Is it better to try and boost an old page that ranks on page #5 or create a better new page
-
Hello Everyone,
We have been looking into our placements recently and see that one of our blog posts shows on page #5 for a popular keyword phrase with a lot of search volume.
Lets say the keyword is "couples fitness ideas"
We show on page 5 for a post
/couples-fitness-ideas-19-tips-and-expert-advice/
We want to try and get on the first page for that phrase and wanted to know if it is better if we did one of the following:
1. Create a new page with over 100 ideas with a few more thousands of words. with a new url (thinking /couples-fitness-ideas)
2. Create a new page with a new url (thinking /couples-fitness-ideas) with the same content as the currently ranking post. We would want to do this for more freedom with layout and design of the page rather than our current blog post template.
Add more content, let's say 100 more ideas.
Then forward the old URL to the new one with a 301 redirect.
3. Add more content to the existing post without changing the layout and change the URL.
Look forward to your thoughts
-
I just wanted to thank everyone again for their insight as well as send an update on the status of our page.
We are now ranking #2 for our target keywords as well as other top10 rankings for similar keywords.
Appreciate all your insight and feedback.
-
Looks good plan. Except content promotion. You need to do them both (updating and promotion) at same time.
-
I have a question regarding adding content to the page.
Currently we have the 19 ideas. Would it do more harm than good to add 5 ideas then publish it.
Then add 10 then publish, add 20 then publish. And so on. Basically updating the post every week or daily with more ideas. Rather than update it one time with 100 new ideas.
Would it be more beneficial or harmful to update the post more frequently than one major update.
Then once we have a significant number we would promote across social and outreach for links.
-
I have a question regarding adding content to the page.
Currently we have the 19 ideas. Would it do more harm than good to add 5 ideas then publish it.
Then add 10 then publish, add 20 then publish. And so on. Basically updating the post every week or daily with more ideas. Rather than update it one time with 100 new ideas.
Would it be more beneficial or harmful to update the post more frequently than one major update.
Then once we have a significant number we would promote across social and outreach for links.
-
Thanks for your feedback. It's good content it can just me expanded upon and have more added to it. This will make it great content.
-
I love how Peter actually brings this point as I recently faced this problem with one of my client. Here is what I would have done if I would be at your place.
If the content you are trying to rank is not good enough, after all the effort all you will get is more traffic with higher bounce rate which I am sure you do not want at the end of the day. One thing you need to make sure that the content you are planning to create is more powerful or the one that you already have is good enough for your target audience.
If you are fine with the content you currently have, stick with that and move as Peter suggest but if you think that the content you are planning is more powerful, I would suggest creating a new page and redirect the current page to the new URL. This way you will skip self-cannibalization plus the audience will get new and more powerful content than the one you were previously targeting.
Now you have the new content ready with old one redirecting to the new URL, it’s time for you to properly optimize your page, get some links and get it rank on your targeted key phrase.
Hope this helps!
-
Awesome.
So add some new ideas to the current post that ranks while we work on the new and improved page. This will move it up a little bit to make the switch even more effective.
Your other insight is great as well. I love Brian Dean's stuff too. Super Helpful.
I'll keep you updated on our progress.
Hopefully it can be a learning experience for all.
-
True.
First make backup and then proceed with #2 or #3. Also you can improve little bit #3 with few "extra" tips and just to see movements in SERP. Because you know - there is vacantions ahead and probably beginning of 2016 you can see move.
Of course implement good and old tricks - social signals, little bit fresh links from authoritative and trusted sources. Also you can put there videos - one video can put your average visit duration up and do engagement. Example is Moz - their regular articles are text-text-text-image-text-text-image and so on. But their WBF articles are text-video (length approx. 10 mins)-text-text-text.
#2 is same way as Brian Dean (Backlinko) - Skyscraper Technique.
Also Rand Fishkin talk about that as 10x http://www.slideshare.net/randfish/onsite-seo-in-2015-an-elegant-weapon-for-a-more-civilized-marketer/102-10X_Content_is_the_Future -
Thanks for your feedback. I would assume if did a whole new page/post for the same keyword we would be competing with ourselves and do more harm than good.
We are going to move forward with number 2 and see how it goes.
-
First you need to read this one:
https://moz.com/ugc/how-to-keep-keyword-cannibalism-from-robbing-your-sites-performance
and more articles about "keyword cannibalism" or "content cannibalism" or something.
