Why one of my top pages dropped?
-
Hello here.
Our website, virtualsheetmusic.com, is pretty popular in the sheet music realm, and we used to rank on the first page for the keyword "violin sheet music" until a few weeks ago with our violin dedicated page:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Violin.html
But a couple of weeks ago we dropped to over the 5th page on Google (I can't even find us!) and I have no idea why. Most of our top ranking pages are still there though. This never happened before, after 17 years on the web.
Do you have any idea why that could have happened?
-
I almost forgot: about Internal Links, please, have a look at this discussion I am having here below:
https://moz.com/community/q/rankings-drop-and-google-search-console-internal-links-panel-correlation
I'd love to know your thoughts about it. Thank you again!
-
Thank you Everett, I understand, I started this thread thinking that just one page of my "category pages" had a rank drop, and that was the "violin sheet music" optimized page. Hence the confusion, my fault. Then, after further research, I discovered that all instrumental category pages dropped in a similar way, therefore I begun to see the problem no more "keyword relate" but "quality related"... here we go
In any case, yes, thank you for the tip, I'll check my internal links. I know that we have overoptimized those a big deal in the past years, and we may want to "de-overoptimize" them a little bit.
And yes, as I am discussing on the thread below, I have currently "noindexed" all those pages while we are working on a redesign of them:
https://moz.com/community/q/can-adding-noindex-help-with-quality-penalizations
Hopefully that'll make most of the trick.
Thank you again very much, I appreciated your help!
-
Fabrizo,
You may be correct about it being a quality issue. What makes me think it is link related is that you said it only affected certain keywords, which tends to be the result of overoptimized anchor text. You may also want to check internal links, which can be overoptimized as well.
In terms of quality, it wouldn't hurt to improve the pages visually. You conversion rates would probably skyrocket.
-
Everett, another clue that suggests me that those category pages may have been hit by a "quality" algorithm instead than a "back link" one, is that it looks like Google released a "Panda" like update in June, and that's exactly when the problem started on my own website:
http://www.gsqi.com/marketing-blog/june-2016-google-algorithm-update/
I can confirm what Glenn highlighted in his article over there: same dates, similar issues.
-
Thanks Everett, I am aware of those pages and they have been already put on our disavow list, but I was talking about all other category pages that have lost rankings in a similar massive way for which I can't find any particular bad back link.
For example, I have used Open Site Explorer for the following similar category pages, but I couldn't find any bad back link:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Choir.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/StringQuartet.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/TenorSax.html
The following ones belongs to a different category altogether (composer's pages) and yet, I can't find any bad back link pointing to them:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Beethoven/DownloadBeethoven.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Chopin/DownloadChopin.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Debussy/DownloadDebussy.html
And many others...
So, I am wondering, why those pages dropped as well? Can a single penalized page put down an entire category of similar pages?
-
This looks like a paid text ad:
http://www.news-1.com/musicnews.php
I'm not sure what this is, but it could look suspicious:
http://web.supernet.com.bo/twallace/Violin/InternetViolin.html
Some of the links are iffy, like the ones from music sites. These are topically relevant, when every link has the exact same anchor text it begins to look suspicious.
This link seems very out of place and spammy:
http://web.supernet.com.bo/twallace/Violin/InternetViolin.htmlThe premise for this text link, again with the exact-match anchor text, is that Dr. Who may want to relax and learn how to write "Virtual Sheet Music"?
All of these pages have links like that. You need to do a lot of disavows.
-
Thanks for your reply Everett.
Well, I don't think that may be a backlink problem because I haven't found any clearly "spammy" websites linking to those category pages. Actually those pages don't have that many backlinks overall.
Please, let me know if you think I am missing anything key here.
I appreciate your help!
-
I don't understand why you don't think it could be a backlink problem. All of those pages I checked had some spammy looking links. By "spammy looking" I mean exact-match anchor text and followable text ads on low-quality websites.
-
Everett, I have an update about this issue and I'd like to know your thoughts about it.
