Content - Similar but not exactly the same content - Duplicate or Spammy?
-
Hey, so I have been wondering for some time now as some pages will get indexed and others won't appear at all. That makes me think that I am either creating to similar content or it is becoming too spammy.
Take these two pages I created for example. The body content is very similar but h tags, meta tags and title are different. So my questions is; would pages not be displaying due possibly being too similar and spammy or duplicate?
I have linked two pages that are very similar below and would love to hear any thoughts about it.
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
-
Lots of people grab content and republish it.
Lots of people grab the same content and republish it.
The first few people who do it have the best chance of getting away with it. But, if you are the tenth or the twentith, then you are more likely to be ignored by Google. (After you republish this duplicate, Google might find it, index it, and rank it... then some months down the road they realize that your stuff is duplicate and take action against it.)
The exception to the above is when you are a powerful publisher. Then you can get away with a lot more than other republishers, and you might even outrank the original source.
"If you've realized that your local industry is riddled with poor quality content, see this as your opportunity to beat out lazier competitors. If you deliver the superior experience, it may give you a very valuable edge, while also safeguarding your reputation and rankings against Google filters and penalties in future."
This is so true and so surprising. There are still a lot of topics on the internet that are not covered by substantive, high quality content written by an authoritative author.
-
Thanks for coming back with further questions on this. Unfortunately, changing tags and maps doesn't make your text content "different enough" to lessen the concern that Google may view what you are doing as duplicative.
Basically, your business model is a local business with a single location. If you wish to gain organic visibility for your services beyond that single location, it's true that developing landing pages for these other locations is a best practice ... only provided that the content of them is actually useful and largely unique. You are in a similar scenario to a plumber, who has a single location from which he offers a set of services to a variety of neighboring towns. His Local SEO is going to be anchored to his city of location, but his organic SEO can branch out to represent his work in the other towns he serves. There is nothing spammy about him featuring this work in his service cities, but unless he has something unique to say about his work there, he's going to end up with a weak site burdened with duplicate content clearly designed for search engines instead of for the assistance of consumers.
I recommend taking a look at a blog post I wrote here a couple of years ago that offers tips for creating strong, diversified landing pages in a scenario much like yours:
https://moz.com/blog/overcoming-your-fear-of-local-landing-pages
You will need to dig deep into your resources to create this type of useful, unique content.
As for your competitors, your question is reasonable. If Google doesn't like thin, duplicate content, why do we see people getting away with it? To this, my answer is:
-
People were getting away with all kinds of things the day before an update like Penguin or Panda. They woke up the following day to a changed world in which their lack of effort was no longer being rewarded.
-
If you've realized that your local industry is riddled with poor quality content, see this as your opportunity to beat out lazier competitors. If you deliver the superior experience, it may give you a very valuable edge, while also safeguarding your reputation and rankings against Google filters and penalties in future.
Hope this helps!
-
-
Thank you for the feedback.
I see all the points mentioned but I still feel confused about it. I have worked in the industry for 5 years now and some of the website that do this have been ranking well for at least that long, would google not have penalised these website by now? I started to do it to and alas, I also started to rank better and get more inquiries.
I want to make one point here. Even though the content is similar. It is not the same and I have clearly changed factors that will help google understand what I am trying to achieve. Meta tags, title, h tags, even maps on the pages. Location to location is what I am trying to factor in with this project. Even though the content is very similar. Is it still not unique? Where is the line? that is what I find confusing. Do I spend more time making pages unique even though I don't need to? Will that be better in the long run and keep the pages positioned better for longer? How unique does the content have to be?
-
Seconding the opinions of Clive and EGOL here. And, particularly want to highlight EGOL's point about not imitating competitors' poor practices. It might help to view these competitors as being just one Google action away from getting dinged for this strategy.
It seems like the challenge for you here is to create something that helps customers understand the geography of your services, without simply duplicating the same page and swapping out city names. I would recommend putting some creative resources behind figuring out how to meet this challenge.
-
Clive Morley is right. 100% right.
These pages are close enough to being duplicates and Google will likely filter one of them from the search results. Maybe they will filter both of them from the search results.
If you want to compete for slightly different keywords then you will need to produce unique and substantive content for every one of them.
Many competitors that rank much better do exactly the same.
This is sometimes true. But Google has detected that you are doing it. Someday Google might detect that they are doing it.
So, now it is up to you to stop taking shortcuts and do the work required to present unique value for each page on your website.
-
Hello,
These pages are virtually identical and I wouldn't be surprised if Google views these as duplicate or spammy.
Both of these pages serve the same user intent - moving from Gold Coast to another location - and it's therefore worth considering having just one page that covers all of the numerous destinations.
Both pages have an unnatural amount of keyword usage which may also trigger a spammy issue.
If the purpose is to rank for "moving from Gold Coast to...." type searches than this page would probably benefit from having more Gold Coast related content - geographical info, images, etc.
Good luck
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Blog Content if Google has stated it doesn't like your blog?
Hi guys, In the new 'mobile usability' tab in Webmaster Tools, Google has stated that our blog isn't offering a good experience for users. Something we already knew and I want to change, but I can't get the budget approved to complete the work. I was just wondering if you think Google isn't going to hold my content very high as a result. I want to produce more content on our blog around our valuable keywords in hope to improve our rankings, but if Google isn't holding our site in high regard I'm thinking there may not be much point in it. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks Brian
Content Development | | brianmadden0 -
SEO for a News based site : Outdated content
How do we maintain the SEO of a 5 year old News content based site? How should we deal with 3-4 year old content, which are outdated or not searched? Some of them are still useful as archiving/history of a topic..but not searched.... ?? Should we no-index them? or should we keep it like that?
