Guest posts on sites you buy advertising with?
-
What are your thoughts about the following scenarios.
Scenario 1: You purchased a banner ad on a site for $50. Then you notice that the site accepts guest posts and you contribute a guest article which has a followed link.
Scenario 2: You pitch a guest post to a blog and they say sure but first pay us $50. You say, I can't pay for links but how about I buy an ad spot for $50 instead in appreciation of you reviewing by submission.
Scenario 3: You pitch a guest post to a blog and they say sure but it will cost $50 to be published. You say sure and pay them.
Which of these would go against Google's guidelines and be considered a paid link? It seems like they are all buying links to a different degree, but they would all be indistinguishable to Google.
-
Right, but the question is more about the ethics of paid placement than the quality of the link, isn't it? Obviously manipulative = bad because it's more likely to be caught. Discretely placed links = better because they're harder to detect and seemingly add value. That all skirts the fundamental ethical issue, though.
Would the link exist without payment? Is there an effort to manipulate search rankings with the link? Google would say that if you really cared about the context of the link and wanted the traffic it would send, you'd have no problem nofollowing it. In that case, paid placement should be fine. If you're letting it pass authority, it shouldn't be paid. There's really not any wiggle room in the TOS.
It all comes down to a risk / reward calculation. If your link is legitimately contextually relevant, the content you supply is good, the site it's published on is high quality, and the site being linked to is likewise a quality site, there's minimal risk.
-
I totally agree that placing a link in-context does not make it a good link. I could also show many examples of links in-context that are obviously manipulative. So we have to go what I've been saying for a long time - is the link adding value to the article? Is it placed at the time of publishing? Is it there just for the link, or does it provide value to someone who would click through?
Studies have been showing time and time again that readers are much more likely to click on something like [click here] or [this article] instead of an exact anchor. Exact anchors are basically only done by SEOs.
So we should think carefully about when'where we put these links too. I think the argument and studies done on partial-match anchor text being valuable bolsters the argument to link whole sentences instead of just the keywords you want to rank for. You may also get more referral traffic if you do this.
-
Agree. But I do think John Muller had a solution for this with the no follow. If it's followed that means you want to influence the rankings (if money has exchanged hands).
The problem is that if the domain is "clean" and not involved (at lest clearly) in selling links there is no proof and for this reason tehy can not take action but at the end of the day is a payed link no matter how is spinned.
But i think it's all about perspective, what's the angle from witch everyone is looking at it. The problem is we care how google is viewing it and google dosen't care how we see it
-
I tend to disagree with John about what constitutes a paid link. Just because a paid link is embedded reasonably in content doesn't mean it suddenly aligns with Google's TOS. The intent is to manipulate search rankings and the link wouldn't exist without payment -- I think that's the easiest criteria to apply to these questions.
From my perspective, scenario 2 and 3 are pretty clearly violating the intent of Google's guidelines. That said, this type of approach is pretty much undetectable, particularly if the post published on the site is of high quality, the site being linked to is of high quality, and the publishing site doesn't publicly solicit this type of arrangement.
-
To your reason for the article, it goes back to your mindset I think - you can either do it for the link and therefore have to produce content, or you can produce content that happens to have a link. Any link is paid for in some way, by someone. Salaries, bandwidth, etc.
I just don't think it's that straight forward, as I said in my first reply on this thread.
-
The questions are really on point but unfortunately there is only one straight answer: if money are exchanging hands and involves a link then it's a paying link.
I've run the same set of questions (not exactly but with the same core) with John Muller from Google and his answer was on point: Yes, it's a payed link but if you want to be safe just place the links on no follow.
It make sense . if you pay for the article and if you want a link that can bring some referral traffic or you need it for branding then go for it but place it on no follow.
That won't happen as you want that article (in most of the cases - 99% ) for the link - you don't give a r..s a...s on the article
Google however is flexible in my opinion and even if it will see a follow link and it will somehow understand that is a payed link it won't take action if it make sense, if the domain is not featuring different similar payed links on each page and so on.
My 2 cents.
-
Great answer John -- I agree that this is a very vague/grey area. Are there any videos or interviews with Matt Cutts talking about this?
I think similar scenarios should be brought up with Matt at conferences so we can his answer "straight from the horse's mouth" as this topic is getting more and more attention (and more severe penalties ie. iAcquire)
Thanks for your answer
-
So, I think this is a great question and underscores a very important part of SEO - it's not black and white. Some links are obviously paid, others are not. Then we have the middle where we have to interpret what is being talked about as "paid" or "incentivized" links.
I wouldn't consider any of these "paid links" I don't think. The only one that I wouldn't say this about with 100% clarity is #3, but in that case you're paying for the article, and technically you could pay to publish an article without a link, right?
The problem is that money always muddies the waters. By buying an ad spot you are advertising yourself, but it's obviously marked as an ad. Also, if you buy ad space you're probably guaranteed to be accepted as a guest author even if it is "reviewed by submission".
By paid links Google is talking about links that are "meant to manipulate Pagerank". All links manipulate Pagerank in some way you could argue. So are all links bad? No. I could show many examples of paid links that add nothing to the page on which they are. THOSE are the manipulative paid links, not one within a blog post that has a publication price.
Also, going in and paying for a link within an article after the publish date, and especially in an article that was not written by you, is definitely manipulation, even if the link makes sense.
Those are my thoughts. I'd love to hear the thoughts of others, though this topic has been discussed to death in the past few years.
