What to do about endless size pages
-
I'm working on a site that sells products that come in many different sizes. One product may come in 30 sizes.The products themselves are identical, except for the size. There are collections pages that are all of several kinds of product in a particular size and then there are individual product pages of one product the specific size. Collections pages for widgets size 30 is the same content as widgets size 29. A single product page for gold-widget-size-30 is the same content as the single product page gold-widget-size-29.
To make matters worse, they all have the same tags and very little written content. The site is in Shopify. Last month there were almost 400 pages that produced visits on organic, mostly in the 1 to 4 per month range, but all together about 1000 visits.
There are several hundred more that produced no traffic in organic, but are duplicate (except for size) and part of this giant ball of tangled string.
What do you think I should do?
Thanks... Mike
-
Hi Nigel,
Thanks for the message. So, just to cap on this, I've got:
150 pages that got any kind of organic landing last month.
115 of those pages are 1 visit out 13000 visits
525 pages in the sitemap
4300 pages in Google's index
if you were me you would noindex/de-index all but about 50 that either have traffic or am working on it and then noindex/deindex/remove from sitemap 4250 pages?
How would I even get a list of everything in Google's index?
Just wondering about the actual process for fixing this.
Thanks! Best... Mike
-
Hi Michael,
Yes - OK forget the brand pages - I had to make some assumptions from what you had written.
Cut it down and write contextually strong descriptive content 3-400 words at category & Sub-cat level.
I work with a lot of eCommerce sites that have fallen victim to pernicious tags, sizes and colours appending themselves to every version of a page.
It might look great having 50000 pages splattered all over Google but can you honestly say that they provide value and a good UX for the consumer?
Make each page sing for it's supper. Have a keywords or small group of contextually similar content for each page and add the written content and you will nail it.
Use MOZ Keyword explorer to provide you will the closely matched keywords,
I hope that helps,
Kind Regards
Nigel
-
Hi Egol & Nigel,
Egol, I always appreciate your answers over the years - thank you!
The site has a Moz domain authority of 37. It's in a organic/product niche with Amazon, Nordstrom, and about a buzzillion other national brand retailers. It makes and sells only its own products.
When you say, "if you have a weak site and you need highly optimized pages to get the traffic, then I might keep things "as is," I get confused. As it is, we have an endless number of duplicate pages. Shouldn't I just pick my winners (adding content there), noindex/nofollow and de-index?
If so, what do I do about the ones that randomly produce in organic search now? Same thing and suffer the loss?
Nigel, super interesting post... thank you! I'm not sure I totally understood everything. The site is the brand, not a retailer of others brands. In any case, you're saying cut it way down?
Thanks!
Best... Mike
-
Sorry but I think the opposite.
If you are a weak site with few back links and a low domain authority then you need to concentrate as much juice through as fewer pages as possible whilst retaining a strong fairly flat hierarchy. You don't have the option of doing nothing as you are cannibalizing your site in search.
I deduce from what you are saying that you have this problem.
Site/size
Site/Collection-1/Size
Site/Collection-2/Sub-collection-1/SizeSo the size filter can be applied to any part of the site at collection level. You may also have
Site/Brand/Size
Site/Brand/Collection/Size
Site/Brand/Collection/Sun-Collection-1/SizeThen you will have maybe
Site/Sale/Size
Site/Sale/Collection-1/Size
Site/Sale/Colelction-1/Sub-collection-1/SizeOn top of this problem you will have
Site/Brand/Product-1/Size-29
Site/Brand/Product-1/Size-30Etc
I hope I am right!
Solution for Brands and Categories
it is better to have size as a tag and noindex/nofollow the tag group so that none of these extra pages get indexed in Google. This will make an enormous difference to your website slashing the number of pages with skinny content and visits right down.
You simply can not have these pages:
Site/Brand/Size
Competing with the main brand page ie
Site/Brand/
I don't know how many sizes you have but say there are 20, then it's like having 20 duplicates of the brand page, the category page, the category/sub category page.
Solution For Products.
Have one product page:
Site/Brand/Product-1
The sizes can then drop down on the page without changing the URL - the canonical on any size is thus
Site/Brand/Product-1
Some sites will append the tag for size thus:
Site/Brand/Product-1#size30
With the size as an attribute - everything after the # is not indexable as Google does not go beyond a #
It would also be prudent to do this for colour as well otherwise you will get mass duplication at colour level. That should also be treated as a tag or attribute that does not append to every version of a page.
I really do hope I have understood this correctly.
I repeat, You don't have the option of doing nothing as you are cannibalizing your site for search.
eCommerce site structure is core to my business.
Kind Regards
Nigel
-
My answer would depend upon two things... 1) the strength of your website, and 2) the number and strength of your competitors.
If you have a really strong site and weak competition then I would have a small number of pages with a lot of products on each page. It will probably rank well against the competition for even the very specific queries.
However, if you have a weak site and you need highly optimized pages to get the traffic, then I might keep things "as is".
We started out with the first option and that worked great for years. Now the competition is getting fierce and we might go with a larger number of pages to keep holding them off.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I apply Canonical Links from my Landing Pages to Core Website Pages?
I am working on an SEO project for the website: https://wave.com.au/ There are some core website pages, which we want to target for organic traffic, like this one: https://wave.com.au/doctors/medical-specialties/anaesthetist-jobs/ Then we have basically have another version that is set up as a landing page and used for CPC campaigns. https://wave.com.au/anaesthetists/ Essentially, my question is should I apply canonical links from the landing page versions to the core website pages (especially if I know they are only utilising them for CPC campaigns) so as to push link equity/juice across? Here is the GA data from January 1 - April 30, 2019 (Behavior > Site Content > All Pages😞
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Wavelength_International0 -
Page not ranking because of React.js ?
