Outbound links
-
Hi everyone,
Just a quick question about using info/statistics from other sources in my articles.
If I use a quote/piece of info from another online article do I just say where it's from and link to it? Is this acceptable or do you have to get permission? I find the whole permissions thing quite confusing! I know that outbound links are good for SEO so just wanted to check this.
Thanks!
-
Thanks, EGOL!
You've been very helpful!
-
If they are taking your original content it can be illegal if...
-
they do not have a case for fair use
-
you have not done something to make your content available for other use (such as make it public domain, creative commons, etc.)
Copyright infringement is covered by Federal statute in the United States. If your content is registered you might have a case to sue, even if no financial damage is suffered. It can be considered criminal if the infringer is knowing and willful.
I am not an attorney. I recommend consulting with one if you have copyright problems.
I have done my due diligence and regularly file DMCA's, send informal take down notices, and have my attorney handle situations that might be complex or are against an infringer of note.
-
-
Thank you for your fast response!
Is it actually illegal to do so or is it just frowned upon? I actually compete against some of these sites and it's not just one or two articles, it's the ENTIRE blog (30+ articles).
-
Verbatim articles on a website can often outrank the original source, especially if the original source website is not very strong.
If they do it with my content, I will probably file a DMCA with Google and perhaps with their host.
-
Hello, EGOL.
I like your detailed answer here! I have seen some blogs copy other entire articles (verbatim, images and all) and then just source the original blog link at the bottom of the article. Unfortunately, these sites rank very well for not doing any REAL work.
Is this something that will eventually come back to bite them or are they just going to get away with it forever? Your expertise is very much appreciated!
Thank you!
-
EGOL - thanks so much for this answer. You have really explained this well and put my mind at rest! I will check out the wiki article.
Thanks again.
-
Here is how many people handle these...
If you write your own sentence that incorporates a statistic or a fact that is not original to you, then it is proper to attribute that information to your source. This is usually done in footnote fashion similar to what you see in Wikipedia articles.
This wikipedia article on "citation" is a good place to see examples of how to dot it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation
Permission is not required if the work is publicly available on a website or in a published book, unless you have agreed to confidentiality of the informaiton. Just use a footnote and a link to their website or a reference to a printed document. Instead of a link you can give the full url if you don't want to use a hyperlink.
If you are going to quote verbatim a sentence or two, but not more than that, then placing that verbatim text in
is often done. This indents the text, separating it from your own, with a footnote number in brackets at the end. [2] Permission is not needed for a short quote from a book or from a website (unless there is a confidentiality agreement). Just make it clear that you have quoted and keep the length of your quote very short - a sentence or two at most. Many people will also place the
text in italics to really make it clear that you have cited.
How many times can you do this in an article? If you do it once with a sentence or two it should be fine. But if you are going to do it multiple times you could run into an infringement problem. How many times? I would get permission if I was going to use multiple blockquotes from a single source.
If you have any doubts about using the text of others in references or quotes, then it is best to consult an attorney about the "fair use" part of copyright law. I am not an attorney and can't give exact answers on this. In fact, many attorneys will tell you that they can't give exact answers because copyright problems often need to be tested in court in front of a jury. It is hard or impossible what a jury will return in many situations.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
ASP Canonical and Internal Linking
Hello - I'm working with a large ASP website and trying to troubleshoot issues I believe might be related to how the canonical element is used. On page - all internal links, including navigation links, use the following format (uppercase) - website.com**/F**older/Folder/Product . So, any page navigated to will always display the uppercase version of the URL. And, all of these pages have the canonical tag pointing to the lowercase version of the URL. The pages included in Google's index are all lowercase versions of the URL like this - website.com**/f**older/folder/product . My concern is that a lot of internal authority flow is being impacted/negated because all internal links point to the uppercase versions of URLs and all those pages reference the lowercase version URL in the canonical reference. Is this a valid concern?
