Is Anybody Familiar With This SEO Reporting Tool?
-
Just for kicks, I decided to pay 5 bucks for an SEO Report on a website I was working on for a client. Yea FIVERR.
The report was actually not too bad and I was able to clean up a bunch of stuff. Here is a link to other sites on the internet who use this tool. I would like to use it for myself so I'm trying to figure out the source of the report. Here are a few urls to the reports. Remove the two stars in the URL. I don't want to give them a backlink.
http://rapid**purple.com/services/free-seo-analysis/
http://www.doc**stoc.com/docs/93426462/SEO-PlanHas anybody used these or know the source?
-Bob
-
Yea, that's it! A bit pricey. Thanks for the "software review". Maybe I'll sit this one out.
-
Hi,
The name on the bottom right, if I remember correctly, will be the name of the company that has a subscription to the service. I.e. you can brand the report with your own logo and url.
-
Hi Bob,
Yep - I used this, oh must be 8 years ago now! Its a company named IBP (Internet Business Promoter - www.ibusinesspromotor dot com).Its not a great reporting tool TBH, I found it just pointed out a load of things it calculates are incorrect. But a lot of the things it thinks are incorrect are incorrect, if that makes sense.
It tries to get you to do all the things it believes are in-line with the search engines, until your page is "100% optimised".
IMHO, your best getting to grips with excel pivot tables and creating your own measurable reporting technique. Tailor the report to the important metrics - i.e. what is delivering ROI for the client site?
-
I've seen this report in 10 different place in Google and seems like it's private labeled. I tried the URL but I don't think this guy is the owner of the tool.
-
Thanks for the info. I just want to be clear that the links I provided to the reports are just random reports I found on Google. They aren't mine. I'm just trying to find the source of that tool that was used.
I use SEO MoZ, Majestic SEO, Bright Local, SEOFrog and a few others. Seems like you need several tools to look at things in different ways.
This tool was pretty cool because it runs through your site, tells you what's wrong and how to fix it with examples. For 5 bucks, I fixed a bunch of things that the other tools wouldn't have found.
I've been meaning to check out Raven tools. Thanks for the reminder!
-
I found the name on the bottom right of the document and I googled it I did not want to post any of the links I found so I am posting the Google search it was so long I had to shorten it I apologize.
-
Hi Bob,
I just checked out your report. I can't say that's the best software I've ever seen in my life now. It's got the word black in its name and that's never a good sign.
I assume the source of the report is a bunch of APIs from tools similar to this that are free. I know of a way to go and find the source. But you could use a tool called builtwith.com
run the URLs through their it will break down what the site is made of. And you can also do a link profile on the URL find out where it's all coming from.
It that doesn't work Here is some friendly advice.
Are you looking for an all-in-one solution? Have you tried the campaigns here am sorry if it's a dumb question I have to ask?
Raven tools is excellent spider mate is surprisingly good and very low cost.
Majestic SEO for links I could go on but SEM Rush is and all the other tools as well not majestic.
I would not listen to the marquee that is being told and not report. Their really kind of off it's good that you have at least 10% matching anchor text to keywords? I guess they did not hear that's a no-no.
I would honestly run the same thing to the campaign tool here http://www.seomoz.org/campaigns
is very good and I believe Raven tools to be the only other software that has it all as it will give you better metrics on wording using tools like scribe instead of whatever that thing was.
I hope I have been of help,
Tom
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
On-page SEO
This is a question for the organic SEO experts, once you added the main keyword that you want to rank for in the homepage title, meta title plus meta description, perhaps once or twice in the text on the homepage. How often do you then write it in the content marketing, say blog posts, we want to rank higher on Google for "SEO agencies Cardiff" however if you mention this in the blog posts too much say once a week, this could lead to over optimisation issues?
On-Page Optimization | | sarahwalsh1 -
403 Forbidden Crawl report
Hi, I am getting 403 forbidden crawl report on some of my pages. However the pages are loading fine. Also when asked my web developer told that some times reports show errors when there is nothing wrong. Also will the errors affect the SEO/Ranking etc.