Hey guys, I'm struggling with this part of my website which uses react.js . My developers used this saying it's much better and much quicker (which I think so too) but we have really low traffic coming from google compared to the other parts of the website (not using react.js). Moz gives me a score of 85% for the page but we get less than 100 visits / day and we were targeting 10.000 visits/day giving the traffic of this section in our competitors website (our whole website has 60.000 visits / day). (Section is online since 3 months now) Can you help me see what is wrong there ? I'm in Belgium so we have the website in 3 languages (FR/NL/EN) but the most important ones are FR & NL. FR : https://gocar.be/fr/prix-voitures-neuves/Audi/A3/A3-Sportback/1-0-TFSI_39CER NL : https://gocar.be/nl/prijzen-nieuwe-wagens/Audi/A3/A3-Sportback/1-0-TFSI_39CER EN : https://gocar.be/en/price-new-cars/Audi/A3/A3-Sportback/1-0-TFSI_39CER Main competitors having a better ranking than us (exemple in FR) : https://www.moniteurautomobile.be/modele--audi--a3/prix.html https://www.vroom.be/fr/prix/audi-a3/citadine-2012/197 Cheers ! Jean-Philippe
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Gocar_be0 -
Page speed - what do you aim for?
Hi Mozzers - was just looking at website speed and know the google guidelines on average page load time but I'm not sure whether Google issues guidelines on any of the other 4? Do you know of any guidance on domain lookup, server response, server connection or page download? Page Load Time (sec) - I tend to aim for 2 seconds max: http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/your-website-design-should-load-in-4-seconds/
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | McTaggart
Server Response Time: [Google recommends 200ms]: https://developers.google.com/speed/docs/insights/Server Redirection Time (sec) [dependent on number of redirects so probably no guide figure]
Domain Lookup Time (sec)
Server Connection Time (sec)
Page Download Time (sec) Thanks, Luke0 -
Multiple pages optimised for the same keywords but pages are functionally different and visually different
Hi MOZ community! We're wondering what the implications would be on organic ranking by having 2 pages, which have quite different functionality were optimised for the same keywords. So, for example, one of the pages in question is
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TrueluxGroup
https://www.whichledlight.com/categories/led-spotlights
and the other page is
https://www.whichledlight.com/t/led-spotlights both of these pages are basically geared towards the keyword led spotlights the first link essentially shows the options for led spotlights, the different kind of fittings available, and the second link is a product search / results page for all products that are spotlights. We're wondering what the implications of this could be, as we are currently looking to improve the ranking for the site particularly for this keyword. Is this even safe to do? Especially since we're at the bottom of the hill of climbing the ranking ladder of this keyword. Give us a shout if you want any more detail on this to answer more easily 🙂0 -
What if page exists for desktop but not mobile?
I have a domain (no subdomains) that serves up different dynamic content for mobile/desktop pages--each having the exact same page url, kind of a semi responsive design, and will be using "Vary: User-Agent" to give Google a heads up on this setup. However, some of the pages are only valid for mobile or only valid for desktop. In the case of when a page is valid only for mobile (call it mysite.com/mobile-page-only ), Google Webmaster Tools is giving me a soft 404 error under Desktop, saying that the page does not exist, Apparently it is doing that because my program is actually redirecting the user/crawler to the home page. It appears from the info about soft 404 errors that Google is saying since it "doesn't exist" I should give the user a 404 page--which I can make it customized and give the user an option to go to the home page, or choose links from a menu, etc.. My concern is that if I tell the desktop bot that mysite.com/mobile-page-only basically is a 404 error (ie doesn't exist), that it could mess up the mobile bot indexing for that page--since it definitely DOES exist for mobile users.. Does anyone here know for sure that Google will index a page for mobile that is a 404 not found for desktop and vice versa? Obviously it is important to not remove something from an index in which it belongs, so whether Google is careful to differential the two is a very important issue. Has anybody here dealt with this or seen anything from Google that addresses it? Might one be better off leaving it as a soft 404 error? EDIT: also, what about Bing and Yahoo? Can we assume they will handle it the same way? EDIT: closely related question--in a case like mine does Google need a separate sitemap for the valid mobile pages and valid desktop pages even though most links will be in both? I can't tell from reading several q&a on this. Thanks, Ted
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | friendoffood0 -
Stuck on Page 2 - What Would You Do?!?
My site is : http://goo.gl/JgK1e My main keyword is : Plastic Bins i have been going back and forth between page 1 and 2 for this keyword and i was wondering if any of you could provide any guidance as to why i can't get on the top of page 1, and stay there... My site has been around for a while, we believe we have a great user experience, all unique, fresh content, and the lowest prices... I must be missing out on something major if I cannot get a steady page 1 ranking... Any thoughts? Thanks in advance...
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Prime850 -
Too many links on home page?
I run a forum that currently has 351 links on its home page (and p.1, 2 etc.) due to all the tags that appear under feed items. Is it a viable solution to get this number down to simply nofollow all of these tag links? How else can I get this number of links down recorded by Google down, or is it not something I should be especially worried about?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | staingurus0 -
301 Redirect for 2500 pages
Hi, We have an existing site done in DNN and we recreated it on a new platform (EPiServer) and now we're going live. However, there are 2500+ page URLs from the old site which is not exisitng on the new site. What do you reckon is the best way we can address this? Do we create a 301 redirect individually for each of these pages? These 2500+ pages have a domain authority 34-35 and I think it's best that we retain those. We'll be using the same domain name. Suggestions for ways to approach this issue would be greatly appreciated. I have access to the server and IIS. *Also, how do I create a virtual page in IIS? and redirect it to another URL within the site? Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Peter.Huxley590