The event does not have all required information in the eyes of Google. Will that harm the site?

If a lot is missing YES you need dates.

http://i.imgur.com/gT3JDhw.png

Raw structured data extracted from the page:

• http://linter.structured-data.org/?url=https:%2F%2Fwww.woorank.com%2Fen%2Fblog%2Frich-snippets-what-why-and-how-to-implement
• http://linter.structured-data.org/
• http://www.seoskeptic.com/structured-data-markup-validation-testing-tools/
• http://json-ld.org/playground/
• https://www.woorank.com/en/blog/rich-snippets-what-why-and-how-to-implement

gT3JDhw.png

Utilizing past events will be will be able to instruct Google that you are having a consistent event cycle whatever length of time that is. So I do recommend doing it. JSON-LD has been, recommended for events.

In the past, Google has suggested Microdata. For websites and JSON-LD for apps however since their overhaul the new schema testing system, it seems like they have gone 100% JSON-LD in their recent "recommendations" for events.

("Try out the following examples using the Structured Data Testing Tool. All examples show JSON-LD syntax. If you prefer, you can use Microdata or RDFa syntax.")

JSON-LD His extremely lightweight but is invisible to the end-user. Microdata Is visible to the end-user.I would base it on what makes sense for your website. I do not know if you are utilizing app?If you are currently using microdata, it is still supported. If you are looking to use schema for the first time, I would recommend JSON-LD for apps and Microdata for end-users.

https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/events#use-cases

https://schema.org/Event

https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool

https://blog.kissmetrics.com/get-started-using-schema/ I would use Google's schema generator for JSON-LD  or one of these options for microdata

http://schema-creator.org/event.php

http://microdatagenerator.org/

Below are two examples of the different styles and keep in mind microdata is visible

Microdata. event example I created.

Your Event

descriptionStarts: 06/30/2016 12:00PM

Ends: 2016-07-01:00.000

Duration: 22:42

1313 Mockingbird Ln.Nowhere, FL32789United States

JSON-LD

** I hope this is been of help,**

** Thomas**

ErhDd6f.png

Hi Malika,

Think about screaming frog and what it has to detect in order to do that correctly it needs the correct  user agent syntax for it will not be able to make a crawl that would satisfy people.

Using a proper syntax for a user agent is essential and I have tried to be non-technical in this explanation I hope it works.

the reason screaming frog needs the user agent because the user-agent was added to HTTP to help web application developers deliver a better user experience.  By respecting the syntax and semantics of the header, we make it easier and faster for header parsers to extract useful information from the headers that we can then act on.

Browser vendors are motivated to make web sites work no matter what specification violations are made.  When the developers building web applications don’t care about following the rules, the browser vendors work to accommodate that.  It is only by us application developers developing a healthy respect

When the developers building web applications don’t care about following the rules, the browser vendors work to accommodate that.  It is only by us application developers developing a healthy respect

It is only by us application developers developing a healthy respect for the standards of the web, that the browser vendors will be able to start tightening up their codebase knowing that they don’t need to account for non-conformances.

For client libraries that do not enforce the syntax rules, you run the risk of using invalid characters that many server side frameworks will not detect.  It is possible that only certain users, in particular, environments would identify the syntax violation.  This can lead to difficult to track down bugs.

I hope this is a good explanation I've tried to keep it very to the point.

Respectfully,

Thomas

I think the idea is to manage them in Moz Analytics for more accurate things like tags they'll be a lot more options soon.

• Citing: https://moz.com/help/guides/keyword-explorer

"Currently, we only support a single column upload (keywords). We will be updating this to support uploading the same file you can export from the keyword list pages which will include the keyword, volume, difficulty, opportunity, custom score and potential. We’ll let everyone know when that update is released!"

• But you can separate them by uploading them to Moz analytics

You can export from the keyword tool which you can save a list of keywords under a tag or name. So if I have list-1 and list-2 I can pick relevancy and use filters to slim them down to exactly what I want but I do not believe you can add another tag in addition to the name of the list. You have to do that inside of Moz Analytics

Here is an excellent walk-through on how to do exactly what you just asked.