On-Page Optimization | | ghrisa65
Some of the links:
https://www.medistaff24.co.uk/contact-us/ https://www.medistaff24.co.uk/elderly-care-in-evesham-worcestershire/ https://www.medistaff24.co.uk/hourly-home-care-in-evesham/0 -
Tags - Good or bad for SEO
We are getting Moz errors for duplicate content because tag pages share the same blog posts. Is there any way to fix this? Are these errors bad for SEO, or can I simply disregard these and ignore them? We are also getting Moz errors for missing descriptions on tag pages. I am unsure how to fix these errors, as we do not actually have pages for these on our WordPress site where we are able to put in a description. I have heard that having tags can be good for SEO? (We don't mind having several links that show up when searching for us on google...) As far as the SEO goes, I am not sure what to do. Does anyone know the best strategy?
On-Page Optimization | | Christinaa0 -
Do Blog Tags affect SEO at all anymore?
We're trying to standardize the use of tags on our site amongst writers/editors, and I'm trying to come up a list of tags they can choose from to tag posts with - and telling them to use no more than 10 (absolute maximum) per post. We are also in the process of migrating to a new CMS, and have 8 defined categories that will all have their own landing page within our "News" section. TLDR: Do blog tags have any impact on SEO anymore? Are they solely meant to help users find articles related on popular topics, or does creating a tag for a popular topic help to improve organic visibility? Full Question: With the tag standardization, I want to make sure we're creating the most useful and effective tags; and the UX/SEO sides of my brain are conflicted. To my understanding, creating a tag about a high volume topic in an industry helps establish the website's relevance to Google/other search engines about that topic and improves overall relevance; but the tag feed page (ex: http://freshome.com/tag/home-protection/) isn't really meant for organic search visibility. So my other question is, is it worth it to noindex the tag pages in the robots.txt? Will that affect any benefit to increased relevance for Google (if there is any)? I'm interested to hear others' thoughts and suggestions. Thanks in advance!
On-Page Optimization | | davidkaralisjr0 -
How to determine what is causing an "F" on-page Report ?
I have a number of pages that I believe are optimized just like other pages that have "A" reports, but they get Fs. How can I specifically drill down and discover the cause of the F?
On-Page Optimization | | enotes0 -
Is reported duplication on the pages or their canonical pages?
There are several sections getting flagged for duplication on one of our sites: http://mysite.com/section-1/?something=X&confirmed=true
On-Page Optimization | | Safelincs
http://mysite.com/section-2/?something=X&confirmed=true
http://mysite.com/section-3/?something=X&confirmed=true Each of the above are showing as having duplicates of the other sections. Indeed, these pages are exactly the same (it's just an SMS confirmation page you enter your code in), however, they all have canonical links back to the section (without the query string), i.e. section-1, section-2 and section-3 respectively. These three sections have unique content and aren't flagged up for duplications themselves, so my questions are: Are the pages with the query strings the duplicates, and if so why are the canonical links being ignored? or Are the canonical pages without the query strings the duplicates, and if so why don't they appear as URLs in their own right in the duplicate content report? I am guessing it's the former, but I can't figure out why it would ignore the canonical links. Any ideas? Thanks0 -
SEO Change/Version Control
Hi. Can anyone suggest apps that might be applied for SEO change/version control? I've tried using Excel and Word in the past but both fall short when dealing with multiple client sites. Nothing suitable pops up so far. Specifically I want to be able to log any on-page changes that might impact SEO for historical analysis and possible roll-back (manual) eg change date, page title, headings, url, anchor text, alt image txt, body copy etc. The ability to have one view that can be filtered in various ways including by client and by url would be ideal. Maybe this is something SEOmoz is considering for Pro campaign management? Surely there's demand... Thanks Andy
On-Page Optimization | | Bluesnapper0 -
Google webmaster tools data update frequency?
What is the lag time for changes to a site to be reflected in Google webmaster tools Diagnostics section? They pointed out some duplicate titles which I fixed a week ago and yet they still show up as an HTML Suggestion. What has your experience been with making changes and then seeing them reflected in the HTML Suggestions section? My site is crawled every day, including the pages I have updated with new titles. Seems like it takes a while for the data to trickle into Webmaster tools, no?
On-Page Optimization | | scanlin0