Will page be marked as 404 if you replace country specific letters from url?
-
What I'm reffering to is replacement of Polish characters from i.e "ł" to "l" or "ę" to "e". I believe it relates same way as other similar Slavic languages.
-
Not a problem. Just remember that web user's browsers, Google's crawlers and SEO-tool crawlers all tend to react to certain factors a little differently
Never lose sight on pleasing Google first. Never lose sight that Google wants to please users the most (as without them, all their ad-revenue disappears)
-
Thank you for rapid and concise response. Relying what you provided here, I don't think that I have to replace url's at all. That saves a bit of work and since Google is fine with that, I'm fine too.
As there wasn't that many url's with polish characters, at least I have a choice to use them (or not) in future.
Again, thanks for great response.
-
If you replace Polish characters with English characters in your URL strings, as long as you redirect the old URLs (containing foreign / Slavic characters) properly to the new ones (Latin / English alphabet characters only) and as long as you update all internal and external links to those old URLs (so Google won't navigate to them internally, or from across the web) then you shouldn't get 404s
The real question is, why would you undo the 'proper' native Slavic URL encoding?
Google say you are fine to use those characters in URLs:
https://searchengineland.com/google-using-non-english-urls-non-english-websites-fine-294758
"This includes non-Latin characters in your URLs. John Mueller said “as long as URLs are valid and unique, that’s fine.” He added, “So to sum it up, yes, non-English words and URLs are fine, [and] we recommend using them for non-English websites."
Most modern web browsers will handle these characters without throwing an exception, obviously if you were to go back to ancient browsers that no one uses any more like IE1 - IE8, or NetScape or something like that - you might have problems
Google try to reflect what they think most browsers are capable of handling. Google won't show errors on such URLs if they believe that most people on most browsers would see the content correctly
Look at this Google search:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%C4%99
Result #1:
Ę - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ę
Ę is a letter in the Polish, Lithuanian and Dalecarlian alphabets. It is used in Navajo to represent the nasal vowel [ẽ]. In Latin, Irish, and Old Norse palaeography, ...
In Polish · History · Alternations · In LithuanianResult number 1 on Google contains the character "Ę" in the URL, so you know Google can index these URLs and is doing so. Not only does it not result in an error, but Google willfully chooses to index such URLs when relevant queries are processed
Let's look at another Google result, the Polish word for "lamb" aka a young sheep which you can eat!
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=jagni%C4%99
Loads of the results contain "ę" in the URL. Seems fine to me
It may be true that Moz and some other SEO crawlers have issues interpreting some foreign characters in the URL string (ę - is but one example). But that's not true for most modern web browsers or for Google. IMO that says Moz needs and update and you don't need to change your site. Aim for what makes Google happy
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Keywords used to land on specific page?
Hi all, Does anyone know if there's anywhere where I can see what keywords are used in search engines to land on a specific page? I have access to the Google Analytics account and linked it to Moz as a campaign, but I can't find this data. I'm curious about this because a very uncommon word is used in a page title for a page I try to optimize. It's the Dutch translation of 'malicious'. And now I wonder if it's better to switch to a word that's used more often. Or if it's better to 'win the battle' on this (probably) rarely used word. I've used Google trends to see how many people use it, but it says there's not enough data to show the interest over time.
On-Page Optimization | | RaoulWB0 -
Wrong pages ranking for specific keywords
Hi moz community We're currently experiencing a lot of our pages ranking for the wrong keyword in the SERPS. Take "womens ski wear" for example, the page rainking via Google links to https://www.dare2b.com/womens/jackets-coats/ When we have an optimized page here https://www.dare2b.com/womens/shop-by/activity/ski/ that imo is more suitable and has the correct H1, meta tile etc. So I'm at a loss to see why google see the jackets page more relevant? Any help on this much appreciated
On-Page Optimization | | KMCBRIDE0 -
Duplicate page content
Hi Crawl errors is showing 2 pages of duplicate content for my clients WordPress site: /news/ & /category/featured/ Yoast is installed so how best to resolve this ? i see that both pages are canonicalised to themselves so presume just need to change the canonical tag on /category/featured/ to reference /news/ ?(since news is the page with higher authority and the main page for showing this info) or is there other way in Yoast or WP to deal with this & prevent from happening again ? Cheers Dan
On-Page Optimization | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Impact of multiple links on the same page to the same url (different anchor text) ?
Hi, On our category pages, for every product we have several links pointing to the product : on the image, on the product name, on the short description, on "read more", and a javascript onclick on the entire div. Could this have a negative impact for link juice distribution, or is it counted as only 1 link with the first anchor text found on the page ? Thanks,
On-Page Optimization | | Strelok0 -
Similar URLs
I'm making a site of LSAT explanations. The content is very meaningful for LSAT students. I'm less sure the urls and headings are meaningful for Google. I'll give you an example. Here are two URLs and heading for two separate pages: http://lsathacks.com/explanations/lsat-69/logical-reasoning-1/q-10/ - LSAT 69, Logical Reasoning I, Q 10 http://lsathacks.com/explanations/lsat-69/logical-reasoning-2/q10/ - LSAT 69, Logical Reasoning II, Q10 There are two logical reasoning sections on LSAT 69. For the first url is for question 10 from section 1, the second URL is for question 10 from the second LR section. I noticed that google.com only displays 23 urls when I search "site:http://lsathacks.com". A couple of days ago it displayed over 120 (i.e. the entire site). 1. Am I hurting myself with this structure, even if it makes sense for users? 2. What could I do to avoid it? I'll eventually have thousands of pages of explanations. They'll all be very similar in terms of how I would categorize them to a human, e.g. "LSAT 52, logic games question 12" I should note that the content of each page is very different. But url, title and h1 is similar. Edit: I could, for example, add a random keyword to differentiate titles and urls (but not H1). For example: http://lsathacks.com/explanations/lsat-69/logical-reasoning-2/q10-car-efficiency/ LSAT 69, Logical Reasoning I, Q 10, Car efficiency But the url is already fairly long as is. Would that be a good idea?
On-Page Optimization | | graemeblake0 -
Why a page with an On Page A grade has a less good rank than a page with a F grade?
Why a page with an On Page A grade is ranked 17 in Google when the home page with a F grade is ranked 9 ? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | Amadeus_eBC0 -
Do product pages need unique content or does having duplcate content hurt on those pages?
We are adding product rapidly to our website but this requires allowing duplicate to exist on our product pages of furniture-online.com. From an SEO standpoint do we need to make this content unique for each product. Since we aren't link building to specific product pages and we don't anticipate product pages being found in a search result, are we ok leaving the duplicate content in place and spending our dollars elsewhere?
On-Page Optimization | | gallreddy0 -
Home page ranking dropped below internal pages
The index page for a site I manage has dropped significantly - internal pages rank above it. It's a new site, 2 months old but was ranking at 1st. Any suggestions as to how I can debug this?
On-Page Optimization | | OptioPublishing0