Skip to content

Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

Moz Q&A is closed.

After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

Category: On-Page Optimization

Explore on-page optimization and its role in a larger SEO strategy.

  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    | KMack
    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    | hfranz
    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0

  • Hi, Just a quick note. I hope you are able to assist. To cut a long story short, on the page below http://www.bookbluemountains.com.au/ -> Features Specials & Packages (middle column) we have 3 links per special going to the same page.
    1. Header is linked
    2. Click on image link - currently with a no follow
    3. 'More info' under the description paragraph is linked too - currently with a no follow Two arguments are as follows:
    1. The reason we do not follow all 3 links is to reduce too many links which may appear spammy to Google. 2. Counter argument:
    The point above has some validity, However, using no follow is basically telling the search engines that the webmaster “does not trust or doesn’t take responsibility” for what is behind the link, something you don’t want to do within your own website.   There is no penalty as such for having too many links, the search engines will generally not worry after a certain number.. nothing that would concern this business though.  I would suggest changing the no follow links a.s.a.p. Could you please advise thoughts. Many thanks Dave Upton [long signature removed by staff]

    | daveupton
    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    1

  • Typically H1 tags are reserved for page headings, i.e. on a blog post the blog post title is very often the pages H1, or top-level heading as the W3C puts it. On the SEOmoz home page they currently have "SEO Software." as their H1 tag, which seems perfectly reasonable and to me fits the W3C criteria. However, what if the primary keyword for SEOmoz was "seo community" so they decided to wrap just those two words in the sentence that follows on their home page and maintain the existing style of the words "seo community" with CSS. (see attachment) Are there any arguments against doing that? Would Google be able to detect this? If so, would Google care? I do believe the overall importance of the H1 tag has lessened to a degree, however I still believe they are valuable to an extent and would love to hear anyone's thoughts. 7NZcD.png

    | TakeLessons
    1
  • This question is deleted!

    0

  • Hi SEOMoz Guys, Hope you guys are doing well. I've been searching online and bumped into this archived page (http://www.seomoz.org/qa/view/34982/meta-nocache-affect-ranking). I would like to get an updated take on this issue whether or not the meta no cache code on a page bears negative/positive or no SEO impact / effect. <meta http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cache" /> <meta http-equiv="Cache-Control" content="no-cache"/> Thanks! Steve

    | sjcbayona-41218
    2
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    2
  • This question is deleted!

    0

  • I would like to know if anyone knew if the relevance of a page changes if I bold the first few sentences. Our journalist wants to bold the first few sentences in every article to make it easier to read, how does that affect SEO?

    | mtueckcr
    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0

  • I have a website with sauna reviews. These are mostly pages that exist for years and regularly change because comments/reviews are added by visitors and/or because I change information on the page. When searching in Google for competitive keywords I noticed that the snippet of my direct competitor included a date stamp in the format (9 hous ago). How can I include a time stamp in the snippet, and more important how can I make sure that the timestamp is very recent. Is it sufficient to add a date on the page every time the page is updated or is ther emore to it?

    | oeroek
    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0

  • I recently moved over from html to wordpress. I have the google sitemap plugin on the new wordpress site, but in webmaster tools, it's only showing 71 pages, and I have hundreds, but many are html. Is it okay, to submit an html sitemap as well as the wp sitemap that's already in there?

    | azguy
    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    | Bragg
    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0
  • This question is deleted!

    0

Got a burning SEO question?

Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.


Start my free trial


Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.