My worst performing pages all have this /products/ URL structure...?
-
I rank first for my brand "example" on example.com
But my product pages simply don't rank. Frankly, I don't know where they rank, but it's not top 40. They are indexed, as searching "site:example.com" returns all my site's pages.
My product pages are outranked even by some of my shorter blog posts about the product.
My product pages are the only ones on the site that use a folder/directory in the url.
example.com**/products/**product-one is nowhere but this is the main product page.
example.com/short-blog-article-about-product-one.
Is the fact that the product pages are with the slashes a red herring and I should be looking for anther cause? Or is google saying, well these product pages are the only ones in these sort of path and therefore we'll treat them as secondary sources?
Thanks
-
Hi Milosz, thanks very much for your reply. I suspected the testimonial pages too. I have found a canonical meta field in my CMS, so I've added a canonical url in the header for all the testimonials for just one product to see how that works.
Hopefully the canonical meta data will be somewhat equivalent you the robots suggestion. I could look at the robots file if recommended.
For the testimonials to which I've added a canonical url (the product page), I have also taken those testimonials out of the sitemap.
I now wonder if I should meta noindex them too? What I don't want to do is stop google visiting the testimonial pages until they have crawled the new canonical meta tag, and I don't know how a noindex would affect that.
-
Hello,
Not sure if you figured it out but looking at your most recent ranking it seems you still have this issue. Your Title tags are just fine. Yes the H1 could be optimized but I've seen worse cases of H1s so this can't be it. What I did find out is that your product page has duplicate content shared with other pages therefore Google is picking the page with absolute unique copy as best option.
Check out where your testimonial's copy reside: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Up+until+two+years+ago+I+was+a+gym+bunny+exercise+freak%2C+then+ill+health+meant+I+had+to+stop+exercising+on+a+regular+basis.+This+almost+drove+me+to+insanity.%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
I could be wrong but I don't think you were planning on having this page indexed:
http://www.reviber.co.uk/reviber%20plus%20success%20toning%20my%20legs%20and%20arms
You could fix this in a various ways, robots.txt/canonical but I would make sure google doesn't crawl your "testimonial" urls. .
Hope this helps,
Milosz
-
Edit.
-
Thanks, yes I know about the h1, those issues are also common to the much better performing pages.
-
Hmmm...one thing I notice is that you have the
tag say "Reviber Products" on each product page, rather than being the name of the product (for example:
Reviber Zen Physio
". That would be my first, easy fix to help boost the products.
Also, you may be stuffing your title tags a little much. The title for the Zen Physio page is 77 characters (Reviber Zen Physio | Percussion Hand Held Deep Tissue Body Massager | Reviber) You should try and keep it under 70.
-
-
That could not be your issue. I would look elsewhere. If you provide the actual URL we could take a look at it and see what could be done to improve rankings for the product pages.
-
I should add a few things:
-
Bing ranks these product pages at No1 for the respective products.
-
There is far more content in the product pages than in the blogs pages that outrank them.
-
-
Also, while URL structure can help, there are dozens of other things that can affect ranking. Does it use a CMS that renders the pages really slowly, but the homepage is solid HTML that pops up in no time? Do your product pages have useful/informative title tags and
tags? Is there good textual content on the pages that would pull in search results?
There are loads of other things to consider.
-
Well, looking at the scenario you have mentioned doesn't show anywhere that slashes are that cause of low search engine ranking. in-fact slashes doesn't even play any role in search engine position.
You need to strengthen your inner pages by acquiring some quality one way links (Do not purchase links), build link manually and gradually with the help of articles, PRs, guest posts, comments, blogging, etc.
You may want to PM me the url of your website to look into the real problem.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Video page duplicates (that aren't really duplicates)
Hi. My company has a 1000 videos, each of the videos appear on their own page that follows the same template. The title is of course different / videos linked to / etc. Google is reporting them as "duplicate content". What should I do to differentiate these pages enough so that google can recognized that they are different pages?.
Image & Video Optimization | | adamorn0 -
Off Page SEO help
What are the thing we ca do to increase our organic traffic for website: http://www.gobol.in/ Please suggest best possible activities to promote our website organically apart from On-page SEO.
Image & Video Optimization | | Obbserv0 -
Local SEO Issue: Google Places Listing on Page 8
Hello, I'm having an issue with a client's Google Places listing. It's showing on page 8 for one of the main keyword terms but their main site is on page 1. Having looked into competitors' places listings ranking above, I've ruled out the following; lack of citations inconsistent citations incomplete profile incorrect category listing details not matching places landing page incorrect location and any form of keyword stuffing Other places listings ranking above have fewer citations, incomplete profiles, details inconsistent with their main site, one is no longer trading as a business and one has no website! In the past, our client had had two listings simultaneously but we addressed this waaaay back. Is it possible we could still be getting punished? I'm at a bit of a loss otherwise. Any thoughts would be hugely appreciated. Thankyou!
Image & Video Optimization | | jasarrow0 -
I understand that in addition to video sitemaps, a transcription of a video, if presented properly will help google and may help SEO. I cannot find information on the basics to add transcription properly to a page. Advice or direction appreciated.
Looking for guidance or information on the nuts and bolts of how to use transcriptions with video.
Image & Video Optimization | | hughman0 -
You Tube Seminars / Events
Hi I was just wondering if you guys knew of any You Tube Seminars / Events held in the UK. I cannot find anything anywhere. Thanks Adam
Image & Video Optimization | | AMG1000 -
Is there a free/cheap self hosting video site? Can't afford wistia, but want to do it for the seo benefits
Is there a free/cheap self hosting video site? Can't afford wistia, but want to do it for the seo benefits
Image & Video Optimization | | anchorwave0 -
Will linking to my citation sources help google recognize them / credit my places account?
Or will those sources be discounted by google then similar to how google discounts link exchanges? I have noticed some pages, like mapquest, don't really have a directory, so google might not be aware of their content unless it is linked too??? In this type of a case, would it help to link to mapquest's search results? then the citation will get picked up by google? Example: http://www.mapquest.com/?hk=6-i30tP49i
Image & Video Optimization | | adriandg0 -
Local Search - New Business - 4 different Erroneous, Unverified Google Places Pages
My client is a new business <1 year old. Google has 4 unverified places pages for this business - all have slight errors in the business name and address. Which one should I claim? Will Google let me change the business name once I verify ownership? How will I get rid of the other listings once I claim and correct one of them? In light of these data errors and/or as a general rule do you recommend the paid submission services for UBL and Localeze (http://getlisted.org/resources/why-listing-services.aspx)? Thanks for the help! Jeff
Image & Video Optimization | | jeffgibson0