Is Anybody Familiar With This SEO Reporting Tool?
-
Just for kicks, I decided to pay 5 bucks for an SEO Report on a website I was working on for a client. Yea FIVERR.
The report was actually not too bad and I was able to clean up a bunch of stuff. Here is a link to other sites on the internet who use this tool. I would like to use it for myself so I'm trying to figure out the source of the report. Here are a few urls to the reports. Remove the two stars in the URL. I don't want to give them a backlink.
http://rapid**purple.com/services/free-seo-analysis/
http://www.doc**stoc.com/docs/93426462/SEO-PlanHas anybody used these or know the source?
-Bob
-
Yea, that's it! A bit pricey. Thanks for the "software review". Maybe I'll sit this one out.
-
Hi,
The name on the bottom right, if I remember correctly, will be the name of the company that has a subscription to the service. I.e. you can brand the report with your own logo and url.
-
Hi Bob,
Yep - I used this, oh must be 8 years ago now! Its a company named IBP (Internet Business Promoter - www.ibusinesspromotor dot com).Its not a great reporting tool TBH, I found it just pointed out a load of things it calculates are incorrect. But a lot of the things it thinks are incorrect are incorrect, if that makes sense.
It tries to get you to do all the things it believes are in-line with the search engines, until your page is "100% optimised".
IMHO, your best getting to grips with excel pivot tables and creating your own measurable reporting technique. Tailor the report to the important metrics - i.e. what is delivering ROI for the client site?
-
I've seen this report in 10 different place in Google and seems like it's private labeled. I tried the URL but I don't think this guy is the owner of the tool.
-
Thanks for the info. I just want to be clear that the links I provided to the reports are just random reports I found on Google. They aren't mine. I'm just trying to find the source of that tool that was used.
I use SEO MoZ, Majestic SEO, Bright Local, SEOFrog and a few others. Seems like you need several tools to look at things in different ways.
This tool was pretty cool because it runs through your site, tells you what's wrong and how to fix it with examples. For 5 bucks, I fixed a bunch of things that the other tools wouldn't have found.
I've been meaning to check out Raven tools. Thanks for the reminder!
-
I found the name on the bottom right of the document and I googled it I did not want to post any of the links I found so I am posting the Google search it was so long I had to shorten it I apologize.
-
Hi Bob,
I just checked out your report. I can't say that's the best software I've ever seen in my life now. It's got the word black in its name and that's never a good sign.
I assume the source of the report is a bunch of APIs from tools similar to this that are free. I know of a way to go and find the source. But you could use a tool called builtwith.com
run the URLs through their it will break down what the site is made of. And you can also do a link profile on the URL find out where it's all coming from.
It that doesn't work Here is some friendly advice.
Are you looking for an all-in-one solution? Have you tried the campaigns here am sorry if it's a dumb question I have to ask?
Raven tools is excellent spider mate is surprisingly good and very low cost.
Majestic SEO for links I could go on but SEM Rush is and all the other tools as well not majestic.
I would not listen to the marquee that is being told and not report. Their really kind of off it's good that you have at least 10% matching anchor text to keywords? I guess they did not hear that's a no-no.
I would honestly run the same thing to the campaign tool here http://www.seomoz.org/campaigns
is very good and I believe Raven tools to be the only other software that has it all as it will give you better metrics on wording using tools like scribe instead of whatever that thing was.
I hope I have been of help,
Tom
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does anyone rate CORA SEO Software?
I can't really see any third party reviews of this software. Does anyone rate it?
On-Page Optimization | | AL123al0 -
Tags - Good or bad for SEO
We are getting Moz errors for duplicate content because tag pages share the same blog posts. Is there any way to fix this? Are these errors bad for SEO, or can I simply disregard these and ignore them? We are also getting Moz errors for missing descriptions on tag pages. I am unsure how to fix these errors, as we do not actually have pages for these on our WordPress site where we are able to put in a description. I have heard that having tags can be good for SEO? (We don't mind having several links that show up when searching for us on google...) As far as the SEO goes, I am not sure what to do. Does anyone know the best strategy?
On-Page Optimization | | Christinaa0 -
Should a website have the same standard headings for product pages? And how does that affect SEO?
Hello! I hope my question is self-explanatory but let me give you an example. Suppose I have website X selling A, B and C and I have a dedicated page for each of those products. For SEO practises, Is it better to have the same webpage structure for all product pages (i.e. the same headings and sections) or is it better to vary the structure of the page? Or is it really not important? Again going back to the example, is it better for product page A, B and C to have the same sections in the same order (i.e. Pricing, Product Details, Product Reviews) or is it better to keep it as a flowing content page (product page A has same information in B and C but all those pages are different with different headings and questions asked depending on the product)? Many thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | MarketingDude0 -
International SEO
We have a client who is looking to expand to other countries, particularly South America. What is my best route forward for SEO on a multi national site?
On-Page Optimization | | CreativeCow0 -
Ranking report problem
Hello, I have two things that I'm a little concerned. Ranking report is not working because all these keywords were on google first page but the report is showing the calendar sign
On-Page Optimization | | angeloweiCrawl results, I just went from 5000 warnings and errors to 4 in two weeks. It seems a little crazy
0 -
Seo Moz says there are 124 links on this page - do you see it?
I'm look at the report under Crawl Diagnostics Summary/Too Many On-Page Links It says there are 124 links on this page. I don't see it?! do you? http://www.kisswedding.com/blog/category/garden-wedding-ideas/
On-Page Optimization | | annasusmiles0 -
SEO Change/Version Control
Hi. Can anyone suggest apps that might be applied for SEO change/version control? I've tried using Excel and Word in the past but both fall short when dealing with multiple client sites. Nothing suitable pops up so far. Specifically I want to be able to log any on-page changes that might impact SEO for historical analysis and possible roll-back (manual) eg change date, page title, headings, url, anchor text, alt image txt, body copy etc. The ability to have one view that can be filtered in various ways including by client and by url would be ideal. Maybe this is something SEOmoz is considering for Pro campaign management? Surely there's demand... Thanks Andy
On-Page Optimization | | Bluesnapper0 -
Best SEO structure for blog
What is the best SEO page/link structure for a blog with, say 100 posts that grows at a rate of 4 per month? Each post is 500+ words with charts/graphics; they're not simple one paragraph postings. Rather than use a CMS I have a hand crafted HTML/CSS blog (for tighter integration with the parent site, some dynamic data effects, and in general to have total control). I have a sidebar with headlines from all prior posts, and my blog home page is a 1 line summary of each article. I feel that after 100 articles the sidebar and home page have too many links on them. What is the optimal way to split them up? They are all covering the same niche topic that my site is about. I thought of making the side bar and home page only have the most recent 25 postings, and then create an archive directory for older posts. But categorizing by time doesn't really help someone looking for a specific topic. I could tag each entry with 2-3 keywords and then make the sidebar a sorted list of tags. Clicking on a tag would then show an intermediate index of all articles that have that tag, and then you could click on an article title to read the whole article. Or is there some other strategy that is optimal for SEO and the indexing robots? Is it bad to have a blog that is too heirarchical (where articles are 3 levels down from the root domain) or too flat (if there are 100s of entries)? Thanks for any thoughts or pointers.
On-Page Optimization | | scanlin0