b4cab1 -
Google Analytics - Organic Search Traffic & Queries -What caused the huge difference?
Our website traffic dropped a little bit during the last month, but it's getting better now, almost the same with previous period. But our conversion rate dropped by 50% for the last three weeks. What could cause this huge drop in conversion rate? In Google Analytics, I compared the Organic Search Traffic with previous period, the result is similar. But the Search Engine Optimization ->Queries shows that the clicks for last month is almost zero. What could be the cause of this huge differnce? e9sJNwD.png k4M8Fa5.png
Reporting & Analytics | | joony0 -
Ecommerce site product link. How to handle a link that doesn't exist.
Suppose we have this product A, and we just have a single item for this. When the item is sold out we do not want to show it on the website saying "out of stock". Instead we would like to remove the product from out store which will now result in a url that doesn't exist. And google webmaster tool and Moz analytic will show them as page not found after they crawl over the site. Should i be generating a new sitemap.xml and update ? How do i handle those pages that don't exist anymore ? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | MindlessWizard0 -
Why my WMT is showing more clicks than my Google Analytics Organic Search Traffic?
Hello Everybody, Can somebody help me figure out this puzzle: My WMT is showing 6000 clicks, while my Organic Traffic in Google Analytics is showing only 3500 daily ... how is that possible? Best Regards
Reporting & Analytics | | Muhammad_Jabali0 -
URL Structure Q - /UniqueURL/ProductA or /SubcategoryURL/ProductA?
Hi Mozers, I have a niche ecommerce site http://www.ecustomfinishes.com that sells custom barn wood furniture. I have about 600 products online. 2 weeks ago I started rewriting my urls from /subcategoryurl/ProductA to /UNIQUEURL/productA for my individual products, For example for my subcategory farm tables (150 products) I had /rustic-farm-tables/productA, /rustic-farm-tables/ProductB ...."rustic-farm-table" about 150 times. 2 weeks ago I started changing the 150x "/rustic-farm-table/" to a more descriptive URL such as /white-farm-table/producA /rustic-square-dining-table/ProductB /Black-harvest-table/ProductC Here is why I am need advice: I have 1181 pages, the page with the most entrances with "rustic-farm-tables" is #31/1181 based on entrances. the 2nd most is #71/1181 Alternatively, I have 13 table product pages such a as /12ft-Rustic-Farm-Dining-Table-p/12-foot-table-with-inlay.htm" that get more entrances than any product that includes "rustic-farm-tables" Since changing the urls to be product specific, my overall traffic has dropped 20%!!! So here is my question: do i continue to have the /UNIQUEURL/product be unique to the product, which is consistant amongst my best preforming pages, yet has dropped my traffic 20% in the last 2 weeks, OR do i keep /SAME-URL/product which written as a best practice, and be happy with the traffic I had? Could the 20% drop just be a temporary shock? Why would this happen? This would be a good long tail/head term experiment. Try to get more head terms, or do what you can do focus on long tail. I hope i was able to explain this well, I say follow the best practices of my best preforming pages, however the 20% drop has me worried. Thank you in advance for your help
Reporting & Analytics | | longdenc_gmail.com0