-
Mmm.. I like your question. I don't google will see any of these links as paid. As long as your guestpost is relevant and the link in it is also, i don't see any problem. Not even to pay for it. But, if i must choose.. Scenario 2, a guestpost with followed link and a bannerad of 50 usd, that's the best deal
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Spammy links redirecting to homepage of site -
Hey guys, I'm auditing a website at the moment and Moz is showing a few spammy links linking to it. The problem is these domains are all 301 redirecting to the domain I'm auditing. Let's say I'm auditing Site A. Site B is been flagged in Moz OSE with 12 spam flags. When I try to open Site B in a browser, it redirects back to Site A. What's the best thing to do, here? Disavowing domains redirecting to the site is surely a bad idea? Cheers.
Link Building | | BrianYork-AIM0 -
Are site profile links from sites like Quantcast still a Google friendly quick win?
I heard one of the speakers from Link Love suggest getting an easy high PR link from Quantcast.by creating a site profile page. What is everyone's opinion on the value of this type of link when blended with other types of link building activity. Low, Moderate? What is the best way to find these types of link profile opportunities? Any one have a good list?
Link Building | | Clicksjim0 -
Linkbuilding Suggestions For Technical Site
Hi Mozzers, I'm facing a tough link building challenge for a manufacturer's representative of technical controls and am struggling to find links beyond directories. The site mainly consists of manufacturers products and creating original content is tough for me because of the technical nature of the business. Any suggestions welcome.
Link Building | | waynekolenchuk0 -
Satellite Sites ?
Hello, One of my competitors has a large amount of sites/blogs, similar to the attachment/screenshot. Is it possible that they own these are are using them to boost their rankings? Thanks! ICZTX.jpg
Link Building | | TP_Marketing0 -
Link Building by Guest Posting.... But How many posts?
Hello I am a small Computer/Tech Blogger (part time) from India and following are my Domain stats: PR: 4 Alexa Rank: 65K *** Open Site Explorer Page Authority: 46/100** *** Open Site Explorer Domain Authority: 35/100** *** Open Site Explorer Linking Root Domain: 98** *** Open Site Explorer Total Links: 1196** *** mR: 4.83** *** mT: 5.81** Domain Age: 3 Years and 4 Months Blog Posts I made: around 580 I never spent ANY time in Link Building, only wrote content for my blog. I only attached my Blog URL in some BIG forums as a signature (never meant for link building, but later found that the signature section of some forums are DOFOLLOW) and very few sites linked/links to me/my articles. Reasons why I am asking question here: Majority of my blog posts ranks very well (top 10) on Google.co.in, but on Google.com, most of them are present from Page 2 - Page 10 - I want to rank my posts well on Google.com, Google.co.uk etc. SERP of Big sites remains static, but my position shuffles a lot. Sometimes any particular blog post of mine is on first page (on a particular Google Domain) and after some days/months, it shifts to 2nd or 3rd page! This happens a lot! As soon as Google Updates pagerank, many recent articles of mine will get atleast PageRank 2 or 3, but when pagerank in updated again, the pagerank of these very same articles drops! Very few articles of mine have static pagerank I am not a master in Computers/Tech and am not the first one on the internet to discover and write something UNIQUE/NEW, but I try to write detailed and good quality tutorials. If main keywords of my posts matches with the keywords of BIG domains, I never rank on first page, no matter I have written more detailed content compared to the content of these BIG sites! Google sends me traffic to majority of my blog posts by means of random keywords! I have decided to do Guest Posting on some blogs of similar niche and with Open Site Explorer Domain Authority ranging from 60 to 80. I will try my level best to write good content for them and they also allows Author Bio with a backlink to my Blog Homepage (in my case, the anchor text for this link will be my Blog Name) I want to ask following questions: Is one guest post with a backlink to my Homepage is enough? or I have to write more content for same domain? I have heard that, if you link to a website/blog which is linking to you, Google don't pass any juice to either of them because of reciprocal linking! - Is this true? The websites on which I am planning to do guest posts are very well established and trusted websites. Some of them have Open Site Explorer Domain Authority of 80+. Also, I never linked to them nor I am planning to do so! I request SEO Gurus here to please help me and I apologize in advance if I am wrong at any point. MY SEO concepts are not much clear and I am a newbie 🙂 Thanks and Regards
Link Building | | technotech0 -
How should I promote my local service site?
I am in the process of promoting my local service site at http://winecountrycarpet.com and I was wondering what you guys would recommend? i have submitted to a lot of directories and get any backlink I can. I have also started writing articles and submitting them to sooper articles and Ezine articles, but I feel like I am doing something wrong. I am open to any suggestions.
Link Building | | ayetti0 -
Advice for brand new site
Dear All I have been an SEO for several years now, and have just laucnhed a new site www.householdsaver.co.uk its in its early stages as I expect to add a community option where people post deals and offers they have found, share them with friends etc My question is really are all the old seo practices still worth doing? Things like directory sites, blog comments, articles sites, social bookmarking etc.... (I have already built up twitter users on the account before the site went live) With Moz's trust factor is it best to go for highrank trust sites first or... I guess you could say that I am suffering from what do I do first and is it all still worth doing and what are the early pit falls to think about..? ie too many links too soon and from to high or to low trusted sites? Any comments from anyone who have put a new site live in the past couple of years would be appricated. Thanks James
Link Building | | JamesT2 -
Commenting on an old post
I've been playing around with OSE and found one of my competitors has a decent link coming from a post created in 2008. It only has two comments, one from my competitor with a link back to his site. The page has a PA: 55, it seems like an easy link but since the post is 3 years old im not sure its appropriate even though commenting is open. Any thoughts?
Link Building | | nbeske0