Hreflang for multple countries but single language
-
I'm working on a site that has implemented hreflang.
The site is all in English but has slight differences and breaks down to separate domains, so
the hreflang implementation targets specific countries per domain.
This was tested using http://flang.dejanseo.com.au but Webmaster Tools has thrown up errors. For example,
**URLs for your site and alternative URLs in 'en_GB' that do not have return tags. **But every page refers back.Any ideas what's going wrong?
-
The only valid redirection is the one based on user browser, not IP, IMHO.
However, if you want to use that kind of redirection for the home page (not the others pages), then that redirection should be working the first time, so that users can eventually choose to go to another version of the site they prefer (i.e.: I live in Spain and I go to domain.eu. When I travel in the US, I still want to go to domain.eu, not always being pushed to use domain.com).
Moreover, doing that, you will let crawlers to discover also the others version even though they were redirected to the one corresponding to their IP the first time. In other words, Googlebot (Mountain View, USA, IP), the first time will go always to domain.com, but once there it will able to discover also domain.eu and domain.co.uk from the versions selector, and it won't be redirected again to domain.com.
Said all this, the fact is that you want to target a political area (EU) with domain.eu, the world with domain.com and the UK with domain.co.uk.
This desire to target three different kind of geographies complicates everything :-).
The only solution I see is:
-
Domain.com set up as "global" >> hreflang="en". All users using English will see it in the SERPs despite of their location but in these cases (see point 2 and 3);
-
Domain.eu set up as the site for the European countries >> hreflang="en-ES" - hreflang="en-IT" - hreflang="en-DE" and so on.
-
Domain.co.uk set up as the site for Great Britain >> hreflang="en-GB".
Doing this and implementing the hreflang in the canonical URLs of the sites and referencing only canonical URLs of the others sites (apart having the self-referral hreflang), then you should be safe.
However, remember that with those hreflang, people searching in another language than English will never (or almost never) see your sites but for brand name searches or very specific brand + product queries.
Therefore, I am still of the idea that having only English websites for targeting the world means missing a huge business opportunity.
-
-
Hi Michael,
The tool crawls with the user agent "Hreflang.org Testing Tool - Desktop version". It does not impersonate Googlebot. It does not follow 301 redirects because if you use Hreflang to point to another page, you should link to the canonical version of that page. A 301 redirect indicates an error.
My opinion is that forced, IP-based redirection is not a good idea because all URLs must be accessible from all locations. Google recently (about a year ago?) started crawling from other countries but you still want all URLs to be accessible from everywhere. The point of Hreflang is to indicate links across URLs; so hreflang makes IP-based redirection unnecessary.
If you really want to do IP-based redirection, do it on the x-default version of the page. And use the x-default version solely for redirection. For example, don't have your English version as the x-default and then redirect non-English users to other versions. If you do that, Germany-based crawlers won't ever be able to access your English URL.
-
Hi Nikhilesh,
as a matter of interest is your tool crawling as a google bot, rather than some IP? We have now set to deliver TLD depending on IP but the tool reports the following for the hreflangs not on the same domain
- Could not load this page. Server responded with HTTP Status code 301. Expected HTTP response code is 200 OK.
-
thanks. I'm taking a look.
-
I believe what's happening with your site is the same thing as what happened here on Google webmaster forums. JohnMu replied in that thread to say that because you have the same content on different sites (it might say en-US or en-GB but there is no detectable language customization for country). Google considers this duplicate content and starts ignoring some of your pages. And when some pages get ignored, the hreflang return tags from those pages go missing.
I blogged about this phenomenon in detail here.
Of course, it's also possible that your Hreflang markup has errors that the dejan seo tool did not detect. You can try the tool at hreflang.org to get a second opinion.
-
This is a bit difficult. All 3 domains are bringing in some good diverse country traffic as is, but Google has said it will now ignore hreflang until resolved.
So for example, .com brings in traffic and sales from Chile, Mexico and Bahamas. So if we removed the 'global' for .com are we not risking dropping the traffic for these locations. Or will Google ignore anyway and serve? There are too many countries getting traffic to implement each one as hreflang and remove the global en, it would be massive.
But having said that if the server was setting the TLD to be served depending on location it would then be adequate to just use the 'global' hreflang's to hreflang="en"? Is that right?
-
You should consider using either one subfolder hreflang or strongly considering wire going into these markets for instance Germany would be best for .de if you are just targeting a European country that speaks English for only English-speaking countries throughout the world you may be best off with A geotld
i agree with Gianluca.
-
If your .eu domain targets English in all European countries but UK (and you are targeting the USA with the .com), then you should not use the hreflang:
because that annotation says to Google to show the .eu domain to all the people using English independently from where they are, but in the UK ("show domain.co.uk") and USA ("show domain.com"). In other words, you .eu site would be visible to Canadian, Australians or even people in Greenland using English.
If that is also the meaning of the .eu domain, than that's fine, but if it is meant just for European countries, then better not having it.
Moreover, if the .eu is meant as "global", then it is useless to add all the hreflang like "en-it", "en-es" and so on, because the hreflang="en" would be enough.
