Does Google consider breadcrumbs to be duplicate titles?
-
Moz has been flagging a lot of our articles for duplicate titles. I noticed that the website was automatically generating the same words that were used for the titles above the articles and main images. But those are bread crumbs. Does anyone know if Google also considers those duplicate titles?
I'm not sure if the screenshot I'm uploading will appear, but this is one of the blog posts the extra wording was showing up on: https://hometowneautorepairandtireofwoodbridge.com/blog/when-why-replace-spark-plugs/
-
No, Google does not consider breadcrumbs to be duplicate titles. Breadcrumbs are typically used in website navigation to show the hierarchical structure of a website and help users understand their current location within the site. They are usually displayed near the top of a webpage and provide a clear path back to previous pages or categories.
Duplicate titles, on the other hand, refer to instances where multiple pages on a website have the same or very similar title tags. Duplicate titles can confuse search engines and make it challenging to determine the relevance and uniqueness of each page.
Google encourages webmasters to create unique and descriptive title tags for each page to improve the overall user experience and SEO performance. Breadcrumbs and title tags serve different purposes, and there is no inherent conflict between them in terms of SEO. It's important to use both effectively to enhance the usability and search engine optimization of your website.
-
Implementing breadcrumbs is a pretty straight forward way to improve a site's SEO and provide better UX. However, there are some times when implementing breadcrumbs could cause more harm than good. Here are a few breadcrumb mistakes you'll want to avoid
-
As of my last knowledge update in September 2021, Google generally does not consider breadcrumbs to be duplicate titles. Breadcrumbs are a navigational aid on websites that show users their path from the homepage to the current page. They are typically displayed as a series of clickable links separated by arrows. Breadcrumb links are meant to provide a clear and hierarchical structure of the website's content, helping users navigate easily.
Project Manager Salary
Google's algorithms aim to understand the content and structure of web pages. While it's essential to have unique and descriptive titles for each page to improve SEO and user experience, breadcrumbs are typically not considered part of the main content or title tag.However, it's crucial to ensure that your website's breadcrumb implementation is done correctly and does not generate duplicate content issues. To avoid any potential problems, you should:
Use proper HTML markup for breadcrumbs.
Ensure that breadcrumb links accurately represent the hierarchical structure of your website.
Avoid using the same anchor text in breadcrumbs and page titles if it doesn't make sense in the context.
Keep in mind that Google's algorithms and guidelines may evolve over time, so it's a good practice to stay updated with the latest SEO best practices and guidelines provided by Google or other search engines. -
No, Google does not consider breadcrumbs to be duplicate titles. Breadcrumbs are a navigational aid on a website that helps users understand their current location within the site's hierarchy. They are typically displayed near the top of a webpage and show the path a user has taken to reach the current page.
Atlantic Immigration Pilot program application formBreadcrumbs serve a different purpose than page titles. Page titles are meant to provide a concise and descriptive title for a specific webpage, while breadcrumbs are designed to show the user's path through the website's structure. Google's search algorithms understand the distinction between these elements and do not treat breadcrumbs as duplicate titles.
However, it's important to ensure that both your page titles and breadcrumbs accurately represent the content and hierarchy of your website. Clear and descriptive titles and breadcrumbs can improve user experience and help search engines understand the context of your pages, potentially benefiting your website's search visibility. ( best digital marketing agency )
-
In my experience, Google generally does not consider breadcrumbs to be duplicate titles. In fact, breadcrumbs can enhance user experience by providing clear pathways to different sections of your site. They offer context and help users easily navigate to their desired destination within the site's hierarchy.
However, it's essential to ensure that the titles used in your breadcrumbs are descriptive, unique, and relevant to the content they represent. This practice not only avoids confusion for users but also aligns with SEO best practices. I did for my subpages because there are not linked with the main product page.
-
Google does not consider breadcrumbs to be duplicate titles. Breadcrumbs are navigational links typically displayed on a website to show the user's path from the homepage to the current page. They usually appear near the top of the page, often just below the header or menu.
Breadcrumbs are helpful for users to understand their current location within the site's hierarchy and easily navigate back to previous pages. They are also useful for search engines to understand the structure of your website and improve its overall crawl ability and indexability.