"Add & Manage Your Keywords in Moz Analytics!"

https://moz.com/help/guides/moz-pro-overview/keyword-rankings/add-and-manage-keywords

Here is a great link to a larger photo than the one below showing you how you can place the tag and first below and add the keywords in bulk. Once you hit upload, you will have your tags attached to any of the keywords that you've placed in the box labeled keywords.

http://i.imgur.com/wl9Pdg7.jpg

I don't think me describing it would do any better than that page can do but please let me know if it is something that you would like more help with or if you have any other issues.

Cite: https://moz.com/help/guides/keyword-explorer FAQ

"How do I add my keywords to my Moz Analytics campaigns?

In the future, we’ll have an automatic button that lets you directly add keywords to a Moz Analytics campaign. For now, the easiest way is to export a list to CSV and import or copy/paste to the “add keywords” page in Moz Analytics."

Photo: http://i.imgur.com/ZMLvbId.jpg

I hope I've been of help,

Thomas

wl9Pdg7.jpg ZMLvbId.jpg

happy I could be of help let me know if there's any issue and I will try to be of help with it. All the best

please let me know if I did not answer the question or you have any other questions

<a class="zippy index13 goog-zippy-expanded" tabindex="0" name="10" data-tracking-impression=""></a>Anatomy of pre-fetch tags

**https://ad.doubleclick.net**: These parameters are the same as in standard tags.

**ddm: **This is a new parameter that distinguishes DCM tags from the legacy product (DFA). It makes no difference to how you export or implement your tags. Learn more

**pfadx**: Lets the ad server know that this is a pre-fetch (pf) tag and an ad command for XML (adx).

_Nxxxx.site-keyname/Byyyyyy_;kw=[keyword];ord=[timestamp];dc_lat=_N_;dc_rdid=_Czzzz_;tag_for_child_directed_treatment=_I_: These parameters are the same as in standard tags.

**sz=_widthxheight_: **Dimensions of the placement, in pixels. (The value of the sz parameter is always 0x0 for VAST placements.)

**dcmt=_text/xml_**: MIME stands for Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions, which tell the browser what type of content you're sending. In this case, the MIME type is text/xml, which means that the content being sent is text in the form of XML code.

**dc_vast=3**: Formats the tag to be compliant with VAST 3.0 specifications.

theoretically you could pass a regular tag through there as well so hopefully that is of some help

No, I know that you're not trying to do anything malicious however unfortunately

it will not pass  juice unless you rig it to do something completely black hat

Here are examples of what 00 tags are being considered by antivirus and malware services you really should be able to pass this with a regular redirect, not anything that is hidden in a clear photo

https://www.freelancer.com/projects/PHP-Software-Architecture/Cookie-stuffing-iframe-pro-wanted/

https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2012/08/16/invisible-iframe-drive-by-malware-attacks-explained-video/

http://forums.seochat.com/affiliate-marketing-58/important-buying-pop-under-iframe-0x0-traffic-140033.html

I hope this helps,

Tom

this gives you a very clear breakdown of  user agents and their  set of syntax rules.  The following is valid example of user-agent that is full of special characters,

read this please http://www.bizcoder.com/the-much-maligned-user-agent-header

user-agent: foo&bar-product!/1.0a$*+ (a;comment,full=of/delimiters

references but you want to pay attention to the first URL

http://www.howtogeek.com/113439/how-to-change-your-browsers-user-agent-without-installing-any-extensions/

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Gecko_user_agent_string_reference

| Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0 |

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15069533/http-request-header-useragent-variable

if you formatted it correctly see below

User-Agent = product *( RWS ( product / comment ) )

and it was received by your headers yes you could fill in the blanks and test it.

https://mobiforge.com/research-analysis/webviews-and-user-agent-strings

http://mobiforge.com/news-comment/standards-and-browser-compatibility

No, you Cannot just put anything in there. The site has to recognize it and ask why you are doing this?

I have listed how to build and already built in addition to what your browser will create by using useragentstring.com

Must be formatted correctly and have it work with a header it is not as easy as it sometimes seems but not that hard either.

