My question is in regards to possible conflict in creating an additional website under a new domain for our company.
-
Our companies, Vulcan Information Packaging and ATC both live under the domain “www.binders.com”. This is a great thing as far as us dominating in the binder industry. However, in the next 2-3 years and forward, we want to build our presence as a company who offers packaging products such as boxes, marketing kits, and other forms of packaging. Obviously, the “binders.com” brand/domain does not contribute much to this effort and can be confusing to customers visiting the site. Essentially, we want to build an additional branding for our company in the packaging industry.
Keeping this in mind, we own the domain “www.vulcaninformationpackaging.com” and we are considering building a new website using this domain which contains the word “packaging”. This new site would only promote and contain packaging related products. This new website will advertise and direct traffic to our company Vulcan Information Packaging, which is the same company “binders.com” directs traffic to.
So my question is to determine whether doing this might be a practice that Google and other search engines might frown upon. I tend to think it will be fine because we will be promoting and driving traffic for non-binder products where as, binders.com is heavily in binder related products.
thank you,
Dominic Zaidan
-
Our thought process is that binders.com limits us to binders and as we all know, looseleaf binders are slowly going away. What comes to your mind when you both think about binders.com? I assume ring/looseleaf binders. So our long term goal behind considering building a new website using vulcaninformationpackaing.com is to strengthen our position as a packaging company, not a binder company.
So anyway, my question wasn't so much about if it's a good idea to build the new website but if Google and other search engines will have a problem with us having 2 websites representing the same company, which is Vulcan Information Packaging. binders.com will continue to promote binders and the new site vulcaninformationpackaging will promote packaging. But they will both represent Vulcan Information Packaging.
thoughts???
-
That's a really good point, Julie.
My suggestion above about a new domain such as VulcanProducts.com was assuming that binders.com would be redirected to pass its ranking value - I just didn't say anything about the redirect. Even with that, some ranking value will pass, but possibly/probably not all.
-
If you've owned Binders.com for a long time and it ranks really well in the SERPS, you might think that creating and ranking a new domain won't be difficult. If your company execs think this, they are potentially in for a big disappointment.
If you start a brand new website from scratch, you could wait a long time before it ranks well enough to bring you any sales. Ranking a subdomain on your current site would certainly be quicker.
-
do you see a problem in regards to Google and other search engines if we do decide to create a website under vulcaninformationpackaging.com that directs traffic to Vulcan Information Packaging, which is the same company represented under binders.com?
I think that Google will rank your websites based upon their quality for each individual querry. I think that customers will find the names and domains confusing. Most of my sites are on exact match keyword domains and those domans can have a limited fit for a growing collection of products and services. A domain that has no product association might be a better fit for a diverse company. VulcanProducts or VulcanServices or something similar might retain a portion of your identity and allow you to build a website for a more diverse company.
You have mentioned "advertising" and "directing traffic" from one domain to another. Would it be more efficient to place all of your efforts into one domain, make everything extremely clear, and focus all of your energy into a single attack. Catching visitors on domain A and transferring them to domain B is like trying to kill rabbits with a ricochet. Just shoot 'em.
-
Thanks much for your response and thoughts. The challenge we face is with our domain which is so focused and limiting. Or so it seems to me. Our domain is binders.com, we do currently market other products such as boxes and packaging but because of the binders.com domain, we feel it might be limiting as far as incoming traffic. This is the main reason we are considering building a new website under www.vulcaninformationpackaging.com, geared more toward packaging only and not binders. I would appreciate any additional input from you. Also, from your experience, do you see a problem in regards to Google and other search engines if we do decide to create a website under vulcaninformationpackaging.com that directs traffic to Vulcan Information Packaging, which is the same company represented under binders.com?
thanks again.
-
Generic advice on this matter isn't good advice. You have to consider a lot of things and then put them together.
One of the most important things that I would consider is how many of your current customers would be customers of these new services. The higher that number the more strongly I would consider keeping everything on one domain and changing the business name to something that fits all types of products offered by the company.
From an SEO perspective, uniting your brands usually creates a more formidable web presence that is more difficult to beat in the SERPs than building a new site for every new product.