After further research we have discovered that our "violin category page" wasn't the only one to have lost a lot of ranking in the past month or so. A whole bunch of category pages, similar to the violin page have lost rankings as well, a big deal, from page 1-2 to page 30 or more. Strange thing, it looks like our "most popular" and most "linked" pages have lost rankings, whereas less popular and less linked page have lost nothing (!!)
Here are some examples:
Category pages that have lost rank since June 25:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Violin.html (dropped on 7/3)
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/AltoSax.html (dropped on 7/19)
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/PianoSolo.html (dropped on 7-19)
and many other "instrument category pages"
Other popular category pages like our most popular composers page have lost rankings in a similar way:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Bach/DownloadBach.html (dropped on 7/2)
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Mozart/DownloadMozart.html (dropped on 7/6)
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Debussy/DownloadDebussy.html (dropped on 6/25)
And as I said above, other similar pages, but not as popular and linked within our website, haven't lost any rankings:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Accordion.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/BassGuitar.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/score/ClarinetCBb.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/EnnioMorricone/DownloadEnnioMorricone.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/MichaelWSmith/DownloadMichaelWSmith.html
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/MarkHayes/DownloadMarkHayes.html
Another strange issue is that all our "genres" category pages are ok, up and running and seems to have not been affected:
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Genre/Jazz/
http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/Indici/Genre/Pop/
Note though that genre pages are much less popular than instrumental and composer/author pages, and less linked within our site.
Any ideas? I don't think this can be due to a "penguin" or "back-link profile" related issue, but maybe a Panda issue, or... what else?
-
Thank you Everett! That makes sense. I appreciated your help!
I'll let you know if I'll have any more questions about all this, but I think for now I'll have to work to cleanup my back link profile first... thank you again.
-
If another site is linking to you, and you don't want that link to "harm" your site, a rel="nofollow" tag within the href is enough.
That said, if you want a link to "help" your site, a rel="nofollow" tag is not recommended. I don't know if your owned sites are harming or helping you. There are much more suspicious links I'd take care of first.
Good luck.
-
Thank you Everett,
I see what you say. But, still I need to know if a rel="nofollow" is enough to get out of trouble, if any.
Thanks!
-
I found those links with Open Site Explorer.
The example you gave of the forum page doesn't see overly suspicious to me. I'd take that on a case-by-case basis. Generally you should start with the most obviously suspicious links first, like those I provided in examples above. If getting rid of those don't do the trick you can move down the list to borderline cases like the one you provided.
-
Thanks Everett for your reply.
About my first question, I am afraid I wasn't clear enough. I was asking about the links I have from those few websites I own that could appear like "paid" links.
For example, take the link to our site on the site below we also own which you already spotted above:
http://www.classicalforums.com/articles/Fourteenth_Century_Composer.html
Do you think that link could be easily "disavowed" by just adding the rel="nofollow" tag?
Also, may I ask you how did you find your above mentioned suspect links?
Thank you so much!
-
1. I don't recommend nofollowing links on your own website. If you don't trust the place you're linking to, maybe then. But usually we don't link to pages we don't trust. I doubt it would help your situation.
2. Use the Moz toolset, including Open Site Explorer. If you can find their contact information request that the link be removed. Keep records of these emails or phone calls so you can submit it with your disavow file, which you should submit for any links that do not get removed after reaching out to the webmaster, or any links for which you could not find webmaster contact details (keep track of these too so Google knows you tried).
-
Also, another couple of questions:
1. Can adding rel="nofollow" to links we own enough? I'd like to keep those links for visitors.
2. How do you suggest tackling unnatural links: contacting the web owners asking to remove those links AND submitting those pages to Google via the disavowing tool right away, or just contacting the web owners hoping they'll remove the links?
Thank you for your help.
-
Thank you Everett for your reply and kind comment about my name, grazie!
With the only exception of the link on classicalforums.com (which we own, and that link has been there for almost 10 years now), we never paid for links and we never "endorsed" those other links you wrote about. I guess like those there are many others around, no idea who and why linked to us in such weird ways. Some of those links looks like have been out there for a long time, and we have never been penalized by Penguin, only by Panda back in 2011... but then we recovered by Panda by tackling and fixing all our duplicate page issues.