You can make & use this to make your own from your Mac or PC

http://www.useragentstring.com/

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/53.0.2747.0 Safari/537.36

how to build a user agent

• https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Gecko_user_agent_string_reference
• https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Setting_HTTP_request_headers
• https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537503(VS.85).aspx

Lists of user agents

https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/1061943?hl=en

http://www.user-agents.org/

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537503(v=vs.85).aspx

To crawl using a different user agent, select ‘User Agent’ in the ‘Configuration’ menu, then select a search bot from the drop-down or type in your desired user agent strings.

http://i.imgur.com/qPbmxnk.png

&

Video http://cl.ly/gH7p/Screen Recording 2016-05-25 at 08.27 PM.mov

Or

1. http://i.imgur.com/FAPVdSe.gifv
2. http://i.imgur.com/p6obu0W.gifv

Also see

http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/screaming-frog-guide/

https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/user-guide/general/#user-agent

https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/user-guide/

https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/faq/

https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/

dvlhxvF.gif p6obu0W.gif qPbmxnk.png

I don't disagree with you about Dom or Google successfully crawling Java/Ajax the issue is the I-frame's I do not believe that the current time they are an ideal situation. It may be possible I think the future has Java written all over it but if I were going to bed on it I would not use I-frames.

Great article I wish it covered the I-frame itself

http://searchengineland.com/tested-googlebot-crawls-javascript-heres-learned-220157

Google can crawl pretty much but it wants but does it advise you to here is the answer

https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/34445?hl=en

https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/webmasters/uQ8m1RPqgxw

Yes look at disadvantages in the first URL and then the reasons why Google modified DART

• http://www.knowonlineadvertising.com/facts-about-online-advertising/sharing-knowledge/popular-third-party-tags/iframe-vs-jscript-tags/
• https://support.google.com/dfa/partner/answer/188733?hl=en
• https://support.google.com/dfp_premium/answer/1131983?hl=en

I wish I had the ability to be in for a computer and give you a more complete answer but using I-frames and hoping Google will index them is a recipe for disaster.

Yes you want to have it match the canonical tag so most effective method is to 301 redirect so they match the canonical tag site map and robots.txt etc.  You can use a Regex code like this at the end of the URL /?$ in the case of category URLs it will allow them when needed.

if you use the proper 301 you will not have to deal with the category issue anyway.

rel="canonical" href="https://moz.com/community/q/duplicate-content-on-url-trailing-slash" />

I hope this is able to shed more light on the issue and great answer Eric.

Hope I was of help,

Tom

I have provided the Apache and Nginx configurations you would need in addition to a URL that will convert

Apache Htaccess to Nginx

The instructions are right here

Remove Trailing Slash

Just like with the WWW example, some prefer to remove the trailing slash. It's a commonly debated question that you'll find around the Internet, but it just depends on what you prefer.

Remember, though, your browser and even your server, by default, add a trailing slash to a directory. It is done for a reason. If you must strip the trailing slash, though, this is how you would do it:

<code class="hljs apache">RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(.*)$
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.domain.com/$1 [R=301,L]</code>

For Nginx

nginx configuration location ~ (.)$ { } location / { if (!-e $request_filename){ rewrite ^(.)$ http://www.domain.com/$1 redirect; } }

The explanation for this rule is the same as it is for when we want to add a trailing slash, just in reverse. We can also specify specific directories that we don't want apply this rule over.

<code class="hljs apache">RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !directory/(.*)$
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(.*)$
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.domain.com/$1 [R=301,L]</code>

For Nginx

nginx configuration location ~ directory/(.)$ { } location ~ (.)$ { } location / { if (!-e $request_filename){ rewrite ^(.*)$ http://www.domain.com/$1 redirect; } }

Please see the note about mod_dir and the DirectorySlash directive in the previous example. You might need to turn this directive off.

