I would use http://www.htaccessredirect.net/
this can help to
http://www.webconfs.com/how-to-redirect-a-webpage.php
Let me know if you need anything
Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
I would use http://www.htaccessredirect.net/
this can help to
http://www.webconfs.com/how-to-redirect-a-webpage.php
Let me know if you need anything
You would use
<%@ Language="VBScript" %>
<%
' ASP permanent URL redirect - generated by www.rapidtables.com
Response.Status="301 Moved Permanently"
Response.AddHeader "Location", "https://www.newdomain.com/newsubdir/FRUIT"
Response.End
%>
try
http://www.rapidtables.com/web/tools/redirect-generator.htm
I hope this helps,
Tom
Christy is right you will get more people responding if you make a new question I would do that. I will still respond
hope that helps,
Tom
I will respond.
It looks like you added it more then one time. I can't look a sorce code right now but I think if you check you will see its been added more then one time based on googles tool
Hi guys thanks for the positive feedback
just thought I would add this for people useing this to get info about rich snippets
http://moz.com/blog/a-visual-guide-to-rich-snippets
Thanks so much,
Thomas
Hi Tim,
if you are creating rich-snippets I would also like to recommend using this
From the guys raven tools
http://schema-creator.org/ (Click to the left of website to create any of these things)
Like reviews here
http://schema-creator.org/review.php
Read
http://raventools.com/blog/free-schema-creator/
I would strongly suggest using Google + with Authorship as well for your profile you don't seem to have that in place
If you scroll down you will see authorship is NOT enabled this is hurting you I would any using this set of instructions
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/1408986?hl=en
I hope this is helpful to you,
Thomas
PS.
Raven Tools makes http://schema-creator.org/ as well
if you code your site I like this just to have.
http://schema-creator.org/person.php
I like Raven tools pulg-in
http://raventools.com/blog/free-schema-creator/
Good job I can see the
Published in Benidorm Hotel ReviewsTagged under
Part and google will rank you for hotel reviews I would look up more on Html 5Use this to test http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets
It is used in HTML5 by default and will help google determine what is what more and more.
As of now it helps to show people the star rating a quick good/bad check The photos help you standout in googles SERPS People might just search reviews only if looking for hotels.The use of Rich snippets will help your site a lot. So you can wright reviews of your Own and then use Rich snippets to allow people to rank itUsing on your site & G+ soon I have heard Hope this helps,Thomas
Very true I shoud have compleated it woun't use a cell phone to Q&A
if you want to pass of google should not care if relevant but.
You say.
"We have link directories on both sites. They've got links that are relevant to the sites but also links that aren't relevant. And they're big directories - we're talking thousands of links to other sites."
Big directories will hurt you unless they help the end user lose them.
I agree that we need to know more about what kind of sites they are to tell you as Moz.com has a directories like recommend seo's, but its relevant to Moz so it will not hurt and helps the end user ask your self if I went here to would this help me?
Hope this helps,
Thomas
The cache-control
header is the primary mechanism for an HTTP server to tell a caching proxy the "freshness" of a response. (i.e., how/if long to store the response in the cache)
In some situations, cache-control
directives are insufficient. A discussion from the HTTP working group is archived here, describing a page that changes only with language. This is not the correct use case for the vary header, but the context is valuable for our discussion. (Although I believe the Vary header would solve the problem in that case, there is a Better Way.) From that page:
Vary
is strictly for those cases where it's hopeless or excessively complicated for a proxy to replicate what the server would do.
A contrived example:
Your HTTP server has a large landing page. You have two slightly different pages with the same URL, depending if the user has been there before. You distinguish between requests and a user's "visit count" based on Cookies. But -- since your server's landing page is so large, you want intermediary proxies to cache the response if possible.
The URL, Last-Modified and Cache-Control headers are insufficient to give this insight to a caching proxy, but if you add Vary: Cookie
, the cache engine will add the Cookie header to it's caching decisions.
Finally, for small traffic, dynamic web sites -- I have always found the simpleCache-Control: no-cache, no-store
and Pragma: no-cache
sufficient.
Edit -- to more precisely answer your question: the HTTP request header 'Accept' defines the Content-Types a client can process. If you have two copies of the same content at the same URL, differing only in Content-Type, then using Vary: Accept
could be appropriate.
Update 11 Sep 12:
I'm including a couple links that have appeared in the comments since this comment was originally posted. They're both excellent resources for real-world examples (and problems) with Vary: Accept; Iif you're reading this answer you need to read those links as well.