In any case, I'll definitively do some research on our back-link profile, but how would you decide when a link should be disavowed or not?
-
Hello Fabrizo Ferrari,
Your name is fantastico!
I would listen to Patrick and do a backlink audit. Here are a few I found that would in-and-of-themselves, help explain an anchor-text specific ranking drop to a specific page:
http://www.news-1.com/musicnews.php
This page has a text link ad with that anchor text.http://www.classicalforums.com/articles/Fourteenth_Century_Composer.html
This forum has a text link ad with that anchor text.This "looks like" a purchased link:
http://www-education.org/music-schools.htmlThis "looks like" a purchased link too, as it seems very out of place:
http://www.scifipulse.net/how-long-can-doctor-survive/I'm sure there are more to consider disavowing. Good luck to you.
-
Patrick, I have tried the Panguin Tool you suggested, and it looks like we had a drop in traffic after the last Mobile update of May 1st, but our website is mobile friendly, why should we have been penalized because of that?
I am eager to know your thoughts on that. Thanks!
-
Thank you Patrick for your reply.
Yes, here is what we have already done and keep doing regularly:
1. Competitor research: We are perfectly aligned with our top competitors, and we would deserve the 5-10 spot in search results. Actually most of the top ranked pages are crappy websites with pages plenty of ads and pretty much the same (messy) contents, it is surprising we have been penalized compared to those ugly pages.
2. SEO Audit: We perform that monthly and we have no special technical issues right now besides some thin content among our product pages that we are trying to improve continuously since 2011.
What we have NOT done is a backlink quality audit, and what you suggest doing (and the tool you are suggesting) is something we can definitively look into right now.
What really puzzles me why that page has dropped so much (or completely removed, I can't find it!) compared with all other top pages of ours that haven't changed. The only logical explanation that now comes to my mind, after reading your posting, is that some kind bad back link pointing to that page has caused this issue... any more thoughts?
-
Hi there
What I would do is this - take a look at your competitors that are now ranking for this - look at the content that's ranking, the type of content it is (educational, transactional, informational, etc.) and see how it aligns with your content. From there, write down what you feel is most important that they are doing and how you can apply (tweaking of course for your unique site) to your marketing strategy.
I would also, because this is such a drastic drop, try aligning your Google Analytics with Google algorithm updates - you can do so with Panguin Tool, it's immensely helpful. Sometimes this could show you if you need to conduct a backlink or content audit depending on what type of penalty you align with, if any.
Also, make sure that you conduct both a SEO audit and a technical audit to see if there are any low hanging fruit.
Hope this helps! Let me know if you have any questions or comments!
Patrick
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How can I avoid duplicate content for a new landing page which is the same as an old one?
Hello mozers! I have a question about duplicate content for you... One on my clients pages have been dropping in search volume for a while now, and I've discovered it's because the search term isn't as popular as it used to be. So... we need to create a new landing page using a more popular search term. The page which is losing traffic is based on the search query "Can I put a solid roof on my conservatory" this only gets 0-10 searches per month according to the keyword explorer tool. However, if we changed this to "replacing conservatory roof with solid roof" this gets up to 500 searches per month. Muuuuch better! The issue is, I don't want to close down and re-direct the old page because it's got a featured snippet and sits in position 1. So I'd like to create another page instead... however, as the two are effectively the same content, I would then land myself in a duplicate content issue. If I were to put a rel="canonical" tag in the original "can I put a solid roof...." page but say the master page is now the new one, would that get around the issue?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Virginia-Girtz0 -
Page not being ranked properly
Hi, Wondering if someone could possibly shed some light on why some of our pages are not being ranked properly on Google. For example this page https://www.mypetzilla.co.uk/dog-breeds Keyword "Dog Breeds" we can't be found on and we are absolutely baffled why? Could it be that we are listing all 100 and something dog breeds on one page? Should we introduce pagination or load more as user scrolls down. This page has been up for at least 4 years. Any suggestion or advice would be much appreciated. Many thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mypetzilla0 -
How to replace an already ranked page with a better, more optimised one?