HTaccess converter for Apache to Nginx configuration.

http://winginx.com/en/htaccess

https://www.maxcdn.com/one/tutorial/remove-trailing-slash/

https://www.crucialhosting.com/knowledgebase/htaccess-apache-rewrites-examples

https://moz.com/community/q/how-to-remove-trailing-slashes-in-urls-using-htaccess-apache

https://gist.github.com/nathos/4645164

Hope this helps,

Please see: https://github.com/blueprintmrk/htaccess

&

https://github.com/blueprintmrk/htaccess#redirect-using-redirectmatch

Removing "/."  from .PHP URLs "win-win"

Alias “Clean” URLs

This snippet lets you use “clean” URLs -- those without a PHP extension, e.g. example.com/users instead ofexample.com/users.php.

RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{SCRIPT_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteRule ^([^.]+)$ $1.php [NC,L]

Remove Trailing Slash

This snippet will redirect paths ending in slashes to their non-slash-terminated counterparts (except for actual directories), e.g. http://www.example.com/blog/ to http://www.example.com/blog That is important for SEO since it’s recommended to have a canonical URL for every page.

RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} (.+)/$
RewriteRule ^ %1 [R=301,L]

Force HTTPS

RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} !on
RewriteRule (.*) https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI}

# Note: It’s also recommended to enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
# on your HTTPS website to help prevent man-in-the-middle attacks.
# See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/HTTP_strict_transport_security
 <ifmodule mod_headers.c="">Header always set Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains"</ifmodule> 

Force HTTPS Behind a Proxy

Useful if you have a proxy in front of your server performing TLS termination.

RewriteCond %{HTTP:X-Forwarded-Proto} !https
RewriteRule (.*) https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI}

PS

checkout

https://www.nginx.com/products/ they are great!

Tom

Alias “Clean” URLs

This snippet lets you use “clean” URLs -- those without a PHP extension, e.g. example.com/users instead ofexample.com/users.php.

RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{SCRIPT_FILENAME} !-d
RewriteRule ^([^.]+)$ $1.php [NC,L]

<code class="language-htaccess" style="padding: 2px 6px; border: 0px; border-image-source: initial; border-image-slice: initial; border-image-width: initial; border-image-outset: initial; border-image-repeat: initial; margin: 0px; border-radius: 3px; text-shadow: #ffffff 0px 1px; word-break: normal; word-wrap: normal; tab-size: 4; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-color: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: 0px 0px; background-repeat: initial;">Glad I can help 
Try useing this to check it  

http://www.redirect-checker.org/index.php </code>

`#removes trailing slash if not a directory RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule ^(.+)/$ /$1 [R=301,L]

or
https://css-tricks.com/snippets/htaccess/remove-file-extention-from-urls/

Take the / off the end of this
https://regex101.com/r/oK8xL9/3 like this` ^((?:\w+/\w+)+)$

Seach & replace might be needed

<code class="language-htaccess" style="padding: 2px 6px; border: 0px; border-image-source: initial; border-image-slice: initial; border-image-width: initial; border-image-outset: initial; border-image-repeat: initial; margin: 0px; border-radius: 3px; text-shadow: #ffffff 0px 1px; word-break: normal; word-wrap: normal; tab-size: 4; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-color: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: 0px 0px; background-repeat: initial;">Hope that helps,
Tom</code>

obO0B3d.png

Hi Dmytro,

Your server cache is not set up correctly. You have the 1800s as when you're going to have your cache expire.

Don't use GoDaddy's hosting

If you want a fast, low-cost host  In the UK or the USA, https://pressidium.com is great and UK based.

Check out http://reviewsignal.com/blog/2015/07/28/wordpress-hosting-performance-benchmarks-2015/

For hosting in the UK.

GetFlywheel.com Cost is $15 a month

Pressidium is $24.90,

WPengine $30 offers to host in England  &  you can get a coupon from WP beginner if you want half off for three months.

If money is not an issue check out Pagely's VPS, Kinsta's VPS, & PressLabs

A managed WordPress host will fix the numerous problems that you have on your site. I tried to use any system like redirect checker and various other tools and your site timed out. You can see the Pingdom test below

http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/#!/c3A3fx/https://www.solvid.co.uk

http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/#!/ipWQZ/https://solvid.co.uk

Hope this helps,

Tom

Found it your non-https .php URL has backlinks & you are 301  redirecting it to the "/" URL.

