Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Hi
It is your CSS. Your style sheat is broken.
If it is a word press, or other popular CMS you need to wake up call games or modules you have added and possibly disable or remove them try to roll the site back if you remember when it was not doing this.
Most importantly you need to contact a developer
I would want them on performanceFoundry.com they're great so is Authoritydev.com & gregreindel.com
A developer is what you need.
all the best,
Tom
I would also strongly recommend a easy backup system blogvalt sucuri.net , codegard are great backup systems.
Your host should also have one.
Tom
Just like Oleg & Paul I agree 100% your site may have and it will probably benefit from having both a site map which is a nice feature in HTML format and one in XML format as they are not used for the same purpose by Google nor by individuals so you may safely create a regular webpage in HTML and call it whatever you like if it ends in.XML it is not a forward facing webpage it has a separate use and that uses to tell Google's crawler where you would like it to go now keep in mind Google does not always listen to what we want but site maps can be helpful.
I hope this was of help to you
sincerely,
Thomas
The only way to know would be to look at the links and your domai ( at the very least understand the type of Business you’re domains is)
If you’re willing to a put the here that would be awesome if not you can send them to me private message
If not I can place a URL that works for only one click and you add the URLs that way?
all the best,
tom
https://cryptoreport.websecurity.symantec.com/checker/
This server cannot be scanned for these vulnerabilities:HeartbleedServer scan unsuccessful. <a>See possible causes.</a>Poodle (TLS)Server scan unsuccessful. See possible causes.BEASTThis server is vulnerable to a BEAST attack. <a>More information.</a>
I am sorry I said your IP was Network solutions when it was 1&1 I still strongly recommend changing hosting companies even though I am German and so is 1&1
The SSL certificate used to load resources from https://www.hkqpc.com will be distrusted in M70. Once distrusted, users will be prevented from loading these resources. See https://g.co/chrome/symantecpkicerts for more information.
Look: https://cl.ly/pCY5
Look: https://cl.ly/pAKa
symantec SSL certificates are now owned by DigiCert
<big>https://www.digicert.com/help/</big>
https://www.dareboost.com/en/report/5a70b33e0cf28f017576367f
The Set-Cookie HTTP header can be configured with your Apache server. Make sure that the mod_headers module is enabled. Then, you can specify the header (in your .htaccess file, for example). Here is an example: <ifmodule mod_headers.c=""># only for Apache > 2.2.4: Header edit Set-Cookie ^(.*)$ $1;HttpOnly;Secure # lower versions: Header set Set-Cookie HttpOnly;Secure</ifmodule>
Double forward slashes after verdicts the same page without double forward slashes you need to add rel canonical tags zero canonical's on any page whatsoever.
The URLs above need a rel=canonical tag I have created an example below for you. For the page without the double forward slashes, and this tells Google the one you'd prefer to have indexed besides it keeps the query string pages and junk pages out of Google's index. Please see the resources below and add them to your website because I do not know what type of CMS you're using I cannot recommend a plug-in to do it but if you were using something like WordPress it would be automatically done by something like Yoast WordPress SEO for the site that you are using it may be a wise move to move to something like WordPress it is a solid platform for a site that size and makes things a lot easier for you to implement change across the entire site quickly.
You need to add a canonical
You have
An unknown error occurred while scanning for the Heartbleed Bug.
I hope the two links below will give you the information that you are looking for. I believe that you will find quite a bit from the second link and the first link will give you a free resource and finding exactly how many links pages have been indexed as far as how many have not you can only find that using the second link
http://www.northcutt.com/tools/free-seo-tools/google-indexed-pages-checker/
along with
http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=2642366
Go to advanced and it will offer you a show all
the report was run prior canonical directives
Anytime remember to noindex your robots.txt
https://yoast.com/x-robots-tag-play/
There are cases in which the robots.txt file itself might show up in search results. By using an alteration of the previous method, you can prevent this from happening to your website:
<filesmatch "robots.txt"="">Header set X-Robots-Tag "noindex"</filesmatch>
**And in Nginx:**
location = robots.txt { add_header X-Robots-Tag "noindex"; }
You guys are fast I was going to answer this and had to do some other things but let me weigh in on couple things.
as you said
“We are in a predicament of how to properly use the canonical and alternate rel tags**. Currently we have a canonical on mobile and alternate on desktop, both of which have the same URL because both mobile and desktop use the same as explained in the first paragraph.”**
so what you’re saying is that you have a dynamic site so you don’t need to add “alternate"media” tags to the site.
https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/mobile-seo/dynamic-serving
As it is not immediately apparent in this setup that the site alters the HTML for mobile user agents (the mobile content is "hidden" when crawled with a desktop user agent), it’s recommend that the server send a hint to request that Googlebot for smartphones also crawl the page, and thus discover the mobile content. This hint is implemented using the Vary HTTP header.