The first, from the outstanding EricLaw, on Internet Explorer's behavior with the Vary header and some of the challenges it presents to developers: Vary Header Prevents Caching in IE. In short, IE (pre IE9) does not cache any content that uses the Vary header because the request cache does not include HTTP Request headers. EricLaw (Eric Lawrence in the real world) is a Program Manager on the IE team.
The second is from Eran Medan, and is an on-going discussion of Vary-related unexpected behavior in Chrome:Backing doesn't handle Vary header correctly. It's related to IE's behavior, except the Chrome devs took a different approach -- though it doesn't appear to have been a deliberate choice.
What do you mean by "look much stronger."
Page rank domain trust will not change with a no follow
Hi Keri,
Thank you for the heads up on that. I definitely was having some technical issues. I have cleaned it up let me know if you think it is a need any more work.
Thank you for letting me know.
Sincerely,
Thomas
Hi Bruce,
I agree with Dana
&
I would use the C name as you will force people to your site I like the way it looks as well I do a vid.blueprintmarketing.com
as a cname for Wistia
the SEO Embed makes a sitemap so google can see your video & rank you for it.
http://wistia.com/doc/video-seo#embed_video_using_the_seo_embed_type
Hope this helps,
Thomas
I don't know if this is what you want because you did ask specifically about detox however if you're not using that tool one another option I have used
I have had a lot of success.
remove'em is also made by a company recommended by Moz called http://www.virante.org/
Hope this was of help,
Thomas
I would do a
Complete site audit
http://www.distilled.net/blog/seo/do-your-very-own-site-structure-audit/
http://yoast.com/articles/duplicate-content/
http://yoast.com/change-wordpress-permalink-structure/
You are wondering why a 301 creates an entirely new URL is because it redirects to another outside link it can be outside of your domain or inside.
Your domain the content of your site obviously was from the links units on Google does not look too kindly on sites that we could possibly not being wanted by some households as it is not for children.
I only use screaming frog to do it quick audit of you links your site
free up to 500 pages
http://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/
Here is best manual for screaming frog
http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/screaming-frog-guide
Honestly you may have some trouble because the content of your site this however if this is illegitimate business
Please do not take offense at all as some of the keywords you were drinking for our big negatives in this business
For us that are not making those sites.
I hope this is going to help,
Thomas
You will not get any thing from the link "link Juice is the common term"
Hope that helps,
Tom
If you are resubmitting you must have all links in the file
I would use http://www.removeem.com/
there made by http://www.virante.org/ & they are Moz Recommended so you can't go wrong &
It's not expensive
Hope I was of help,
Thomas
If you want someone to confirm Matts answer I would do the same thing.
Hope that help,
Thomas
I think it is for one reason people type it in when they type a link there used to it SO if there linking to you it will go right to the www. 200 code & not 301 if you pick www.
But if its a long domain I like to drop the www.
Use what you like I like using www. it's matter of choice
Rember to 301 your domain
All the best,
Thomas
Hi,
For insights regarding the usage of the Vary HTTP Header.
I would check out this blog post right here
As far as using a content delivery network. I love them and have used quite a few. Depending on your budget there is a wide range
Use Anycast DNS with CDN's here is what I think of them.
#1 DNS DynECT (my fav)
#2 DNS Made Easy (great deal $25 for 10 domains for the YEAR)
#3 UltraDNS
#4 VerisignDNS
CDN's many have anycast DNS built in already
Check out this website it will give you a good view of what's going on this site
http://www.cdnplanet.com/cdns/
I don't know what you want for data however if you want a great CDN with support & killer price Max CDN it's only $39 for the first terabyte performs Amazon's cloudflaire Rackspace clouldfiles
My list of CDN's I would use the cost is anywhere form $39 a year to $4,000 a month if you said you where going to use video it will cost more as data adds up fast.
#1 Level 3 personal favorite content delivery network
http://www.level3.com/en/products-and-services/data-and-internet/cdn-content-delivery-network/
http://www.edgecast.com/free-trial/
http://mediatemple.net/webhosting/procdn/ You get 200 gb's a month for $20 it is 100% EdgeCast (just a reseller)
https://presscdn.com/ PRESSCDN is 50GB's for $10 month & gives you FOUR CDN's it has Max CDN, Edgecast, Akamai & cloudfront price for 150GB a month is $19
http://www.rackspace.com/cloud/files/
http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/
Look a thttp://cloudharmony.com/speedtest for speed testing
However please remember that coding makes a huge difference on websites and it is not really a fair depiction of speed.