After that redirects to the non-/. Thus creating a redirect chain

You need to redirect the non-HTTPS version of the site/URL  to the non-/ version of the site.  This will give you the domain and page authority that you are missing.

I confirmed the back links using majestic.com

Result

http://www.ultrawebsitehosting.com/hosting-dedicated.php backlinks 
301 Moved Permanently
https://www.ultrawebhosting.com/dedicated-servers/
301 Moved Permanently
https://www.ultrawebhosting.com/dedicated-servers lost PA when redirected so many times. 
200 OK

HTTP Headers

http://www.ultrawebsitehosting.com/hosting-dedicated.php

---

301 Moved Permanently

| Status: | 301 Moved Permanently |
| Code: | 301 |
| Server: | UltraSpeed Hosting by UltraWebHosting.com |
| Date: | Sun, 03 Apr 2016 23:42:41 GMT |
| Content-Type: | text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 |
| Content-Length: | 258 |
| Connection: | close |
| Location: | https://www.ultrawebhosting.com/dedicated-servers/ |

https://www.ultrawebhosting.com/dedicated-servers/

---

301 Moved Permanently

| Status: | 301 Moved Permanently |
| Code: | 301 |
| Server: | UltraSpeed Hosting by UltraWebHosting.com |
| Date: | Sun, 03 Apr 2016 23:42:47 GMT |
| Content-Type: | text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 |
| Content-Length: | 257 |
| Connection: | close |
| Location: | https://www.ultrawebhosting.com/dedicated-servers |
| X-Cache: | HIT from Backend |

https://www.ultrawebhosting.com/dedicated-servers

---

200 OK

| Status: | 200 OK |
| Code: | 200 |
| Server: | UltraSpeed Hosting by UltraWebHosting.com |
| Date: | Sun, 03 Apr 2016 23:42:48 GMT |
| Content-Type: | text/html |
| Content-Length: | 40741 |
| Connection: | close |
| Vary: | Accept-Encoding |
| Last-Modified: | Fri, 01 Apr 2016 02:03:57 GMT |
| Access-Control-Allow-Origin: | * |
| X-Cache: | HIT from Backend |
| Accept-Ranges: | bytes |

Features

This Redirect Checker supports several features like:

• · Select different User Agents like
     · Desktop-Browsers (Chrome, Internet Explorer, Safari, Firefox,...)
     · Mobile Devices (IPad, Iphone, Android, Windows Phone, Kindle, Nokia...
     · Search Engine Bots (GoogleBot, Google Mobile Bot, Yandex, BingBot, Baidu, Yahoo Slurp, Naver,...
• · checking 302 and 301 redirects
• · supports & checks https redirects
• · checks meta refresh redirects
• · analysis of common javascript redirects
• · check and show redirect chains
• · check http headers like Status Code, X-Robots-Tag, Rel Canonical Header Tag "Link:"

I did not show what the PA was when I dropped the /

its 0 but when I add it is PA 28 see & try it.

Video of what I'm saying http://cl.ly/faXF

The 301 has to point to the / it shows PA

I'm about to grab dinner when I get back I will do it deep crawl your site and I'll find out the problem for you because it's definitely not a hard issue to figure out and I will dedicate some time to find out.

It's because there are back links pointing to the URLs that you redirected to dedicated servers for instance. The others have no back links therefore they do not have any page rank.

Was not able to fix the problem? If not you may want to force a / with a /?$  that way it will only be forced if needed.

Hope that helps, Tom

Try //Rewrite to www

Options +FollowSymLinks

RewriteEngine on

RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^ultrawebhosting.com[nc]

RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.ultrawebhosting.com/$1 [r=301,nc]

//301 Redirect Old File

Redirect 301 .php /

See http://www.askapache.info//2.3/mod/mod_alias.html#redirectmatch

Sorry for all the duplicate stuff everything posts that way is annoying sorry about that. Nevertheless, you have to remove the PHP from your site. And redirect it correctly.