So, if I thought that I could create a website that funnels visitors to what they need easily and efficiently then I might do everything on one website. A lot of people don't want to mix business lines or don't want to think hard or are not up to the design challenge. They take the easy route and build a separate site. I would work hard to avoid that if the products and services are complimentary.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Standardising of Company Name Across The Web Question
Good Morning All There are two variations of our company name on the website. Sometimes the name is listed as "name and name" and sometimes listed as "name & name" The domain is obviously www.nameandname.co.uk I believe I am correct in saying that we would be wise to go through and standardise, using one form or the other? Secondly, my main question is would we be wise to use "name and name" as the default, as the word "and" and not the symbol "&" is in the domain itself? Many Thanks
Branding | | ruislip180 -
Hosting videos on your own website versus youtube - which is best?
_Hi Folks, __simple question - We are creating a highly shareable video __to gain links/shares/traffic/google love for our site _and want to know if its worth hosting it on youtube i__n any circumstances.? We have the bandwidth to host it for sure. Cheers, Tom
Branding | | tomnivore1 -
Revisited: The subdomain vs subdirectory question
This has been much discussed before, but I would like to bring it up again in a specific content. I was wondering what people think about choosing between the two (subdomain vs subdirectory), when adding new 'channels' to a digital media platform. The two examples that I have are both very smart companies, that very recently went different route for the same challenge. I'd like to hear some pro's/con''s and any input you might have! The exapmles are: Vice: the main site is Vice.com, and they have begun to add a ton of new 'channals' or topically specific content (e.g. news.vice.com, noisey.vice.com, munchies.vice.com etc). Mic: the main site is Mic.com and they have been adding new channels in sub-directories: mic.com/arts, mic.com/world, mic.com/music Thanks!!
Branding | | stacksnew1 -
Making the most from a Press Release being featured on news websites
We have recently sent out a press release to targeted publications and have been lucky enough to be featured on a hand full of quality news websites which all feature links to our main URL. A minor draw back is some of the sites have just used the press release with minimal changes so we are a tiny bit worried about duplicate content issues but the sites are all high quality with a Domain Authority of 65+. Anyway I am wondering how best to capitalise on these. A few ideas I have:- 1. Go to our Company Google Plus page and +1 them. 2. Go to our Twitter profile and favourite the "tweets" that have been sent out mentioning each article. 3. Go to our Facebook page and "Like" the articles on each of the sites. 4. Setup a Squidoo page called "My Company featured around the internet" and link to the news pages. 5. Setup a Tumblr page called " MY Company featured around the internet" and link to the news pages. We are not sure if featured the links/urls on our "Press" section will undermine any benefit of link juice - we were thinking of doing a PDF of the pages and hosting the PDF on our site.
Branding | | JohnW-UK0 -
Long Exact Match Domain, or short "Brand" domain?
I've searched and found a lot of discussion regarding the benefits of using Exact Match Domains, however I'm still unsure of what is a "too long" domain to make it not user friendly. I'm working on a new web application that help users design their own <product>. </product> Let's say that the product would be canvas paintings as an example. Would you choose the domain www.designcanvaspaintings.com if it was available? Or would you rather create a "brand" like paintify.com that is shorter and has a more "brand" feeling to it.
Branding | | marcuslind0 -
Protecting Your Domain/Brand
Hi All, We've registered our domain with register.com they will not all us to buy .ca unless we reside in canada, same fro uk. Has anyone run into this problem? I wouldnt want someone to snatch it up and use it to their advantage.
Branding | | TP_Marketing0 -
301 or 302 for one of our domains
We have one of our sites that we got rid of and incorporated into our "main" site. We left a 302 redirect from the old sites URL to a landing page on the new site. It act as a branded stub page before registration. We are currently using a 302 to redirect from www.oldsite.com -> www.newbigsite.com/old-site Should I change this to a 301? I loose my google SERP ranking for www.oldsite.com if I do the 301 and it will be replaced by www.newbigsite.com/old-site correct? Thanks
Branding | | GeorgeLaRochelle0