You could use CloudFlare it is free I don't like it for for anything other than site protection it's not very fast and my opinion and is simply a proxy reverse proxy server
You get CloudFlare with Railgun already on
https://www.cloudflare.com/railgun cost is now $200 a month (Use Level 3 if paying that much)
Edge cast is a great content delivery network. However,you will have to buy it through a third-party that you want a full enterprise version. You can buy to media temple that you must use their DNS and it is only $20 a month.
However if you're going to spend over $20 a month I would strongly consider talking to Level 3. There notoriously high-priced however they just lowered their prices and you can negotiate some very sweet deals.
I would simply sign up for DNS made easy and MaxCDN if you don't have a content delivery network already & just convenient fast
It's also faster. It is faster than AWS cloudfront & rack space cloudfiles.
Max CDN is faster than anything else I have compared to the it's price range for almost double
But inexpensive service you will get Anycast DNS for $25 and the CDN would be $39 and that's for the year not the month
I hope this is been of help to you,and it answers your question. Please let me know if I could be of any more help.
Sincerely,
Thomas
If you feel a domain that is linking to you is relevant and you do not want to delete the link because you feel you can change the anchor text I requesting it make sure it is a good link using one of these tools will send you the URL's
http://www.majesticseo.com/reports/compare-domain-backlink-history
http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/
http://seogadget.com/anchor-text-tool/
More
Screaming Frog and Xenu are great crawling tools that can be useful for analyzing backlinks,
http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/screaming-frog-guide
http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/competitor-backlink-analysis-in-excel/
http://moz.com/blog/guide-to-competitive-backlink-analysis
http://raventools.com/blog/seo-competitor-analysis-checklist/
I love this
then sign up
http://tools.seogadget.co.uk/urlform/
Hope this will help you,
Thomas
First off let me congratulate you on your choice tools removeem is awesome
Secondly because you said that there from directories and I'm relevant sites no I would not ask them to change anchor txt you would still be getting a bad link being sent to your website regardless of brother or not it has the correct anchor text
Honestly removeem is a very successful tool, and if you follow it to the T or use their full-service it is a fantastic tool and I believe they will help you with your penalty.
If you want to do some more investigating on some that you think you should keep use MajesticSEO & Moz OSE
They will tell you all you need to go along with removeem
Sincerely,
Thomas
Make sure your category pages are linked to each other as well. So your architecture takes this form because of internal linking. Keep category page that is linked from another category page, and not the homepage, does not have as much link equity flowing to it and is now 2 levels deep into the architecture
When looking at the internal links of a website the main thing to consider is whether or not you are consistently sending the search engines to the correct page. This especially becomes a concern with large websites where the possibility of multiple pages targeting similar keywords is more apt to exist, and from a user, conversion and crawler perspective a preferred page exists.
Use http://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/
to make sure the site looks good to you
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7XOy2cz0aQ&feature=player_embedded
Did you use a record rule firmly making the changes to this website?
I hope this is a account sincerely,
Thomas
You did a site redesign on 19 May and deployed then? If you did and saw a immediate decrease in the SERPS it is normal
However after this amount of time I imagine that you would at least be ranking for your brand words or something similar to that. However it can take over three months to gain your traffic back
If you have a Google Webmaster tools account and you do not have any messages from them telling you you and penalized and you have not been penalized.
Use mozcast.com
And compare that with your analytics data it will tell you if there was a change in Google that could've triggered this result.
Last but not least some web designers forget to do a no follow no index removal make sure that is not still there. You can use this cool check or look at your source code
http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/seo-tools/robots-txt-generator/
Sincerely,
Thomas
In Google Webmaster tools you can use the remove button or click the little icon and total. I would definitely say there is a correlation with 404's and losing pages to the Google index. As Google does not index 404's
You have nine things being blocked by robot text go to the robots.txt file in Google Webmaster tools and find out there if there's an issue and you're blocking some of your website to Google
You can also use this tool to tell you exactly what your Google robots.txt file looks like right now and compared to any changes being made is very valuable tool
http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/seo-tools/robots-txt-generator/
I hope I've been of help sincerely,
Thomas
Hi, you can view this site which is owned by company recommended by Moz
Essentially this will tell you everything. But what it needs to contain his all the work you've done screenshots of what you've done you've tried to contact, quite a bit of information it's all contained in this tool's info
Are you the owner of the site, or are you working as an agent of this site?
Have you received an unnatural links notice from Google via Google Webmaster Tools? (or an email could have been sent from WMT-NOREPLY@Google.com)
If so, have you tried disavowing links?
Have you sent in a Reconsideration Request? Please be prepared to provide copies and the date(s) of any prior requests.
Have you noticed a significant rankings/traffic drop? When did this drop happen? Can you provide a list of the kywords you've noticed have lost rankings/traffic?