Let me know if that helps,

See below

|

Purpose

|

Example formatting

Include an entire directory but nothing beneath it

|

http://www.yourdomain.com/shop/

^/shop/?$

Include all subdirectories

|

http://www.yourdomain.com/shop/*

^/shop/.*

Include a single file

|

http://www.yourdomain.com/shop.php

^/shop.php

Include any file of a specific type

|

^/shop/.*.php – any php file

|

Look at this http://cl.ly/faXF

https://moz.com/researchtools/ose/comparisons?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ultrawebhosting.com%2Fdedicated-servers

compare with

https://moz.com/researchtools/ose/comparisons?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ultrawebhosting.com%2Fhosting-dedicated.php

It is still showing up with .php

https://www.ultrawebhosting.com/hosting-dedicated.php needs to 301 to

https://www.ultrawebhosting.com/dedicated-servers/

Its the .php &  different link that has back links to it that is not properly pointing to it. Check

You have 2

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *

Server: UltraSpeed Hosting by UltraWebHosting.com

Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 08:06:06 GMT

Content-Type: text/html

Content-Length: 34133

Connection: keep-alive

Vary: Accept-Encoding

Last-Modified: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 05:37:53 GMT

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *

X-Cache: HIT from Backend

Accept-Ranges: bytes

Intro to HTTP

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *

thank you for providing me with that URL I will take a look right now

Are your subpages subdomains? Or subfolders? I'm going to assume they are subfolders.

If you're domain authority changes because of your page, that would be the only thing that would make me think you're talking about a subdomain.

PA 63 & DA 56 your site will be crawled quickly because it has decent domain authority just because your homepage has high page authority does not mean the rest of the site will.

It is not unusual for a brand-new page to have little page authority you can check if your forward slash "/" is being forced use screaming frog, redirect mapper, or https://varvy.com/tools/redirects/

You can then force a "/"  or prevent one depending on what you find. Using regex

Name: Redirect my contact page
Domain: www.domain.com
Source: ^/old-path/contact-us/?$
Destination: /new-path/contact-us/
Redirect type: 301 Permanent

• This Redirect Rule will match a URL of http://www.domain.com/old-path/contact-us -or- http://www.domain.com/old-path/contact-us/
• The variation is because of the Regex Syntax “/?$”
• The Question Mark “?” makes the Trailing slash Optional
• It will also only match the Source if it Starts with a “/” (note the carrot “^” ), or ends with either “s” or “/” (note the ending “$” )

https://wpengine.com/support/regex/

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16657152/matching-a-forward-slash-with-a-regex

This depends on your server, and what language are using so, I strongly suggest you use tool to verify your changes before making them.

https://regex101.com/r/oK8xL9/1

http://www.regexpal.com/

I hope this helps,

Tom

Ryan gave an excellent answer. Google is using other clues to pick up on new pages I'm not saying don't submit your sitemap I'm just saying add structured data/schema into your store as well. Check your crawl budget and see if your site is eating up too much of it and not being indexed properly by Google.

A simple test to see if something is being blocked is to run your site through https://varvy.com/

If you do not know, I would stress using Deep Crawl or screaming frog SEO spider

Navigation Is often one of many can cause problems where your site will not be crawled correctly.

To determine whether or not you have to crawl budget issue we got each can make independent image sitemaps and index sitemaps as well just to be sure that Google is getting what you want to.

Like Ryan said check out

https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/183669

Here is a Magento dynamic site map http://i.imgur.com/QKS0bgU.png

validate your sitemap check it for problems

http://tools.seochat.com/tools/site-validator/

https://moz.com/learn/seo/schema-structured-data

http://www.searchmetrics.com/news-and-events/schema-org-in-google-search-results/

https://blog.kissmetrics.com/seo-for-marketplaces-ecommerce/

JSON-LD Microdata

https://builtvisible.com/micro-data-schema-org-guide-generating-rich-snippets/#json

I hope this helps,

Thomas

http://i.imgur.com/QKS0bgU.png

QKS0bgU.png