Keywords local and national
-
Hello everyone. I asked a similar question but still find myself a bit confused. I am a magician who is trying to improve my web presence. I found a list of keywords which I will list below. The results read from left to right the search results in the United States, and in Ohio ( where I am from). I found these results using google planner.
Magician 14800 390
Magicians 5400 170
Corporate Magician 170 10
Comedy Magician 140 10
Here is my question. Lets use the word Magician as an example. I see that there are 390 results in Ohio for the search term Magician. Would I want to key the phrase "magician" or "Ohio Magician". How does google work with this? If I key just the word "magician" and someone in Ohio google searches for Ohio Magicians or something similar, will it detect their location and put me on there radar? When I key in " Ohio Magician" in the planner the results that come back are 0 or less than 10.
I'm curious if google works on location and if I'm wasting my time keying in all of these cities that are showing no results. I began targeting "Cleveland Magician" "Columbus Magician" etc. Should I just stick with the main term Magician?
-
Good luck! So glad to be of help!
-
Awesome, thank you. I'm considering targeting the main keyword on a national level and then zeroing in on the each individual city. I am a national act and if I am able to rank for Corporate entertainment on a national level and local, awesome. Thank you so much for the help. I appreciate it.
-
Hi Jason,
Thank you for the additional details. To be honest, I have little or no faith in keyword tools for local research these days, so I wouldn't necessarily believe that no one in Pittsburgh is searching for a magician. It just isn't logical.
That being said, yes, you must create pages optimized for Cleveland to have a hope of appearing organically for relevant searches. You do have a chance, definitely! Create great content for your target cities and you do have a chance to gain organic visibility for these terms, though it will likely never outrank competitors physically located in these cities. You are understanding this correctly.
-
Miriam,
Thank you for your response. That is very helpful. Here is my current situation
I have established a local search marketing campaign. I'm located in Akron Ohio. I began by listing myself, which puts me right at the top of the list. I then wrote solid content for terms such as Magician, Magic Show, Kids entertainer, Corporate etc including the term Akron.
I guess my real question is in regards to other cities in my area. As I mentioned, when I search for the term Magicians ( generic no city after) I find results of 5,400 with a low competition rate. This is great. I'm interested in demoniating the market in Columbus, Cleveland, and Pittsburgh. When I place the term "Cleveland Magician" Or "PIttsburgh Magician" into the keyword planner I'm receiving a return of 0 searches. BUT, if I change the targeting area to Cleveland and search just for the term " Magician" I'm getting a return of 10.
The question being this, do I still need to include the term Cleveland magician in a target pages which is trying to get me ranking in the Cleveland area? Even though the results for Cleveland magician comes back 0 and magician comes back 10, how should Id approach this? If someone in Cleveland search just for the term "Magician" would google recognize my targeted page of " Cleveland Magician", highlight the term "magician" and point them towards me? I know the local magicians in Cleveland will rank better because they are local, but if I give good content, I have a chance. Right?
-
Hi Jason,
Are you carrying out a Local Search Marketing campaign for the business? I'm assuming you travel to your clients to perform for them, right? And you do so within a certain geographic radius, I'm guessing. If this is the case, a campaign for you would typically look something like:
-
You'd need to have a street address (even your home address) that you'd be using to create your Google+ Local listing and then following the options within the dashboard to ensure that the address is hidden to comply with Google's rule about SABs (service area businesses) hiding their addresses. If you're physically located in Colombus, then your Google+ Local page would display that you are based in Columbus, OH, without actually showing your street address. Google would then consider as you a most relevant LOCAL result for queries like 'magician columbus' or searches for magicians stemming from Columbus-based devices.
-
You would also need to have a dedicated local area code phone number.
-
In addition to building your Google+ Local page for your city of location, you would be creating listings (called citations) for your business in a number of other local directories.
-
The main thrust of your website optimization would center on your service terms (magician, comedy magician, corporate magician etc.) + your city of location. So, in other words, if you're physically located in Columbus, you'd be optimizing the core pages on your website for 'Columbus Magician', 'Corporate Magician in Columbus', etc. I would consider this a much more typical way to handle the SEO for a local business than optimizing just for the state of Ohio would be. The point of all of the above is to earn high local rankings for the business where it has a physical address.
-
In addition to optimizing your core website pages for your city of location, you would likely be building out additional content on the website to showcase the additional cities to which you will travel to serve. So, if you serve in 10 cities within Ohio, then that would be 10 pages of unique, terrific content, optimized for your services in that specific city. A common way to approach this is to showcase your work in those cities, which should be easy for a magician to do. Just remember, the content must be unique on each page. The point of this work is to go after high organic rankings for cities in which you lack a physical location. You're unlikely to achieve local pack rankings for any city in which you're not physically located, but you can pursue organic rankings via a combination of content development, social buzz and link earning.
-
Google will personalize users' results based on their physical location whether or not they add a geo-modifier. If I search for 'pizza', Google shows me a local pack of pizza places in my city. But, this behavior is typically on a city basis - not a state basis, so that's an important distinction. On mobile devices, this type of city-based geo-personalization is even more pronounced, to the point that you'll get different results when you're at one end of town than you will at the other end of town for many queries.
So, basically, I think Local SEO is the area you need to be investigating and learning about. All Moz Members have free access to our new Moz Local Learning Center (http://moz.com/learn/local) and we have lots of great Local SEO blog posts on the Moz blog.
I hope this helps with your question.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why would a newly created site, have ranked ahead of our site for keyword that we are optimized for?