Have you worked with any SEO agencies in the past?
If so, did these companies build links for you? Are they available to remove any links they built?
Can you provide us with any lists/reports of links built by prior SEO companies
What types of linkbuilding do you do for your website? (press releases, infographics, directories, comments, social media, link purchasing, guest blog posts, advertorials, etc.)
When was the last time you had links developed for your website?
Make sure you make the pages so that there are no follow pages and no index there's no risk of Google penalizing you for duplicate content whatsoever.
Build away. I hope I have helped you
Sincerely,
Thomas
Look at how many people are actually finding them via Google or any search engine and subtract that from the amount now and you will get your number
I would not count on any branding alliance between you carrying over or people thinking that you are them
you must put a lot of effort into that.
It's simply going to be taking them back links and that's the only important thing you should really be worried about other than that you should just retire the domain honestly
If you don't want that domains back links this is really not worth it in my opinion.
You have to do a street for 301 redirect to your site from the purchase domain. You may get some links this way it might not be the most ethical way of going about it
This is what you have to look for when you're assessing a domain brother chores or somebody else's
If you purchased this domain and redirect it to yours you will game everyone who types in that Tomine and all the back links from that company you should make sure it has no negative back links prior to doing so
Other than what I stated above and you were coming benefiting from having that domain 31 redirecting to a meeting giving it everything it has almost 90 something percent of it
You really have to establish rather not to high-quality domain before you 301 redirect to what you've established outside while you come in you want to purchase it the purchase then 301 redirects to your website
Two relative pages only you can use this tool to assess the back links it's very good
http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/competitor-backlink-analysis-in-excel/
so as
http://seogadget.com/categorising-your-links/
Of course is use
ahrefs
majestic SEO
&
OSE
To check the demesnes back links if it has that links pointing that is no good to you and all. You want to make sure you're redirecting a domain that's high-quality. You really do not want more than one domain and a competitor is really somebody that you could just get rid of right now however if you should choose 301 redirect to be very careful
If you need help with this I strongly suggest using a recommended search engine optimization partner Moz
I hope this is of help to you sincerely,
Thomas
This is because of GA & http://www.a1webstats.com/
http://www.a1webstats.com/stats/pt.js
see this linkhttps://builtwith.com/datasat.com
To fix 301 &
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/06/supporting-relcanonical-http-headers.html
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/139066?hl=en
http://moz.com/blog/how-to-advanced-relcanonical-http-headers
http://moz.com/blog/rel-confused-answers-to-your-rel-canonical-questions
For an example of this type of data you can see, click on the link below:
http://www.a1webstats.com/stats/view-report.aspx?ReportID=9B7D261C-F465-46DC-8751-D4367AC02E11
What this shows you is information that often includes the search phrase typed into Google Images and it always shows you the path that each person took through the website. As you can see from the example link above, a click from a Google Images search can lead to lots of pages being viewed.
Being realistic, the majority of people that search for something in Google Images, are not going to be potential buyers. They could just be casually interested or need an image for something they’re working on.
What you should be interested in are the small percentage who ARE potentially useful to you.
Take the example of that link http://www.a1webstats.com/stats/view-report.aspx?ReportID=9B7D261C-F465-46DC-8751-D4367AC02E11 – that shows just 7 visitors who went to the website (from Google Images) and looked at a few pages (within a week). There were actually a lot more Google Images visits but we’ve shown just those that are of most interest/value. If that business had only those 7 visitors in a week then the opportunities to convert them to enquiries/business aren’t great. But what if they had 70, 170, 270, more …
Quite simply, the more traffic there is from Google Images, the more potential there is that some of those visitors are going to be potentially useful.
The business given in that example create highly exclusive swimming pool designs that are only affordable to a tiny percentage of the world population. Of the visitors to their website (coming in from Google Images), it would be surprising if even 1% were the target market. Therefore, by raising the visibility within Google Images, the chances of getting useful visitors becomes higher.
If you use the Referrers report within A1WebStats you’ll see how many visits you get (from Google Images searchers) within a period of time (e.g. a month). If the number is quite small (and you see the value on using images to bring traffic to your website) then you need to identify ways to boost your visibility in Google Images (again, ask us how if you’re not sure).
Probably the simplest modification we can make to the tracking code is to modify the "trackPageView" call so that it records a pageview of a page we specify rather than its default behavior of reading the URL from the address bar.
Common reasons for making this change include:
In your page your using
Google Analytics Usage Statistics - Websites using Google Analytics
Google Analytics offers a host of compelling features and benefits for everyone from senior executives and advertising and marketing professionals to site owners and content developers.