On-Page Optimization | | LA_Steve0 -
How does the footer links impact the the pages SEO quality?
Hi, i want to ask a question. Does this kind of internal links will affect the SEO post quality? Please open the attachment (image) KskOg3U
On-Page Optimization | | joshuaong0 -
Need Professional Help with Site Structure, Page Authority, and Internal Linking
We are a 10 year + small (1000 pages) niche ecommerce site (Magento) that has recently lost rankings to a competitor. We out perform them in every metric so I do not understand them leap frogging us to the top spot. This has forced me to look at my site structure, page authority (rank), and internal linking. After reviewing a moz crawl issues report, here are some of my observations: Root domain has a PA of 40 Top 3 $ Category pages have a PA of 22, 18, 18 Multiple meaningless blog posts and other category/product pages have PA’s of 30+ Here is a screenshot of the crawl report with internal links, links, etc showing. I need some help - thoughts, suggestions, next steps in analysis?
On-Page Optimization | | SammyT0 -
Too many on page links
Hello, I have a page that isn't ranking very well. http://nicontrols.com/uk/drives-motors/variable-speed-drives According to the MOZ research tools I have too many on page links. I believe most of these are a result of the advanced filtration options on the left hand side of the page. I don't want to remove the filters as they are extremely useful for customers but I am also worried about the number of links Anyone get any ideas about the number of links? Should I care?
On-Page Optimization | | DavidLenehan0 -
Can my amount of internal linking seem spammy ?
Ecommerce site. I am optimizing for each producer of products on a separate page. Atm my provider does lack some functions(i cant put in H1 , title and can put text only product pictures) on the product pages - like here http://www.epleskrinet.no/smafolk/M_23 . The are updating within 1-2 months to allow me do this. This has led to actually some of the products themself ranking higher that the producer page. what Ive been doing is to put anchor text and link back to the producer page for all 9 products on this page. Is that a problem or should i just do it like this ? thanks
On-Page Optimization | | danlae0 -
Too many On-Page Links on a WP based Website
Hi, I've already browsed through various of the Q&As on the "too many On-Page links" issue, but I would really need some advice concerning a WP Site with a dropdown navigation. As outlined in the on-page report, every site has about 180 outgoing links, which pretty much is the number of site featured in the navigation. Even though the 100 link limit is somewhat outdated I'm still worried about the distribution of linkjuice from the starting page and how Google perceives the importance of the various pages. Would it make sense to adapt the structure of the navigation, so that the starting page only links to the 5 category pages and the category pages only link to the detail pages they contain? The site has good rankings for several pages and I assume that Google can tell that the large number of links is caused by the navigation. But with every page having appr. 180 links it may be difficult for Google to tell, which of those pages are the most important regarding internal link structure... Looking foward to your opinion and insights! Cheers, Chris
On-Page Optimization | | adwordize0 -
Optimizing Internal Links to Homepage
I've read that the Bots only count the first link on a page. My navigation has 2 links to my homepage - 1 from the logo keyword.png alt txt=keyword & 1 text link 'keyword.' Now in my content does it have any seo value to link relevant pieces of text back to the homepage? Thanks Jason Jackson
On-Page Optimization | | JasonJackson0 -
Does Frequency of content updates affect likelyhood outbound links will be indexed?
I have several pages on our website with low pr, that also themselves link to lots and lots of pages that are service/product specific. Since there are so many outbound links, I know that the small amount of PR will be spread thin as it is. My question is, if I were to supply fresh content to the top level pages, and change it often, would that influence whether or not google indexes the underlying pages? Also if I supply fresh content to the underlying pages, once google crawls them, would that guarantee that google considers them 'important' enough to be indexed" I guess my real question is, can freshness of content and frequency of update convince google that the underlying pages are 'worthy of being indexed', and can producing fresh content on those pages 'keep google's interest', so to speak, despite having little if any pagerank.
On-Page Optimization | | ilyaelbert0