Hello peeps! I need your collective wisdom to help me deal with something. We manage a website that is doing quite well in its niche, however we have the following problem: Our section landing pages are well established and they rank for a wide range of search terms, including some with a transactional focus. It is obvious that these pages do not cater for users with transactional intent. Our competitors are targeting those transactional keywords with a completely different type of pages, and are winning across the board (annoying but understandable). We have now created a number of pages, which are very similar to the ones that our competitors are using and with an even better on-page SEO score ... WIN! ...well, not so much! Our old section pages are still ranking for the transactional search terms and our new pages are getting very little traction and are having a really slow start. 1. I suspect there is some sort of page cannibalisation going on. How would you address that?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Yordan.Vasilev
2. Is there a tried and tested way of telling search engines to rank your new page because it meets the search intent in a better way? Please note that we cannot just redirect the old page to the new one - there are structural and commercial reasons for keeping the old page as it is.
3. Is there anything else that I am missing? Your help is much appreciated.
Thanks
Yordan0 -
Top hierarchy pages vs footer links vs header links
Hi All, We want to change some of the linking structure on our website. I think we are repeating some non-important pages at footer menu. So I want to move them as second hierarchy level pages and bring some important pages at footer menu. But I have confusion which pages will get more influence: Top menu or bottom menu or normal pages? What is the best place to link non-important pages; so the link juice will not get diluted by passing through these. And what is the right place for "keyword-pages" which must influence our rankings for such keywords? Again one thing to notice here is we cannot highlight pages which are created in keyword perspective in top menu. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | vtmoz0 -
What to do with Authoritative footer pages?
Alo everyone! The site I'm working on has had a homepage that essentially used the footer as the main form of navigation on the site and the PA of each of those pages reflects that. I'm helping them re-organize the site (I'm still a noob though), and was curious for some input on this particular situation. Some of the most authoritative pages are: 1. www.charged.fm/privacy - PA 29 2. www.charged.fm/terms - PA 29 My question: Is this just a consequence of previous mistakes that we live with, or is there something involving 301's and creation of new pages that could help us utilize the link juice on these pages. Or should we come up with ways to internally link to 'money' pages from these pages instead? Thanks for any input, Luke
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | keL.A.xT.o0 -
How many inner links on one page?
I have seen Matt Cutts video about links per page and know that too many links "may" harm the flow of link juice. But what should e-commerce sites do? We have category pages with more than a few thousands products in each of them. So linking to each of them dilutes the PR flow? We could use pagination, but doesn't it give a disadvantage in user experience when he needs to go 10 links deep to reach a product? And Google robots won't update the information frequently because it will be on the lowest part of our site? Now our goal is to make all our products appear like Facebook scroll down page. We know that Google doesn't use Ajax to see more links so robots and all the users that don't have JavaScript could see the paginated results. Is it a good way to put all products and links like this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | komeksimas1 -
Home page sudden drop in rank, but not others.
Over the weekend, I noticed "www.thematstore.com" drop out of the search results for "chair mats", where previously it was between 10-12 ranked. The other pages on the domain have remained the same in regards to rankings for their intended keywords. The only thing I changed (on Nov 29th) is the title tag from "Chair Mats - Commercial Quality Chair Mats, Custom Made", to "Chair Mats - Best Custom Chair Mats, Commercial Quality". I know there is a lot that needs to be done on the site, and the site architecture is a bit of a mess (I recommended building a new site)... but I was hoping to gradually fix these issues without gambling with a rank drop. Not sure why the home page all of the sudden dropped out, any suggestions?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Joes_Ideas0 -
Pages with Little Content
I have a website that lists events in Dublin, Ireland. I want to provide a comprehensive number of listings but there are not enough hours in the day to provide a detailed (or even short) unique description for every event. At the moment I have some pages with little detail other than the event title and venue. Should I try and prevent Google from crawling/indexing these pages for fear of reducing the overall ranking of the site? At the moment I only link to these pages via the RSS feed. I could remove the pages entirely from my feed, but then that mean I remove information that might be useful to people following the events feed. Here is an example page with very little content
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | andywozhere0