Net-Results Usage Statistics - Websites using Net-Results
Marketing automation software.
Hope this helps,Thomas
Hi Ramesh,
Chris is absolutely right there's no way your IP address is creating content
Your site is accessible through using DNS domain name servers your IP address is translated by a computer DNS server into something that you can remember like example.com instead of 123.488.91.00
It has no way of creating duplicate content
Regardless you do want to use a
Tags for every valid webpage that you want to show up in Google search engine.
here is more
http://moz.com/learn/seo/canonicalization
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/rel-canonical-html-head/
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2013/04/5-common-mistakes-with-relcanonical.html
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/139394?hl=en
Hope this is of help,
Thomas
Here is an answer from EGOL (a respected communityy member) to another Q in the forum about content length:
http://moz.com/community/q/does-reducing-content-length-on-a-page-effects-ranking#reply_56067
You may also be interested in this study by Neil Patel, which claims that the longer the blog post, the better, whether it’s the homepage of your website or your daily blog post. Here are some more resources on content resource you may be interested in:
http://www.pardot.com/content-marketing/is-long-content-king/
http://www.wiredinseo.com/content-length.php
http://blog.links4top.com/how-content-length-affects-rankings-and-conversions/
Hope this is what your looking for,
Thomas
The general rule is that every post must contain 150 words minimum for news and 300 words minimum for a blog post
However I want stressless the more information give people the better Google has definitely shown preference to longer peaches shorter pages. So you're being a better source of information by giving more information
As far as the statistics that you just stated to me I have honestly no idea
You could do a 2000 word posts on each one whatever is honestly the most comprehensive and is the best for that product this is an e-commerce website I'm sending? Or this is a how-to website?
So you're saying that their link profile is not very good? And you're only looking to get traffic from their existing website? If that is the case then you have to leave their existing website or just 301 redirect the site over to yours which would only last as long as people remember to use that website it would no longer be in the SERPS you could do a 302 but if you want to show up for there trafic not links have a page that tells people the site is now your site click here.
You might not want to pay much with out it being looked at this is not gray hat If you buy there site but if done wrong could be very bad
Absolutely worth it you should have approximately in my opinion about 2000 words to 300 word minimum is a minimum set by Google and with 300 word really can't go to in-depth about anything. I would use a read more to open it up so you have your mission statement for the critical information above the fold you want to sell the people on what you're doing let them know instantly when they see your site so use lots of great content and don't wory about useing read more as it will work very well.
Hope that helps,
Tom
One other thing to remember is switch that who is on that domain name in Google realizes that you've swapped you are no longer that company and that they could change things drastically however you will most likely benefit greatly from the inbound links that are going to be pointing at your domain after their redirected away from this other site the right way I will grab some info on what I mean for you. Give me 20 min
Thomas
This is done correctly could be extremely valuable. If your company is selling the exact same product this other company is in your information is relevant meaning that your site is relevant with their sites links would be relevant to be very Valuable and I would use a quality search engine optimization firm to do this job I would not just wing it
If you buy there domain and point it at your site you must 301 to your sites relavent pages not just 301 all to home page.
You could get links for good so that's worth a lot ONLY IF DONE RIGHT
Hope I was of help,
Thomas
the letters after the URL's HTML is a tracking code for tracking shared urls
hope that helps,
Thomas
Check your source code for a no archive tag
what to look for
http://searchengineland.com/google-explains-the-noindex-nofollow-noarchive-nosnippet-meta-tags-10595
Use
https://moz.com/researchtools/on-page-grader
to look for a bad tag
check your robots.txt file using
http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/seo-tools/robots-txt-generator/
Then use
http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/seo-tools/free-optimization/
to check for any other thing blocking it
REMEMBER your site is new google might not have archived your site yet
Hope this helps,
Thomas
Moosa,
is right your product page might have better social sharing or CTR on your product page you will rank higher then your brand’s page
You will want to be sure your brand’s page has good relevant content at least 2000 works of content regarding the brand and information users will want when looking for a scooter of that brand
Think your product page must have a lot of good scooter info.
I use scribe http://scribecontent.com/
For writing pages & link building
Info on Scribe
http://www.copyblogger.com/scribe-4/
Check your own links use
http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/
To check the pages this will tell you the links your own sites links count as well.
Then check the rank using Moz rank tracker
https://moz.com/researchtools/rank-tracker
if you want you can use
http://authoritylabs.com/ or http://SERPS.com as well to get the true rank google will give you a rank made just for you.
Hope this was of help,
Thomas
Sounds like a redirect to me Moz & Screaming Frog's desktop crawler and it also returned a single page.
Hope that helps,
Thomas