See the following website using the breadcrumbs.
https://trackstatus.in/Duplicate titles, on the other hand, refer to multiple pages on a website having the same or very similar page titles. Having duplicate titles can potentially lead to confusion for both users and search engines, as they might not be able to distinguish between the pages.
-
Read the full blog here: https://www.inbound.blog/breadcrumbs-seo/. Here you can find the complete information about breadcrumbs in SEO.
-
Are these bread crumbs? I'm confused
-
Bump. I would also like to know the answer.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Images on Bing
I have uploaded images to our Mozlocal account and they are showing up on Google but when we go to Bing not all the images are showing up and there is a png image of our logo that is not on Google. Wondering why this is happening and if it is possible to be fixed?
Image & Video Optimization | | SCMarCom0 -
Unsolved drahmadi
Re: Star snippet not work
Moz Tools | | freakymozzz5
Thank you, I am writing Persian text:
برای داشتن مبل و دکوراسیون خانه سایت دکورانیک پیشنهاد می شود.
داشتن اسپاتیفای خرید اسپاتیفای مناسب است.
آیین نامه
قالیشویی اصل سایت اصلی قالیشویی های برتر تهران
سایت اصلی تالار عروسی سایت مناسب تالارهای تهران و سالن عقد
سایت آموزشی انگلیسی آموزش هایی مربوط به یادگیری زبان0 -
Do you think its better to have a published date AND a last updated date ? Does google even look if you updated but left the published date old
Do you think its better to have a published date AND a last updated date on Posts ? Does google even look if you updated but left the published date old I was thinking of adding a "last updated" field to my articles. But is it worth it? or should I just keep it uncluttered and leave only the last published date? I would think that Google would not notice if I updated a last updated meta field since their is a published date field already.
Content Development | | ianizaguirre1 -
Duplicate Content
I have a service based client that is interested in optimizing his website for all the services that he provides in all the locations that he provides them in. For example: Service 1, location 1 Service 1, location 2 Service 2, location 1 Service 2, location 2 He wants to essentially create an individual page for each of the above, but i'm concerned that he will be penalized for duplicate content. Each of the pages would have the keyword in the url, page title and within the main body of content. We would certainly alter the content somewhat, but not sure how much a difference this would make. Any thoughts or advice would be greatly appreciated.
Content Development | | embracedarrenhughes1 -
Content Curation & Duplicate Content
Hi, I have a client that wants to do content curation but it has been my understanding that adding external content that is already live on another website to your website, you get penalized for duplicate content. I have read that you can create an excerpt and then Google won't penalizes you for duplicate content. Can anyone shed more light on this topic. Thanks
Content Development | | M_80 -
Duplicate Content Discovery
I was hit with Penguin on April 24th like a ton of bricks. Luckily my cash cow keyword was kept safe and still is today with even an increase in traffic over the year. With some other main keywords I used to rank far I fell off the board on that day. Since then I have been slowly trying to clean things up as much as I know Today I was sitting down with my coffee and Penguin mindset and I decided to use copyscape again to review duplicate content issues and something I noticed which I either didn't before or didn't think was an issue was my footer. In my footer I used a blurb from some other site in my niche a long time ago. Which I discovered they used from one of the main sites in my niche. Anyways I noticed that my footer is what kept coming up as being duplicate content and was always at an overage of 28% according to copyscape. My question is should I be worried about the footer? Is 28% a lot?
Content Development | | cbielich0 -
Typepad.com blog migration & duplicate content
I've migrated a typepad.com blog with a bunch of content (but little traffic) onto a hosted WordPress site under my own domain name (the way I should've done it in the first place). Now I don't want to confuse Google that the new site is duplicating content from the other site, so would I be better off with: 1) meta-refresh redirecting each typepad.com post to the same post on the new blog, or 2) just killing the typepad.com blog entirely so Google will not find duplicate posts anywhere. In favor of #2 is the fact that these posts get very little traffic today. I figure I will lose more traffic from duplicate content ranking penalties than from losing the posts themselves in the original blog. What do you think?
Content Development | | chriscrabtree0