This newly created site has a DA of 1 and PA of 1, no backlinks, no optimized urls, the keyword they ranked better than us on was listed a total of 6 times on the homepage. Our PA is 29 and DA is 18 for the page that ranks for this keyword. They really copied a few elements of our site but made sure to change a few things, but also list at the bottom of their site 5 keywords that are crucial to our niche industry but they're all linking to the same page. Any ideas? It's an SEO guy running the site, we've watched them toy with adwords trying to be number 1, but not liking the price, so they are here and there with it. Mainly I don't see why they'd rank better for this keyword, we our site have prolly 500% more content that's both of quality and relevance to our customers, in the form of Pdfs, infographics, help sections, and video. Very baffled here, any advice would rock!
Competitive Research | | Deacyde1 -
Possible google sandbox issue? Organically ranking page 1 for our number 1 keyword, but page 5 sometimes 6 on google?
What are some things I can look into to figure out why google is ranking us on page 5 sometimes page 6, with some slight rank boosts to rank 36 from 48 but then falls right back. While Yahoo and Bing rank us page 1 consistently, without these big drops back. I use google search ( webmaster tools ) daily, fix 404s and make sure to fetch new content I create. Our site is within the Sandbox issue time frame, google 1st indexed the site about a year and a half ago, the site has been through various SEO service checks, and has had those issues fixed ( some bigcommerce won't allow, such as full sitewide ssl and a few other small factors ) but all the big stuff was handled or will be 100% handled after this redesign is complete. But just still seems we're stuck in the google hole again. We do use adwords, but no clear signs as to why we'd suffer such hardships with google ranking, only thing we don't have optimized in terms of on page optimization from moz is keyword in url, of which will be changing within the next month or two, as we're rolling our a new redesign with SEO 100% at the forefront, nice url paths, with keywords in their url, much more responsive site that uses less resources. But before we release this redesign, I'd like to find out what toe we stubbed of google's to give us such a ranking blackeye... We don't have that many backlinks, and I know these are a huge factor, however, building quality backlinks it's harder than walking on water at time and on the same level as spinning hay into gold. Any ideas community...
Competitive Research | | Deacyde0 -
Competitor Keywords
Is there any way to find out what keywords my competitors are ranking for? I would like ideas for blogs, website content, etc. to drive traffic and am curious as to what topics my competitors are focusing on. I am able to see my competitors' rankings for keywords which I am currently tracking but I would like to see keywords they are ranking for that I am not tracking if possible. Any suggestions? Josh
Competitive Research | | jbeals0 -
What's the value of Exact Match Keyword Domains vs. Company Name Domains?
Hey Mozers, I was in a discussion this morning about the value of Exact Match Keyword domains vs. a company name domain and wanted to get a little more clarification. Let's say we are doing a site for a company called Favored Dental, and they have had the domain favoredental.com for quite a while and have their authority built up in it. Is it better to have favored-dental.com or favoreddental.co or keep its current form? The reasoning behind the alternate domains would be they have the exact match keyterm, in this case lets say "Favored Dental" is the keyterm we were going after. To my knowledge EMDs aren't as relevant as they'd use to be as Google would rather branding of companies instead of keyterm domains? Is this correct, or do EMDs of keywords you're going after hold higher authority? Thanks for the clarification!
Competitive Research | | MonsterWeb280 -
Effort for "moderate competition" keywords
I'm rather new to this, and while I'm getting some sense of everything I'm trying to figure out what kind of scope of work lays ahead of me. The keywords I'm looking to rank for are "moderate difficulty" -- somewhere between the 45%-55% "difficulty scale" on seomoz's keyword difficulty report. Assuming I have a number of "A-grade" (according to SEOmoz's reports) optimized pages for these keywords, how many links of a given quality level should I be looking at building up? I mean, of course, the more the better, but if I'm gunning for high DA/PA pages, am I looking at dozens here or hundreds of such links? I can imagine that any answer isn't going to come with much specificity, but if there was just an "idea" of the scale of backlinking involved here, that'd be great!
Competitive Research | | yoni450 -
Why is different the difficulty of a keyword in Google Spain and Google mexico?
In your opinion, Which are the main reasons of this difference?
Competitive Research | | BorjaUrreta910 -
Keyword based link problem on site
So I think I might have identified an issue with a site that I'm trying to get ranked for a specific keyword but, wanted to get some opinions before I started making some big changes on the site. On my homepage I have the keyword that I would like to be ranked for in the title lets say "Blue Widgets - Company Name', also on the home page I have some descriptions of our services including the keywords. I also have a couple of the keyword based links within in the content, navigation and footer. But these keyword based links all point to another page on the site: blue-widgets.htm. If I really want my home page to rank for the keyword "Blue Widgets' should all of these links point to the home page instead of the sub page? I know there are a great number of other factors that contribute to rankings but looking at my competition, this is something that they seem to be doing. The keyword based links within the content, navigation or footer all point to the homepage. I also have a higher Domain Authority than some of the sites that rank higher than me so I'm not sure if building more links is the answer. Of course I always want to build natural links but these sites don't seem to be doing that either. Any comments, suggestions or input would be greatly appreciated.
Competitive Research | | TRICORSystems0 -
Keyword difficulty tool - bit confused here!!
Hi, Got a question about the keyword difficulty tool, I'm new to seomoz so might be a silly question but here goes. Q: It takes the top 10 results from Google under a certain search query, the results displayed gives a rough breakdown of what power the page on the search results has along with the root domain. It looks like it rewards the best out of the bunch for each section with a tick, so 1 tick per column for the best performer. Now I would have thought if one of the websites in the top 10 had all 4 ticks it would rank at the top of the list but this is not the case. What else would come into play to make others which have no ticks rank higher then one which has all. Sorry if this sounds really confusing.
Competitive Research | | activitysuper0