Because for you it's much more important to not harm current position as primary goal and secondary goal is to get some improvements.So it's safe to try N:3 on same or other page just for test. But N:2 is probably correct way. You just to watch for implementing same on-page SEO optimization for new layout if there is new one.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google ranking content for phrases that don't exist on-page
I am experiencing an issue with negative keywords, but the “negative” keyword in question isn’t truly negative and is required within the content – the problem is that Google is ranking pages for inaccurate phrases that don’t exist on the page. To explain, this product page (as one of many examples) - https://www.scamblermusic.com/albums/royalty-free-rock-music/ - is optimised for “Royalty free rock music” and it gets a Moz grade of 100. “Royalty free” is the most accurate description of the music (I optimised for “royalty free” instead of “royalty-free” (including a hyphen) because of improved search volume), and there is just one reference to the term “copyrighted” towards the foot of the page – this term is relevant because I need to make the point that the music is licensed, not sold, and the licensee pays for the right to use the music but does not own it (as it remains copyrighted). It turns out however that I appear to need to treat “copyrighted” almost as a negative term because Google isn’t accurately ranking the content. Despite excellent optimisation for “Royalty free rock music” and only one single reference of “copyrighted” within the copy, I am seeing this page (and other album genres) wrongly rank for the following search terms: “free rock music”
On-Page Optimization | | JCN-SBWD
“Copyright free rock music"
“Uncopyrighted rock music”
“Non copyrighted rock music” I understand that pages might rank for “free rock music” because it is part of the “Royalty free rock music” optimisation, what I can’t get my head around is why the page (and similar product pages) are ranking for “Copyright free”, “Uncopyrighted music” and “Non copyrighted music”. “Uncopyrighted” and “Non copyrighted” don’t exist anywhere within the copy or source code – why would Google consider it helpful to rank a page for a search term that doesn’t exist as a complete phrase within the content? By the same logic the page should also wrongly rank for “Skylark rock music” or “Pretzel rock music” as the words “Skylark” and “Pretzel” also feature just once within the content and therefore should generate completely inaccurate results too. To me this demonstrates just how poor Google is when it comes to understanding relevant content and optimization - it's taking part of an optimized term and combining it with just one other single-use word and then inappropriately ranking the page for that completely made up phrase. It’s one thing to misinterpret one reference of the term “copyrighted” and something else entirely to rank a page for completely made up terms such as “Uncopyrighted” and “Non copyrighted”. It almost makes me think that I’ve got a better chance of accurately ranking content if I buy a goat, shove a cigar up its backside, and sacrifice it in the name of the great god Google! Any advice (about wrongly attributed negative keywords, not goat sacrifice ) would be most welcome.0 -
Why am I ranking on both Bing and Yahoo and yet the rankings are declining on Google
I'm seeing ranking go up on both Bing and Yahoo and yet they are going down on Google. I did see a bunch of spammy links show up about a month ago but have managed to get all those taken down although did not get any warnings from Google in Webmaster tools about them was more of a preemptive measure. The site in question. http://www.gocitrusnow.com
On-Page Optimization | | mwaters19790 -
Redirecting pages (old site to new site)
I have a question- there is one location, one set of pages for both the old and new site on the same host environment so when I did the redirect it get into a loop trying to redirect from itself to itself Not sure how its gonna affect SEO. Will pages get hit for duplicate content?
On-Page Optimization | | Yanez0 -
Deleted pages still registering as 404 pages.
I have a an all html site that I can only work on through the ftp. The previous marketing company ran a script that built thousands of location landing pages, but all they did was change the tags and headers and the keywords in the pages, other than that they are all duplicate pages. I removed them, but Google is reading them as 404 pages. How do I tell Google those pages don't exist? or do I just need to let the bots crawl it a few times and it will see that eventually?
On-Page Optimization | | SwanJob0 -
Local Service Pages
We've all been here before if you do local. What type of content should go on a local service page when dealing with multiple service locations? You could: Describe Services List Local News Articles List staff in that location (although I would prefer in the staff page for that city) Testimonials from that location or service But what happens when you are describing something that needs no explanation. Or a medical procedure that requires no localization and altering the wording can actually cause legal problems if misstated. Matt Cuts recommends a few sentences to a paragraph to describe a service, but my experience hasn't found this to hold up locally. Any ideas or suggestions about how this could be remedied?
On-Page Optimization | | allenrocks0 -
301 to Intermediate Page then Rel=Canonical from Intermediate to target page
Hi I'm working on an eCommerce site and don't have direct access to the CMS. I had requested developers to provide me a facilty to 301 via htaccess however this is working slight differently. I need guidance from experts whether it's okay or not: Old Page: example.com/old Target New Page: example.com/new After Implementing the redirect, It redirects to an intermediate page or in other words, The same target URL with a question mark added: example.com/new? (notice the question mark in the new URL) This intermediate page has a canonical tag for the exact target URL. So, if I 301 redirect example.com/old to example.com/new? (Intermediate page) and If the intermediate page example.com/new? has a canonical tag for the exact target URL (example.com/new), Will I be able to pass the link juice and authority of old page to the new page?
On-Page Optimization | | Ankkesh0 -
Different pages for OS's vs 1 Page with Dynamic Content (user agent), what's the right approach?
We are creating a new homepage and the product are at different stages of development for different OS's. The value prop/messaging/some target keywords will be different for the various OS's for that reason. Question is, for SEO reasons, is it better to separate them into different pages or use 1 page and flip different content in based on the user agent?
On-Page Optimization | | JoeLin0 -
If a site has https versions of every page, will the search engines view them as duplicate pages?
A client's site has HTTPS versions of every page for their site and it is possible to view both http and https versions of the page. Do the search engines view this as duplicate content?
On-Page Optimization | | harryholmes0070