Annotations in the HTML
On the desktop page (http://www.example.com/page-1), add the following annotation:
<code dir="ltr"><linkrel="alternate"media="only screen="" and="" (max-width:="" 640px)"<br="">href="http://m.example.com/page-1"></linkrel="alternate"media="only></code>
On the mobile page (http://m.example.com/page-1), the required annotation should be:
<code dir="ltr"><linkrel="canonical"href="http: www.example.com="" page-1"=""></linkrel="canonical"href="http:></code>
This rel="canonical" tag on the mobile URL pointing to the desktop page is required.
We support including the rel="alternate"annotation for the desktop pages in sitemaps like this:
<code dir="ltr"><urlsetxmlns="http: www.sitemaps.org="" schemas="" sitemap="" 0.9"<br="">xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<url><loc>http://www.example.com/page-1/</loc>
<xhtml:linkrel="alternate"media="only screen="" and="" (max-width:="" 640px)"<br="">href="http://m.example.com/page-1"/></xhtml:linkrel="alternate"media="only></url></urlsetxmlns="http:></code>
The required rel="canonical" tag on the mobile URL should still be added to the mobile page's HTML.
**to be sure **
Are you willing to share your domain with us? Or one domain?
We're talking about multiple websites that all have the identical site structure or at least mobile and desktop site structure?
Your server is making the change for you?
Would you be kind enough to install this plug-in on chrome in order for you to show a couple examples of the canonical and the URL?
In addition, would you be kind enough to run your site through the two tools here ( 100% free and very easy to use)
If you would not mind doing this and sending screenshots it would mean a lot to us and getting your canonical's straightened out.
screenshots https://snag.gy/ then upload to http://imgur.com/
everything is on the same server I'm assuming?
Of the three below how would you categorize your site?
Respectfully,
Tom
That would normally be the case but not tonight.
LOL, I am picking up a lot of the UK Q&A I will be at BrightonSEO and search love London if any of you guys will be in the area I'd love to grab a pint?
sincerely,
Thomas
Point the canonicals to the pages you kn will have the high organic traffic.
I would rewrite t pages to be different if you want the best results.
All all the best,
Tom
You got some great info look at https://schema.org/Casino
https://schema.org/docs/search_results.html?q=Poker%20
If the vehicle has only one engine, this property can be attached directly to the vehicle. gameLocation · Game or VideoGameSeries, Real or fictional location of ...
Casino. Thing > Organization > LocalBusiness > EntertainmentBusiness > Casino · Thing > Place > LocalBusiness > EntertainmentBusiness > Casino. A casino.
Schema.org Enumeration Type: GameServerStatus - Status of a game server.
Schema.org Property: gameItem - An item is an object within the game world that can be collected by a player or, occasionally, a non-player character.
Schema.org Property: numberOfPlayers - Indicate how many people can play this game (minimum, maximum, or range).
An EventSeries is a collection of events that share some unifying characteristic. For example, "The Olympic Games" is a series, which is repeated regularly.
; NBA Eastern Conference First Round Playoff Tickets: Miami Heat at Philadelphia 76ers - Game 3 (Home Game ...
Schema.org Property: playMode - Indicates whether this game is multi-player, co- op or single-player. The game can be marked as multi-player, co-op and ...
actor · Person, An actor, e.g. in tv, radio, movie, video games etc., or in an event. Actors can be associated with individual items or with a series, episode, clip.
as well
Hope this helps,
Tom
Hi Nick,
My hart goes out to you and your company for having to deal with this. However I do believe that you should use a 302 redirect along with a no flow just to be certain. Here's some more information.
http://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/11285/SEO-Are-Nofollow-Links-Still-Valuable.aspx
http://moz.com/blog/nofollow-is-dying-the-impact-of-microblogging-and-nofollow-on-seo
Google lists the three main intended uses of nofollow as:
Leaving aside for a second the ability / likelihood of webmasters using nofollow correctly (which means that the search engines need to work even with broken implementations just as they often rank HTML code that doesn't validate), there are two big uses of nofollow that are breaking the model:
"Silo-isation"
Disregarding the fact that I just made that word up, there is a very real trend of powerful sites nofollowing all (or nearly all) outbound links even though they are the very definition of editorial links. The site owners have presumably seen the ranking power achieved by Wikipedia nofollowing all outbound links and are trying to form their very own black hole.
Lack of trust
My understanding of the original intent of proffering nofollow as a solution to the problem of linking to untrusted places was that it was mainly intended for situations like blog comments, profile links, etc., where users of your site could create links to wherever they pleased.
This is definitely valuable (as anyone who has ever had to moderate blog comments can attest) but what about once you do trust the commenter? Since so many sites have no mechanism whereby that nofollow is ever removed, we end up in a situation where people are creating huge amounts of really valuable content and the links they create are nofollow.
Sincerely, Thomas