Content Development | | Wpfreesetup0 -
Duplicate Content behind a Paywall
We have a website that is publicly visible. This website has content. We'd like to take that same content, put it on another website, behind a paywall. Since Google will not be able to crawl those pages behind the paywall is there any risk to ua doing this? Thanks! Mike
Content Development | | FOTF_DigitalMarketing0 -
Content Marketing - Car Space
Hey looking for cool content marketing examples in the car industry. Like major car companies leveraging their resources, in developing awesome, and viral content. Anyone aware of any cool campaigns? Cheers, Mark
Content Development | | MBASydney0 -
Stolen Content and a Panda Penalty
Hey Folks Question for those folks that have spent some time helping people with the recent penalties and the like. I have a client who has a clear Panda Penalty, huge drop in traffic on the initial Panda date and a further drop on the second date. Much smaller incremental drops on subsequent recent updates as well. From digging in it seems fairly cut and dry - copyscape shows another 250 or so sites with content from this site and there are nearly 2000 external URLs with duplicate content across these sites. We are talking complete, shameless copies of all of the text, sometimes the images as well. The client claims the content is all 100% unique and is his content and that the other blogs must have stolen his content resulting in the penalty - which, if it is true, and I have no reason to suspect otherwise, kind of sucks. Now, many moons ago, way before Penguin or Panda (maybe around 2006) I had a client that had suddenly lost all traffic and their historical rankings. No funny business, it was a small company, had been online since around 2000 and they were pretty much the first of their kind and always did very well from organic search. As it turned out, the content from the site had not really changed since it was set up and as lots of companies had sprung up offering a similar service they had seen their content copied wholesale, across many sites, all over the world. We attempted to contact many of these sites and got some results but many were just old, abandoned copy cat sites on advert supported hosting that had ceased to trade so we maybe got rid of about 20%. Well, in the end we just decided to rewrite the content, we did this and sure enough, the site bounced back to it's previous standing and has been pretty much there ever since. Now that was kind of easy, the site had maybe 20 pages, and it needed a sprucing up but in this case the site has around 500 pages so doing a rewrite is not going to be so easy. Problem is, I don't see removal requests being particularly successful either. So, I see the options and steps as being. Contact all the sites and request the removal of the content use the Google content removal facility:
Content Development | | Marcus_Miller
https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/removals File a DMCA takedown for anything remaining Report Scraped Pages to Google:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dGM4TXhIOFd3c1hZR2NHUDN1NmllU0E6MQ&ndplr=1 Submit a spam report for all sites involved ? Submit a reconsideration request to let Google know what we have been doing (unlikely In a nutshell, do everything we can to get this content removed and then documenting this to Google in the hope we catch hold of someone who hears our plight. Interestingly enough, this is a sensitive one, so no URL but I would welcome any thoughts or experiences any of you may have had with similar problems. There is a little extra info here from Matt Cutts + Barry Schwartz that kind of tallies with my approach above but would really like to hear any feedback. http://www.seroundtable.com/google-stolen-content-13243.html Cheers all Marcus0 -
Should we syndicate content?
Hello Mozzers! Our company (FindMyAccident) is an accident news site. The goal is to roll our reporting out to all 50 states; currently, we operate full-time in 7 states. To date, the largest expenditure is our writing staff. We hire professional
Content Development | | Wayne76
journalists who work with police departments and other sources to develop written
content and video for our site. Our visitors also contribute stories and/or
tips that add to the content on our domain. In short, our content is original. A site that often appears alongside us in the SERPs in the markets where we work full-time is accidentin.com. They are a site that only syndicates accident news and offers little original content. (They also allow users to submit their own accident stories, and the entries index quickly and are sometimes viewed by hundreds of people in the same day. What's perplexing is that these entires are isolated incidents that have little to no media value, yet they do extremely well.) The link profile is virtually non-existent. There are approximately 6 linking domains. I don't rest my bets with Quantcast figures, but accidentin does use their pixel sourcing and the figures indicate that they are receiving up to 80k visitors a day in some instances. Not too shabby for the Flying Dutchman of accident news sites. 🙂 I understand that it's common to see news sites syndicate from the AP, etc., and traffic accident news is not going to have a lot of competition (in most instances), but the real shocker is that accidentin will sometimes appear as the first or second result above the original sources. What the...!? The question: does anyone have a guess as to what is making it perform so well? While looking at their model, I'm wondering if we're not silly to syndicate news in the states where we don't have actual staff? It would seem we could attract more traffic by setting up syndication in our vacant states. Should the Panda updates have any effect on their site? Thanks, gang.... Wayne0 -
If you have the best sales on the weekends, when is the best day to post the content?
The Client has the best sales on the weekends and his writing a weekly blog post to help the overall site rank better and hopefully drive more sales. When is the best time to post this content? On Monday so that it hopefully gets indexed by the weekend? or On Friday so that we can leverage twitter and Facebook to increase sales.
Content Development | | anchorwave0 -
Content issue
Hi, Quick question; I have set up a micro site in which i was going to take some of the content from my reviews and recipes my customers have posted and have them placed on my other site. The site i currently have is a large site receiving over 200,00 visitors every day. Will this be affected as duplicate content if i was to do this as i do not want to affect my rankings. Any suggestions what i can do to get round this? Cheers
Content Development | | wazza19851