However, I hope you are considering the .eu in English for targeting countries like Italy, Spain, France, Germany et al as temporary, because - let me tell you - you are not going to see lot of traffic from European not English speaking countries. Why? Because we don't search in English, neither we have our browser set up to use English as main language
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Hreflang - different navigation for all countries
Hi all! Currently we are implementing the href lang tag. I'm not really sure how to solve this: We sell our products in the Netherlands and Belgium. For the Netherlands we have 1 category page for pebbles (stones) which contain both rounded and non-rounded pebbles. In the Netherlands there is not really a difference between them (people search for pebbles and that's it). The URL: https://www.website.com/nl/pebbles. In Belgium there is a difference (people specifically search for rounded/non-rounded pebbles). Therefore, in Belgium we have 2 pages (we don't have an overall page): https://www.website.com/be/pebbles-rounded.
Technical SEO | | AMAGARD
https://www.website.com/be/pebbles-non-rounded. My question now is, what to do with the hreflang tags on these pages? Thanks in advance! Best, Remco0 -
Spanish United States Vs Puerto Rico Hreflang
Hey Moz, So we are trying to figure out weather it is the same if we have Hreflang for "US-ES" vs "US-PR", IF we do "US-PR" for Puerto Rico for its own links we then have to create 3 parts to our site, PR Spanish PR English US Spanish We looked at Apple as an example and they had a "Latin America" for their Hreflang and labeled everything has either "es-419" is that the same concept as having just "us-es" for Puerto Rico? ( see attached screenshot ) We are trying to figure out what would be more effective and weather or not "US-ES" search results will appear for Puerto Rico also. PZVwg16
Technical SEO | | uBreakiFix0 -
Canonical vs Alternate for country based subdomain dupe content?
What's the correct method for tagging dupe content between country based subdomains? We have: mydomain.com // default, en-us www.mydomain.com // en-us uk.mydomain.com // uk, en-gb au.mydomain.com // australia, en-au eu.mydomain.com // europe, en-eu In the header of each we currently have rel="alternate" tags but we're still getting dupe content warnings in Moz for the "WWW" subdomain. Question 1) Are we headed in the right direction with using alternate? Or would it be better to use canonical since the languages are technically all English, just different regions. The content is pretty much the same minus currency and localization differences. Question 2) How can we solve the dupe content between WWW and the base domain, since the above isn't working. Thanks so much
Technical SEO | | lvdh11 -
Using a 302 redirect for language variants. How should I use the canonical?
Hi there, I have a question regarding the canonical tag. The current setup is like so... www.site.com 302 redirects to.. www.site.com/de/ I want to add canonical tags on every page to avoid duplicate content but I'm not sure about the homepage. Should the canonical URL be www.site.com or www.site.com/de/ ? I'm concerned that I could be about to hurt my ranking. Thanks,
Technical SEO | | zuriwolf
Mitch0 -
Use hreflang for language and regional URLs
I have implemented hreflang on site, seen here http://www.cobaltrecruitment.com/ but Webmaster Tools is returning loads of errors in the international targeting area..... "'“en-sg"' - unknown language code" and "'“en-ar"' - unknown language code" Can anyone suggest what I need to tell my developers to do? Thanks for your help!
Technical SEO | | the-gate-films0 -
Hiding Price html component for all countries except US
Hello everybody, We are planning to have a new website soon, which will be an E-Commerce website for people from the US, and non E-Commerce website for people from other countries. In other words, in the poduct pages, we would like to have the price of the product shown to the users from the US, and on the other hand we would like it to be invisible for users outside of the US. We thought about setting the html elelment of the price to be visible only for US users (by ip). My question is - can Google crawler see this as potential cloacking, since we hide some of the content to some of the users (while google might scan it from US iip address)? Thanks in advance...
Technical SEO | | skifr0 -
Handling 301s: Multiple pages to a single page (consolidation)
Been scouring the interwebs and haven't found much information on redirecting two serparate pages to a single new page. Here is what it boils down to: Let's say a website has two pages, both with good page authority of products that are becoming fazed out. The products, Widget A and Widget B, are still popular search terms, but they are being combined into ONE product, Widget C. While Widget A and Widget B STILL have plenty to do with Widget C, Widget C is now the new page, the main focus page, and the page you want everyone to see and Google to recognize. Now, do I 301 Widget A and Widget B pages to Widget C, ALTHOUGH Widgets A and B previously had nothing to do with one another? (Remember, we want to try and keep some of that authority the two page have had.) OR do we keep Widget A and Widget B pages "alive", take them off the main navigation, and then put a "disclaimer" on the pages announcing they are now part of Widget C and link to Widget C? OR Should Widgets A and B page be canonicalized to Widget C? Again, keep in mind, widgets A and B previously were not similar, but NOW they are and result in Widget C. (If you are confused, we can provide a REAL work example of what we are talkinga about, but decided to not be specific to our industry for this.) Appreciate any and all thoughts on this.
Technical SEO | | JU19850 -
Will same language different region (US/UK) geotargeting via subdirectory (& GWT) cause dupe content or other issues ?
If a UK hosted site on a .com, needs to target US now too but for keywords that are spelt differently in US is creating duplicate version of uk hosted .com site and putting it on a subdirectory .com/us/ and geotargeting via webmaster tools (to usa) ok ? I take it in this scenario no dupe content issues (or other issues) so long as is geotargeted via GWT ? Or are there ? Comments from anyone with experience doing similar (same language, different region geo-targeting dupe content with kw spelling being only difference, via a subdirectory or other route) much appreciated ? Many Thanks 🙂
Technical SEO | | Dan-Lawrence0